[1]
A., C. and M., H. 2008. Implementing a Mixed Methods Approach to Explore the Financial Implications of Death of a Life Partner. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. (2008).
[2]
A. I. Rogan 2005. Chronicles From the Classroom: Making Sense of the Methodology and Methods of Narrative Analysis. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 4 (Aug. 2005), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405276777.
[3]
A. Markham, et al. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee.
[4]
Ackerly, B.A. and True, J. 2010. Doing feminist research in political and social science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[5]
Alan Bryman 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Alan Bryman 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Alan Bryman 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Alan Bryman and Robert G. Burgess ed. 1994. Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.
[9]
Alasuutari, P. et al. 2008. The SAGE handbook of social research methods. Sage Publications.
[10]
Alasuutari, P. et al. 2008. The SAGE handbook of social research methods. Sage Publications.
[11]
Alasuutari, P. et al. 2008. The SAGE handbook of social research methods. Sage Publications.
[12]
Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. 1993. Feminist epistemologies. Routledge.
[13]
Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. 1993. Feminist epistemologies. Routledge.
[14]
Allen, L. 2005. Managing masculinity: young men’s identity work in focus groups. Qualitative Research. 5, 1 (Apr. 2005), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105048650.
[15]
Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin ed. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications.
[16]
Arksey, H. and Knight, P. 1999. Interviewing for social scientists: an introductory resource with examples. SAGE.
[17]
Arnet Connidis, I. 2012. Interview and Memoir: Complementary Narratives on the Family Ties of Gay Adults. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 4, 2 (June 2012), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00127.x.
[18]
Association of Social Anthropologists Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice: http://www.theasa.org/ethics.shtml.
[19]
Atkinson, P. et al. 2001. A debate about our canon. Qualitative Research. 1, 1 (Apr. 2001), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100101.
[20]
Atkinson, P. 2001. Handbook of ethnography. SAGE.
[21]
Atkinson, P. 2001. Handbook of ethnography. SAGE.
[22]
Atkinson, R. 1998. The life story interview. Sage Publications.
[23]
Back, L. 2010. Broken devices and new opportunities: re-imagining the tools of qualitative research - NCRM Working Paper.
[24]
Baker, S.E. and Edwards, R. 2012. How many qualitative interviews is enough - NCRM Discussion paper. (2012).
[25]
Barbour, R.S. and Kitzinger, J. 1999. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. Sage.
[26]
Bates, R.H. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton University Press.
[27]
Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the trade: how to think about your research while you’re doing it. University of Chicago Press.
[28]
Becker, H.S. 1998. Tricks of the trade: how to think about your research while you’re doing it. University of Chicago Press.
[29]
Becker, S. et al. 2012. Understanding research for social policy and practice: themes, methods and approaches. Policy Press.
[30]
Becker, S. and Bryman, A. 2004. Understanding research for social policy and practice: themes, methods and approaches. Policy.
[31]
Becker, S. and Bryman, A. 2004. Understanding research for social policy and practice: themes, methods and approaches. Policy.
[32]
Becker, S. and Bryman, A. 2004. Understanding research for social policy and practice: themes, methods and approaches. Policy.
[33]
Beer, D. 2012. Using Social Media Data Aggregators to Do Social Research. Sociological Research Online. 17, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2618.
[34]
Bell, J. and Waters, S. 2014. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education.
[35]
Bennett, A. and Checkel, J.T. eds 2015. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
[36]
Benton, T. and Craib, I. 2001. Philosophy of social science: the philosophical foundations of social thought. Palgrave.
[37]
Berg, B.L. and Lune, H. 2014. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education Limited.
[38]
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. 1966. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Open Road Integrated Media.
[39]
Best, A.L. 2007. Representing youth: methodological issues in critical youth studies. New York University Press.
[40]
Bhavnani, K.-K. 1988. Empowerment and social research: Some comments. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 8, 1–2 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.41.
[41]
Birch, M. and Miller, T. 2000. Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 3, 3 (Jan. 2000), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570050083689.
[42]
Bloor, M. 2001. Focus groups in social research. SAGE Publications.
[43]
Bowen, G.A. 2009. Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: an illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 12, 4 (Oct. 2009), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802156196.
[44]
Bowen, G.A. 2009. Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: an illustration. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 12, 4 (Oct. 2009), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802156196.
[45]
Boyd, D. and Crawford, K. 2012. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 5 (June 2012), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
[46]
Brannen, J. Mixed Methods Research: A discussion paper.
