1.
Elena Gorfinkel: Cult Film or Cinephilia by Any Other Name. Cinéaste. 34, 33–38 (2008).
2.
Joe Bob Briggs, J. Hoberman, Damien Love, Tim Lucas, Danny Peary, Jeffrey Sconce and Peter Stanfield: Cult cinema: A critical symposium. Cinéaste. 34, 43–50 (2008).
3.
Barry K Grant: Science fiction double feature: Ideology in the cult film. In: J P Telotte (ed.) The Cult film experience: beyond all reason. pp. 122–137. University of Texas Press, Austin (1991).
4.
Hunter, I.Q.: Cult film as a guide to life: fandom, adaptation, and identity. Bloomsbury Academic, New York (2016).
5.
J P Telotte: Beyond all reason: The nature of the cult. In: J P Telotte (ed.) The Cult film experience: beyond all reason. pp. 5–17. University of Texas Press, Austin (1991).
6.
Jamie Sexton, Ernest Mathijs: Introduction. In: Cult Cinema. pp. 1–10. Wiley-Blackwell; 1 edition (22)AD.
7.
Ernest Mathijs, Xavier Mendik eds: The cult film reader. McGraw Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead, England (2008).
8.
J. Hoberman, Jonathan Rosenbaum: Midnight movies. Da Capo Press, New York (1991).
9.
Danny Peary: Cult movies: the classics, the sleepers, the weird, and the wonderful. Delacorte Press, New York (1981).
10.
Matt Hills: Defining Cult TV: Texts, inter-texts and fan audiences. In: Robert C Allen and Annette Hill (eds.) The Television Studies Reader. pp. 509–523. Routledge, London (2003).
11.
Lorna Jowett: Nightmare in red? Twin Peaks parody, homage, intertextuality, and mash-up. In: Weinstock, J.A. and Spooner, C. (eds.) Return to Twin Peaks: new approaches to materiality, theory, and genre on television. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2016).
12.
Gwenllian-Jones, S., Pearson, R.E. eds: Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn (2004).
13.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: The cult TV book. I.B. Tauris, London (2010).
14.
Leon Hunt: Cult British TV comedy: from Reeves and Mortimer to Psychoville. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2013).
15.
John Tulloch, Henry Jenkins: Science fiction audiences: watching Doctor Who and Star Trek. Routledge, London (1995).
16.
Mark Jancovich, James Lyons eds: Quality popular television: cult TV, the industry and fans. British Film Institute, London (2003).
17.
David Lavery ed: The essential cult TV reader. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (2010).
18.
Lavery, D.: Full of secrets: critical approaches to Twin Peaks. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI (1995).
19.
Jowett, L., Abbott, S.: TV horror: investigating the darker side of the small screen. I.B. Tauris, London (2013).
20.
Jancovich, M.: Cult fictions: Cult movies, subcultural capital and the production of cultural distinctions. Cultural Studies. 16, 306–322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107607.
21.
Klinger, B.: Becoming cult: The Big Lebowski, replay culture and male fans. Screen. 51, 1–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjp055.
22.
Henry Jenkins: ‘Get a Life!’: Fans, Poachers, Nomads. In: Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. pp. 9–49. Routledge, New York (1992).
23.
Matt Hills, Dawson Books: Introduction: Who’s who? Academics, fans, scholar fans and fan scholars. In: Fan cultures. Routledge, London (2002).
24.
Nathan Hunt: The importance of trivia: ownership, exclusion and authority in science fiction fandom. In: Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis (eds.) Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
25.
Sanjek, D.: Fans’ Notes: The Horror Film Fanzine. Literature/Film Quarterly. (1990).
26.
I Q Hunter: Beaver Las Vegas! A fan-boy’s defence of Showgirls. In: Graeme Harper and Xavier Mendik (eds.) Unruly Pleasures. pp. 187–202. FAB Press.
27.
Geraghty, L.: Cult collectors: nostalgia, fandom and collecting popular culture. Routledge, London (2014).
28.
Zubernis, L.S., Larsen, K.: Fandom at the crossroads: celebration, shame and fan/producer relationships. Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle (2012).
