1
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Porter G, et al. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics, Chapter 1. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
2
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials, Chapter 1. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
3
Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994;309:184–184. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184
4
Muirhead W. When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice. Journal of Medical Ethics 2012;38:195–6. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100136
5
Gillon R. When four principles are too many: a commentary. Journal of Medical Ethics 2012;38:197–8. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100385
6
Foster C. Autonomy in the Medico-Legal Courtroom: A Principle fit for Purpose? Medical Law Review 2013;22:48–63. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwt039
7
Foster C, Miola J. Who’s in Charge? The Relationship Between Medical Law, Medical Ethics, and Medical Morality? Medical Law Review 2015;23:505–30. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv004
8
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Porter G, et al. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics, Chapter 5. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
9
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials, Chapter 3. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
10
Mulheron R. Trumping Bolam: A Critical Legal Analysis of Bolitho’s "Gloss”. The Cambridge Law Journal 2010;69:609–38. doi:10.1017/S0008197310000826
11
Miola J. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]: Medical Law’s Accordion. In: Landmark cases in medical law. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201438
13
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee.
14
Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority.
16
Williams v Bermuda Hospitals Board.
17
Brazier M, Miola J. Bye-bye Bolam: a medical litigation revolution? Medical Law Review 2000;8:85–114. doi:10.1093/medlaw/8.1.85
18
Heywood R. The logic of Bolitho. Professional Negligence 2006;22.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI21C07EA0001C11DC8AEF929ED2972873%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
19
Maclean A. Beyond Bolam and Bolitho. Medical Law International 2002;5:205–30. doi:10.1177/096853320200500305
20
Stewart A. ‘Best interests’: towards a more patient-friendly law? Edinburgh Law Review 2007;11.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIC15A4C304A5C11DD8F5AD5BBDD350CBC%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
21
Teff H. The standard of care in medical negligence - moving on from Bolam? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1998;18:473–84. doi:10.1093/ojls/18.3.473
22
Are the Courts Excessively Deferential to the Medical Profession? Medical Law Review 2001;9:1–16. doi:10.1093/medlaw/9.1.1
23
Amirthalingam K. Causation and the medical duty to refer. Law Quarterly Review Published Online First: 2012.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?sp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=ID1FEB4C06F2111E1900BAA4302CC6BEE
24
Foster C. A material contribution to forensic clarity. The New Law Journal;166.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5J6Y-6671-DYJD-X096&csi=280276&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
25
Hobson C. Williams v the Bermuda Hospitals Board: Pro-Patient, but for Ambiguities Which Remain. Medical Law Review 2017;25:126–37. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fww041
26
Maskrey S, Edia W. Chester v Afshar and Gregg v Scott: mixed messages for lawyers. Journal of Personal Injury Law 2005;3:205–23.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICA10DA10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
27
Green S. Contributing to the risk of confusion? Causation in the Court of Appeal. Law Quarterly Review Published Online First: 2009.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?csp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=I09E8E0D0C02611DD83FAE07C467B4925
28
Stauch M. ‘Material Contribution’ as a Response to Causal Uncertainty: Time for a Rethink. The Cambridge Law Journal 2009;68. doi:10.1017/S0008197309000269
29
Turton G. A Case For Clarity in Causation? Medical Law Review 2008;17:140–7. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn029
30
Roe v Ministry of Health.
33
Maynard v W. Midlands Health Authority.
34
Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospital.
36
Marriott v West Midlands RHA.
37
Wisniewski v Central Manchester Health Authority.
38
Penney v East Kent HA.
39
Morris (A Child by his Mother & Litigation Friend) v Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust.
40
Birch v University College London NHS Trust.
42
Honisz v Lothian Health Board.
43
Brown v The Scarborough & North East Yorkshire Healthcare NHS Trust.
44
Carter v Ministry of Justice.
45
Glancy v The Southern General Hospital NHS Trust.
46
Hannigan v Lanarkshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust.
47
C v North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust.
48
KR v Lanarkshire Health Board [2016] CSOH 133.
51
Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington.
52
Kay’s Tutor v Ayrshire and Arran Health Board.
53
Hotson v East Berkshire.
56
Gouldsmith v Mid Staffordshire General Hospitals NHS Trust.
57
Bailey v Ministry of Defence.
58
Canning-Kishver v Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust.
59
Wright (A Child) v Cambridge Medical Group (A Partnership).
60
John v Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
61
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Porter G, et al. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics, Chapter 5, ‘Criminal Negligence’ pp 174-178. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
62
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials, Chapter 3, ‘The Criminal Law’ pp182-187. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
63
Alghrani A, Bennett R, Ost S, editors. Bioethics, medicine, and the criminal law: Volume 1: The criminal law and bioethical conflict : walking the tightrope. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177382
64
Brazier M, Alghrani A. Fatal medical malpractice and criminal liability. Professional Negligence 2009;25.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI37D98810EC5211DEA990E8403C437E97%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
65
Quick O. Medicine, Mistakes and Manslaughter: A Criminal Combination? The Cambridge Law Journal 2010;69. doi:10.1017/S0008197310000231
66
Quick O. Expert Evidence and Medical Manslaughter: Vagueness in Action. Journal of Law and Society 2011;38:496–518. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00556.x
67
R v Rose (Honey Maria).
71
R v Adomako (John Asare).
72
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, ss 20-21.
73
Health (Tobacco, Nicotine etc. and Care) (Scotland) Act 2016, ss 26-28.
