1.
Burchell S, Clubb C, Hopwood A, Hughes J, Nahapiet J. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1980 Jan;5(1):5–27.
2.
Demski, Joel S., Feltham, Gerald A. Cost determination: a conceptual approach. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1976.
3.
T. A. Lee et al., editor. Accounting history from the Renaissance to the present: a remembrance of Luca Pacioli. Vol. Series: New works in accounting history. New York: Garland Pub; 1996.
4.
Fleischman RK. Completing the triangle: Taylorism and the paradigms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2000;13(5):597–624.
5.
Fleischman RK, Tyson TN. Parallels between US and UK cost accountancy in the World War I era. Accounting, Business & Financial History. 2000 July;10(2):191–212.
6.
Johnson HT. The search for gain in markets and firms: A review of the historical emergence of management accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1983 Jan;8(2–3):139–46.
7.
Johnson, H. Thomas, Kaplan, Robert S. Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 1991.
8.
Loft A. Towards a critical understanding of accounting: The case of cost accounting in the U.K., 1914–1925. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1986 Jan;11(2):137–69.
9.
H. Okano. Invisibility in Management Accounting: A Historical Perspective. Osaka City University Business Review. 1993;4.
10.
Solomons, David. Studies in cost analysis. 2 ed. Sydney: Law Book Co; 1968.
11.
T. A. Lee et al., editor. Accounting history from the Renaissance to the present: a remembrance of Luca Pacioli. Vol. Series: New works in accounting history. New York: Garland Pub; 1996.
12.
M. C. Wells. Influences on the Development of Cost Accounting. The Accounting Historians Journal [Internet]. 4(2). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40697542
13.
C. Argyris. The Impact of Budgets on People. New York: Controllership Foundation; 1952.
14.
University of Illinois. The International journal of accounting: education and research.
15.
William J. Bruns, Jr. and John H. Waterhouse. Budgetary Control and Organization Structure. Journal of Accounting Research [Internet]. 1975;13(2):177–203. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2490360
16.
Edwin H. Caplan. Behavioral Assumptions of Management Accounting. The Accounting Review [Internet]. 1966;41(3):496–509. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/244479
17.
Edwin H. Caplan. Behavioral Assumptions of Management Accounting -- Report of a Field Study. The Accounting Review [Internet]. 1968;43(2):342–62. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/243771
18.
Donaldson, Lex. The contingency theory of organizations. Vol. Series: Foundations for organizational science. London: SAGE; 2001.
19.
Gordon LA, Miller D. A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1976 Jan;1(1):59–69.
20.
Heath, Robert L. Management of corporate communication: from interpersonal contacts to external affairs. Vol. LEA’s communication series. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum; 1994.
21.
Hopwood AG. Towards an organizational perspective for the study of accounting and information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1978 Jan;3(1):3–13.
22.
Luthans, Fred. Organizational behavior. 12th ed. London: McGraw-Hill Education - Europe; 2011.
23.
Otley DT. The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1980 Jan;5(4):413–28.
24.
Robert W. Scapens, David T. Otley &  Roger J. Lister. Management accounting, organizational theory and capital budgeting: three surveys. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1984.
25.
Reid GC, Smith JA. The impact of contingencies on management accounting system development. Management Accounting Research. 2000 Dec;11(4):427–50.
26.
Robert W. Scapens, David T. Otley &  Roger J. Lister. Management accounting, organizational theory and capital budgeting: three surveys. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1984.
27.
Waterhouse JH, Tiessen P. A contingency framework for management accounting systems research. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1978 Jan;3(1):65–76.
28.
Margaret Woods. A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research. 20(1).
29.
G. Baldvinsdottir, M. Falconer & H. Norreklit. Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting. Management Accounting Research. 2010 June;21(2):79–82.
30.
Boer G. Five Modern Management Accounting Myths. Management Accounting (USA) [Internet]. 1994;75(7). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA15004299&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&asid=538ede8fe4aa5d0fd34a165148542071
31.
Nasuhi I. Bursal. German cost accounting education and the changing manufacturing environment. Management Accounting Research. 1992 Mar;3(1):39–51.
32.
Child, John. Organization: contemporary principles and practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
33.
Edwards KA, Emmanuel CR. Diverging views on the boundaries of management accounting. Management Accounting Research. 1990 Mar;1(1):51–63.
34.
