1.
U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Issues [Internet]. Available from: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/119526/Full_Text.pdf
2.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
DCAF - Publications - The Definition of a National Strategic Concept [Internet]. Available from: https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/DCAF_BG_9_National%20Security%20Policies.11.15.pdf
4.
van Eekelen W. DCAF - Publications - The Definition of a National Strategic Concept [Internet]. Available from: http://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/WIM%2520Nepal%2520DCAF%2520Strategic%2520Concept%2520low.pdf
5.
Kennedy PM. Grand strategies in war and peace. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1991.
6.
A.G S. How Nation States Craft National Security Strategy Documents [Internet]. Carlisle, PA.: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College; p. 1–17. Available from: https://www.globalsecurity.org/jhtml/jframe.html#https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2012/ssi_stolberg.pdf|||How%20Nation-States%20Craft%20National%20Security%20Strategy%20Documents
7.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
8.
Drew, Dennis M. Making Strategy: An Introduction to National Security Processes and Problems. 1988; Available from: https://media.defense.gov/2017/Apr/06/2001728005/-1/-1/0/B_0023_DREW_SNOW_MAKING_STRATEGY.PDF
9.
Schmidt H. A Grand Strategy for the West: the anachronism of national strategies in an interdependent world. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1985.
10.
National Security Strategies of the 21st Century: Five Minutes with Chuck Hagel | Georgetown Journal of International Affairs [Internet]. Available from: https://www.georgetownjournalofinternationalaffairs.org/online-edition/national-security-strategies-of-the-21st-century-five-minutes-with-chuck-hagel
11.
Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe [EU Global Security Strategy] [Internet]. Available from: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
12.
Missiroli A. Towards An EU Global Strategy [Internet]. Paris: EUISS; 2015. Available from: https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/EUGS_Expert_Opinions.pdf
13.
Simon L. Geopolitical change, grand strategy and European security: The EU-NATO conundrum [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137029133
14.
Biscop S, Coelmont J. Europe, strategy and armed forces: the making of a distinctive power [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=743960
15.
Biscop S, Whitman RG. The Routledge handbook of European security. London: Routledge; 2013.
16.
Contemporary Security Policy: Vol 37, No 3. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcsp20/current
17.
National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015.
18.
Biscop S. All or nothing? The EU Global Strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy. 2016 Sep;37(3):431–445.
19.
BLAGDEN D. Global multipolarity, European security and implications for UK grand strategy: back to the future, once again. International Affairs. 2015 Mar;91(2):333–350.
20.
CORNISH P, DORMAN AM. Complex security and strategic latency: the UK Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015. International Affairs. 2015 Mar;91(2):351–370.
21.
Hammerstad A, Boas I. National security risks? Uncertainty, austerity and other logics of risk in the UK government’s National Security Strategy. Cooperation and Conflict. 2015 Dec 1;50(4):475–491.
22.
How Nation-States Craft National Security Strategy Documents [Internet]. Available from: https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pdffiles/PUB1128.pdf
23.
Galeotti M. The politics of security in modern Russia. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Co; 2010.
24.
The Russian Federation’s National Security Strategy [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf
25.
Russia’s New National Security Strategy: Familiar Themes, Gaudy Rhetoric [Internet]. Available from: https://warontherocks.com/2016/01/russias-new-national-security-strategy-familiar-themes-gaudy-rhetoric/
26.
Makarychev A. Security Agenda in Russia: Academic Concepts, Political Discourses, and Institutional Practices. In: Kaldor M, Rangelov I, editors. The Handbook of Global Security Policy [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. p. 408–425. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118442975.ch23
27.
Forsberg T, Herd G. Russia and NATO: From Windows of Opportunities to Closed Doors. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015 Jan 2;23(1):41–57.
28.
Alla Kassianova. Russia: Still Open to the West? Evolution of the State Identity in the Foreign Policy and Security Discourse. Europe-Asia Studies [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.; 2001;53(6):821–839. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/826442
29.
Lilly B. Russian foreign policy toward missile defense: actors, motivations, and influence. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books; 2014.
30.
Tichý L. Security and Foreign Policy of Dmitry Medvedev in the Period 2008–2012. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. 2014 Oct 2;27(4):533–552.
31.
NATO LibGuides: NATO 2010 Strategic Concept: Home [Internet]. Available from: http://www.natolibguides.info/nsc
32.
Odgaard L. Strategy in NATO: Preparing for an imperfect world [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137382054
33.
Rutherford IP. NATO’s New Strategic Concept, Nuclear Weapons, and Global Zero. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis. 2011 Jun 1;66(2):463–482.
34.
Simon L. Geopolitical change, grand strategy and European security: The EU-NATO conundrum [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137029133
35.
RYNNING S. The geography of the Atlantic peace: NATO 25 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. International Affairs. 2014 Nov;90(6):1383–1401.
36.
Sean Kay. What Went Wrong with NATO? Cambridge Review of International Affairs [Internet]. Taylor & Francis GroupAbingdon, UK; Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557570500059589
37.
NOETZEL T, SCHREER B. Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change. International Affairs. 2009 Mar;85(2):211–226.
38.
