Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew, *241 Mothew v Bristol & West Building Society ___.
Ecclesiastical Insurance Office plc v Whitehouse-Grant-Christ [2017] CSIH 33, Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc v Lady Iam Hazel Virginia Whitehouse-Grant-Christ ___.
Invicta UK v International Brands Ltd [2013] EWHC 1564 (QB), Invicta UK (a partnership) v International Brands Limited ___.
McQuillan v McCormick [2010] EWHC 1112 (QB), Michael McQuillan, Lorna McQuillan v Darren McCormick, Wizzeweb Limited, Pandora Jewelry Limited ___.
AIB Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland (1993 SC 588).
AIB Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland (1993 SC 588).
AIB Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland (1993 SC 588), *588 Aib Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland ___.
AIB Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland (1993 SC 588), *588 Aib Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland ___.
Cheshire Mortgage Corporation v Grandison [2012] CSIH 66; 2013 SC 160, *160 Cheshire Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Grandison ___.
Parks of Hamilton Holdings Ltd v Campbell [2014] CSIH 36; 2014 SC 726, *726 Parks of Hamilton Holdings Ltd v Campbell ___.
Brand Studio Ltd v St John Knits Inc [2015] EWHC 3143 (QB), Brand Studio Limited v St John Knits, Inc ___.
W Nagel (a firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Co NV [2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm), W Nagel (A Firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Company NV ___.
W Nagel (a firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Co NV [2017] EWHC 1750 (Comm), W Nagel (A Firm) v Pluczenik Diamond Company NV ___.
Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates Ltd [2016] EWHC 1587 (QB), Software Incubator Limited v Computer Associates UK Limited ___.
Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates Ltd [2016] EWHC 1587 (QB), Software Incubator Limited v Computer Associates UK Limited ___.
Imageview Management v Jack Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 63, Imageview Management Ltd v Kelvin Jack ___.
[2017] CSOH 124, Kidd v Paull and Williamson LLP ___.
2017 GWD 31-499., Kidd v Paull and Williamson LLP ___.
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1021, Rossetti Marketing Limited, Solutions Marketing Limited v Diamond Sofa Company Limited ___.
Accentuate Ltd v Asigra [2009] EWHC 2655 (QB); [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 738.].
Adam v Newbigging (1888) 13 App Cas 308.
Analysis. (2013). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.euppublishing.com/full/10.3366/elr.2013.0139
Anderson v Croall & Sons Ltd (1903) 6 F 153, *153 Anderson v Croall & Sons, Limited ___.
Angove’s Pty Ltd v Bailey [2016] UKSC 47.
Bank of Beirut SAL v Prince El-Hashemite [2015] EWHC 1451 (Ch); [2016] Ch 1.
Bank of Scotland v Brunswick Developments Ltd.
Bank of Scotland v Butcher [2003] 2 All ER (Comm) 557.
Bank of Scotland v Butcher [2003] EWCA Civ 67.
Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007.
Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007.
Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007.
Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007.
Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007.
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016.
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017a). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017b). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017c). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017d). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017e). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Banks, R. C. I., & Lindley, N. L. (2017f). Lindley & Banks on partnership (Twentieth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLindleyBanks%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2014] UKSC 32; [2014] 1 WLR 2047.
Bell, G. J., & M’Laren, J. (n.d.-a). Commentaries on the law of Scotland, and on the principles of mercantile jurisprudence (Seventh edition). T. & T. Clark.
Bell, G. J., & M’Laren, J. (n.d.-b). Commentaries on the law of Scotland, and on the principles of mercantile jurisprudence (Seventh edition). T. & T. Clark.
Bell, G. J., & M’Laren, J. (n.d.-c). Commentaries on the law of Scotland, and on the principles of mercantile jurisprudence (Seventh edition). T. & T. Clark.
Black v Cornelius (1879) 6 R 581, Session Cases > Rettie (1873-1897) ___.
Blisset v Daniel (1853) 10 Hare 493; 68 ER 1022.
Bolton Partners v Lambert (1889) 41 Ch D 295.
Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co Ltd v Farnham (1 WLR 1051).