[47]
Breuer, F. et al. 2002. Subjectivity and Reflexivity: An Introduction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3, 3 (2002).
[48]
Brewer, J.D. 2000. Ethnography. Open University Press.
[49]
Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S. 2015. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.
[50]
British Sociological Association Statement of Ethical Practice: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24310/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice.pdf.
[51]
Brown, S. 2001. What Makes Men Talk About Health? Journal of Gender Studies. 10, 2 (July 2001), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230120053300.
[52]
Brownlow, C. and O’Dell, L. 2002. Ethical Issues for Qualitative Research in On-line Communities. Disability & Society. 17, 6 (Oct. 2002), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759022000010452.
[53]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[55]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[58]
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[60]
Bryman, A. 2012. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[61]
Bulmer, M. 1986. Social science and social policy. Allen & Unwin.
[62]
Burawoy, M. 1991. Ethnography unbound: power and resistance in the modern metropolis. University of California Press.
[63]
Burgess, R.G. 1990. In the field: an introduction to field research. Routledge.
[64]
Burman, M.J. et al. 2001. Researching Girls and Violence. Facing the Dilemmas of Fieldwork. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 3 (June 2001), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.443.
[65]
Burnham, P. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[66]
Burnham, P. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[67]
Burnham, P. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[68]
Callaghan, G. 2005. Accessing Habitus: Relating Structure and Agency through Focus Group Research. Sociological Research Online. 10, 3 (Nov. 2005), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1129.
[69]
Campbell, A.T. and ProQuest (Firm) 1995. Getting to know Waiwai: an Amazonian ethnography. Routledge.
[70]
Cassell, C. and Symon, G. 2004. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[71]
Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
[72]
Clifford, J. et al. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar. University of California Press.
[73]
Coffey, A. 1999. The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. Sage.
[74]
Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. SAGE Publications.
[75]
Corbin, J. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
[76]
Cottrell, S. 2014. Dissertations and project reports: a step by step guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
[77]
Creswell, J.W. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
[78]
Creswell, J.W. 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 14. SAGE Publications.
[79]
D. J. Warr 2005. ‘It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things’: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 2 (Apr. 2005), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412.
[80]
David L. Morgan 1996. Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology. 22, (1996), 129–152.
[81]
David L. Morgan ed. 1993. Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. Sage Publications.
[82]
David Silverman ed. 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[83]
David Silverman ed. 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[84]
De Soto, H.G. and Dudwick, N. 2000. Fieldwork dilemmas: anthropologists in postsocialist states. University of Wisconsin Press.
[85]
De Soto, H.G. and Dudwick, N. 2000. Fieldwork dilemmas: anthropologists in postsocialist states. University of Wisconsin Press.
[86]
Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. eds 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[87]
Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. eds 2008. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[88]
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[89]
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[90]
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[91]
Denscombe, M. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press.
[92]
Denzin, N.K. 2009. The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research. 9, 2 (Apr. 2009), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098034.
[93]
Denzin, N.K. 1970. The research act in sociology: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Butterworths.
[94]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1998. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage Publications.
[95]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. eds 2013. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. SAGE.
[96]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 2011. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
[97]
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 2011. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
[98]
Devine, F. and Heath, S. 1999. Sociological research methods in context. Palgrave.
[99]
Diana M Bailey & Jeanne M Jackson 2003. Qualitative data analysis: challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 57, (2003), 57–65.
[100]
Dickson-Swift, V. et al. 2007. Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research. 7, 3 (Aug. 2007), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107078515.
[101]
Du Bois, W.E.B. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2005. The souls of black folk. Kessinger Pub.
[102]
Economic and Social Research Council Framework for Research Ethics: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics/.
[103]
Elliott, J. 2005. Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
[104]
Emmel, N. 2013. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: a realist approach. SAGE.
[105]
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods: http://www.ncrm.ac.uk/.
[106]
European Association of Methodology 2005. Methodology: European journal of research methods for the behavioral & social sciences. (2005).
[107]
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
[108]
Fallon, G. and Brown, R.B. 2002. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2, 2 (Aug. 2002), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200204.
[109]
Fetterman, D.M. 1998. Ethnography: step by step. SAGE Publications.
[110]
Fielding, N. 2003. Interviewing. Sage.
[111]
Fielding, N. et al. eds 2017. The SAGE handbook of online research methods. SAGE.
