1.
Bowers D. Medical statistics from scratch: an introduction for health professionals [Internet]. Fourth edition. Hoboken NJ: WileyBlackwell; 2020. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5855517
2.
Grove SK, Burns N, Gray J, Dawson Books. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence [Internet]. Seventh edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2013. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780323293310
3.
Greenhalgh T, ProQuest (Firm). How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare [Internet]. Sixth edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell; 2019. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5747438
4.
Holloway I, Galvin K, ProQuest (Firm). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4622920
5.
Ellis P. Understanding research for nursing students [Internet]. 4th edition. London: Learning Matters; 2018. Available from: https://app.talis.com/glasgow/player#/modules/5f55ffaa3f2b343bc876562b/resources/5f563aeb3b6d6d6499f453fd
6.
Gerrish K, Lathlean J. The research process in nursing. Seventh edition. Gerrish K, Lathlean J, editors. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2015.
7.
Moule P. Nursing research: An introduction [Internet]. 3rd edition. London: SAGE Publications; 2016. Available from: https://elevate.talis.com/textbooks/9781473998469
8.
Parahoo K. Nursing research: principles, process and issues [Internet]. Third edition. Basingstoke, Hampshire, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4763662
9.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Tenth edition, International edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.
10.
Robson C, McCartan K. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
11.
Stayt LC, Merriman C, Ricketts B, Morton S, Simpson T. Recognizing and managing a deteriorating patient: a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing [Internet]. 2015;71(11):2563–2574. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.12722/full
12.
Grove SK, Burns N, Gray J, Dawson Books. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence [Internet]. Seventh edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780323293310
13.
Burls A, Hayward Medical Communications Ltd, sanofi aventis (Firm). What is critical appraisal? [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Hayward Medical Communications; 2009. Available from: http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/what_is_critical_appraisal.pdf
14.
Coughlan M, Cronin P, Ryan F. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: Quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing; 2007;16(11):658–663. Available from: http://keiranhenderson.com/articulate/Critiquing_research/data/downloads/critiquing_quantitative_research_bjn.pdf
15.
Jarde A, Losilla JM, Vives J. Methodological quality assessment tools of non-experimental studies: a systematic review. Anales de psicología [Internet]. 2012;28(2). Available from: https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/analesps.28.2.148911/132941
16.
Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar VS, Grimmer KA. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2004;4(1).
17.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) - appraisal checklists (online resource). [Internet]. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/
18.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Critical appraisal: Notes and checklists [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/what-we-do/methodology/checklists/
19.
Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N. Critical review form - Quantitative Studies [Internet]. McMaster University; Available from: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDEQFjADahUKEwjxm-ylzIjIAhVH7RQKHd3oDSs&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unisa.edu.au%2FGlobal%2FHealth%2FSansom%2FDocuments%2FiCAHE%2FCATs%2FMcMasters_Quantitative%2520review.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGHRmZDVfXnAMNiet4RRpDkpvgZbg&sig2=S5BHzj-XnOVvY3_Cl6W2Xg
20.
STrengthening the Reporting of OBsErvational studies (STROBE): Available checklists [Internet]. Available from: http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists
21.
Center for Evidence-Based Management. Critical Appraisal of a Survey [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-Survey.pdf
22.
Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O’Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon M, Rousseau M. McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [Internet]. Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Montreal, Canada: Department of Family Medicine, McGill University; 2011. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com
23.
AGREE II critical appraisal tool for clinical guidelines [Internet]. Available from: http://www.agreetrust.org/
24.
R Fu M. Women at work with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Journal of lymphoedema [Internet]. 2008;3(1). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4262922/?report=classic
25.
Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ [Internet]. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):740–743. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.bmj.com/content/315/7110/740
26.
Ryan F, Coughlan M, Cronin P. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British journal of nursing. London: Mark Allen; 1992;16(12):738–744.
27.
Barker JH, Linsley P, Kane R. Evidence-based practice for nurses & healthcare professionals. Third edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2016.
28.
Dixon-Woods M. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004 Jun 1;13(3):223–225.
29.
Jors K, Tietgen S, Xander C, Momm F, Becker G. Tidying rooms and tending hearts: An explorative, mixed-methods study of hospital cleaning staffs experiences with seriously ill and dying patients. Palliative Medicine [Internet]. 2016 May 9; Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/04/29/0269216316648071.full.pdf+html
30.
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. 2004 Oct;33(7):14–26.
31.
Wheeler, Stephanie Holloway, Immy. Qualitative Research in Nursing and HealthcareQualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare [Internet]. Wiley; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/reader.action?docID=707888#
32.
Badger, Caroline M. A., Peacock, Janet L., Mortimer, Peter S. A randomized, controlled, parallel‐group clinical trial comparing multilayer bandaging followed by hosiery versus hosiery alone in the treatment of patients with lymphedema of the limb. Cancer [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000;88(12):2832–2837. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12%3C2832::AID-CNCR24%3E3.0.CO;2-U/pdf
33.
Taylor DB. Reviewing Research Articles. Writing in the Health Sciences: a comprehensive guide [Internet]. 2007;1(1). Available from: http://hswriting.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/hswriting/article/view/3336/1469
34.
Booth Y. Writing an academic essay: a practical guide for nurses. British Journal of Nursing [Internet]. 1996 Sep 12;5(16):995–999. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.1996.5.16.995
35.
Bee PE, Barnes P, Luker KA. A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing [Internet]. 2009 May;18(10):1379–1393. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02405.x/abstract;jsessionid=556A33037FCFC2CDC6B73B7D35233AB0.f01t03
36.
Hemingway P, Brereton N. What is a systematic review? [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hayward Medical Communications; 2009. Available from: http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/syst-review.pdf
37.
Barker JH, Linsley P, Kane R. Evidence-based practice for nurses & healthcare professionals. Third edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2016.
38.
Smith GCS. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1459–1461.
39.
Mantzoukas S. A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007 Apr 5;070621074500014-???
40.
Cochrane Community. Archie Cochrane: the name behind Cochrane | Cochrane Community (beta) [Internet]. Available from: http://community.cochrane.org/about-us/history/archie-cochrane
41.
Visvis V, Plotnick J. The Comparative Essay [Internet]. Available from: http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/comparative-essay
42.
Grammar Exercises [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/arts/exercises/grammar/grammar_tutorial/page_41.htm
43.
Staff guidelines for the management of alcohol withdrawal in NHS Grampian adult inpatients [Internet]. NHS Grampian; Available from: http://foi.nhsgrampian.org/globalassets/foidocument/foi-public-documents1---all-documents/Guide_Alcohol_Withdrawal.pdf
44.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Tenth edition. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.
45.
NICE - Into practice guide. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2015; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg30/chapter/introduction-and-background
46.
Jones H. Clinical research nurse or nurse researcher? Nursing Times [Internet]. 2015;111(19):12–14. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/12a4bd57-67bb-4f4f-853e-4ad263de60ac/?context=1519360
