1.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
2.
Brazier M, Cave E. Medicine, Patients and the Law. Vol Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Law and Medical Humanities. Sixth edition. Manchester University Press; 2016.
3.
Lord Lane C.J., Ormrod L.J. and Smith J. 1981 March 17(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [1981] 1 W.L.R. 690. *690 Regina v Malcherek
4.
Seamus Burns. Human Rights: How Certain Is Death? The New Law Journal 159
5.
Keown J. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909
6.
Dworkin R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. HarperCollins; 1993.
7.
Harris J, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Value of Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron?target=patron&extendedid=P_178154_0&
8.
Glover J. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Vol Penguin philosophy. Penguin; 1990.
9.
A code of practice for the diagnosis and confirmation of death - Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. http://www.aomrc.org.uk/publications/reports-guidance/ukdec-reports-and-guidance/code-practice-diagnosis-confirmation-death/
10.
Brain stem death - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Brain-death/Pages/Introduction.aspx
11.
Bagheri A. Individual choice in the definition of death. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2007;33(3):146-149. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016014
12.
Ford M. The Personhood Paradox and the ‘Right to Die’. Medical Law Review. 2005;13(1):80-101. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi004
13.
Harris J. The Right to Die Lives! There is no Personhood Paradox. Medical Law Review. 2005;13(3):386-392. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi030
14.
Maclean A. The Elimination of Morality: Reflections on Utilitarianism and Bioethics. Routledge; 1993.
15.
Kuhse H. The Sanctity-of-Life Doctrine in Medicine: A Critique. Clarendon; 1987.
16.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/death-definition/
17.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
18.
UK Parliament, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology Briefing Paper: Vegetative and minimally conscious states. 2015;489. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST-PN-489#fullreport
19.
Mental Capacity Act 2005.
20.
Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice
21.
Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). http://www.scie.org.uk/?res=true
22.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
23.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000: Code of Practice (Third Edition): For Practitioners Authorised to Carry Out Medical Treatment or Research Under Part 5 of the Act effective from 10 May 2010 - 0105906.pdf. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/327864/0105906.pdf
24.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000: A short guide to the Act. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2008/03/25120154/1
25.
Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Lowry, Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Lord Mustill Sir Thomas Bingham M.R., Butler-Sloss and Hoffmann L.JJ. Sir Stephen Brown P.1992 Dec. 14, 15, 16; 1993 Feb. 41992 Dec. 1, 2, 3; 91992 Nov. 12, 13; 19(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [1993] 2 W.L.R. 316. *789 Airedale N.H.S. Trust Respondents v Bland Appellant
26.
Law Hospital N.H.S. Trust Pursuers against Lord Advocate and Others Defenders. Scottish Civil Law Reports
27.
Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P2000 Oct 5, 6; 25(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [2001] 2 W.L.R. 942. *348 NHS Trust A v M
28.
Munby J2004 Feb 26, 27, March 1; July 30(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [2004] EWHC 1879 (Admin). *424 Regina (Burke) v General Medical Council (Official Solicitor intervening)
29.
/2086Court of Appeal (Civil Division)28 July 2005Before: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers , MR Lord Justice Waller and Lord Justice Wall Thursday 28th July, 2005Crown copyright. [2005] EWCA Civ 1003. The Queen on the Application of Oliver Leslie Burke v The General Medical Council
30.
483Court of Protecton28 September 2011Before: The Hon Mr Justice Baker Date: 28/09/2011Crown copyright. [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), S, A NHS Primary Care Trust
31.
483Court of Protecton28 September 2011Before: The Hon Mr Justice Baker Date: 28/09/2011Crown copyright. [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), S, A NHS Primary Care Trust
32.
4253Court of Protection23 January 2013Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Jackson Date: 23/1/2013Crown copyright. [2013] EWHC 78 (COP). The NHS Trust v AW (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
33.
8359Court of Protection21 July 2014Before: Mrs Justice Pauffley Date: 21/07/2014Crown copyright. [2014] EWCOP 16. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust v N (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
34.
1264Court of Protection27 November 2014Before: The Honourable Mr Justice Baker Date: 27/11/2014Crown copyright. [2014] EWCOP 49. Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group v AB, (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), CD
35.
1732Court of Protection26 June 2015Before: Mr Justice Newton Date: 26/06/2015Crown copyright. [2015] EWCOP 42. St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v P (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor), Q
36.
N, Re [2015] EWCOP 76 (19 November 2015).
37.
NHS TRUST A v H. 2(2001).
39.
