1
Virgil, Bartsch S. The Aeneid. New edition. London: Profile Books 2020.
2
Raeburn DA, Feeney DC, Ovid. Metamorphoses: a new verse translation. London: Penguin 2004.
3
Braund SH, Lucan. Civil war. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992.
4
Statius PP, Shackleton Bailey DR. Thebaid, books I-VII. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2003.
5
Statius PP, Shackleton Bailey DR, Statius PP. Thebaid, books VIII-XII: Achilleid. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2003.
6
Silius Italicus TC, Duff JD. Punica. London: Heinemann 1934.
7
Loeb J, Henderson J, editors. Loeb classical library. 2014. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.loebclassics.com
8
Fagles R, Knox B, Homer. The Iliad. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books 1998.
9
Fagles R, Homer. The Odyssey. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books 2006.
10
Apollonius. Argonautica. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2008.
11
Cooley A, Augustus. Res gestae divi Augusti: text, translation, and commentary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2009.
12
Ahl F. Lucan: an introduction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1976.
13
Barchiesi A. The poet and the prince: Ovid and Augustan discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press 1997.
14
Bartsch S. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil war. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1997.
15
Conte GB. The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets : translated from the Italian. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1986.
16
Feeney DC. The gods in epic: poets and critics of the classical tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1991.
17
Schiesaro A, Habinek TN. The Roman cultural revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.
18
Hardie PR. Virgil’s Aeneid: cosmos and imperium. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.
19
Hardie PR. The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
20
Hinds S. Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
21
Laird A. Powers of expression, expressions of power: speech presentation and Latin literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999.
22
Lyne ROAM. Further voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987.
23
Masters J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
24
London Classical Society. Roman poetry & propaganda in the age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press 1992.
25
Quint D. Epic and empire: politics and generic form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1993.
26
Reed JD. Virgil’s gaze: nation and poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2007.
27
Zanker P. The power of images in the age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1988.
28
Bates C. The Cambridge Companion to the Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
29
Boyle AJ. Roman epic. London: Routledge 1993.
30
Clarke MJ, Currie B, Lyne ROAM, et al. Epic interactions: perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the epic tradition : presented to Jasper Griffin by former pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
31
Foley JM. A companion to ancient epic. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub 2005.
32
Toohey P. Reading epic: an introduction to the ancient narratives. London: Routledge 1992.
33
Goldberg SM. Epic in Republican Rome. New York: Oxford University Press 1995.
34
Crook JA, Lintott A, Rawson E, editors. The Cambridge Ancient History: Volume 9: The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146-43 BC. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
35
Bowman AK, Champlin E, Lintott A, editors. The Cambridge Ancient History.nVolume 10: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC-AD 69. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
36
Bowman AK, Garnsey P, Rathbone D, editors. The Cambridge Ancient History: Volume 11: The High Empire, AD 70-120. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.
37
Ebooks Corporation Limited. A companion to the Roman Republic. Chichester, West Sussex: Willey-Blackwell 2010.
38
Galinsky K. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
39
Buckley E, Dinter MT. A companion to the Neronian age. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2013.
40
Steel CEW. The end of the Roman Republic, 146 to 44 BC: conquest and crisis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2013.
41
Gallia AB. Remembering the Roman republic: culture, politics and history under the Principate. New York: Cambridge University Press 2012.
42
Boyle AJ, Dominik WJ. Flavian Rome: culture, image, text. Leiden: Brill 2003.
43
Griffin MT. Nero: the end of a dynasty. London: B.T. Batsford 1984.
44
Galinsky K. Augustan culture: an interpretive introduction. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1996.
45
White P. Promised verse: poets in the society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1993.
46
Eagleton T. Criticism and ideology: a study in Marxist literary theory. London: Verso 1978.
47
Eagleton T. Ideology: an introduction. London: Verso 2007.
48
Jameson F. The political unconscious: narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge 2002.
49
Macherey P. A theory of literary production. London: Routledge 2006.
50
Derrida J, Ronell A. The Law of Genre. Critical Inquiry. 1980;7:55–81.
51
Todorov T. Genres in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.
52
Conte GB. The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets : translated from the Italian. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1986.
53
Edmunds L. Intertextuality and the reading of Roman poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 2001.
54
Don Fowler. On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 1997;13–34.