74
Kazarian M, Griffiths D, Brazier M. Criminal responsibility for medical malpractice in France. Professional Negligence 2011;27.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI4CA309F027B611E1A6AFBF6CE47F523B%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
75
Lodge A. Gross Negligence Manslaughter on the Cusp. The Journal of Criminal Law 2017;81:125–42. doi:10.1177/0022018317694719
76
Quick O. Prosecuting ‘Gross’ Medical Negligence: Manslaughter, Discretion, and the Crown Prosecution Service. Journal of Law and Society 2006;33:421–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00365.x
77
McCall-Smith A. Criminal Negligence and the Incompetent Doctor. Medical Law Review 1993;1:336–49. doi:10.1093/medlaw/1.3.336
79
Transco plc v HM Advocate.
80
Laird K. Filling a Lacuna: The Care Worker and Care Provider Offences in the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. Statute Law Review 2016;37:1–18. doi:10.1093/slr/hmv020
81
The new criminal sanctions of wilful neglect or ill-treatment - The MDU. https://www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/latest-updates-and-advice/the-new-criminal-sanctions-of-wilful-neglect-or-ill-treatment
82
BMA/s Written Submission to the Health and Sport Committee. http://www.parliament.scot/S4_HealthandSportCommittee/Inquiries/HTNC017_-_BMA_Scotland.pdf
83
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Porter G, et al. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics, Chapter 5.01-5.17. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
84
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials, pp 169-174. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
85
Douglas T. Medical Injury Compensation: Beyond ‘No-Fault’. Medical Law Review 2008;17:30–51. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn022
86
Farrell A-M, Harpwood V. Farrell, A-M. ‘No-Fault Compensation for Medical Injury: Principles, Practice and Prospects for Reform’ Chapter 10; and V. Harpwood Clinical Negligence and Poor Quality Care: Is Wales ‘Putting Things Right’? Chapter 9. In: Ferguson PR, Laurie GT, eds. Inspiring a medico-legal revolution: essays in honour of Sheila McLean. Farnham, Surrey: : Ashgate 2015. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=2039138
87
Harris J. The injustice of compensation for victims of medical accidents. BMJ 1997;314:1821–1821. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7097.1821
88
Oliphant K. Beyond Misadventure: Compensation for Medical Injuries in New Zealand. Medical Law Review 2007;15:357–91. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwm016
89
Quick O. Patient safety and the problem and potential of law. Professional Negligence 2012;28.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB97DCF91C4CF11E180C19F9AB713BD06%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
90
Volume 1 - No Fault Compensation Review Group Report and Recommendations. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Policy/No-Fault-Compensation/ReviewGroupVol1
91
‘No-Blame’ Redress scheme: A Public Consultation on Draft Proposals for a ‘No-blame’ Redress Scheme in Scotland for Harm Resulting from Clinical Treatment Scottish Government 22 March: 2016, pp 1-16. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/03/7618
92
Introducing a Rapid Resolution and Redress Scheme for Severe Avoidable Birth Injury - Department of Health - Citizen Space. https://consultations.dh.gov.uk/rapid-resolution-and-redress/maternity-litigation/
93
Dauer EA. Strong reciprocity and accountability: behavioural analysis of patients’ legal responses to medical injury. International Journal of Law in Context 2006;2. doi:10.1017/S1744552306003041
94
Hedley S. Making sense of negligence. Legal Studies 2016;36:491–512. doi:10.1111/lest.12121
95
No Fault Compensation Review Group, See No-Fault Compensation Schemes for Medical Injury: A Review (Vol II); A study of medical negligence claiming in Scotland 2012 Volume III. http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Policy/No-Fault-Compensation
96
Consultation Report - Consultation on recommendations for no-fault compensation in Scotland for injuries resulting from clinical treatment. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2014/04/6437/downloads#res447863
97
Responses to the recent consultation on "Recommendations for No-Fault Compensation in Scotland for Injuries Resulting from Clinical Treatment”. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2013/02/4882/downloads
98
Rapid resolution and redress scheme for severe birth injury - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/rapid-resolution-and-redress-scheme-for-severe-birth-injury
99
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials, Chapter 10. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
100
Goldberg R. R. Goldberg Medicinal Product Liability and Regulation Oxford, Hart Publishing 2013 Ch 1 – ‘Medicinal Product Liability in Context’; and Ch 8 ‘The Development Risk Defence and Medicinal Products’. In: Medicinal product liability and regulation. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
101
A and Others v National Blood Authority and Others.
102
Commission v UK Case C-300/95.
103
Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v AOK Sachsen-Anhalt - Die Gesundheitskasse (C-503/13).
104
Wilkes v DePuy International Ltd.
105
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v G.
106
Consumer Protection Act 1987, Part I (esp. Sections 3 & 4).
107
EU Directive - Products Liability 85/374/EEC, esp. Preamble; Articles 6 & 7.
108
Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 c.17.
109
Bergkamp L. Is There a Defect in the European Court’s Defect Test? Musings about Acceptable Risk. European Journal of Risk Regulation 2015;6:309–22. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00004633
110
Van Leeuwen B, Verbruggen P. Resuscitating EU Product Liability Law? Contemplating the Effects of Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. AOK Sachsen-Anhalt and Betriebskrankenkasse RWE (Joined Cases C-503/13 and C-504/13). SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2015. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2639582
111
Eisler J. One Step Forward and Two Steps Back in Product Liability: The Search for Clarity in the Identification of Defects. The Cambridge Law Journal 2017;76:233–6. doi:10.1017/S0008197317000472
112
Harvey M. Wilkes v Depuy International Ltd. Journal of Personal Injury Law 2017;3:C128–38.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI39717C108D9D11E7876EC640A7B18BC3%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
113
Howells G, Mildred M. Infected Blood: Defect and Discoverability A First Exposition of the EC Product Liability Directive. The Modern Law Review 2002;65:95–106. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00369
114
Laing J. Consumer Protection Act 1987: Liability for Defective Products. Medical Law Review 2002;10:82–8. doi:10.1093/medlaw/10.1.82
115
Pugh C, Pilgerstorfer M. The development risk defence - knowledge, discoverability and creative leaps. Journal of Personal Injury Law 2004;4:258–69.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICA22B460E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
116
Fairgrieve D, Howells G. Rethinking Product Liability: A Missing Element in the European Commission’s Third Review of the European Product Liability Directive. Modern Law Review 2007;70:962–78. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00672.x
117
Millward G. A Disability Act? The Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 and the British Government’s Response to the Pertussis Vaccine Scare. Social History of Medicine Published Online First: 4 August 2016. doi:10.1093/shm/hkv140
118
Cave E. Voluntary vaccination: the pandemic effect. Legal Studies 2017;37:279–304. doi:10.1111/lest.12144
119
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Porter G, et al. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
120
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
121
Statutory duty of candour in secondary care - The MDU. https://www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/guides/statutory-duty-of-candour/statutory-duty-of-candour
122
Chatterton v Gerson [1981] QB 432, [1981] 1 All ER 257.