0872High Court of Justice Family Division Court of Protection17 November 2010Before: Mr. Justice Ryder Date: Wednesday, 17th November 2010Crown copyright. [2010] EWHC 3448 (FAM). A Primary Care Trust, An NHS Trust v Mr. CW by his Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor), HW (Mother), PW (Father), AW (Brother), EW (Sister)
40.
J.M. Finnis. Bland: crossing the Rubicon? Law Quarterly Review. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICD05B010E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
41.
John Keown. Restoring moral and intellectual shape to the law after Bland. Law Quarterly Review. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICCDDDCC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
42.
Court of Protection Practice Direction 9E - Serious Medical Treatment. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/copd-pd-9e-serious-medical-treatment.pdf
43.
Vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management – RCP London. https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0924/4392/files/vegetative-state.pdf?7537870595093585378
44.
RCP London. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/search?text=press%20releases%20patients%20vegetative%20state%20updated%20guidelines&keys=
45.
Prolonged disorders of consciousness: national clinical guidelines | RCP London. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/prolonged-disorders-consciousness-national-clinical-guidelines
46.
Mullock A. Deciding the fate of a minimally conscious patient: an unsatisfactory balancing act? Medical Law Review. 2012;20(3):460-469. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fws017
47.
Skene L, Wilkinson D, Kahane G, Savulescu J. Neuroimaging and the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients in vegetative state. Medical Law Review. 2009;17(2):245-261. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwp002
48.
Lewis P. ’Withdrawal of treatment from a patient in a permanent vegetative state: judicial involvement and innovative ‘treatment’. Medical Law Review. 2007;15(3):392-399. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwm017
49.
Mclean SAM. Permanent vegetative state: the legal position. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 15(3):237-250. doi:10.1080/09602010443000272
50.
Maclean A. Crossing the Rubicon on the Human Rights Ferry. The Modern Law Review. 2001;64(5):775-794. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1097281
51.
BMA - Withdrawing or withholding artificial nutrition and hydration. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/withdraw-withhold-artificial-nutrition-and-hydration
52.
Treatment and care towards the end of life: decision making. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/end_of_life_care.asp
53.
End-of-Life Decisions: views of the BMA. Published online 2009. http://bmaopac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/exlibris/aleph/a23_1/apache_media/VITJEQ4TGE1SQBYYUCDDQ2T93SAHVT.pdf
54.
Mental Capacity Act 2005.
55.
Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice
56.
Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). http://www.scie.org.uk/?res=true
57.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.
58.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000: Code of Practice (Third Edition): For Practitioners Authorised to Carry Out Medical Treatment or Research Under Part 5 of the Act effective from 10 May 2010 - 0105906.pdf. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/327864/0105906.pdf
59.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000: A short guide to the Act. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2008/03/25120154/1
60.
Thorpe J.1993 Oct. 8, 11; 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [1994] 1 W.L.R. 290. *290 In re C. (Adult: Refusal of Treatment)
61.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). All England Law Reports 4(1992).
62.
Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). All England Law Reports 2(2002).
63.
Munby J2004 Feb 26, 27, March 1; July 30(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [2004] EWHC 1879 (Admin). *424 Regina (Burke) v General Medical Council (Official Solicitor intervening)
64.
/2086Court of Appeal (Civil Division)28 July 2005Before: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers , MR Lord Justice Waller and Lord Justice Wall Thursday 28th July, 2005Crown copyright. [2005] EWCA Civ 1003. The Queen on the Application of Oliver Leslie Burke v The General Medical Council
65.
Brooke , Clarke and Maurice Kay LJJ 2004 Sept 17(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. [2004] EWCA Civ 1324. *833 W Healthcare NHS Trust v H and others
66.
Re E (Medical Treatment: Anorexia) (Rev 1) [2012] EWCOP 1639 (15 June 2012).
67.
Treatment and care towards the end of life: decision making. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/end_of_life_care.asp
68.
End-of-Life Decisions: views of the BMA. Published online 2009. http://bmaopac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/exlibris/aleph/a23_1/apache_media/VITJEQ4TGE1SQBYYUCDDQ2T93SAHVT.pdf
69.
British Medical Association, Dawson Books. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment: Guidance for Decision Making. 3rd ed. Blackwell Pub; 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781405181464
70.
Biggs, H. Taking Account of the Views of the Patient, but Only if the Clinician (and the Court) Agrees - R (Burke) v General Medical Council. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2007;19(2):225-238. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq19&id=225
71.