Bowstead, W., & Reynolds, F. M. B. (2018a). Bowstead and Reynolds on agency (P. Watts, Ed.; Twenty-first edition). Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FBowsteadReynoldsonAgency%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Bowstead, W., & Reynolds, F. M. B. (2018b). Bowstead and Reynolds on agency (P. Watts, Ed.; Twenty-first edition). Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/tocectory?sp=ukuniglasg-1&stnew=true&crumb-label=Books&sttype=stdtemplate&ao=o.I568EADD055CC11E787BEFEB3BD542D4F&ndd=2
Bowstead, W., & Reynolds, F. M. B. (2018c). Bowstead and Reynolds on agency (P. Watts, Ed.; Twenty-first edition). Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FBowsteadReynoldsonAgency%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Brand Studio Ltd v St John Knits Inc [2016] 1 All ER (Comm) 1163, 1 All England Commercial Cases ___ (2016).
Buchanan v Nolan [2013] CSIH 38.
Hunter v Hanley 1955 SC 200, *200 Hunter v Hanley ___.
International Sponge Importers Ltd v Andrew Watt & Sons 1911 SC (HL) 57, *57 International Sponge Importers, Limited v Watt & Sons ___.
Sharp v Thomson 1997 SC (HL) 66.
Sharp v Thomson 1997 SC (HL) 66.
Tomlinson v Scottish Amalgamated Silks Liquidator 1935 SC (HL) 1, *1 Tomlinson v Liquidators of Scottish Amalgamated Silks, Limited ___.
Walker, Fraser & Steele v Fraser’s Trs 1910 SC 222, *222 Walker, Fraser, & Steele v Fraser’s Trustees ___.
McAdam v Boxpak Ltd 2006 SLT 217, *217 McAdam v Boxpak Ltd ___.
Cabrelli, D. (2005). The Case against the Floating Charge in Scotland. Edinburgh Law Review, 9(3), 407–438. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2005.9.3.407
Carmichael v Evans [1904] 1 Ch 486.
Casey Oils Ltd v Wood [2018] CSOH 42.
Certain Limited Partners in Henderson PFI Secondary Fund II LP v Henderson PFI Secondary Fund II LP [2012] EWHC 3259 (Comm); [2013] QB 934.
CitizenM LND St Paul’s Properties BV v Chil Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 771.
Clark v Jamieson 1909 S.C. 132.
Clark v Watson 1982 SLT 450.
Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3053).
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985.
Companies Act 1985. (n.d.-l). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/6/contents
Companies Act 2006. (n.d.-a). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006.
Companies Act 2006. (n.d.-q). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
Companies Act 2006. (n.d.-r). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
Companies House - GOV.UK. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/companies-house
Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. (n.d.). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/46/contents
Ham v Ham [2013] EWCA Civ 1301.
David Logan & Sons v Schuldt (1903) 10 SLT 598.
Davidson et al, F. (2016a). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson et al, F. (2016b). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson et al, F. (2016c). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson et al, F. (2016d). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson, F. et al. (2018). Commercial law in Scotland (5th ed.). Thomson Reuters. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/408122
Davidson, F., Garrity, D. J., Macgregor, L., & Richardson, L. (2016a). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson, F., Garrity, D. J., Macgregor, L., & Richardson, L. (2016b). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson, F., Garrity, D. J., Macgregor, L., & Richardson, L. (2016c). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davidson, F., Garrity, D. J., Macgregor, L., & Richardson, L. (2016d). Commercial law in Scotland (Fourth edition). W. Green/Thomson Reuters.
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016a). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016b). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016c). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016d). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016e). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016f). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Davies, P. L., Gower, L. C. B., & Worthington, S. (2016g). Gower’s principles of modern company law (Tenth edition). Sweet & Maxwell. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
Draft Statutory Guidance on the meaning of "significant influence or control” over Limited Liability Partnerships in the context of the Register of People with Significant Control. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523122/Draft_statutory_guidance_LLPs.pdf
Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam [2002] UKHL 48; [2003] 2 AC 366.
Duncan v MFV Marigold PD145 [2006] CSOH 128; 2006 SLT 975.
Duncan v MFV Marigold PD145 [2006] CSOH 128; 2006 SLT 975.
Duncan v MFV Marigold PD145 [2006] CSOH 128; 2006 SLT 975.
Duncan v The MF Marigold Pd145, *975 Duncan v The MFV Marigold Pd145 ___.
Dyce v Fairgrieve [2013] CSOH 155.
