1.
Epstein B. The ant trap: rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences [Internet]. [First edition]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
2.
Mason R. The metaphysics of social kinds. Philosophy Compass. 2016 Dec;11(12):841–50.
3.
Epstein B. The ant trap: rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences [Internet]. [First edition]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
4.
Kim J. Supervenience for Multiple Domains. Philosophical Topics [Internet]. 1988;16(1):129–50. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154017
5.
Epstein B. The ant trap: rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences [Internet]. [First edition]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
6.
Searle JR. The construction of social reality [Internet]. London: Allen Lane; 1995. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8a6595e4-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
7.
HINDRIKS F. But Where Is the University? Dialectica. 2012 Mar;66(1):93–113.
8.
Rosen G. Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction. In: Modality [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 109–36. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.001.0001/acprof-9780199565818-chapter-7
9.
Mikkola M. Grounding and anchoring: on the structure of Epstein’s social ontology. Inquiry. 2019 Feb 7;62(2):198–216.
10.
Hawley K. Comments on Brian Epstein’s. Inquiry. 2019 Feb 7;62(2):217–29.
11.
Epstein B. Replies to Hawley, Mikkola, and Hindriks. Inquiry. 2019 Feb 7;62(2):230–46.
12.
Schaffer J. Anchoring as Grounding. Available from: http://www.jonathanschaffer.org/anchorground.pdf
13.
Uzquiano G. The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Nous. 2004 Mar;38(1):135–53.
14.
Uzquiano G. Groups: Toward a Theory of Plural Embodiment. The Journal of Philosophy. 2018;115(8):423–52.
15.
Margaret Gilbert. Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese [Internet]. 1987;73(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20116447
16.
Lippert-Rasmussen K, Brownlee K, Coady D, editors. A companion to applied philosophy. Vol. 63. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2017.
17.
Gilbert M. Living together: rationality, sociality, and obligation. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1996.
18.
Gilbert M. On social facts. London: Routledge; 1988.
19.
Gilbert M, Oxford University Press. Joint commitment: how we make the social world [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.001.0001
20.
Haslanger SA, Oxford University Press. Resisting reality: social construction and social critique [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.001.0001
21.
List C, Pettit P. Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001
22.
Guala F. Understanding institutions: the science and philosophy of living together. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2016.
23.
Searle JR. The construction of social reality. London: Allen Lane; 1995.
24.
Searle JR. Making the social world: the structure of human civilization [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
25.
Tuomela R. The philosophy of sociality: the shared point of view [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001
26.
Tuomela R. Social ontology: collective intentionality and group agents [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199978267.001.0001
27.
Bratman M, Oxford University Press. Shared agency: a planning theory of acting together [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
28.
Professor Tony Lawson | Faculty of Economics [Internet]. Available from: http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/people/emeritus/tl27
29.
Social Ontology. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-ontology/#GrouMindCollInteGrouAgen
30.
Ritchie K. The Metaphysics of Social Groups. Philosophy Compass. 2015 May;10(5):310–21.
31.
Gilbert M. Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese [Internet]. 1987;73(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20116447