BMA - Withdrawing or withholding artificial nutrition and hydration. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/withdraw-withhold-artificial-nutrition-and-hydration
72.
BMA - Withdrawing or withholding artificial nutrition and hydration. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/withdraw-withhold-artificial-nutrition-and-hydration
73.
British Medical Association, Dawson Books. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment: Guidance for Decision Making. 3rd ed. Blackwell Pub; 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781405181464
74.
Treatment and care towards the end of life: decision making. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/end_of_life_care.asp
75.
Price, D. My View of the Sanctity of Life: A Rebuttal of John Keown’s Critique. Legal Studies. 2007;27(4):549-565. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd27&id=559
76.
Keown, J. Restoring the Sanctity of Life and Replacing the Caricature: A Reply to David Price. Legal Studies. 2006;26(1):109-119. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd26&id=119
77.
Price, D. Fairly Bland: An Alternative View of a Supposed New Death Ethic and the BMA Guidelines. Legal Studies. 2001;21(4):618-643. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd21&id=620
78.
Coggon J. Could the right to die with dignity represent a new right to die in English law? Medical Law Review. 2006;14(2):219-237. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl002
79.
Cartwright W. Killing and letting die: a defensible distinction. British Medical Bulletin. 1996;52(2):354-361. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011550
80.
Keownz J. Beyond Bland: a critique of the BMA guidance on withholding and withdrawing medical treatment. Legal Studies. 2000;20(1):66-84. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2000.tb00133.x
81.
Michalowski S. Advance Refusals of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment: The Relativity of an Absolute Right. Modern Law Review. 2005;68(6):958-982. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00568.x
82.
Practice Direction. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110204003313/http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/files/09E_-_Serious_Medical_Treatment_PD.pdf
83.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
84.
Mental Capacity Act 2005 c. 9Arrangement of Act.
85.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 Asp 4 (Scottish Act)Arrangement of Act.
86.
In Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1994] 1 WLR 290. C (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment), Re
87.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). All England Law Reports 4(1992).
88.
In Re T (Adult - Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1992] 3 WLR 782. T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment), Re
90.
HE v A Hospital NHS Trust [2003] EWHC 1017. HE v A Hospital NHS Trust
91.
W Healthcare NHS Trust v. H and Others [2005] 1 W.L.R. 834. W Healthcare NHS Trust v H
92.
W Healthcare NHS Trust v. H and Others [2005] 1 W.L.R. 834. W Healthcare NHS Trust v H
93.
Re E (Medical Treatment: Anorexia) (Rev 1) [2012] EWCOP 1639 (15 June 2012).
94.
Re M; W v M [2011] EWHC 2443 (COP) - Mental Health Law Online.
95.
Dresser R. Dworkin on Dementia: Elegant Theory, Questionable Policy. The Hastings Center Report. 1995;25(6). doi:10.2307/3527839
96.
Dworkin R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. HarperCollins; 1993.
97.
Maclean AR. Advance Directives and the Rocky Waters of Anticipatory Decision-making. Medical Law Review. 2008;16(1):1-22. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwm019
98.
Michalowski S. Trial and Error at the End of Life--No Harm Done? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2005;27(2):257-280. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqi040
99.
Walker S. Autonomy or Preservation of Life? Advance Directives and patients with dementia. UCL jurisprudence review. 2011;17:100-121.
100.
Kerrigan J. Living wills - why? The Journal Online. 2009;54(1). https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal/issues/vol-54-issue-01/living-wills-why/
101.
Maclean AR. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making. Medical Law Review. 2006;14(3):291-320. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl009
102.
Herring, J. Losing It - Losing What - The Law and Dementia. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2009;21(1):3-29. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq21&id=3
103.
Kuhse H. Some Reflections on the Problem of Advance Directives, Personhood, and Personal Identity. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 1999;9(4):347-364. doi:10.1353/ken.1999.0027
104.
KUCZEWSKI MG. WHOSE WILL IS IT, ANYWAY? A DISCUSSION OF ADVANCE DIRECTIVES, PERSONAL IDENTITY, AND CONSENSUS IN MEDICAL ETHICS. Bioethics. 1994;8(1):27-48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00240.x
105.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/advance-directives/
106.
The Commission on Assisted Dying. The current legal status of assisted dying is inadequate and incoherent. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/476_CoAD_FinalReport_158x240_I_web_single-NEW_.pdf?1328113363
107.
Montgomery J. Guarding the gates of St Peter: life, death and law making. Legal Studies. 2011;31(4):644-666. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00205.x
108.