123
Re T (adult: refusal of medical treatment) ) [1992] 4 All ER 649, [1993] 3 WLR 782. 1992.
124
Re AK (adult patient) (medical treatment: consent) (2001) 58 BMLR 151.
125
Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [2002] 2 All ER 449, (2002) 65 BMLR 149.
126
3373High Court of Justice Family Division1 May 2012Before: Mrs. Justice Theis 1st May 2012Crown copyright. X Primary Care Trust v XB [2012] EWHC 1390.
127
/2086Court of Appeal (Civil Division)28 July 2005Before: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers , MR Lord Justice Waller and Lord Justice Wall Thursday 28th July, 2005Crown copyright. R v General Medical Council, ex p. Burke [2005] EWCA Civ 1003 (CA).
128
Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] 2 WLR 480. 1985.
129
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.
130
Border v Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust (formerly South London Healthcare NHS Trust) [2015] EWCA Civ 8 (CA).
131
Connolly v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1339 (QB) (QBD).
132
( The Lord Justice-Clerk (Wheatley), Lords Leechman and Thomson)24 January 1975(c) W. Green & Son Limited. Smart v HMA 1975 SLT 65 [*65 Smart v H.M. Advocate].
133
R v Cox (1992) 12 BMLR 38.
134
Dec. 1, 2, 3, 7; 1993 March 11(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75, [1994] 1 AC 212 (HL).
135
7/93, 21826/93, 21974/93Before the European Court of Human Rights19 February 1997(The President , Mr R. Bernhardt ; Judges Pettiti , Russo , Spielmann , Freeland , Rocha , Wildhaber , Kūris , Levits )19 February 1997. Laskey v United Kingdom (1997) 24 HERR 39.
136
Sir John Donaldson M.R., Fox and Stephen Brown L.JJ. McCowan J.1984 Feb. 22, 23; March 71983 May 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Freeman v Home Office (No.2), [1984] QB 524, [1984] 1 All ER.
137
Re MB [1997] 8 Med LR 217, [1997] 38 BMLR 175 CA, [1997] 2 FCR 541.
138
St George’s NHS Trust v S [1999] Fam 26.
139
Before: Mr. Justice Mostyn In PrivateDate: Thursday, 23rd August 2012Crown copyright. Re AA (Compulsorily Detained Patient: Elective Caesarean), Re [2012] EWHC 4378 (COP); [2014] 2 F.L.R. 237 (CP)].
140
/02Before the European Court of Human Rights29 April 2002( The President , Judge Pellonpää ; Judges Bratza , Palm , Makarczyk , Fischbach , Casadevall , Pavlovschi )29 April 2002. Pretty v United Kingdom (Application 2346/02) 29 April 2002 (2002) 35 EHRR 1, (2002) 66 BMLR 147 (ECHR).
141
R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v Ministry of Justice; R (on the application of AM) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38.
142
8High Court of Justice Queens Bench Division18 February 2005Before: The Hon Mr Justice Simon Date: 18 February 2005, Hearing dates: 31 January, 1–4 February 2005Crown copyright. Al Hamwi v Johnston, The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust [2005] EWHC 206 (QB).
143
Poynter v Hillingdon Health Authority (1997) 37 BMLR 192.
144
8High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division19 May 2015Before: Mr Justice Nicol Date: 19/05/2015Crown copyright. ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 1394 (QB).
145
ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 336 (16 May 2017). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/336.html
146
Feng TK. Failure of medical advice: trespass or negligence. Legal Studies 1987;7.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd7&id=157
147
Komrad MS. A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patient’s autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics 1983;9:38–44. doi:10.1136/jme.9.1.38
148
Wicks E. The Right to Refuse Medical Treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights. Medical Law Review 2001;9:17–40. doi:10.1093/medlaw/9.1.17
149
MacLean AR. Consent, sectionalisation and the concept of medical procedure. Journal of Medical Ethics;28.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A90796838&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authCount=1#
150
Teff H. H.Teff, ‘Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance.’ (1985) 101 Law Quarterly Rev 432–453. The Law quarterly review 1985;101:432–53.
151
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Seventh edition. New York, New York: : Oxford University Press 2013.
152
BBC News | SCOTLAND | Surgeon defends amputations, 31 January, 2000. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/625680.stm
153
BMA: The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on Medical Decision Making (2000). http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/BMA-human-rights/
154
GMC: Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008). http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/consent_guidance_index.asp
155
Department of Health, Reference Guide to Consent for Examination and Treatment, 2nd Edn, 2009, London, Department of Health. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reference-guide-to-consent-for-examination-or-treatment-second-edition
156
BMA - Consent tool kit. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/consent/consent-tool-kit
157
A Good Practice Guide on Consent for Health Professionals in NHS Scotland (Scottish Executive Health Department, 2006). 2006.http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/mels/HDL2006_34.pdf
158
Müller S. Sabine Müller, ‘Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID)—Is the Amputation of Healthy Limbs Ethically Justified?’ The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 9 (1) 2009. The American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9:36–43. doi:10.1080/15265160802588194
159
Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal and the Maudsley Hospital [1985] 2 WLR 480. 1985.