[112]
Flick, U. 2018. An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[113]
Flick, U. 2018. An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[114]
Flick, U. 2018. An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[115]
Flick, U. 2011. Introducing research methodology: a beginner’s guide to doing a research project. SAGE.
[116]
Flick, U. 1992. Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 22, 2 (June 1992), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x.
[117]
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 12, 2 (Apr. 2006), 219–245.
[118]
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. 2000. Research methods in the social sciences. Worth.
[119]
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. 2000. Research methods in the social sciences. Worth.
[120]
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. 2000. Research methods in the social sciences. Worth.
[121]
Freeman, M. et al. 2007. Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse. Educational Researcher. 36, 1 (2007), 25–32.
[122]
Garfinkel, H. 1984. Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[123]
Geddes, B. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 2, (1990), 131–150.
[124]
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[125]
Gerring, J. 2007. Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
[126]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[127]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[128]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[129]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[130]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[131]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[132]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[133]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[134]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[135]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[136]
Gilbert, G.N. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE Publications.
[137]
Golden-Biddle, K. and Locke, K. 1993. Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince. Organization Science. 4, 4 (1993), 595–616.
[138]
Gordon, S. 1991. The history and philosophy of social science. Routledge.
[139]
Gray, D.E. 2017. Doing research in the real world. SAGE Publications.
[140]
Green, G. et al. 1993. "Who wears the trousers?”. Women’s Studies International Forum. 16, 6 (Nov. 1993), 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(08)80007-6.
[141]
Greenbaum, T.L. 2000. Moderating focus groups: a practical guide for group facilitation. Sage.
[142]
Greg Myers 1998. Displaying Opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups. Language in Society. 27, 1 (1998), 85–111.
[143]
Grenz, S. 2005. Intersections of Sex and Power in Research on Prostitution: A Female Researcher Interviewing Male Heterosexual Clients. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30, 4 (June 2005), 2091–2113. https://doi.org/10.1086/428418.
[144]
Griffin, ChristinePhoenix, Ann The Relationship between Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Lessons from Feminist Psychology. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 4, 287–298.
[145]
Grills, S. 1998. Doing ethnographic research: fieldwork settings. Sage Publications.
[146]
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
[147]
Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. 2001. Handbook of Interview Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[148]
Gubrium, J.F. et al. eds 2012. The SAGE handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. SAGE Publications.
[149]
Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein, J.A. 2002. Handbook of interview research. SAGE.
[150]
Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L. 2004. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10, 2 (Apr. 2004), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
[151]
Halkier, B. 2011. Methodological Practicalities in Analytical Generalization. Qualitative Inquiry. 17, 9 (Nov. 2011), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411423194.
[152]
Hammersley, M. 1998. Reading ethnographic research: a critical guide. Longman.
[153]
Hammersley, M. 1993. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. Sage in association with the Open University.
[154]
Hammersley, M. 2000. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. Routledge.
[155]
Hammersley, M. 1995. The politics of social research. Sage Publications.
[156]
Hammersley, M. 1992. What’s wrong with ethnography?: methodological explorations. Routledge.
[157]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 1995. Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge.
[158]
Hammersley, M. and MyiLibrary 2000. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. Routledge.
[159]
Hammersley, M. and Open University 1993. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. Sage in association with the Open University.
[160]
Hancock, D.R. and Algozzine, R. 2011. Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.
[161]
Hanna, P. 2012. Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qualitative Research. 12, 2 (Apr. 2012), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111426607.
[162]
Harding, S.G. 1987. Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Indiana University Press.
[163]
Harrison, L. 2001. Political research: an introduction. Routledge.
[164]
Heather T. Battles Exploring Ethical and Methodological Issues in Internet-Based Research with Adolescents. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 9, 1, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900104.
[165]
Hertz, R. 1996. Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qualitative Sociology. 19, 1 (Mar. 1996), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393245.
[166]
Hesse-Biber, S. 2010. Qualitative Approaches to Mixed Methods Practice. Qualitative Inquiry. 16, 6 (July 2010), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364611.
[167]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[168]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[169]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[170]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[171]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[172]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[173]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[174]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2017. The practice of qualitative research: engaging students in the research process. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[175]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Yaiser, M.L. 2004. Feminist perspectives on social research. Oxford University Press.
[176]
Hill Collins, P. 2000. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
[177]
Hine, C. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
[178]
Hine, C. 2012. The Internet. Oxford University Press.