Dyster v Randall & Sons [1926] Ch 932, 939.
Eason v Miller [2016] CSOH 59.
Eason v Miller [2016] CSOH 59.
Enterprise Act 2002.
European Commercial Cases. (n.d.). http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=7072&recordid=463
Factors Act 1889.
Factors Act 1889.
F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd v Barthelemy [2011] EWHC 1731 (Ch); [2012] Ch 613.
Ferrier v Dods (1865) 3 M 561.
FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious [2015] AC 250, ICLR: Appeal Cases ___.
FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious [2014] UKSC 45.
Financial Conduct Authority v Asset LI Inc and others [2016] 3 All ER 93.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 s 235.
Financial Services Authority v Asset LI Inc (t/ a Asset Land Investment Inc) [2016] UKSC 17.
Finch, V. (2000). Is pari passu passe? Insolvency Lawyer, 5, 194–210. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIBD91FFD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Finch, V. (2012). Corporate rescue: a game of three halves. Legal Studies, 32(02), 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00230.x
Finch, V., & Milman, D. (2017a). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
Finch, V., & Milman, D. (2017b). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
Finch, V., & Milman, D. (2017c). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
Finch, V., & Milman, D. (2017d). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
Finch, V., & Milman, D. (2017e). Corporate insolvency law: perspectives and principles (Third edition). Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139626811
F.M.B. Reynolds. (n.d.). The ultimate apparent authority. Law Quarterly Review. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICD036620E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Monk v Largo Foods Ltd [2016] EWHC 1837 (Comm), Mr Paul Monk, Inventabrand Consulting, Mr Philip Collins v Largo Foods Ltd ___.
Forman & Co Pty v The Liddesdale [1900] AC 190.
Forster v Ferguson & Foster [2010] CSIH 38; 2010 SLT 867.
Frape v Emreco International 2002 SLT 371.
FRC. (n.d.). https://www.frc.org.uk/
French, D. (Ed.). (2019). Blackstone’s statutes on company law 2019-2020 (23rd edition). Oxford University Press.
Gailey v. Environmental Waste Controls and Others; Outer House, Court of Session, 5 December 2003. (2004). European Law Reports. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurlawreo8&size=2&collection=journals&id=423
Gillies v M’Lean (1885) 13 R 12, *12 William Don Gillies v John M’Lean ___.
Gilmour v Clark (1853) 15 D. 478, *478 Gilmour v Clark ___.
Gloag, W. M. (1929). The law of contract: a treatise on the principles of contract in the law of Scotland (2nd ed). Green.
Gloag, W. M., & Henderson, R. C. (2017). Gloag and Henderson: the law of Scotland (H. L. MacQueen & R. D. Mackay, Eds.; Fourteenth edition). W. Green. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGloagHenderson%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Goodall v Bilsland 1909 SC 1152.
Goodall v Bilsland 1909 SC 1152.
Goode, R. M. (2016). Goode on commercial law (E. McKendrick, Ed.; Fifth edition). LexisNexis. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/renderTocBrowse.do?formId=GB03STCmtrySrch&rand=0.2985015757133682&csi=434468&returnTo=20_T29212552251&pap=brws_select_from_cs
Goode, R. M. (2018a). Goode on principles of corporate insolvency law (K. van Zwieten, Ed.; Fifth edition). Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.westlaw.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGoodeCorporateInsolvency
Goode, R. M. (2018b). Goode on principles of corporate insolvency law (K. van Zwieten, Ed.; Fifth edition). Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.westlaw.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGoodeCorporateInsolvency
Goode, R. M. (2018c). Goode on principles of corporate insolvency law (K. van Zwieten, Ed.; Fifth edition). Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.westlaw.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGoodeCorporateInsolvency
Goode, R. M. (2018d). Goode on principles of corporate insolvency law (K. van Zwieten, Ed.; Fifth edition). Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.westlaw.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGoodeCorporateInsolvency
Goode, R. M. (2018e). Goode on principles of corporate insolvency law (K. van Zwieten, Ed.; Fifth edition). Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.westlaw.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FGoodeCorporateInsolvency
Gray v Braid Logistics (UK) Ltd.
Gray v Braid Logistics (UK) Ltd.
Gray’s Trs v Drummond and Reid (1881) 8 R 956, *956 Rev. James Ronaldson and Others (Gray’s Trustees) v Drummond & Reid ___.