29.
McCulloch, R.: ‘Most people bring their own spoons’: The Room’s participatory audiences as comedy mediators. Participations. 8, (2011).
30.
Austin, B.A.: Portrait of a Cult Film Audience: The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Journal of Communication. 31, 43–54 (1981).
31.
Church, D.: Grindhouse nostalgia: memory, home video and exploitation film fandom. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2015).
32.
Sexton, J., Mathijs, E.: The Cult Auteur. In: Cult cinema: an introduction. pp. 67–75. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts (2011).
33.
Hill, R.F.: Science fiction and the cult of Ed Wood: Glen or Glenda?, Bride of the Monster, and Plan 9 From Outer Space. In: Telotte, J.P. and Duchovnay, G. (eds.) Science fiction double feature: the science fiction film as cult text. pp. 172–189. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool (2016).
34.
Routt, W.D.: Bad For Good. Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media.
35.
Barry Keith Grant: Auteurs and Authorship: A film reader. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Mass (2008).
36.
Robert S. Birchard: Edward D. Wood, Jr.: Some Notes on a Subject for Further Research. Film History. 7, 450–455 (1995).
37.
Michael J Bowen: Doris Wishman meets the avant-garde. Underground USA: filmmaking beyond the Hollywood canon. 109–122 (2002).
38.
Tania Modleski: Women’s cinema as counterphobic cinema: Doris Wishman as the last auteur. In: Jeffrey Sconce (ed.) Sleaze artists: cinema at the margins of taste, style, and politics. pp. 47–70. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (2007).
39.
Roger Corman, Jim Jerome: How I Made a Hundred Movies in Hollywood and Never Lost a Dime. Random House, New York (1989).
40.
Antony Todd: Authorship and the films of David Lynch: aesthetic receptions in contemporary Hollywood. I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd, London (2012).
41.
Dawson Books: The works of Tim Burton: margins to mainstream. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2013).
42.
Jeffrey Todd Adams: The cinema of the Coen brothers: hard-boiled entertainments. Columbia University Press, New York (2015).
43.
Pezzotta, E.: Stanley Kubrick: adapting the sublime. University Press of Mississippi, Jackson (2013).
44.
Jim Smith: Tarantino. Virgin Books, London (2005).
45.
Hills, M.: Cult Movies With and Without Stars: Differentiating Discourses of Stardom. In: Cult film stardom: Offbeat attractions and processes of cultification. pp. 21–36. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
46.
Thomas, S.: ‘Marginal moments of spectacle’: Character Actors, Cult Stardom and Hollywood Cinema. In: Cult film stardom: Offbeat attractions and processes of cultification. pp. 37–54. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
47.
Kate Egan, Sarah Thomas eds: Cult film stardom: Offbeat attractions and processes of cultification. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
48.
Jamie Sexton, Ernest Mathijs: Cult Stardom. In: Cult Cinema. pp. 76–85.
49.
Roberta E Pearson: ‘Bright particular star’: Patrick Stewart, Jean-Luc Picard, and Cult Television. Cult television. 61–82 (2004).
50.
Rebecca Feasey: ‘Sharon Stone, screen diva’: Stardom, femininity and cult fandom. In: Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis (eds.) Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. pp. 172–184. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
51.
Oppenheim, P.: Grave expectations: Vampira and her audiences, 1954-1956. Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media. (2013).
52.
Mikita Brottman: Star cults/ cult stars: Cinema, psychosis, celebrity, death. In: Graeme Harper and Xavier Mendik (eds.) Unruly Pleasures. pp. 103–120. FAB Press.
53.
Hills, M., Williams, R.: ‘It’s all my interpretation’: Reading Spike through the subcultural celebrity of James Marsters. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 8, 345–365 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549405054866.
54.
Wade Jennings: The star as cult icon: Judy Garland. In: The Cult film experience: beyond all reason. University of Texas Press, Austin (1991).
55.
Leon Hunt: Kung Fu cult masters: Stardom, performance and ‘authenticity’ in Hong Kong martial arts films. In: Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
56.