[179]
Hollis, M. 1994. The philosophy of social science: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[180]
Holstein, J.A. and Gubrium, J.F. 1995. The active interview. Sage.
[181]
Hood, S. et al. 1999. Critical issues in social research: power and prejudice. Open University Press.
[182]
Hughes, J.A. and Sharrock, W.W. 1997. The philosophy of social research. Longman.
[183]
Ian Dey 1993. Qualitative data analysis: a user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge.
[184]
Ingold, T. 2007. Earth, sky, wind, and weather. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 13, s1 (Apr. 2007), S19–S38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00401.x.
[185]
International Institute for Qualitative Methodology International journal of qualitative methods.
[186]
Irwin, S. 2006. Combining data, enhancing explanation. (2006).
[187]
J., G. 2008. Assessing Satisfaction: Insights from a multi-methods study. (2008).
[188]
Janice M. Morse 2008. Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE. 1, 2 (2008), 13–22.
[189]
Joanne Jordan Using Focus Groups to Research Sensitive Issues: Insights from Group Interviews on Nursing in the Northern Ireland "Troubles”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 6, 4, 1–19.
[190]
John Postill and Sarah Pink 2012. Social media ethnography: the digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy. (2012).
[191]
Johnson, A. `It’s good to talk’: The focus group and the sociological imagination. Sociological Review. 44, 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1996.tb00435.x.
[192]
Johnson, J.E. 2009. Unwilling Participant Observation among Russian Siloviki and the Good-Enough Field Researcher. PS: Political Science and Politics. 42, 2 (2009), 321–324.
[193]
Johnson, J.E. 2009. Unwilling Participant Observation among Russian Siloviki and the Good-Enough Field Researcher. PS: Political Science and Politics. 42, 2 (2009), 321–324.
[194]
Jorgensen, D.L. 1989. Participant observation: a methodology for human studies. SAGE Publications.
[195]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 19, 6 (1990), 418–427.
[196]
Karpf, D. 2012. Social Science Research Methods in Internet Time. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 5 (June 2012), 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.665468.
[197]
Kimmel, A.J. 1988. Ethics and values in applied social research. Sage.
[198]
Kirsch, G.E. 2005. Friendship, Friendliness, and Feminist Fieldwork. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30, 4 (June 2005), 2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1086/428415.
[199]
Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness. 16, 1 (Jan. 1994), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.
[200]
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage.
[201]
Krueger, R.A. 1998. Analyzing & reporting focus group results. SAGE Publications.
[202]
Krueger, R.A. 1998. Moderating focus groups. SAGE Publications.
[203]
Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
[204]
Labaree, R.V. 2002. The risk of ‘going observationalist’: negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research. 2, 1 (Apr. 2002), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001641.
[205]
Ladson-Billings, G. 2003. It’s Your World, I’m Just Trying to Explain It: Understanding Our Epistemological and Methodological Challenges. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 1 (Feb. 2003), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800402239333.
[206]
Laine, M. de 2000. Fieldwork, participation and practice: ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. SAGE.
[207]
Laine, M. de 2000. Fieldwork, participation and practice: ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. SAGE.
[208]
Layder, D. 1993. New strategies in social research: an introduction and guide. Polity Pr.
[209]
Lecompte, M. 2002. The transformation of ethnographic practice: past and current challenges. Qualitative Research. 2, 3 (Dec. 2002), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200301.
[210]
Lee, D. 1997. Interviewing men: Vulnerabilities and dilemmas. Women’s Studies International Forum. 20, 4 (July 1997), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00043-5.
[211]
Lee, R.M. 1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.
[212]
Lee, R.M. 2000. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Open University Press.
[213]
Leech, B.L. 2002. Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics. 35, 4 (2002), 665–668.
[214]
Lee-Treweek, G. and Linkogle, S. 2000. Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research. Routledge.
[215]
Letherby, G. 2003. Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press.
[216]
Liav Sade-Beck Internet Ethnography: Online and Offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 3, 2, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300204.
[217]
Lieblich, A. et al. 1998. Narrative research: reading, analysis and interpretation. Sage Publications.
[218]
Lijphart, A. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies. 8, 2.
[219]
Lincoln, Y.S. 1995. Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 1, 3 (Sept. 1995), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301.
[220]
Luff, D. 1999. Dialogue Across the Divides: `Moments of Rapport’ and Power in Feminist Research with Anti-Feminist Women. Sociology. 33, 4 (Nov. 1999), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038599000437.