Green v Moran 2002 SC 575.
Gregor Homes Ltd v Emlick (2012) S.L.T. (Sh Ct) 5.
Gretton, G. L. (2002a). Registration of Company Charges. Edinburgh Law Review, 6(2), 146–175. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/elr.2002.6.2.146
Gretton, G. L. (2002b). Registration of Company Charges. Edinburgh Law Review, 6(2), 146–175. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/elr.2002.6.2.146
Gretton, G. L. (2003). Reception without Integration - Floating Charges and Mixed Systems. Tulane Law Review. http://www.heinonline.org.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tulr78&start_page=307&collection=journals&id=325
Guidance on personal debt relief options, company liquidation, investigation and enforcement. - GOV.UK. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/guidance-on-personal-debt-relief-options-company-liquidation-investigation-and-enforcement
Guidance On The Meaning Of "Significant Influence Or Control” Over Eligible Scottish Partnerships In The Context Of The Register Of People With Significant Control. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621569/170622_Eligible_Scot_P_GUI_June_2017.pdf
Hardman, J. (2017). Some Legal Determinants of External Finance in Scotland: A Response to Lord Hodge. Edinburgh Law Review, 21(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2017.0388
Heather Capital Ltd (in liq) v Levy & McRae [2015] CSOH 115.
Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates Ltd [2016] 2 CLC 77, *77 Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates UK Ltd. ___.
Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates Ltd [2016] 2 CLC 77, *77 Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates UK Ltd. ___.
Hopper v Hopper [2008] EWCA Civ 1417.
Hudson, A. & Dawson Books. (2018a). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315158099
Hudson, A. & Dawson Books. (2018b). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315158099
Hudson, A. & Dawson Books. (2018c). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315158099
Hudson, A. & Dawson Books. (2018d). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315158099
Hudson, A. & Dawson Books. (2018e). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315158099
Hudson, A. & Taylor & Francis Group. (2018a). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351655569
Hudson, A. & Taylor & Francis Group. (2018b). Understanding company law (Second edition). Routledge. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351655569
Ilott v Williams [2013] EWCA Civ 645.
Imageview Management Ltd v Jack [2009] 2 All ER 666, (2009).
Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Inc [2001] CLC 1825.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45 Part I THE FIRST GROUP OF PARTS COMPANY INSOLVENCY; COMPANIES WINDING UPCOMPANY VOLUNTARY ARRANGEMENTSConsideration and implementation of proposal, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act, Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act.
Insolvency Act 1986 c. 45Arrangement of Act.
Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915Arrangement of SI, Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915.
Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915Arrangement of SI, Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915.
Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915Arrangement of SI, Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915.
Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915Arrangement of SI, Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986/1915.
Inversiones Frieira SL v Colyzeo Investors II LP [2011] EWHC 1762 (Ch), [2011] EWHC 1450 (Ch); [2012] Bus LR 1136.
Inversiones Frieira SL v Colyzeo Investors II LP [2012] EWHC 1450 (Ch); [2012] Bus LR 1136.
Ireland v Livingston (1871-72) LR 5 HL 395, *395 George Ireland and Others v Joseph Gibbons Livingston ___.
Jack v Jack [2016] CSIH 75; 2016 Fam LR 177.
James Richardson & Sons v The Kipp, 9 May 2017.
Invicta UK v International Brands Ltd [2013] ECC 30, *301 Invicta UK v International Brands Ltd ___.
Keay, A. (2008). Ascertaining The Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model. Modern Law Review, 71(5), 663–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00711.x
Keighley Maxsted & Co v Durant [1901] AC 240.
Kelly v Fraser (2012) UKPC 25.
Kennedy v Glass (1890) 17 R 1085, *1085 Thomas Kennedy v Peter Glass ___.
Kershaw, D. (2012a). Company law in context: text and materials (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Kershaw, D. (2012b). Company law in context: text and materials (Second edition). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4e74b607-e440-e911-80cd-005056af4099
Kershaw, D. (2012c). Company law in context: text and materials (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Kershaw, D. (2012d). Company law in context: text and materials (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Khan v Miah [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2123.
Kidd v Paull & Williamsons LLP [2017] CSOH 16 [37]ff.
Kidd v Paull & Williamsons LLP [2017] CSOH 124, Kidd v Paull and Williamson LLP ___.