Livings, B. A Right to Assist - Assisted Dying and the Interim Policy. Journal of Criminal Law. 2010;74(1):31-52. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jcriml74&id=37
109.
Heywood R. The DPP’s Prosecutorial Policy on Assisted Suicide. King’s Law Journal. 2010;21(3):425-444. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/kingsclj21&id=425
110.
Greasley K. R(Purdy) v DPP and the Case for Wilful Blindness. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2010;30(2):301-326. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqq010
111.
Mullock A. Overlooking the criminally compassionate: what are the implications of prosecutorial policy on encouraging or assisting suicide? Medical Law Review. 2010;18(4):442-470. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwq027
112.
Cartwright N. 48 Years On: Is The Suicide Act Fit For Purpose? Medical Law Review. 2009;17(3):467-476. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwp022
113.
Keown J. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Lord Joffe’s Slippery Bill. Medical Law Review. 2007;15(1):126-135. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl020
114.
McLean S. Assisted Dying: Reflections on the Need for Law Reform. Vol Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge-Cavendish; 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203940471
115.
Lewis P. Assisted Dying and Legal Change. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199212873.001.0001
116.
Dieterle JM. Physician Assisted Suicide: A New Look at the Arguments. Bioethics. 2007;21(3):127-139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00536.x
117.
The House of Lords - Assisted Dying Bill Reports. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldasdy.htm
118.
Otlowski M. Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Oxford University Press; 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298687.001.0001
119.
McLean S, Britton A, Frontline Scotland, System Three (Scotland) Limited. Sometimes a Small Victory. University of Glasgow, Institute of Law and Ethics in Medicine; 1996.
120.
McLean S. End-of-life decisions and the law. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1996;22(5). doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.261
121.
Battin MP. The Least Worst Death: Essays in Bioethics on the End of Life. Oxford University Press; 1994.
122.
Dworkin R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. HarperCollins; 1993.
123.
End of life care: Flow chart for decision making when patients may lack capacity. https://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/end_of_life_decision_making_flowchart.asp
124.
End of life care - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/planners/end-of-life-care/Pages/End-of-life-care.aspx
125.
Herring J. Medical Law and Ethics. 8th edition. Oxford University Press; 2020. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198846956.001.0001
126.
Stauch M, Wheat K. Text, Cases and Materials on Medical Law and Ethics. Fifth edition. Routledge; 2015.
127.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
128.
Brazier M, Cave E. Medicine, Patients and the Law. Vol Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Law and Medical Humanities. Sixth edition. Manchester University Press; 2016.
129.
Sally Lipscombe. Assisted suicide. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN04857
130.
Suicide Act 1961 c. 60 Arrangement of Act.
131.
Coroners and Justice Act 2009 c. 25 Arrangement of Act.
132.
Assisted Dying (No. 2) Bill 2015-16 — UK Parliament. http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2015-16/assisteddyingno2.html
133.
Assisted Dying Bill (HL Bill 25 2015-16). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2015-2016/0025/160025.pdf
134.
Assisted Dying Bill Explanatory Notes (HL Bill 25). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2015-2016/0025/en/160025en.pdf
135.
Assisted Dying Bill (HL Bill 6 2014-15). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2014-2015/0006/15006.pdf
136.
Bill documents — Assisted Dying Bill [HL] 2014-15 — UK Parliament. http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/assisteddying/documents.html
137.
Assisted Dying Bill (HL Bill 6 2014-15) explanatory notes. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2014-2015/0006/en/15006en.pdf
138.
Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill. http://www.parliament.scot/S4_Bills/Assisted%20Suicide/b40s4-introd.pdf
139.
Assisted Suicide Bill Explanatory Notes. http://www.parliament.scot/S4_Bills/Assisted%20Suicide/b40s4-introd-en.pdf
140.
Scottish parliament rejects assisted dying law. The Guardian. Published online 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/may/27/scottish-parliament-rejects-assisted-suicide-law
141.
Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill. http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/Bills/69604.aspx
142.
The CPS : Assisted Suicide : ‘Policy for Prosecutors in respect of cases of encouraging or assisting suicide’. https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/assisted-suicide
143.
The CPS : Assisted Suicide. https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/assisted-suicide
144.
Director of Public Prosecutions responds to Supreme Court on assisted suicide policy. http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/director_of_public_prosecutions_responds_to_supreme_court_on_assisted_suicide_policy/
145.
DPP publishes assisted suicide policy. http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/109_10/
146.