160
Pearce and another v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1998] EWCA Civ 865, [1999] PIQR P53, (1999) 48 BMLR 118.
161
Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41. 2004.
162
Birch v University College London NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 2237, 104 BMLR 168.
163
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11.
164
Moyes v Lothian Health Board [1990] 1 Med LR 463. 1990.
165
Goorkani v Tayside Health Board [1991] 1 Med LR 33. 1991.
166
Smith v Tunbridge Wells Health Authority [1994] 5 Med LR 334. 1994.
167
Newell and Newell v Goldenberg [1995] 6 Med LR 371. 1995.
168
8High Court of Justice Queens Bench Division18 February 2005Before: The Hon Mr Justice Simon Date: 18 February 2005, Hearing dates: 31 January, 1–4 February 2005Crown copyright. Al Hamwi v Johnston, The North West London Hospitals NHS Trust [2005] EWHC 206 (QB).
169
Opinion of Lord Boyd of Duncansby 1 March 2013(c) Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. 1999. Glancy v Southern General Hospital NHS Trust [2013] CSOH 35; 2013 G.W.D. 10-221 (OH).
170
Wright (a child by her Demelza Wright her litigation friend) v Cambridge Medical Group [2011] EWCA Civ 669.
171
Crown copyright. Meiklejohn v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 120; [2014] Med. L.R. 122.
172
High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division31 March 2015Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Dingemans Date: 20/04/2015Crown copyright. A v East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWHC 1038 (QB); [2015] Med LR 262.
173
Rogers v Whitaker [1993] 4 Med LR 79. 1993.
174
Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55, [1998] 72 Australian Law Journal Reports 1344, [1999] Lloyd’s Law Reports (Medical) 223. London: : LLP Professional Pub 1998.
175
Farrell AM, Brazier M. Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board’. Journal of Medical Ethics 2016;42:85–8. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102861
176
Vickery S. Revisiting consent: communication of risks, medical paternalism versus patient autonomy. Coventry Law Journal 2015;20:40–5.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6CF45120306111E5BC5EF319DA6D29FE%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
177
Johnston L. Informed consent and the lingering shadow of Chester v Afshar: Part 1. Scots Law Timeshttps://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIF5F2C420148211E589A4A4CE49B8FEF0%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
178
Johnston L. Informed consent and the lingering shadow of Chester v Afshar: Part 2. Scots Law Timeshttps://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI9FA593A01ACB11E58C72BE1A3BED0105%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
179
Montgomery J, Montgomery E. Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision? Journal of Medical Ethics 2016;42:89–94. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102862
180
Hogg MA. Re-establishing Orthodoxy in the Realm of Causation. Edinburgh Law Review 2007;11:8–30.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr11&id=14
181
Stapleton J. Occam’s razor reveals an orthodox basis for Chester v Afshar. Law Quarterly Review;:426–48.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI92B0E190FC8011DAA462ECB8AE6EC68E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
182
Maclean A. From Sidaway to Pearce and beyond: is the legal regulation of consent any better following a quarter of a century of judicial scrutiny? Medical Law Review 2012;20:108–29. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwr040
183
Miola J. J.Miola ‘On the Materiality of Risk: Paper Tigers and Panaceas’ (2009) 17 Medical Law Review 76-108. Medical Law Review 2008;17:76–108. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn024
184
Mason JK, Brodie D. Bolam, Bolam - wherefore are thou Bolam? Edinburgh Law Review 2005;9:298–306.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr9&id=304
185
Maclean AR. The Doctrine of Informed Consent: Does It Exist and Has It Crossed the Atlantic? Legal Studies 2004;24:386–413.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd24&id=398
186
Hobson C. No (,) More Bolam Please: Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. The Modern Law Review 2016;79:488–503. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12194
187
Heywood R. R.I.P. Sidaway: Patient-Orientated Disclosure – A Standard Worth Waiting For? Medical Law Review 2015;23:455–66. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv024
188
Reid E. E. Reid, ‘Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and the Rights of the Reasonable Patient (2015) Edinburgh Law Review 19(3) 360-366. Edinburgh Law Review 2015;19:360–6. doi:10.3366/elr.2015.0295
189
Junor G. Junor, G. ‘Case Comment: Glancy v Southern General Hospital NHS Trust’ SLT 2013, 35, 243-246. Scots Law Times 2013;35:243–6.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6249E4D0429F11E3A5AADD6B3922D809%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
190
Sutherland L. Causation in consent cases: where are we now following Montgomery in the Supreme Court? Reparation Bulletin 2015;124:3–6.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3AAC716009F711E5BF9F8241925ED0A8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
191
Heywood R. Heywood, R. ‘Subjectivity in risk disclosure: considering the position of the particular patient’ (2009) 25(1) Professional Negligence 3-14. Professional Negligence 2009;25:3–14.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI40B98B607B2D11DE93A8DB25A7A7B399%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
192
Hogg M. M.Hogg ‘Duties of care, causation, and the implications of Chester v Afshar.’ (2005) 9(1) Edinburgh Law Review 156-167. Edinburgh Law Review 2005;9.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr9&collection=journals&id=162
193
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
194
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. 5th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
195
Elliston S, Dawson Books. The best interests of the child in healthcare. London: : Routledge-Cavendish 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203940464
196
Family Law Reform Act 1969 S8.