King v T Tunnock Ltd 2000 S.C. 424.
L. J. Macgregor. (2013). The Law of Agency in Scotland. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Lamont Nisbet & Co v Hamilton 1907 SC 628.
Large and Medium-sized Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008/1913.
Laura Macgregor. (n.d.). Apparent authority in agency: Gregor Homes Ltd v Emlick. Edinburgh Law Review. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI2A2B4211D6A911E094E9B2000284DD1A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Law Key Databases List. (n.d.). http://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/search~S6?/mLaw/mlaw/1,2,42,B/exact&FF=mlaw key databases&1,8,
Graham v United Turkey Red 1922 SC 533, *533 Graham & Co. v United Turkey Red Co. ___.
M’Pherson’s Trs v Watt (1877) 5 R (HL) 9, *9 M’Pherson’s Trustees v Thomas Watt ___.
Stein’s Assignees v Brown (1830) 8 S 1064, *1064 Stein’s Assignees v Brown ___.
Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2008/1911.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (Commencement) Order 2000/3316.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 1(1).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 1(2).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 1(2).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 1(3).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 1(5).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 2.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 3.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 4(1)-(2).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 4(3).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 4(4).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 4A.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 5.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 6(1)-(2).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 6(3).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 6(4).
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 s 18.
Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009/1804.
Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001/1090.
Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001/1090 reg 7.
Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations 2001/1090 reg 8.
Limited Liability Partnerships (Scotland) Regulations 2001.
Limited Liability Partnerships (Scotland) Regulations 2001. (n.d.-b). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/sdsi/2001/0110595874/contents
Limited Liability Partnerships (Scotland) Regulations 2001/128 (Scottish SI).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 4(2)-(2A).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 4(2B).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 4(3).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 4(3A).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 4(4).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 5.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 5.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(1).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(1).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(2).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(3).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(3A).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(3B).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(5).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(5)(f).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6(6).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6A(2).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6A(2)(a).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6A(2)(f).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6A(2)(j).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 6A(4).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 7.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 7.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8A.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8A.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8B.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8B.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8C.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8C.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8C(4).
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8D.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 8D.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 9.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 9.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 10.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 13.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 13.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 14.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 14.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 15.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907 s 15.
Lindsay v Inland Revenue 1933 S.C. 33.
Liquidator of Letham Grange v Foxworth Investments: [2011] CSOH 66, Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd ___.
Liquidator of Letham Grange v Foxworth Investments: [2011] CSOH 66, Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd ___.
Lloyd’s law reports. (1968).
Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd [2007] UKHL 32; [2007] 1 WLR 2055.
Burnett’s Tr v Grainger 2004 SC (HL) 19, *19 Burnett’s Trustee v Grainger ___.
Burnett’s Tr v Grainger 2004 SC (HL) 19, *19 Burnett’s Trustee v Grainger ___.
MacRoberts LLP v McCrindle Group Ltd [2016] CSIH 27, *1 MacRoberts LLP v McCrindle Group Ltd ___.
Whitbread Group plc v Goldapple (No 2) 2005 SLT 281, *281 Whitbread Group Plc v Goldapple Ltd ___.
Fernie v Robertson (1871) 9 M 437, *437 Fernie v Robertson ___.
Joint Administrators of Rangers Football Club Plc, Noters 2012 S.L.T. 599, *599 ___.
Kelly v Cooper [1993] AC 205, *205 Horace Brenton Kelly Appellant v Margot Cooper and Another Respondents ___.
Armagas v Mundogas SA (The Ocean Frost) [1986] AC 717.
Robb v Kinnear’s Trs (1825) 4 S 106, *106 Robb v Kinnear’s Trustees ___.
Ecclesiastical Insurance Office plc v Whitehouse-Grant-Christ 2017 SLT 697, *697 Ecclesiastical Insurance Office Plc v Whitehouse-Grant-Christ ___.
Lujo Properties Ltd v Green 1997 SLT 225.
MacDonald v Carnbroe Estates 2018 SLT 205 (permission to appeal granted by UK Supreme Court in October 2018).