DPP publishes interim policy on prosecuting assisted suicide - CPS press release. http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/144_09/
147.
Kerr D. Preserving Life: Scots Law and Assisted Suicide. The Juridical review. 2011;1:33-44.
148.
Laurie G, Mason JJ. Assistance in Dying or Euthanasia - Comments on the End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill. Edinburgh Law Review. 2010;14(3):493-497. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr14&id=493
149.
McLean SAM, Connelly C, Mason JK. Purdy in Scotland: We Hear But Should We Listen? The Juridical review. 2009;4:265-284.
150.
Ferguson PR. Killing without Getting into Trouble - Assisted Suicide and Scots Criminal Law. Edinburgh Law Review. 1998;2(3):288-314. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr2&id=294
151.
Biggs H. Legitimate Compassion or Compassionate Legitimation? Reflections on the Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide. Feminist Legal Studies. 2011;19(1):83-91. doi:10.1007/s10691-011-9165-6
152.
Lewis P. Informal legal change on assisted suicide: the policy for prosecutors. Legal Studies. 2011;31(1):119-134. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00184.x
153.
Medical Law Review. 2010;18(4). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://academic-oup-com/medlaw/issue/18/4
154.
Chalmers, J. Assisted Suicide: Jurisdiction and Discretion. Edinburgh Law Review. 2010;14(2):295-300. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr14&id=295
155.
Williams, G. Assisting Suicide, the Code for Crown Prosecutors and the DPP’s Discretion. Common Law World Review. 2010;39(2):181-203. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/comlwr39&id=185
156.
Burns S. The Limits of Maternal Love. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly. 2010;174. https://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/features/Limits-Maternal-Love
157.
Ost S. The de-medicalisation of assisted dying: is a less medicalised model the way forward? Medical Law Review. 2010;18(4):497-540. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwq025
158.
Mullock A. ’Prosecutors Making Bad Law? Medical Law Review. 2009;17(2):290-299. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwp009
159.
Grosse C, Grosse A. Assisted suicide: Models of legal regulation in selected European countries and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Medicine, Science and the Law. 2015;55(4):246-258. doi:10.1177/0025802414540636
160.
Battin MP, van der Heide A, Ganzini L, van der Wal G, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in ‘vulnerable’ groups. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2007;33(10):591-597. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.022335
161.
Oregon Health Authority : Frequently Asked Questions : Death with Dignity Act : State of Oregon. http://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Pages/faqs.aspx
162.
R v Reed [1982] Crim LR 819.
163.
Attorney General v Able and Others [1984] 1 QB 795. Attorney General v Able
165.
R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Dianne Pretty [2002] 1 AC 800 (HL). R. (on the application of Pretty) v DPP
166.
Pretty v UK, Application No. 2346/02 [2002] 2 FLR 45. Pretty v United Kingdom (2346/02)
167.
Pretty v UK, Application No. 2346/02 (2002) 35 EHRR 1. Pretty v United Kingdom (2346/02)
168.
Re Z [2004] WL 2790666 (Fam Div), [2005] 1 W.L.R. 959. Z (Local Authority: Duty), Re
169.
R. v S [2005] EWCA Crim 819. R. v S
170.
R. (on the Application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] EWCA Civ 92. R. (on the application of Purdy) v DPP
171.
Appeal to the House of Lords, [2009] UKHL 45. R. (on the application of Purdy) v DPP
172.
Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38. R. (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice
173.
Nicklinson v UK (Admissibility) (2015) 61 EHRR SE7. Nicklinson v United Kingdom (Admissibility) (2478/15)
174.
The Coroners and Justice Bill 2008-9. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmbills/009/2009009.pdf
175.
LDW - Parliament - Safeguarding Choice - Draft Bill. http://www.livinganddyingwell.org.uk/sites/default/files/LDW%20-%20Parliament%20-%20Safeguarding%20Choice%20-%20Draft%20Bill.pdf
176.
Info about the All Party Parliamentary Group on Choice at the End of Life | Social work and end-of-life care. https://sweol.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/info-about-the-all-party-parliamentary-group-on-choice-at-the-end-of-life/
177.
Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill 2005 (Lord Joffe’s Bill). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldbills/036/2006036.pdf
178.
Dying with Dignity Consultation paper. http://www.parliament.scot/S2_MembersBills/Draft%20proposals/Dying%20with%20Dignity%20Consultation%20paper.pdf
179.
End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill. http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/Bills/21272.aspx
180.
