1
Sherwin-White AN. The Lex Repetundarum and the Political Ideas of Gaius Gracchus. Journal of Roman Studies 1982;72:18–31.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/299113
2
Blom H van der, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Oratory and political career in the late Roman republic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4620932
3
Erskine A. The Hellenistic Stoa: political thought and action. 2nd ed. Bristol: : Bristol Classical 2011. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=85c2e715-bae9-e911-80cd-005056af4099
4
Henrik Mouritsen. Caius Gracchus and the ‘Cives Sine Suffragio’. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte Published Online First: 2006.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org./stable/4436828
5
Stockton DL. The Gracchi. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1979.
6
Robb MA. Beyond Populares and Optimates: political language in the late Republic. Stuttgart: : Steiner 2010.
7
Wiseman TP. Remembering the Roman people: essays on late-Republican politics and literature. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239764.001.0001
8
Blom H van der, Gray C, Steel CEW, editors. Institutions and ideology in Republican Rome: speech, audience and decision. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681476
9
Steel CEW, Blom H van der. Community and communication: oratory and politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641895.001.0001
10
Gruen ES. Roman politics and the criminal courts, 149-78 B.C. Cambridge, MA: : Harvard University Press 1968.
11
Riggsby AM. Did the Romans Believe in Their Verdicts? Rhetorica 1997;15:235–51.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rh.1997.15.3.235
12
Richardson JS. The Purpose of the Lex Calpurnia de repetundis. Journal of Roman Studies 1987;77:1–12.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/300571
13
Lintott A. V. The leges de repetundis and Associate Measures Under the Republic. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 1981;98:162–212. doi:10.7767/zrgra.1981.98.1.162
14
Bispham E, Oxford University Press. From Asculum to Actium: the municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231843.001.0001
15
Mouritsen H. Italian unification: a study in ancient and modern historiography. London: : Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London 1998.
16
Eilers C. Diplomats and diplomacy in the Roman world. Leiden: : Brill 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789047424291
17
Fiona C. Tweedie. Caenum aut caelum: M. Livius Drusus and the Land. Mnemosyne 2011;64.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23054388
18
Kallet-Marx RM. Hegemony to empire: the development of the Roman Imperium in the East from 148 to 62 B.C. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1995.
19
Wallace-Hadrill A. Rome’s cultural revolution. Cambridge, [Eng.]: : Cambridge University Press 2008. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a591e5c4-ffd5-e911-80cd-005056af4099
20
Gruen ES. Culture and national identity in republican Rome. London: : Duckworth 1993. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bd90e308-7bd4-e911-80cd-005056af4099
21
Zetzel, James E G. A CONTRACT ON AMERIA: LAW AND LEGALITY IN CICERO’S PRO ROSCIO AMERINO. American Journal of Philology;134:425–44.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1441488042?pq-origsite=summon
22
Syme R. Approaching the Roman revolution: papers on Republican history. First edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198767060.001.0001
23
May JM. Brill’s companion to Cicero: oratory and rhetoric. Leiden: : Brill 2002. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_484680_0
24
Steel C. Cicero’s autobiography: narratives of success in the pre-consular orations. Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 2012;23:251–66. doi:10.3406/ccgg.2012.1780
25
Kallet-Marx R. The Trial of Rutilius Rufus. Phoenix 1990;44. doi:10.2307/1088326
26
Steel C. RETHINKING SULLA: THE CASE OF THE ROMAN SENATE. The Classical Quarterly 2014;64:657–68. doi:DOI:10.1017/S0009838814000421
27
Brunt PA. The fall of the Roman Republic and related essays. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1988. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=accc4475-ffd5-e911-80cd-005056af4099
28
Pina Polo F. The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511921377
29
Morrell K. Pompey, Cato, and the governance of the Roman Empire. First edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755142.001.0001
30
Blom H van der, Gray C, Steel CEW, editors. Institutions and ideology in Republican Rome: speech, audience and decision. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681476
31
Tan J. Power and public finance at Rome, 264-49 BCE. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190639570.001.0001
32
Richardson J. The language of empire: Rome and the idea of empire from the third century BC to the second century AD. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575341
33
Golden GK. Crisis management during the Roman Republic: the role of political institutions in emergencies. Cambridge: : Cambridge Univesity Press 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507462
34
Arena V. Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139235754
35
Straumann B. Crisis and constitutionalism: Roman political thought from the fall of the republic to the age of revolution. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199950928.001.0001
36
Gruen ES. The last generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, CA: : University of California Press 1974. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7f8dd313-00d6-e911-80cd-005056af4099
37
Beck H. Consuls and res publica: holding high office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511736124
38
Rosenblitt JA. Rome after Sulla. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5603062
39
SANTANGELO F. Roman Politics in the 70s B.C.: a Story of Realignments? The Journal of Roman Studies 2014;104.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43286864