Macgregor, L. (2020). Commercial law in Scotland / Laura J. MacGregor, Dennis J. Garrity, Jonathan Hardman, Alistair D. J. Macpherson, Lorna Richardson (6th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/614449
Macgregor, L. J., & Whitty, N. R. (2011). Payment of Another’s Debt, Unjustified Enrichment and Agency. Edinburgh Law Review, 15(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2011.0004
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013a). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013b). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013c). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013d). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013e). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macgregor, L., Scottish Universities Law Institute, WESTLAW (Information retrieval system), & Sweet & Maxwell. (2013f). The law of agency in Scotland. W. Green/Thomson Reuters. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FLawAgencyScotland%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Macleod, J. (Ed.). (2017). Avizandum statutes on Scots commercial and consumer law 2018-2019 (Sixteenth edition). Avizandum Publishing.
MacNeil, I. (Ed.). (2014a). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing Ltd.
MacNeil, I. (Ed.). (2014b). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing Ltd.
MacNeil, I. (Ed.). (2014c). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing Ltd.
MacNeil, I. (Ed.). (2014d). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing Ltd.
MacNeil, I. (Ed.). (2014e). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing Ltd.
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020a). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020b). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020c). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020d). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020e). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020f). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020g). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
MacNeill, I. G. (Ed.). (2020h). Scots commercial law. Avizandum Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6190129
Maillie v Swanney 2000 SLT 464.
Maillie v Swanney 2000 SLT 464.
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46, *46 Boardman and Another Appellants v Phipps Respondent ___.
McAdam v Boxpak Ltd [2006] CSIH 9.
McIrvine v McIrvine [2012] CSOH 23.
Martin-Baker Aircraft Co Ltd v Canadian Flight Equipment Ltd [1955] 2 QB 556, *556 Martin-Baker Aircraft Co. LD. and Another v Canadian Flight Equipment LD. ___.
Meier and Co v Küchenmeister (1881) 8 R 642.
M’Gown v Henderson 1914 SC 839.
Morris, C. (2017). The private fund limited partnership: the reform company lawyers have been waiting for? Company Lawyer, 38(6), 192–194. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI70DB31E03A1F11E7A9E1F8E5C12DC658%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Negotiorum gestio. (n.d.-a). In Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Vol. 15 para 95). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?ipcounter=1&cookieState=0&rand=0.1782808445740388&bhcp=1
Negotiorum gestio. (n.d.-b). In Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Vol. 15 para 97). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?ipcounter=1&cookieState=0&rand=0.1782808445740388&bhcp=1
Negotiorum gestio. (n.d.-c). In Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Vol. 15 para 98). http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?ipcounter=1&cookieState=0&rand=0.1782808445740388&bhcp=1
Nigel Fryer Joinery Services Ltd v Ian Frith Hardware Ltd [2008] EWHC 767 (Ch), Nigel Fryer Joinery Services Ltd v Ian Firth Hardware Ltd ___.
Nordic Travel v Scotpoint 1980 SC 1.
Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Co Ltd v Cowling [2015] EWCA Civ 651.
Northampton Regional Livestock Centre Co Ltd v Cowling [2016] 1 BCLC 431.
First Energy (UK) Ltd v Hungarian International Bank Ltd [1993] BCC 533.
Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222, *222 Prince Jefri Bolkiah Appellant v KPMG (A Firm) Respondents ___.
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009a). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009b). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009c). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009d). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009e). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Palmer, F. B., Sweet & Maxwell, & WESTLAW (Information retrieval system). (2009f). Palmer’s company law. Sweet & Maxwell. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FPalmers%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Parks v. Esso Petroleum Co. LTD, European Law Reports ___. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurlawreo4&div=4&start_page=25&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890.
Partnership Act 1890 s 1(1).
Partnership Act 1890 s 1(2).
Partnership Act 1890 s 2.
Partnership Act 1890 s 4(2).
Partnership Act 1890 s 5.
Partnership Act 1890 s 5.
Partnership Act 1890 s 6.
Partnership Act 1890 s 7.
Partnership Act 1890 s 8.
Partnership Act 1890 s 9.
Partnership Act 1890 s 13.
Partnership Act 1890 s 14.
Partnership Act 1890 s 15.
Partnership Act 1890 s 16.
Partnership Act 1890 s 17.
Partnership Act 1890 s 19.
Partnership Act 1890 s 20.
Partnership Act 1890 s 21.
Partnership Act 1890 s 22.