End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill. http://www.parliament.scot/SPICeResources/Research%20briefings%20and%20fact%20sheets/SB10-51.pdf
181.
Margo MacDonald’s End of Life Assistance Bill rejected - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11876821
182.
Healthcare Professionals for Assisted DyingHome. http://www.hpad.org.uk/
183.
Campaign for Dignity in Dying. https://www.dignityindying.org.uk/about-us/
184.
Assisted Dying in Oregon, USA | Dignity in Dying. https://www.dignityindying.org.uk/assisted-dying/international-examples/assisted-dying-oregon/
185.
Care Not Killing. http://www.carenotkilling.org.uk/
186.
Treatment and care towards the end of life: decision making. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/end_of_life_care.asp
187.
End-of-Life Decisions: views of the BMA. Published online 2009. http://bmaopac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/exlibris/aleph/a23_1/apache_media/VITJEQ4TGE1SQBYYUCDDQ2T93SAHVT.pdf
188.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
189.
McLean S. Assisted Dying: Reflections on the Need for Law Reform. Vol Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge-Cavendish; 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203940471
190.
Jackson E, Keown J. Debating Euthanasia. Vol Debating law. Hart; 2012.
191.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
193.
Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38. R. (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice
194.
Nicklinson v UK (Admissibility) (2015) 61EHRRSE7. Nicklinson v United Kingdom (Admissibility) (2478/15)
195.
Glover J. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Vol Penguin philosophy. Penguin; 1990.
196.
Harris J, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Value of Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron?target=patron&extendedid=P_178154_0&
197.
Keown J. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909
198.
Kushe H. The 2. Case for Active Voluntary Euthanasia. Law, Medicine and Health Care. 1986;(4):145-148. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/medeth14&id=145
199.
Otlowski M. Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Oxford University Press; 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298687.001.0001
200.
Singer P. Applied Ethics. Vol Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press; 1986.
201.
Smith SW. Evidence for the Practical Slippery Slope in the Debate on Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Medical Law Review. 2005;13(1):17-44. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi002
202.
Williams GO. Intention and Causation in Medical Non-Killing: The Impact of Criminal Law Concepts on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Vol Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
203.
McCall Smith A. Euthanasia: the strengths of the middle ground. Medical Law Review. 1999;7(2):194-207. doi:10.1093/medlaw/7.2.194
204.
Casonato, C. Informed Consent and End-of-Life Decisions: Notes of Comparative Law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2011;18(3):225-256. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/maastje18&id=227
205.
Griffiths J, Weyers H, Adams M, Academic Rights Press. Euthanasia and Law in Europe. Hart Pub; 2008. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000419.html
206.
Cohen-Almagori R. The Chabot Case: Analysis and Account of Dutch Perspectives. Medical Law International. 2002;5(3):141-159. doi:10.1177/096853320200500301
207.
De Haan J. The New Dutch Law on Euthanasia. Medical Law Review. 2002;10(1):57-75. doi:10.1093/medlaw/10.1.57
208.
Griffiths J. Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands: The Chabot Case. The Modern Law Review. 1995;58(2):232-248. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096356
209.
Keown J. Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107337909
210.
Keown J. Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
211.
Jochemsen H. Euthanasia in Holland: an ethical critique of the new law. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1994;20(4). doi:10.1136/jme.20.4.212
212.
Jochemsen H, Keown J. Voluntary euthanasia under control? Further empirical evidence from The Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1999;25(1):16-21. doi:10.1136/jme.25.1.16
213.
Kimsma GK, Van Leeuwen E. Dutch Euthanasia: Background, Practice, and Present Justifications. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1993;2(01). doi:10.1017/S096318010000058X
214.
Legemaate J, Gevers JKM. Physician-Assisted Suicide in Psychiatry: Developments in the Netherlands. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1997;6(02). doi:10.1017/S0963180100007799
215.
Möller M. Euthanasia in the Netherlands: the case of "life fatigue”. The New Law Journal. 151(7006). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4GR8-W780-TWWR-G0X1-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
216.
Ogilvie AD, Potts SG. Assisted suicide for depression: the slippery slope in action? BMJ. 1994;309(6953):492-493. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6953.492
217.
van Delden JJ. Slippery slopes in flat countries--a response. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1999;25(1):22-24. doi:10.1136/jme.25.1.22
218.
Van der Maas P. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. The Lancet. 1991;338(8768):669-674. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-L
219.
van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I, et al. Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Other Medical Practices Involving the End of Life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;335(22):1699-1705. doi:10.1056/NEJM199611283352227
220.
van der Wal G, Muller MT, Christ LM, Ribbe MW, van Eijk JThM. ’Voluntary Active Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in Dutch Nursing Homes: Requests and Administration. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1994;42:620-623.