M. Ezzamel et al. Managing It All By numbers: A Review of Johnson & Kaplan’s ‘Relevance Lost’. Accounting and Business Research [Internet]. 1990;20(1):153–66. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=13833208&site=ehost-live
35.
Hopper T, Armstrong P. Cost accounting, controlling labour and the rise of conglomerates. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1991 Jan;16(5–6):405–38.
36.
Trevor Hopper et al. Does financial accounting dominate management accounting—a research note. Management Accounting Research. 1992 Dec;3(4):307–11.
37.
Management accounting. 1965;
38.
Scapens RW. Never mind the gap: towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research. 1994 Sept;5(3–4):301–21.
39.
Management accounting. 1965;
40.
University of Florida, Society of Accounting Research Digest (U.S.). Journal of accounting literature. 1982;
41.
John T. Addison and W. Stanley Siebert. The Social Charter of the European Community: Evolution and Controversies. Industrial and Labor Relations Review [Internet]. 1991;44(4):597–625. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2524452
42.
JUDY A. BROWN BROWN. COMPETING IDEOLOGIES IN THE ACCOUNTING AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ENVIRONMENT. The British Accounting Review. 2000 Mar;32(1):43–75.
43.
Craft JA. Information disclosure and the role of the accountant in collective bargaining. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1981 Jan;6(1):97–107.
44.
Foley, B. J. and Maunders, K. T. Accounting information disclosure and collective bargaining. London: Macmillan; 1977.
45.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Accountancy: the journal of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
46.
David Mautz R. Inflation-adjusted disclosures and the determination of ability to pay in collective bargaining. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1990 Jan;15(4):273–95.
47.
Management accounting. 1965;
48.
Ogden S, Bougen P. A radical perspective on the disclosure of accounting information to trade unions. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1985 Jan;10(2):211–24.
49.
Peter F. Pope and D. A. Peel. Information Disclosure to Employees and Rational Expectations: a Game-Theoretical Perspective: a Comment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1997 Oct;24(9 & 10):1433–5.
50.
Purdy D. The provision of financial information to employees: A study of the reporting practices of some large public companies in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1981 Jan;6(4):327–38.
51.
Ken Shackleton. THE SOCIAL POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY: REPORTING INFORMATION TO EMPLOYEES, a U.K. perspective: Historical Analysis and Prognosis [Internet]. Available from: http://gemf.fe.uc.pt/workingpapers/pdf/1996/gemf96_5.pdf
52.
Johnson, H. Thomas, Kaplan, Robert S. Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 1987.
53.
Magdy G. Abdel-Kadera and David Dugdaleb Abdel-Kader. Investment in advanced manufacturing technology: a study of practice in large U.K. companies. Management Accounting Research. 1998 Sept;9(3):261–84.
54.
Baker WM, Fry TD, Kirwan K. The Rise and Fall of Time Based Manufacturing. Management Accounting (USA) [Internet]. 75(12). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA15536557&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&asid=9475d0043c80d5e2c32c99676766ef54
55.
Peter Armstrong and Chris Jones Armstrong. The decline of operational expertise in the knowledge-base of management accounting: An examination of some post-war trends in the qualifying requirements of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. Management Accounting Research. 1992 Mar;3(1):53–75.
56.
Josep Bisbe and Ricardo Malagueño Bisbe. Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: Does it work in dynamic environments? Management Accounting Research. 2012 Dec;23(4):296–311.
57.
J. Bright, R.E. Davies, C.A. Downes and  R.C. Sweeting Bright. The deployment of costing techniques and practices: a UK study. Management Accounting Research. 1992 Sept;3(3):201–11.
58.
Demirag IS. Management control systems and performance evaluations in Japanese companies: A British perspective. Management control systems and performance evaluations in Japanese companies: A British perspective. 72(7).
59.
Cooper R, Kaplan RS. How cost accounting distorts product costs. Management Accounting (USA). 1988;69(10):20–2.
60.
Johanna Hyvönen. Strategy, performance measurement techniques and information technology of the firm and their links to organizational performance. Management Accounting Research. 2007 Sept;18(3):343–66.
61.
Howell RA, Sakurai M. Management accounting (and other) lessons from the Japanese. Management Accounting (USA), [Internet]. 74(6). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA13902076&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&asid=6c93ffcba04aba30d09f9b9dfca8d17c
62.
J. Innes and F. Mitchell Innes. The process of change in management accounting: some field study evidence. Management Accounting Research. 1990 Mar;1(1):3–19.