[221]
Lundberg, T.C. 2014. Tensions Between Constituency and Regional Members of the Scottish Parliament Under Mixed-Member Proportional Representation: A Failure of the New Politics. Parliamentary Affairs. 67, 2 (Apr. 2014), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss055.
[222]
M. M. Bergman 2011. The Politics, Fashions, and Conventions of Research Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 5, 2 (Apr. 2011), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811408318.
[223]
Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. 2010. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[224]
Martin W. Bauer and George Gaskell ed. 2000. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. SAGE.
[225]
Mason, J. 2006. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research. 6, 1 (Feb. 2006), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058866.
[226]
Mason, J. 2017. Qualitative researching. SAGE Publications.
[227]
Mason, J. 2017. Qualitative researching. SAGE Publications.
[228]
Mason, J. 2017. Qualitative researching. SAGE Publications.
[229]
Mason, J. 2006. Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research. (2006).
[230]
Matthews, S.H. et al. 1993. Research on older families when more than one member responds: Producing and interpreting findings. Journal of Aging Studies. 7, 2 (June 1993), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-4065(93)90036-J.
[231]
Maxwell, J.A. 2012. The Importance of Qualitative Research for Causal Explanation in Education. Qualitative Inquiry. 18, 8 (Oct. 2012), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412452856.
[232]
May, T. 2002. Qualitative research in action. SAGE.
[233]
May, T. 2011. Social research: issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[234]
May, T. and Dawson Books 2011. Social research: issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[235]
May, T. and Dawson Books 2011. Social research: issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[236]
May, T. and Dawson Books 2011. Social research: issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[237]
May, T. and Williams, M. 1998. Knowing the social world. Open University Press.
[238]
Maynard, M. and Purvis, J. 1994. Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. Taylor & Francis.
[239]
McDowell, L. and Sharp, J.P. 1997. Space, gender, knowlege: feminist readings. Arnold.
[240]
Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman ed. 2004. Handbook of data analysis. SAGE.
[241]
Miles, M.B. 2019. Qualitative data analysis - international student edition: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
[242]
Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The internet: an ethnographic approach. Berg.
[243]
Miller, T. 2012. Ethics in qualitative research. SAGE.
[244]
Mills, C.W. 2000. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.
[245]
Miner, H. 1956. Body Ritual among the Nacirema. American Anthropologist. 58, 3 (1956), 503–507.
[246]
Molly Andrews, Corinne Squire, Maria Taboukou ed. 2013. Doing narrative research. SAGE.
[247]
Morgan, D.L. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
[248]
Morgan, D.L. 2007. Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1, 1 (Jan. 2007), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462.
[249]
Morse, J.M. and Richards, L. 2002. Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Sage Publications.
[250]
Munday, J. 2006. Identity in Focus: The Use of Focus Groups to Study the Construction of Collective Identity. Sociology. 40, 1 (Feb. 2006), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506058436.
[251]
Murthy, D. 2008. Digital Ethnography. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094565.
[252]
Nairn, K. 2005. A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’ interview. Qualitative Research. 5, 2 (Aug. 2005), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105050836.
[253]
Narayan, U. and Harding, S.G. 2000. Decentering the center: philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world. Indiana University Press.
[254]
Natasha S. Mauthner and Andrea Doucet 2003. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 37, 3 (2003), 413–431.
[255]
NCRM Online learning resources: http://www.ncrm.ac.uk/resources/online/.
[256]
Neuendorf, K.A. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
[257]
Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln ed. 2011. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
[258]
Northedge, A. and Open University 2005. The good study guide. Open University.
[259]
Oakley, A. 2000. Experiments in knowing: gender and method in the social sciences. Polity Press.
[260]
Oakley, A. 2000. Experiments in knowing: gender and method in the social sciences. Polity Press.
[261]
Oakley, A. 1999. Paradigm wars: Some thoughts on a personal and public trajectory. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2, 3 (Jan. 1999), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455799295041.
[262]
O’Reilly, K. 2012. Ethnographic methods. Routledge.
[263]
Orton-Johnson, K. and Prior, N. 2013. Digital sociology: critical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[264]
Patton, M.Q. and Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
[265]
Peter Burnham 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[266]
Phillips, D.C. 1987. Philosophy, science, and social inquiry: contemporary methodological controversies in social science and related applied fields of research. Pergamon.