221.
Vickers L. Assisted dying and the laws of three European countries. The New Law Journal. 147(6789). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4RCW-XHM0-TWWR-G1GM-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
222.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/euthanasia-voluntary/
223.
Brownsword R. Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas For A New Millennium. Medical Law Review. 2004;12(1):14-39. doi:10.1093/medlaw/12.1.14
224.
de Melo-Martin I. Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2005;31(9):526-530. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.008417
225.
Ilkilic I. Coming to Grips with Genetic Exceptionalism: Roots and Reach of an Explanatory Model. Medicine Studies. 2009;1(2):131-142. doi:10.1007/s12376-009-0015-7
226.
Kakuk P. Genetic Information in the Age of Genohype. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2006;9(3):325-337. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17072566
227.
Wikler D. Can we learn from eugenics? Journal of Medical Ethics. 1999;25(2):183-194. doi:10.1136/jme.25.2.183
228.
Stewart A, Brice P. Genetics, Health and Disease. Published online 2004. http://www.phgfoundation.org/
229.
Lucassen A, Gilbar R. Disclosure of genetic information to relatives: balancing confidentiality and relatives’ interests. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2018;55(4):285-286. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104843
230.
Gilbar R. The Status of the Family in Law and Bioethics: The Genetic Context. Ashgate; 2005.
231.
ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 336 (16 May 2017).
232.
Gilbar R, Foster C. It’s arrived! Relational Autonomy Comes to Court: ABC v ST George’s Healthcare NHS Trust [2017] EWCA 336. Medical Law Review. 2018;26(1):125-133. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwx044
233.
Smith & Anor v University of Leicester NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 817 (QB) (15 April 2016).
234.
Fay M. Cousins, Genetic Diagnosis and Liability of Clinicians: Smith & Another V University of Leicester NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 817 (QB). Medical Law Review. 2017;25(4):672-683. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwx032
235.
Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information (2017). Published online 27 February 2017. https://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/confidentiality.asp
236.
Human Tissue Act 2004 c. 30Arrangement of Act.
237.
Lucassen A, Kaye J. Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2006;32(12):690-692. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013631
238.
Non-consensual DNA analysis | Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/non-consensual-dna-analysis
239.
Chico V. Non-disclosure of genetic risks. Medical Law International. 2016;16(1-2):3-26. doi:10.1177/0968533216653440
240.
Fay M. Negligence, genetics and families. Medical Law International. 2016;16(3-4):115-142. doi:10.1177/0968533216664113
241.
Gilbar R. The Passive Patient and Disclosure of Genetic Information: Can English Tort Law Protect the Relatives’ Right to Know? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2016;30(1):79-104. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebv015
242.
Mitchell CR. A duty to warn relatives in clinical genetics: arguably ‘fair, just and reasonable’ in English law? Professional Negligence. 2016;32:120-136. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI008F37404AE911E69426958412386EA1%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
243.
Andorno R. The right not to know: an autonomy based approach. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(5):435-439. doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001578
244.
Liao SM. Is there a duty to share genetic information? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009;35(5):306-309. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027029
245.
Parker M. Genetic information: a joint account? BMJ. 2004;329(7458):165-167. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7458.165
246.
Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Lucassen A. ‘Is this knowledge mine and nobody else’s? I don’t feel that.’ Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine: Table 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42(3):174-179. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102781
247.
Foster C, Herring J, Boyd M. Testing the limits of the ‘joint account’ model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015;41(5):379-382. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102142
248.
Chadwick RF, Levitt M, Shickle D, eds. The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
249.
Mulheron RP. Medical Negligence: Non-Patient and Third Party Claims. Ashgate; 2010.
250.
Stark Z, Wallace J, Gillam L, Burgess M, Delatycki MB. Predictive genetic testing for neurodegenerative conditions: how should conflicting interests within families be managed? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42(10):640-642. doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103400
251.
Malpas PJ. Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;34(7):548-551. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023101
252.
Mittra J. Predictive Genetic Information and Access to Life Assurance: The Poverty of ‘Genetic Exceptionalism’. BioSocieties. 2007;2(3):349-373. doi:10.1017/S1745855207005789
253.
Stirton R. Insurance, Genetic Information and the Future of Industry Self-Regulation in the UK. Law, Innovation and Technology. 2012;4(2):212-237. doi:10.5235/LIT.4.2.212
254.