63.
H.Thomas Johnson. Relevance Regained: Total Quality Management and the Role of Management Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 1994 Sept;5(3):259–67.
64.
Kaplan RS. The role for empirical research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1986 Jan;11(4–5):429–52.
65.
Kaplan RS. Relevance regained: cost accounting. Management accounting. 66(8):38–42.
66.
Kerremans M, Theunisse H, Van Overloop G. Impact of Automation on Cost Accounting. Accounting and Business Research. 1991 Mar;21(82):147–55.
67.
Paul Scarbrough, Alfred J. Nanni Jr. and  M. Sakurai. Japanese management accounting practices and the effects of assembly and process automation. Management Accounting Research. 1991 Mar;2(1):27–46.
68.
J.A.A. Sillince and G.M.H. Sykes Sillince. The role of accountants in improving manufacturing technology. Management Accounting Research. 1995 June;6(2):103–24.
69.
Journal of accounting literature.
70.
Kristi Yuthas and Tony Tinker Yuthas. Paradise Regained? Myth, Milton and Management Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 1994 Sept;5(3):295–310.
71.
F. B. Green, F. Amenkhienan and G. Johnson. Performance measures and JIT: U.S. companies are revamping traditional cost systems. Management accounting (US). 1991;72(8).
72.
Harrell HW. Materials variance analysis and JIT: a new approach. Management Accounting (USA) [Internet]. 73(11):33–8. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA12399337&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&asid=e02e0c3c853436be8ada7dee10209116
73.
Kitney, Richard B. Production systems with pull. CMA Magazine [Internet]. 1994;68(6):22–4. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9410100545&site=ehost-live
74.
National Association of Accountants. Management accounting (USA).
75.
Management accounting (UK). 1965;
76.
Management accounting (UK). 1965;
77.
Management accounting. 1965;
78.
Rosemary R. Fullerton, Cheryl S. McWatters and Chris Fawson Fullerton. An examination of the relationships between JIT and financial performance. Journal of Operations Management. 2003 July;21(4):383–404.
79.
Clive Emmanuel, David Otley and Kenneth Merchant. Accounting for management control. 2nd ed. London: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2004.
80.
Monica Franco-Santos, Lorenzo Lucianetti and Mike Field. Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research. 2012 June;23(2):79–119.
81.
C. D. Ittner & D. F. Larcker. Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research [Internet]. 1998;10:205–40. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=2720283&site=ehost-live
82.
Frank G.H. Hartmann. The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2000 May;25(4–5):451–82.
83.
Robert H. Chenhall. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2003 Feb;28(2–3):127–68.
84.
Otley DT. The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1980 Jan;5(4):413–28.
85.
Mark K. Hirst. Accounting Information and the Evaluation of Subordinate Performance: A Situational Approach. The Accounting Review [Internet]. 1981;56(4):771–84. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/247200
86.
Chia-Ling Lee and Huan-Jung Yang Lee. Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance. Management Accounting Research. 2011 June;22(2):84–104.
87.
Parker LD. Divisional Performance Measurement: Beyond an Exclusive Profit Test. Accounting and Business Research. 1979 Sept;9(36):309–19.
88.
Journal of accounting literature. 1982;
89.
Briers M, Hirst M. The role of budgetary information in performance evaluation. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1990 Jan;15(4):373–98.
90.
Emsley D. Budget-Emphasis in Performance Evaluation and Managers’ Job Related Tension: the Moderating Effect of Information Completeness. The British Accounting Review. 2001 Sept;33(3):399–419.
91.
Ridgeway VF. Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance Measurements. Administrative Science Quarterly [Internet]. 1956;1(2):240–7. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2390989
92.
Speckbacher G, Wentges P. The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: A research note. Management Accounting Research. 2012 Mar;23(1):34–46.
93.
D.E. Butler and Anthony King. The British General Election of 1964. London: Macmillan; 1965.
94.
Harold Macmillan. The Macmillan diaries: The Cabinet years, 1950-1957. Edited and with an introduction by Peter Catterall., editor. London: Pan; 2004.
95.
Harold Macmillan. The Macmillan diaries: The Cabinet years, 1950-1957. Edited and with an introduction by Peter Catterall, editor. London: Pan; 2004.
96.
Peter Hennessy and Anthony Seldon, editor. Ruling performance: British governments from Attlee to Thatcher. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987.