197
Children Act 1989 c. 41. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/data.xht?wrap=true
198
Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1991/50/contents
199
Children (Scotland) Act 1995. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/36/contents
200
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 s186 Consent of child to medical examination or treatment. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2011/1/section/186
201
Re T (a minor) (Wardship Medical treatment) [1997] 1 WLR 242, [1997] 1 All ER 906, 35 BMLR 63 (CA). 1997.
202
High Court of Justice Family Division15 August 2003Before : The Honourable Mr. Justice Johnson Date: Friday, 15th August 2003Crown copyright. Re: ‘P’ (Minor), Bro Morgannwg NHS Trust v ‘P’ and Others 15 August 2003 [2003] EWHC 2327 (Fam) 2003 WL 23508999.
203
Re J (child’s religious upbringing and circumcision) [2000] 1 FCR 307, 52 BMLR 82.
204
Re C (A Child) (Immunisation: Parental Rights) (2003) 73 BMLR 152 (CA).
205
Re A (children) (conjoined twins: surgical separation) [2001] 57 BMLR 1 (CA).
206
9High Court of Justice Family Division15 March 2006Before : Mr Justice Holman Date: 15th March 2006, Hearing dates: 2nd–9th March 2006Crown copyright. An NHS Trust v MB [2006] EWHC 507 (Fam); [2006] 2 FLR 319; [2006] Fam. Law 445.
207
High Court of Justice Family Division18 July 2007Before: Mr Justice Holman Date: 18/07/2007, Hearing dates: 4th, 5th and 9th July 2007Crown copyright. NHS Trust v A (A Child) [2007] EWHC 1696 (Fam); [2008] 1 FLR 70; [2008] 1 FCR 34.
208
Crown copyright. Portsmouth City Council v King 08 September 2014 [2014] EWHC 2964 (Fam).
209
Before: Sir James Munby President of the Family Division12 September 2016Crown copyright. Re E (A Child) (Medical Treatment [2016] EWHC 2267 (Fam).
210
Finlayson, Applicant 1989 SCLR 601.
211
Re O [1993] FLR 149. 1993.
212
Re S (children) (specific issue order: religion, circumcision) [2005] 1 FLR 236. 1993.
213
Before: Mr. Justice Keehan Date: Thursday, 13th February 2014Crown copyright. Birmingham Children’s NHS Trust v B 13 February 2014 [2014] EWHC 531 (Fam).
214
South Glamorgan County Council v B and W [1993] 11 BMLR 162.
215
Re C (a child HIV test) [1999] 3 FCR 289.
216
Re A [2000] 1 FLR 549.
217
Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC , Baroness Hale of Richmond DPSC , Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony , Lord Carnwath , Lord Hughes JJSC 2013 July 24; Oct 30(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67; [2014] AC 591; [2013] 3 WLR 1299; [2014] 1 All E.R. 573.
218
Dec 5, 6; 11; 17(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Simms v Simms and Another [2003] Fam 83 [2002] EWHC 2734.
219
8High Court of Justice Family Division5 September 2013Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice Theis Date: 05/09/2013Crown copyright. F v F (MMR Vaccine) Also known as: F v F (Welfare of Children: Immunisation) 05 September 2013 [2013] EWHC 2683.
220
9High Court of Justice Family Division17 December 2013Before: Mr Justice Holman (sitting in public)Date: Tuesday, 17th December 2013Crown copyright. Re TM (Medical Treatment) Family Division 17 December 2013 [2013] EWHC 4103 (Fam).
221
7/00Before the European Court of Human Rights9 March 2004(The President , Judge Pellonpää ; Judges Bratza , Casadevall , Maruste , Pavlovschi , Borrego Borrego and Fura-Sandström )March 9, 2004. Glass v United Kingdom (2004) 39 EHRR 15 ECHR.
222
Templeman and Dunn L.JJ. 1981 Aug. 7(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Re B (a minor) [1981] 1 WLR 1421, [1990] 3 All ER.
223
Re J (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment [1990] 3 All ER 930. 1990.
224
Re J (a minor) [1991] 2 WLR 140, [1990] 3 All ER 930, 6 BMLR 25. 1990.
225
Portsmouth NHS Trust v Wyatt [2005] 1 FLR 21. 2004.
226
High Court of Justice Family Division3 October 201Before: Mr Justice Moor Date: 3rd October 2014Crown copyright. Kirklees Council v RE [2014] EWHC 3182 (Fam); [2015] 1 FLR 1316; [2015] 2 FCR 438.
227
High Court of Justice Family Division24 June 2015 Before: The Honourable Mr Justice MacDonald Date: 24/06/2015Crown copyright. Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v MH [2015] EWHC 1920 (Fam).
228
Heywood R. Parents and medical professionals: conflict, cooperation, and best interests. Medical Law Review 2012;20:29–44. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwr037
229
Hagger L. The child as vulnerable patient: protection and empowerment. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate Pub 2009.
230
Meyers DW. Wyatt and Winston-Jones: who decides to treat or let die seriously ill babies? Edinburgh Law Review 2005;9:307–16.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr9&collection=journals&id=313
231
Brazier M. An Intractable Dispute: When Parents and Professionals Disagree. Medical Law Review 2005;13:412–8. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi029
232
Department of Health, Seeking Consent: working with young people, 2001. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120106063807/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4067204.pdf
233
British Medical Association, Dawson Books. Consent, rights and choices in health care for children and young people. London: : BMJ Books 2001. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780585394022
234
Larcher V, Craig F, Bhogal K, et al. Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice: Archives of Disease in Childhood 2015;100:s1–23. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306666
235
Elliston S, Dawson Books. The best interests of the child in healthcare. London: : Routledge-Cavendish 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203940464
236
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and another. 1985.