Partnership Act 1890 s 24.
Partnership Act 1890 s 24.
Partnership Act 1890 s 24 (1).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24 (1).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24 (3)-(4).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(3).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(5).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(6).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(7).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(7).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(8).
Partnership Act 1890 s 24(9).
Partnership Act 1890 s 25.
Partnership Act 1890 s 26.
Partnership Act 1890 s 27.
Partnership Act 1890 s 27.
Partnership Act 1890 s 28.
Partnership Act 1890 s 28.
Partnership Act 1890 s 29.
Partnership Act 1890 s 30.
Partnership Act 1890 s 30.
Partnership Act 1890 s 31(1).
Partnership Act 1890 s 32.
Partnership Act 1890 s 32 (b).
Partnership Act 1890 s 33.
Partnership Act 1890 s 34.
Partnership Act 1890 s 35.
Partnership Act 1890 s 36.
Partnership Act 1890 s 36(1).
Partnership Act 1890 s 37.
Partnership Act 1890 s 38.
Partnership Act 1890 s 39.
Partnership Act 1890 s 40.
Partnership Act 1890 s 41.
Partnership Act 1890 s 42.
Partnership Act 1890 s 43.
Partnership Act 1890 s 44.
Partnership Act 1890 s 45.
Partnership Act 1890 s 46.
Partnerships (Prosecution) (Scotland) Act 2013 s 5.
Pentland-Clark v Maclehose [2009] CSOH 153.
‘People with Significant Control’ Companies House register goes live. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/news/people-with-significant-control-companies-house-register-goes-live
[2002] B.C.C. 247 Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Adam & Partners Ltd, *247 Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Adam & Partners Ltd ___.
Peter Watts Q.C. (2017). The insolvency of agents. Law Quarterly Review. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI17166BE0BE0811E689319702776550D2%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
Pillans Bros v Pillans (1908) 16 SLT 611.
Pine Energy Consultants Ltd v Talisman Energy (UK) Limited [2008] CSOH 10.
PJ Pipe & Valve Co. Limited v. Audco India Limited; High Court (Queen’s Bench Division), 2 September 2005. (2006). European Law Reports. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurlawreo10&size=2&collection=journals&id=368
Primary Health Care Centres (Broadford) Ltd v Ravangave [2008] CSOH 14; 2008 Hous LR 24.
Primary Health Care Centres (Broadford) Ltd v Ravangave [2008] CSOH 14; 2008 Hous LR 24.
Primary Healthcare Centres (Broadford) Ltd v Humphrey [2010] CSOH 129.
PSC requirements for companies and limited liability partnerships - GOV.UK. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-to-the-people-with-significant-control-requirements-for-companies-and-limited-liability-partnerships
Purewall v Purewall [2009] CSIH 74; 2010 SLT 120.
Re Hawk Insurance Co Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 241, Hawk Insurance Co Ltd, Re ___.
Register of People with Significant Control. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621571/170623_NONSTAT_GU.pdf
Register Of People With Significant Control Guidance For Registered And Unregistered Companies, Societates Europaeae, Limited Liability Partnerships, And Eligible Scottish Partnerships (Scottish Limited Partnerships And Scottish Qualifying Partnerships). (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/621571/170623_NONSTAT_GU.pdf
Reinhard v Ondra LLP [2015] EWHC 26 (Ch).
Reinhard v Ondra LLP [2015] EWHC 1869 (ch).
Reinhard v Ondra LLP [2015] EWHC 2943 (CH).
Reinhard v Ondra LLP and others [2016] 2 BCLC 571.
Report on Sharp v Thomson (SLC 208). (n.d.). https://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/7412/7989/7430/rep208.pdf
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2013] 1 All ER (Comm) 308, 1 All England Commercial Cases ___ (2013).
Ruddy v Monte Marco [2008] CSIH 47; 2008 SC 667.
Ruddy v Monte Marco [2008] CSIH 47; 2008 SC 667.
Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497.
Scottish Law Commision. (n.d.-a). Report on Sharp v Thomson (SLC No 208, 2007).
Scottish Law Commision. (n.d.-b). Report on Sharp v Thomson (SLC No 208, 2007).
Scottish Law Commission. (n.d.-c). Discussion Paper on Moveable Transactions (SLC DP No 151, 2011).