Pierre Bourdieu: Introduction. In: Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. pp. 1–7. Routledge & K. Paul, London (1984).
57.
David Church: Freakery, Cult Films, and the Problem of Ambivalence. Journal of Film and Video. 63, 03–17 (2011).
58.
Joan Hawkins: From horror to avant-garde: Tod Browning’s Freaks. In: Cutting Edge: Art horror and the horrific avant-garde. pp. 141–168. University of Minnesota Press (2000).
59.
Kate Egan: Trash or treasure?: censorship and the changing meanings of the video nasties. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2007).
60.
Paul Watson: There’s no accounting for taste: Exploitation cinema and the limits of film theory. Trash aesthetics: popular culture and its audience. Film/fiction, 66–83 (1997).
61.
Ernest Mathijs: The making of a cult reputation: Topicality and controversy in the critical reception of Shivers. Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Inside popular film, 109–126 (2003).
62.
Xavier Mendik, Stephen Jay Schneider: A tasteless art: Waters, Kaufman and the pursuit of ‘pure’ gross-out. Underground USA: filmmaking beyond the Hollywood canon. 204–220 (2002).
63.
Martin Barker, Jane Arthurs, Ramaswami Harindranath: The Crash controversy: Reviewing the press. The cult film reader. 456–471 (2008).
64.
Pett, E.: A new media landscape? The BBFC, extreme cinema as cult, and technological change. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 13, 83–99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2014.982910.
65.
Waters, J.: Shock value: a tasteful book about bad taste. Thunder’s Mouth Press, New York (2005).
66.
Jeffrey Sconce: ‘Trashing’ the academy: taste, excess, and an emerging politics of cinematic style. Screen. 36, 371–393 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/36.4.371.
67.
Hunter, I.Q.: Trash Horror and the Cult of the Bad Film. In: Benshoff, H.M. (ed.) A companion to the horror film. pp. 483–500. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2014).
68.
MacDowell, J., Zborowski, J.: The aesthetics of ‘so bad it’s good’: Value, intention, and The Room. Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media. (2013).
69.
Ernest Mathijs: Bad reputations: the reception of ‘trash’ cinema. Screen. 46, 451–472 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/46.4.451.
70.
J Hoberman: Bad Movies. Film Comment. 7–12 (1962).
71.
Susan Sontag: Notes on ‘Camp’. In: Against Interpretation and Other Essays. Penguin Classics, London (2009).
72.
Pauline Kael: Trash, Art and the Movies. In: Going steady: film writings, 1968-1969. pp. 85–130. M. Boyars, New York (1994).
73.
Jeffrey Sconce: Esper, the renunciator: Teaching ‘bad’ movies to good students. In: Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis (eds.) Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. pp. 14–34. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
74.
Telotte, J.P.: Robot Monster and the ‘watchable... terrible’ cult/SF film. In: Telotte, J.P. and Duchovnay, G. (eds.) Science fiction double feature: the science fiction film as cult text. pp. 159–170. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool (2016).
75.
David Ray Carter: Cinemasochism: Bad movies and the people who love them. In: Weiner, R.G. and Barba, S.E. (eds.) In the peanut gallery with Mystery Science Theater 3000: essays on film, fandom, technology, and the culture of riffing. McFarland, Jefferson, N.C. (2011).
76.
Joanne Hollows: The Masculinity of Cult. In: Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis (eds.) Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. pp. 35–53. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
77.
Lisa Bode: Transitional tastes: Teen girls and genre in the critical reception of Twilight. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 24, 707–719 (2010).
78.
Jacinda Read: The cult of masculinity: From fan-boys to academic bad-boys. Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Inside popular film, 54–70 (2003).
79.
Barker, M., Mathijs, E., Mendik, X.: Menstrual monsters: the reception of the Ginger Snaps cult horror franchise. [Intellect], [Bristol] (2006).
80.
Imelda Whelehan, Esther Sonnet: Regendered reading: Tank Girl and Postmodernist Intertextuality. Trash aesthetics: popular culture and its audience. Film/fiction, 31–47 (1997).