237
Re E (a minor) (Wardship:Medical Treatment) [1993] 1 FLR 386. 1993.
238
Re J (a minor) - Refusal of Medical Treatment), New Law Journal, 1123, (1992). New Law Journal 1992.
239
Re R (a minor) [1991] 4 All ER 177. 1991.
240
Re W (a minor) - Refusal of Medical Treatment, New Law Journal, 1124, (1992). The New law journal 1992.
241
Re M (medical treatment: consent) [1999] 2 FLR 1097. 1999.
242
Re L (medical treatment: Gillick competency) [1998] 2 FLR 810. 1998.
243
R v Secretary of State for Health and the Family Planning Association, ex p Axon [2006] 1 FCR 175.
244
585TCourt of Protection and High Court of Justice, Family Division1 May 2014Before: Mr Justice Mostyn Date: 01/05/2014Crown copyright. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust v RC, Court of Protection, 01 May 2014 [2014] EWCOP 1317; [2014] Med. L.R. 260.
245
Re JA (A Minor) (Medical Treatment: Child Diagnosed with HIV [2014] EWHC 1135 (Fam); [2015] 2 F.L.R. 1030; [2015] Med. L.R. 26; [2015] Fam. Law 139. 2015.
247
Houston, applicant 1996 SCLR 943; (1996) 32 BMLR 93.
248
Hagger L. Some Implications of the Human Rights Act 1998 for the Medical Treatment of Children. Medical Law International 2003;6:25–51. doi:10.1177/096853320300600103
249
Cave E. E, Cave (April 2013). Young People who Refuse Life Sustaining Treatment: A Briefing Paper on Current Law and the Need for Reform. http://www.law.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/research/cfig/Young-People-who-Refuse-Life-Sustaining-Treatment-Briefing-Paper.pdf
250
Cave E, Stavrinudes Z. E, Cave; Stavrinides, Z (April 2013).Medical Practitioners, Adolescents and Informed Consent Project Final Report. University of Leeds. http://www.law.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/research/cfig/Medical-Practitioners-Adolescents-and-Informed-Consent-Final-Report-2013.pdf
251
Gilmore S, Herring J. ‘No’ is the Hardest Word: Consent and Children’s Autonomy, (2011) 23 (1) C.F.L.Q. 3-25,. Child and family law quarterly 2011;23:1–152.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_01_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_01_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_01_1
252
Cave E, Wallbank J. Minors’ capacity to refuse treatment: a reply to Gilmore and Herring. Medical Law Review 2012;20:423–49. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fws003
253
Alderson, P. Consent to Children’s Surgery and Intensive Medical Treatment. Journal of Law and Society 1990;17:52–65.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty17&id=60
254
Garwood-Gowers A, Tingle J, Lewis T. Healthcare law: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998. London: : Cavendish 2001.
255
Norrie KMck. K. McK.Norrie, ‘The Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991’ (1991) 36 Journal of the Law Society of Scotland 434. The journal of the Law Society of Scotland 1991;36.
256
Edwards L. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent. The Juridical review 1993;1993:52–73.
257
Bridge C. C.Bridge, ‘Adolescents and mental disorder: who consents to treatment?’ (1997) 3 Medical Law International 51-74. Medical law international 1997;3:51–74.
258
Bridge C. Religious Beliefs and Teenage Refusal of Medical Treatment Case. Modern Law Review 1999;62:585–94.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/modlr62&collection=journals&id=599
259
Cave E. Maximisation of Minors’ Capacity. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2011;23:431–49.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq23&collection=journals&id=437
260
Adolescents and informed consent | Nuffield Foundation. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/adolescents-and-informed-consent
261
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
262
Thomson LDG, Cherry J, McManus JJ. Mental health and Scots law in practice. Second edition. Edinburgh: : W. Green 2014. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FBooks%2FMentalHealth%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
263
BMA. Medical treatment for adults with incapacity: guidance on ethical and medico-legal issues in Scotland. 2009.https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni
264
Cave E. Determining Capacity to Make Medical Treatment Decisions: Problems Implementing the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Statute Law Review 2015;36:86–106. doi:10.1093/slr/hmu034
265
Donnelly M. Best interests, patient participation and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Medical Law Review 2008;17:1–29. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn021
266
Donnelly M. Capacity assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Delivering on the functional approach? Legal Studies 2009;29:464–91.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/legstd29&i=468
267
Heywood R. Revisiting Advance Decision making Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: A Tale of Mixed Messages. Medical Law Review 2015;23:81–102. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwu021
268
Samanta J. Lasting Powers of Attorney for Healthcare under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Enhanced Prospective Self Determination for Future Incapacity or a Simulacrum? Medical Law Review 2009;17:377–409. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwp018
269
Maclean AR. Advance Directives and the Rocky Waters of Anticipatory Decision-making. Medical Law Review 2008;16:1–22. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwm019
270
Maclean AR. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making. Medical Law Review 2006;14:291–320. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl009
271
Wrigley A. Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:527–31. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019711
272
F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1990] 2 AC 1.
273
Re T (adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1992] 4 All ER 649. 1992.
274
Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R. , Butler-Sloss and Staughton L.JJ. 1992 July 22, 23, 24; 30(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Re T. (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 3 W.L.R. 782.
275
Re C (Adult - Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819.
276
Thorpe J.1993 Oct. 8, 11; 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Re C (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1994] 1 W.L.R. 290.
277
Edwards R, Butterworths (Firm). Butterworths medico-legal reports. London: : Butterworths 1992.
278
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v C & Anor [2015] EWCOP 80 (30 November 2015).
279
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust v JB [2014] EWCOP 342 (17 February 2014).
280
SB (A Patient; Capacity To Consent To Termination), Re [2013] EWCOP 1417 (21 May 2013).