[267]
Pierce, R. 2008. Research methods in politics: a practical guide. Sage.
[268]
Plummer, K. 2001. Documents of life: 2: An invitation to critical humanism. SAGE.
[269]
Pope, C. 2013. Secret notes, artful stories and temporal compression.
[270]
Presser, L. 2005. Negotiating Power and Narrative in Research: Implications for Feminist Methodology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30, 4 (June 2005), 2067–2090. https://doi.org/10.1086/428424.
[271]
Ragin, C.C. 1987. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies. University of California Press.
[272]
Ragin, C.C. 1987. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies. University of California Press.
[273]
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. 2002. Feminist methodology: challenges and choices. Paul Chapman.
[274]
Redman, P. 2017. Good essay writing. SAGE Publications.
[275]
Reinharz, S. and Davidman, L. 1992. Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
[276]
Ribbens, J. 1989. Interviewing—An "unnatural situation”? Women’s Studies International Forum. 12, 6 (1989), 579–592.
[277]
Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. 1998. Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. Sage.
[278]
Richard A. Krueger & Mary Anne Casey ed. 2015. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[279]
Richards, L. 2020. Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
[280]
Riessman, C.K. 1993. Narrative analysis. Sage Publications.
[281]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications.
[282]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications.
[283]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[284]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[285]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[286]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[287]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[288]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[289]
Ritchie, J. 2013. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 14. SAGE Publications.
[290]
Roberto Franzosi Narrative analysis - or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology.
[291]
Roberts, H. 1981. Doing feminist research. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[292]
Roberts, H. 1981. Doing feminist research. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[293]
Robson, C. 2011. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[294]
Robson, C. 2011. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[295]
Robson, C. 2011. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[296]
Robson, C. and McCartan, K. 2016. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. John Wiley & Sons.
[297]
Robson, C. and McCartan, K. 2016. Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings. John Wiley & Sons.
[298]
Rosenblatt, P.C. 2012. One Interviewer Versus Several: Modernist and Postmodernist Perspectives in Qualitative Family Interviewing. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 4, 2 (June 2012), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00120.x.
[299]
Roulston, K. et al. 2003. Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences. Qualitative Inquiry. 9, 4 (2003), 643–668.
[300]
Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications.
[301]
Ryan-Flood, R. and Gill, R. 2010. Secrecy and silence in the research process: feminist reflections. Routledge.
[302]
Saldana, J. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publishing.
[303]
Sale, J.E.M. et al. 2002. Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research. Quality and Quantity. 36, 1 (2002), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592.
[304]
Sarantakos, S. 2005. Social research. Palgrave Macmillan.
[305]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[306]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[307]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[308]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[309]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[310]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[311]
Seale, C. 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[312]
Seale, C. 1999. Quality in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 5, 4 (Dec. 1999), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500402.
[313]
Seale, C. 2017. Researching society and culture. SAGE Publications.
[314]
Seale, C. 2004. Social research methods: a reader. Routledge.
[315]
Seale, C. 1999. The quality of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[316]
Seale, C. 1999. The quality of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[317]
Shiner, M. and Newburn, T. 1997. Definitely, maybe not? The Normalisation of Recreational Drug use amongst Young People. Sociology. 31, 3 (Aug. 1997), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003008.
[318]
Silverman, D. 2017. Doing qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[319]
Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
[320]
Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
[321]
Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
[322]
Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
[323]
Silverman, D. 2019. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE Publications.
[324]
Silverman, D. 2016. Qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
[325]
Silverman, D. 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[326]
Silverman, D. 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[327]
Silverman, D. 2004. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. Sage Publications.
[328]
Slonim-Nevo, V. and Nevo, I. 2008. Conflicting Findings in Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From an Israeli Study on Immigration. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 3, 2 (Nov. 2008), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330621.
[329]
Smith, A.-M. 2014. Old Fieldwork, New Ethnography: Taking the Stories Out of the Bag. Qualitative Inquiry. 20, 5 (June 2014), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513729.
[330]
Smith, J.A. 2015. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications.
[331]
Social Research Update 5: Ethnographic writing: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU5.html.
[332]
Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups: 1997. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html.
[333]
Social Research Updates: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/.
[334]
Sommer Harrits, G. 2011. More Than Method?: A Discussion of Paradigm Differences Within Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 5, 2 (Apr. 2011), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811402506.