81.
Helen Merrick: The readers feminism doesn’t see: Feminist fans, critics and science fiction. Trash aesthetics: popular culture and its audience. Film/fiction, 48–65 (1997).
82.
Moya Luckett: Sexploitation as feminine territory: The films of Doris Wishman. In: Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, and Andy Willis (eds.) Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. pp. 142–156. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
83.
Clayton, W., Harman, S.: Screening Twilight: critical approaches to a cinematic phenomenon. I. B. Tauris, London (2014).
84.
Pender, P.: I’m Buffy and you’re history: Buffy the vampire slayer and contemporary feminism. I.B. Tauris, London (2016).
85.
Jowett, L.: Representation: Exploring issues of sex, gender, and race in cult television. In: Abbott, S. (ed.) The cult TV book. pp. 107–113. I.B. Tauris, London (2010).
86.
Joan Hawkins: Sleaze Mania, Euro-Trash, and High Art: The Place of European Art Films in American Low Culture. Film Quarterly. 53, 14–29 (2000).
87.
Sexton, J.: The allure of otherness: transnational cult film fandom and the exoticist assumption. Transnational Cinemas. 8, 5–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/20403526.2016.1245922.
88.
Jamie Sexton, M.H. ed: Transnational Cinemas: Vol 8, No 1. (2017).
89.
Ernest Mathijs: Bad reputations: the reception of ‘trash’ cinema. Screen. 46, 451–472 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/46.4.451.
90.
Joan Hawkins: Cutting Edge: Art horror and the horrific avant-garde. University of Minnesota Press (2000).
91.
Peter Hutchings: The Argento effect. Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Inside popular film, 127–141 (2003).
92.
Daniel Martin: Extreme Asia: the rise of cult cinema from the Far East. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2015).
93.
Kevin Heffernan: Art house or house of exorcism? The changing distribution and reception contexts of Mario Bava’s Lisa and the Devil. In: Jeffrey Sconce (ed.) Sleaze artists: cinema at the margins of taste, style, and politics. pp. 144–166. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (2007).
94.
Victoria Ruétalo, Dolores Tierney eds: Latsploitation, exploitation cinemas, and Latin America. Routledge, London (2009).
95.
Smith, I.R.: The Hollywood Meme. EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS, Edinburgh (2018).
96.
Tatsumi, T.: Transnational interactions: District 9, or Apaches in Johannesburg. In: Telotte, J.P. and Duchovnay, G. (eds.) Science fiction double feature: the science fiction film as cult text. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool (2016).
97.
Andrews, D.: Theorizing art cinemas: foreign, cult, avant-garde, and beyond. University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex (2013).
98.
Martin, A.: What’s Cult Got To Do With It?: In Defense of Cinephile Elitism. Cinéaste. 34, 39–42 (2008).
99.
Hills, M., Sexton, J.: Cult cinema and technological change. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 13, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2014.989007.
100.
Ernest Mathijs: Cult Survey, http://cultsurvey.org/index.shtml.
101.
Jamie Sexton: From Bad to Good and Back to Bad Again? Cult Cinema and Its Unstable Trajectory. In: Claire Perkins and Constantine Verevis (eds.) B Is for Bad Cinema. pp. 129–148.
102.
Matt Hills: Veronica Mars, fandom, and the ‘Affective Economics’ of crowdfunding poachers. New Media & Society. 17, 183–197 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558909.
103.
Jeffrey Sconce: Movies: A century of failure. In: Jeffrey Sconce (ed.) Sleaze artists: cinema at the margins of taste, style, and politics. pp. 273–310. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (2007).
104.
Hills, M.: Cult cinema and the ‘mainstreaming’ discourse of technological change: revisiting subcultural capital in liquid modernity. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 13, 100–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2014.982928.
105.
Iain Robert Smith: Bootleg Archives: Notes on BitTorrent Communities and Issues of Access. Flow TV. 2, (2011).
106.
Mathijs, E., Sexton, J.: Cult cinema: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts (2011).