281
Wye Valley NHS Trust v B (Rev 1) [2015] EWCOP 60 (28 September 2015).
282
Surrey And Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust v Ms AB [2015] EWCOP 50 (31 July 2015).
283
A NHS Trust v P& Anor [2013] EWHC 50 COP.
284
A Local Authority v K [2013] EWCOP 242 (15 February 2013).
285
The Mental Health Trust & Ors v DD & Anor [2015] EWCOP 4 (04 February 2015).
286
1473High Court of Justice Court of Protection30 August 2012Before: Mrs. Justice Eleanor King Date: 30/08/2012Crown copyright. The NHS Trust v L & Others [2012] EWHC 2741 (COP).
287
3212Court of Protection15 June 2012Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Jackson Date: 15 June 2012Crown copyright. [A Local Authority v E and others [2012] EWHC 1639.
288
Re AA [2012] EWHC 4378 (COP).
289
Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust v AB [2014] EWCOP 50.
290
The X Primary Care Trust v XB & Anor [2012] EWHC 1390 (Fam).
291
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust v LM [2014] EWCOP 454.
292
Mental Capacity Act 2005.
293
Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice (2007). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/497253/Mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice.pdf
294
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Independent Mental Capacity Advocates) (General) Regulations 2006.
295
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
296
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Regulations 2002/275.
297
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2002/302.
298
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000: Code of Practice (Third Edition). http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2010/10/20153801/0
299
Stephens v Avery and others. 1988.
300
W v Egdell and others. 1990.
301
Re Z (a minor) (freedom of publication). 1995.
302
Campbell v MGN Limited.
304
R (on the application of Axon) v Secretary of State for Health.
305
R v Department of Health ex parte Source Informatics.
306
R. v Department of Health Ex p. Source Informatics Ltd (No.1).
309
TV v Finland (21780/93).
310
Duncan v Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee. 1986.
311
Coco v A. N. Clark (Engineers) LTD.
312
Stephens v Avery and others. 1988.
313
Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers and others (No 2). 1988.
314
Ackroyd v Mersey Care NHS Trust.
315
In Re A Local Authority (Inquiry: Restraint on Publication).
316
ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust (2015).
317
ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017).
318
Palmer v Tees HA (2000).
319
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California.
320
C v Dr Cairns. Lloyd’s law reports: Medical 2003;90.
322
Reisner v. Regents of University of California.
323
Myers v Queensbury 144 Cal App 3d 888; 193 Cal Rptr 733.
324
Pd v Dr Nicholas Harvey.
325
Smith v. Jones, 1998 CanLII 4689 (BC CA). 1998.
326
Mason and McCall Smith’s Law & medical ethics. Tenth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
327
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
328
Herring J. Medical law and ethics. 8th edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2020. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198846956.001.0001
329
Kottow MH. Medical confidentiality: an intransigent and absolute obligation. Journal of Medical Ethics 1986;12:117–22. doi:10.1136/jme.12.3.117
330
Thompson IE. The nature of confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics 1979;5:57–64. doi:10.1136/jme.5.2.57
331
Roy Gilbar. Medical confidentiality and communication with the patient’s family: legal and practical perspectives. 2012;24:139–256.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq24&id=203
332
Case P. Confidence Matters: The Rise and Fall of Informational Autonomy in Medical Law. Medical Law Review 2003;11:208–36. doi:10.1093/medlaw/11.2.208
334
Loughrey J. Can You Keep a Secret - Children, Human Rights, and the Law of Medical Confidentiality. Child and Family Law Quarterly Published Online First: 2008.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=312
335
Dute J. Child Abuse, Human Rights and the Role of the Doctor. European Journal of Health Law Published Online First: 2009.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/eurjhlb16&id=127
336
Reversing the retreat from Gillick? R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health. Child and Family Law Quarterlyhttps://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/5N3S-JHM1-DYK7-S0XN-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
337
British Medical Association. Confidentiality and Disclosure of Health Information Tool Kit. https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/.../ethics/confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf?
338
Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information (2017). https://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/confidentiality.asp
339
Decision tools and other learning materials. 2013.https://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/20473.asp
340
Department of Health. Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/confidentiality-nhs-code-of-practice
341
Best practice guidance for doctors and other health professionals on the provision of advice and treatment to young people under 16 on contraception, sexual and reproductive health : Department of Health - Publications. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121202102500/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4086960
342
United Kingdom. Medical Negligence: Fact, Breach and Bolitho. Medical Law Review 1999;7:327–56. doi:10.1093/medlaw/7.3.327
343
Gilbar R, Foster C. It’s arrived! Relational Autonomy Comes to Court: ABC v ST George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2017] EWCA 336. Medical Law Review Published Online First: 17 October 2017. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwx044
344
Gilbar R, Foster C. Doctors’ Liability to the Patient’s Relatives in Genetic Medicine. Medical Law Review Published Online First: 3 October 2015. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv037
345
Mackay RR. Dangerous Patients: Third Party Safety and Psychiatrists’ Duties - Walking the Tarasoff Tightrope. Medicine, Science and the Law Published Online First: 1990.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mdsclw30&size=2&collection=journals&id=52
346
Almason AL. Personal Liability Implications of the Duty to Warn Are Hard Pills to Swallow: From Tarasoff To Hutchinson v. Patel and Beyond. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy Published Online First: 1997.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jchlp13&start_page=471&collection=journals&id=505
347
Jones C. Tightropes and Tragedies: 25 years of Tarasoff. Medicine, Science and the Law 2003;43:13–22.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mdsclw43&i=13
348
Gavaghan C. A Tarasoff for Europe? A European Human Rights perspective on the duty to protect. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2007;30:255–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.01.001
349
Gavaghan C. Dangerous Patients and Duties to Warn: a European Human Rights Perspective. European Journal of Health Law 2007;14:113–30. doi:10.1163/092902707X205016
350
Information Commissioner’s Office. 2017.https://ico.org.uk/
351
Data Protection Act 1998.