[335]
Spradley, J.P. 1980. Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[336]
Stake, R.E. 1995. The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
[337]
Stanley, L. 1990. Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. Routledge.
[338]
Stephen White and Valentina Feklyunina 2011. Russia’s Authoritarian Elections: The View from Below. Europe-Asia Studies. 63, 4 (June 2011), 579–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.566425.
[339]
Stewart, D.W. and Shamdasani, P.N. 1990. Focus groups: theory and practice. Sage Publications.
[340]
Stivers, Camilla Reflections on the Role of Personal Narrative in Social Science. Signs. 18, 2.
[341]
Swanborn, P.G. 2010. Case study research: what, why and how?. SAGE.
[342]
Taber, N. 2010. Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies. Qualitative Research. 10, 1 (Feb. 2010), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348680.
[343]
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. 1998. Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.
[344]
Thomas, G. 2017. How to do your research project: A guide for students, 14. SAGE Publications.
[345]
Thomas L. Greenbaum 1998. The handbook for focus group research. SAGE.
[346]
Tolman, D.L. and Szalacha, L.A. 1999. Dimensions of Desire. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 23, 1 (Mar. 1999), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x.
[347]
Trigg, R. 2001. Understanding social science: a philosophical introduction to the social sciences. Blackwell Publisers.
[348]
University of Glasgow Library - Subjects & Support: http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/library/subjectssupport/.
[349]
Van Evera, S. 1997. Guide to methods for students of political science. Cornell University Press.
[350]
Van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
[351]
Virtual Training Suite - Social research methods: http://www.vtstutorials.co.uk/tutorial/socialresearchmethods.
[352]
Walliman, N. et al. 2008. Your dissertation in education. SAGE.
[353]
Wengraf, T. 2001. Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. SAGE.
[354]
White, S. et al. 1996. Interviewing the Soviet Elite. Russian Review. 55, 2 (Apr. 1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/131843.
[355]
Whyte, W.F. 1993. Street corner society: the social structure of an Italian slum. University of Chicago Press.
[356]
Whyte, W.F. and Whyte, K.K. 1984. Learning from the field: a guide from experience. Sage Publications.
[357]
Wiles, R. et al. 2006. Anonymity and Confidentiality - NCRM Working Paper. (2006).
[358]
Wiles, R. et al. 2007. Informed Consent and the Research Process: Following Rules or Striking Balances? 12, 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1208.
[359]
Wiles, R. and Boddy, J. 2013. Introduction to the Special Issue: Research Ethics in Challenging Contexts. Methodological Innovations Online. 8, 2 (Aug. 2013), 1–5.
[360]
Williams, M. 2000. Interpretivism and Generalisation. Sociology. 34, 2 (2000), 209–224.
[361]
Williams, M. and May, T. 1996. Introduction to the philosophy of social research. UCL Press.
[362]
Willis, P. 2000. The ethnographic imagination. Polity Press.
[363]
Winlow, S. et al. 2001. GET READY TO DUCK: Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. The British Journal of Criminology. 41, 3 (2001), 536–548.
[364]
Wolcott, H.F. 1995. The art of fieldwork. AltaMira Press.
[365]
Woolley, C.M. 2009. Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 3, 1 (Jan. 2009), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325774.
[366]
Yin, R.K. 2003. Applications of case study research. Sage Publications.
[367]
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. SAGE Publictions.
[368]
Yin, R.K. 2004. The case study anthology. Sage Publications.
[369]
3 AD. Barbour, Rose: Focus Groups.
[370]
British Society of Criminology Code of Ethics for Researchers in the Field of Criminology.
[371]
2000. Ethnography. (2000).
[372]
2004. Feminist perspectives on social research. Oxford University Press.
[373]
2004. Handbook of data analysis. SAGE.
[374]
International journal of social research methodology.
[375]
Journal of mixed methods research.
[376]
Methodological Innovations.
[377]
Political Studies Association Guidelines for Good Professional Conduct.
[378]
Qualitative inquiry.
[379]
2001. Qualitative research: QR. (2001).
[380]
Qualitative sociology.
[381]
2006. Qualitative Sociology. 29, 3 (2006).
[382]
2006. Qualitative Sociology. 29, 4 (2006).
[383]
Social Policy Association Guidelines on Research Ethics.
[384]
2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[385]
2307. Vol. 35, No. 4, Dec., 2002 of PS: Political Science and Politics on JSTOR. (2307).
[386]
What is qualitative interviewing by Professor Janet Holland.