107.
J. Hoberman, Jonathan Rosenbaum: Midnight movies. Da Capo Press, New York (1991).
108.
Joan Hawkins: Cutting Edge: Art horror and the horrific avant-garde. University of Minnesota Press (2000).
109.
Mark Jancovich: ‘A Real Shocker’: Authenticity, genre and the struggle for distinction. Continuum. 14, 23–35 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/713657675.
110.
Jancovich, M.: Cult fictions: Cult movies, subcultural capital and the production of cultural distinctions. Cultural Studies. 16, 306–322 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107607.
111.
Mark Jancovich, Antonio Lazaro Reboll, Julian Stringer, Andy Willis eds: Defining cult movies: the cultural politics of oppositional taste. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2003).
112.
J P Telotte ed: The Cult film experience: beyond all reason. University of Texas Press, Austin (1991).
113.
Intensities: The Journal of Cult Media.
114.
Perkins, C., Verevis, C. eds: B is for bad cinema: aesthetics, politics, and cultural value. SUNY Press, Albany (2014).
115.
Eric Schaefer: ‘Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!’: a history of exploitation films, 1919-1959. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (1999).
116.
Ernest Mathijs, Xavier Mendik eds: The cult film reader. McGraw Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead, England (2008).
117.
Kate Egan, Sarah Thomas eds: Cult film stardom: Offbeat attractions and processes of cultification. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
118.
Geraghty, L.: Popular media cultures: fans, audiences and paratexts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2015).
119.
Deborah Cartmell, I Q Hunter, Heidi Kaye, Imelda Whelehan eds: Trash aesthetics: popular culture and its audience. Pluto Press, London (1997).
120.
Harry M. Benshoff: Blaxploitation Horror Films: Generic Reappropriation or Reinscription? Cinema Journal. 39, 31–50 (2000).
121.
Jeffrey Sconce ed: Sleaze artists: cinema at the margins of taste, style, and politics. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (2007).
122.
Davis, B.: The battle for the Bs: 1950s Hollywood and the rebirth of low-budget cinema. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J. (2012).
123.
Akira Mizuta  Lippit, Noel Burch, Chon Noriega, Ara Osterweil, Linda Williams, Eric Schaefer, Jeffrey Sconce: Round Table: Showgirls. Film Quarterly. 56, 32–46 (2003).
124.
Xavier Mendik, Stephen Jay Schneider eds: Underground USA: filmmaking beyond the Hollywood canon. Wallflower, London (2002).
125.
Mendik, X., Harper, G.: Unruly pleasures: the cult film and its critics. FAB Press, Guildford, Surrey (2000).
126.
Mark Jancovich: Rational fears: American horror in the 1950s. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1996).
127.
Gary Hentzi: Little Cinema of Horrors. Film Quarterly. 46, 22–27 (1993).
128.
Weiner, R.G., Barba, S.E.: In the peanut gallery with Mystery Science Theater 3000: essays on film, fandom, technology, and the culture of riffing. McFarland, Jefferson, N.C. (2011).
129.
Ernest Mathijs: Cult Survey, http://cultsurvey.org/index.shtml.
130.
Bill Warren: Keep watching the skies!: American science fiction movies of the fifties. McFarland & Co, Jefferson, NC (2010).
131.
McCarthy, T., Flynn, C.: Kings of the Bs: working within the Hollywood system : an anthology of film history and criticism. E. P. Dutton, New York (1975).
132.
Danny Peary: Cult movies: the classics, the sleepers, the weird, and the wonderful. Delacorte Press, New York (1981).
133.
Gwenllian-Jones, S., Pearson, R.E. eds: Cult Television. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn (2004).
134.
Mark Jancovich, James Lyons eds: Quality popular television: cult TV, the industry and fans. British Film Institute, London (2003).
135.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: The cult TV book. I.B. Tauris, London (2010).
136.
John Tulloch, Henry Jenkins: Science fiction audiences: watching Doctor Who and Star Trek. Routledge, London (1995).
137.
David Lavery ed: The essential cult TV reader. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (2010).