352
Health and Social Care Act 2001 c. 15 Arrangement of Act. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/15/contents
353
Human Rights Act 1998.
354
European Convention on Human Rights.
355
*R v Dica [2004] 3 All E.R. 593. 2004.
356
*R v Dica (2004) 77 B.M.L.R. 243 (CA).
357
/02181/C1Court of Appeal Criminal Division27 July 2005Before: Lord Justice Judge , Mrs Justice Hallett , Mrs Justice Rafferty Wednesday 27th July, 2005Crown copyright. *R v Dica , [2005] EWCA Crim 2304.
358
03166 D4Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)17 March 2005Before: Lord Justice Judge Deputy Chief Justice of England and Wales Mr Justice Grigson and His Honour Judge Radford Thursday 17th March, 2005Crown copyright. *R v Konzani (Feston) [2005] EWCA Crim 706.
359
05243 C2Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)8 May 2014Before: Lord Justice Treacy Mr Justice Bean and His Honour Judge Lakin Date: Thursday 8th May 2014Crown copyright. *R v Golding (David) [2014] EWCA Crim 889.
360
National Aids Trust v National Health Service Commissioning Board (NHS England) (Rev 1) [2016] EWHC 2005 (Admin) (02 August 2016).
361
*HMA v Kelly Friday, 23rd February 2001 (unreported). https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/1186093.stm
362
*HMA v Giovanni Mola 5th April 2007, (unreported). https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/6528885.stm
363
*HMA v Giovanni Mola 5th April 2007, (unreported). https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/6338777.stm
364
*HMA v Devereaux 25th February 2010, (unreported). https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/north_east/8519593.stm
365
Italian man who intentionally infected more than 30 women with HIV jailed. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italian-man-hiv-infected-girlfriends-jailed-sentence-valentino-tullato-a8024166.html
366
Hairdresser accused of giving men HIV told one ‘I ripped the condom. Burn. I got you’, court hears. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/hiv-hairdresser-grindr-victims-trial-burn-i-got-you-a7992871.html
367
California reduces penalty for knowingly exposing someone to HIV. http://www.independent.co.uk/california-hiv-infecting-felony-misdemeanor-a7988261.html
368
People on HIV medication cannot transmit the virus, declares CDC. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/hiv-medication-people-on-it-cannot-transmit-virus-cdc-treatment-aids-a7990286.html
369
CPS : Policy for prosecuting cases involving the intentional or reckless sexual transmission of infection. http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/prosecution/sti.html
370
Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Prosecution policy on the sexual transmission of infection. http://www.copfs.gov.uk/images/Documents/Prosecution_Policy_Guidance/Guidelines_and_Policy/Prosecution%20policy%20on%20the%20sexual%20transmission%20of%20infection%20-%20July%2014.pdf
371
Law Commission. Reform of Offences Against the Person Law Com No 361 2 November 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reform-of-offences-against-the-person
372
Weait M. Intimacy and responsibility: the criminalisation of HIV transmission. 1st ed. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203937938
373
Stanton C. Maternal transmission of HIV infection: a crime against my child? Journal of Medical Ethics 2015;41:375–8. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101368
374
Ryan S. Disclosure and HIV Transmission. The Journal of Criminal Law 2015;79:395–410. doi:10.1177/0022018315614444
375
Cowan S. Offenses of Sex or Violence? Consent, Fraud, and HIV Transmission. New Criminal Law Review 2014;17:135–61. doi:10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.135
376
Weait M. Criminal Law and the Sexual Transmission of HIV: R v Dica. Modern Law Review 2005;68:121–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00531.x
377
Matthew Weait. Knowledge, autonomy and consent: R. v Konzani. Criminal Law Review Published Online First: 2005.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI78F32F40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
378
Cherkassky L. Being Informed: The Complexities of Knowledge, Deception and Consent When Transmitting HIV. The Journal of Criminal Law 2010;74:242–58. doi:10.1350/jcla.2010.74.3.636
379
Samantha Ryan. Reckless transmission of HIV: knowledge and culpability. Criminal Law Reviewhttps://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI37B9B0A057F211DB919FA1123923A50B%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
380
Munro V E. On Responsible Relationships and Irresponsible Sex - Criminalising the Reckless Transmission of HIV R v Dica and R v Konzani. Child and Family Law Quarterly Published Online First: 2007.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq19&size=2&collection=journals&id=112
381
The Juridical review.
382
Hughes D. Condom Use, Viral Load and the Type of Sexual Activity as Defences to the Sexual Transmission of HIV. The Journal of Criminal Law 2013;77:136–50. doi:10.1350/jcla.2013.77.2.832
383
Chalmers J. Legal responses to HIV and AIDS. Oxford: : Hart Publishing Ltd 2008. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474200615?locatt=label:secondary_bloomsburyCollections
384
Tadros V. Recklessness, Consent and the Transmission of HIV. Edinburgh Law Review 2001;5:371–80. doi:10.3366/elr.2001.5.3.371
385
JR Spencer. Retrial for reckless infection. The New Law Journal;154.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FFX-CDX0-TWWR-G1FF-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
386
JR Spencer. Liability for reckless infection—part 1. The New Law Journal;154.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FFX-CDX0-TWWR-G0YB-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
387
JR Spencer. Liability for reckless infection—part 2. The New Law Journal;154.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FFX-CF00-TWWR-G01J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
388
Mawhinney GR. To Be Ill or to Kill: The Criminality of Contagion. The Journal of Criminal Law 2013;77:202–14. doi:10.1350/jcla.2013.77.3.840