55
Hinds S. Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
56
Sharrock A, Morales H. Intratextuality: Greek and Roman textual relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
57
Frederick Ahl. The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome. The American Journal of Philology. 1984;105:174–208.
58
Don Fowler. On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 1997;13–34.
59
London Classical Society. Roman poetry & propaganda in the age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press 1992.
60
Zanker P. The power of images in the age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1988.
61
Bartsch S. Actors in the audience: theatricality and doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1994.
62
Conte GB. The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Virgil and other Latin poets : translated from the Italian. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1986.
63
Hinds S. Allusion and intertext: dynamics of appropriation in Roman poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
64
Jameson F. The political unconscious: narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge 2002.
65
Laird A. Powers of expression, expressions of power: speech presentation and Latin literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999.
66
Sharrock A, Morales H. Intratextuality: Greek and Roman textual relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
67
Hardie PR. Virgil’s Aeneid: cosmos and imperium. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.
68
Cairns F. Virgil’s Augustan epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
69
Quint D. Repetition and Ideology in the Aeneid. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 1989;9–54.
70
Quint D. Epic and Empire. Comparative Literature. 1989;41:1–32.
71
Adam Parry. The Two Voices of Virgil’s ‘Aeneid’. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics. 1963;2:66–80.
72
Powell A. Roman poetry and propaganda in the age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press 1992.
73
Michael C. J. Putnam. Possesiveness, Sexuality and Heroism in the ‘Aeneid’. Vergilius (1959-). 1985;1–21.
74
Putnam MCJ. Virgil’s Aeneid: interpretation and influence. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press 1995.
75
Feeney DC. The gods in epic: poets and critics of the classical tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1991.
76
Feldherr A, Dawson Books. Playing gods: Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the politics of fiction. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2010.
77
Oliensis E. The Power of Image-Makers:  Representation and Revenge in  Ovid Metamorphoses 6 and Tristia 4. Classical Antiquity. 2004;23:285–321.
78
Philip Hardie. Ovid’s Theban History: The First ‘Anti-Aeneid’? The Classical Quarterly. 1990;40:224–35.
79
Dawson Books. Brill’s companion to Ovid. Leiden: Brill 2002.
80
Papaioannou S. Epic succession and dissension: Ovid, Metamorphoses 13.623-14.582, and the reinvention of the Aeneid. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2005.
81
Ahl F. Lucan: an introduction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1976.
82
Michael Lapidge. Lucan’s Imagery of Cosmic Dissolution. Hermes. 1979;344–70.
83
Bernard F. Dick. The Technique of Prophecy in Lucan. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 1963;94:37–49.
84
Bramble JC, Hardie PR, Whitby M, et al. Homo viator: classical essays for John Bramble. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press 1987.
85
Masters J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
86
O’Higgins D. Lucan as ‘Vates’. Classical Antiquity. 1988;7:208–26.
87
Bartsch S. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil war. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1997.
88
Elsner J, Masters J. Reflections of Nero: culture, history & representation. London: Duckworth 1994.
89
Henderson JGW. Fighting for Rome: poets and Caesars, history and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
90
Dominik WJ. The mythic voice of Statius: power and politics in the Thebaid. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1994.
91
J. Henderson. ‘Statius’ Thebaid / Form Premade’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society vol. 37, pp. 30-80. Published Online First: 1992.
92
Ganiban RT, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Statius and Virgil: the Thebaid and the reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
93
Denis Feeney. Tenui ... Latens Discrimine: Spotting the Differences in Statins’ Achilleid. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici. 2004;85–105.
94
Boyle AJ, Dominik WJ. Flavian Rome: culture, image, text. Leiden: Brill 2003.
95
William C. McDermott and Anne E. Orentzel. Silius Italicus and Domitian. The American Journal of Philology. 1977;98:24–34.
96
Augoustakis A, editor. Brill’s companion to Silius Italicus. Leiden: Brill 2010.
97
D. W. Thomson Vessey. Silius Italicus: The Shield of Hannibal. The American Journal of Philology. 1975;96:391–405.
98
Stocks C. The Roman Hannibal: remembering the enemy in Silius Italicus’ Punica. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press 2014.
99
Spentzou E. Eluding ‘Romanitas’: Heroes and Antiheroes in Silius Italicus’s Roman History. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome Supplementary Volumes. 2008;7:133–45.