Scottish Law Commission. (n.d.-d). Discussion Paper on Moveable Transactions (SLC DP No 151, 2011).
Scottish Law Commission Report on Registration of Rights in Security by Companies (SLC No 197, 2004). (n.d.). https://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/2812/7989/6878/rep197.pdf
Scottish Lion Insurance Co Ltd, Petitioner [2011] CSIH 18.
Scottish Power Energy Retail Ltd v Taskforce Contracts Ltd [2008] CSOH 110; 2009 SCLR 137.
SEB Trygg Liv Holding AB v Manches.
Sharp v Thomson, Sharp v Thomson ___.
Sharpe v Carswell 1910 S.C. 391.
Sim v Howat [2012] CSOH 171.
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (2011).
Small Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008/1912.
Smith v Strathclyde Passenger Transport Executive 2003 SLT (Sh Ct) 97.
St. Clair, J., & Drummond Young, J. E. (2011a). The law of corporate insolvency in Scotland (4th ed). Thomson/W. Green.
St. Clair, J., & Drummond Young, J. E. (2011b). The law of corporate insolvency in Scotland (4th ed). Thomson/W. Green.
Robertson v Foulds (1860) 22 D 714, *714 Robertson, &c. v Foulds ___.
Millar v Mitchell (1860) 22 D 833, *833 Millar v Mitchell, &c. ___.
Stevenson & Sons v Aktiengesellschaft fur Cartonnagen-Industrie [1918] AC 239.
Stevenson v Duncan (1842) 5 D 167, *167 Stavenson v Dunean ___.
Stewart v Shannessy (1900) 2 F 1288, *1288 Stewart v Shannessy ___.
Talbot Underwriting Ltd v Nausch Hogan & Murray Inc.
Woodhouse v Wright Johnston & Mackenzie 2004 SLT 911, *911 Woodhouse v Wright Johnston & Mackenzie ___.
The Gazette | Official Public Record. (n.d.). https://www.thegazette.co.uk/
The Information about People with Significant Control (Amendment) Regulations 2017. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/693/contents/made
The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission. (2003). Partnership law: report on a reference under section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commission Act 1965. https://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/3812/7989/6640/rep192.pdf
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2008. (n.d.). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1911/contents/made
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009.
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009. (n.d.-b). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/1804/contents/made
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009. (n.d.-c). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/1804/contents/made
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009. (n.d.-d). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/1804/contents/made
The Limited Liability Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2016. (n.d.). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/340/contents/made
The private fund limited partnership: the reform company lawyers have been waiting for? (n.d.). Company Lawyer. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI70DB31E03A1F11E7A9E1F8E5C12DC658%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
The Register of People with Significant Control Regulations 2016. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/339/contents/made
The Scottish Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2017. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/694/contents/made
Thom’s Executrix v Russel & Aitken 1983 SLT 335.
UCB Home Loans Corp Ltd v Soni [2013] EWCA Civ 62.
Umfreville, C. (2018). Review of the pre-pack industry measures: reconsidering the connected party sale before the sun sets. Insolvency Intelligence, 31(2), 58–63. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIA2403770489311E8B01E9A068090939C%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
University Court of the University of St Andrews v Headon Holdings Ltd [2017] CSIH 61.
Walker v Somerville (1837) 16 S 217, *217 Walker v Somerville ___.
Wee, M. S. (2015). Understanding Commercial Insolvency and its Justifications as a Test for Winding-Up. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 62. https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=351761
Welsh v Knartson 1972 SLT 96.
Welsh v Knartson 1973 SLT 66.
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480, *480 Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm) v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd. and Another. ___.
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480, *480 Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm) v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd. and Another. ___.
Wilson v Dunbar 1988 SLT 93.
Worbey v Campbell [2016] CSOH 148.
Worbey v Campbell [2016] CSOH 148; [2017] CSIH 49.
Worbey v Campbell [2017] CSIH 49.
Worbey v Campbell [2017] CSIH 49.
Worbey v Campbell [2017] CSIH 49.
Worbey v Campbell [2017] CSIH 49.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016a). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016b). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016c). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016d). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016e). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016f). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Worthington, S., Worthington, S., & Sealy, L. S. (2016g). Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law (Eleventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Zurich GSG Ltd v Gray & Kellas [2007] CSOH 91; 2007 SLT 917.