Asmus RD. Opening NATO’s door: how the alliance remade itself for a new era. New York: Columbia University Press; 2002.
39.
YOST DS. NATO’s evolving purposes and the next Strategic Concept. International Affairs. 2010 Mar;86(2):489–522.
40.
Gheorghe I, Ilie M, Ilie AM. THE NEW STRATEGIC CONCEPT NATO 2010. Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM) [Internet]. 2(1):51–56. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=75139
41.
Zapolskis M. 1999 and 2010 NATO Strategic Concepts: A Comparative Analysis. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review [Internet]. 10(1):35–56. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/lasr.2012.10.issue-1/v10243-012-0012-5/v10243-012-0012-5.xml
42.
Zapolskis M. Redefining the Euro-Atlantic Security Agenda: What is the Role for the New NATO Strategic Concept? Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review [Internet]. (23):29–51. Available from: https://www-ceeol-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/search/article-detail?id=183441
43.
Constantin Moştoflei. NATO STRATEGIC CONCEPT – DETERMINATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES. Strategic Impact [Internet]. 49(4):12–16. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www-ceeol-com/search/article-detail?id=17608
44.
Rotfeld AD. NATO 2020: A New Strategic Concept of the Alliance. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs [Internet]. (4):5–25. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=270417
45.
Hatfield, Richard. NATO’s New Strategic Concept. The RUSI Journal [Internet]. 144(6). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1305572918?pq-origsite=summon
46.
National Security Strategy (February 2015) United States Government [Internet]. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy.pdf
47.
Stephen G. Brooks. Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 2012;37(3):7–51. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/492406
48.
Edstrom H, Matlary JH, Petersson M. NATO: The power of partnerships [Internet]. Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy; S.Kay. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230297500
49.
Craig C. Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 2013;38(2):181–199. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/523385
50.
Snow DM, Haney PJ. American foreign policy in a new era. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson; 2013.
51.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Obama and the world: new directions in US foreign policy [Internet]. Second edition. Parmar I, Miller LB, Ledwidge M, editors. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1675953
52.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. National security under the Obama administration [Internet]. First edition. Rajaee BM, Miller MJ, editors. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=868380
53.
Christopher Layne. The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 2006;31(2):7–41. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137515
54.
Romaniuk SN, Grice F, editors. The future of US warfare [Internet]. London, [England]: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315557892
55.
Quinn A. The United States. In: Kaldor M, Rangelov I, editors. The Handbook of Global Security Policy [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. p. 446–462. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118442975.ch25
56.
Campbell Craig. Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 2013;38(2):181–199. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/523385
57.
Cox M, Stokes D, editors. US foreign policy. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
58.
Miller PD. Five Pillars of American Grand Strategy. Survival. 2012 Nov;54(5):7–44.
59.
Hemmer C. Continuity and Change in the Obama Administration’s National Security Strategy. Comparative Strategy. 2011 Jul;30(3):268–277.
60.
Ettinger A. U.S. national security strategies: Patterns of continuity and change, 1987–2015. Comparative Strategy. 2017 Mar 15;36(2):115–128.
61.
Full Text: Xi Jinping’s keynote speech at the World Economic Forum _china.org.cn [Internet]. Available from: http://www.china.org.cn/node_7247529/content_40569136.htm
62.
Le Corre P, Pollack J. China’s rise: what about a transatlantic dialog? Asia Europe Journal. 2017 Jun;15(2):147–160.
63.
Dian M. The strategic value of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the consequences of abandoning it for the US role in Asia. International Politics. 2017 Sep;54(5):583–597.
64.
Shambaugh DL. Power shift: China and Asia’s new dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005.
65.
Goldstein A. Rising to the challenge: China’s grand strategy and international security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2005.
66.
Fisher R. Reflections on China’s military trajectory and the US Pivot. The US strategic pivot to Asia and cross-strait relations: economic and security dynamics [Internet]. First edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. p. 207–226. Available from: http://gla.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1809209
67.
Odgaard L. Peaceful Coexistence Strategy and China’s Diplomatic Power. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2013 Sep 1;6(3):233–272.
68.
Clarke M, Ricketts A. US grand strategy and national security: the dilemmas of primacy, decline and denial. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2017 Sep 3;71(5):479–498.
69.
Beeson M, Lee-Brown T. The Future of Asian Regionalism: Not What It Used to Be? Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. 2017 May;4(2):195–206.
70.
Stumbaum MBU, Xuefeng S. China. In: Kaldor M, Rangelov I, editors. The Handbook of Global Security Policy [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2014. p. 371–387. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118442975.ch21
71.
Swaine, Michael D. Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy [Internet]. RAND Corporation; 2000. Available from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1121.html
72.
Norton S. China’s grand strategy. University of Sydney; 2015; Available from: https://sydney.edu.au/china_studies_centre/images/content/ccpublications/policy_paper_series/2015/chinas-grand-strategy.pdf
73.
Zhang F. Chinese hegemony: grand strategy and international institutions in East Asian history [Internet]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804793896.001.0001
74.
Dian M. The strategic value of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the consequences of abandoning it for the US role in Asia. International Politics. 2017 Sep;54(5):583–597.