Thomas RG. Genetics and insurance in the United Kingdom 1995–2010: the rise and fall of "scientific” discrimination. New Genetics and Society. 2012;31(2):203-222. doi:10.1080/14636778.2012.662046
255.
Wilkinson R. Unjustified Discrimination: Is the Moratorium on the use of Genetic Test Results by Insurers a Contradiction in Terms? Health Care Analysis. 2010;18(3):279-293. doi:10.1007/s10728-009-0137-9
256.
Wilkinson RH. Genetic information: Important but not "exceptional”. Identity in the Information Society. 2010;3(3):457-472. doi:10.1007/s12394-010-0070-y
257.
Code on Genetic Testing and Insurance. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/751230/code-on-genetic-testing-and-insurance.pdf
258.
The Employment Practices Code. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1064/the_employment_practices_code.pdf
259.
The Employment Practices Code – Supplementary Guidance. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1066/employment_practice_code_supplementary_guidance.pdf
260.
Lippert-Rasmussen K. Genetic Discrimination and Health Insurance. Res Publica. 2015;21(2):185-199. doi:10.1007/s11158-015-9271-4
261.
Otlowski M, Taylor S, Bombard Y. Genetic Discrimination: International Perspectives. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2012;13(1):433-454. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163800
262.
Plümecke T. Genes, symptoms, and the "asymptomatic ill”: toward a broader understanding of genetic discrimination. New Genetics and Society. 2016;35(2):124-148. doi:10.1080/14636778.2016.1176525
263.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
264.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
265.
HFEA Code of Practice. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2793/2019-01-03-code-of-practice-9th-edition-v2.pdf
266.
Dawson Books. Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology. (Horsey K, ed.). Routledge; 2015. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315767895
267.
Fovargue S, Bennett R. What Role Should Public Opinion Play in Ethico-Legal decision Making? The Example of Selecting Sex for Non-Medical Reasons Using Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Medical Law Review. Published online 24 January 2016. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv046
268.
Malek J. Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2010;36(4):217-221. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.034645
269.
Porter G, Smith MK. Preventing the selection of "deaf embryos” under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: problematizing disability? New Genetics and Society. 2013;32(2):171-189. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.788355
270.
Smith MK. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings” and the relevance of the harm principle. New Genetics and Society. 2013;32(2):154-170. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.788358
271.
de Melo-Martín I. Sex Selection and the Procreative Liberty Framework. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2013;23(1):1-18. doi:10.1353/ken.2013.0000
272.
Gilbar R. Between Unconditional Acceptance and Responsibility: Should Family Ethics Limit the Scope of Reproductive Autonomy. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2009;(3). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq21&id=1
273.
Gyngell C, Douglas T. Selecting Against Disability: The Liberal Eugenic Challenge and the Argument from Cognitive Diversity. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2018;35(2):319-340. doi:10.1111/japp.12199
274.
Krahn TM. Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the case of Down’s Syndrome. Medical Law Review. 2011;19(2):157-191. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwr009
275.
Wilkinson S. Sexism, Sex Selection and ‘Family Balancing’. Medical Law Review. 2008;16(3):369-389. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn013
276.
Savulescu J, Kahane G. The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life. Bioethics. 2009;23(5):274-290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00687.x
277.
Bennett R. The Fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Bioethics. 2009;23(5):265-273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00655.x
278.
R. (on the Application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HL) [2005] UKHL 28.
279.
Alghrani, A. Suitable to Be a Saviour: R (Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2006;(3). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq18&id=1
280.
Brownsword, R. Happy Families, Consenting Couples, and Children with Dignity: Sex Selection and Saviour Siblings. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2005;(4). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chilflq17&id=1
281.
Welcome to the HFEA | Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/
282.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
283.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
284.
de Melo-Martin I. On Cloning Human Beings. Bioethics. 2002;16(3):246-265. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00284
285.
Elsner D. Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2006;32(10):596-600. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.013748
286.
Harris J. Time to Exorcise the Cloning Demon. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2014;23(01):53-62. doi:10.1017/S0963180113000443
287.
Hayry M. Philosophical Arguments for and Against Human Reproductive Cloning. Bioethics. 2003;17(5-6):447-460. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00360
288.
Holm S. Going to the Roots of the Stem Cell Controversy. Bioethics. 2002;16(6):493-507. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00307
289.
Savulescu J, Harris J. The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons from Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2004;13(01). doi:10.1017/S0963180104241123
290.
Sparrow R. Cloning, Parenthood, and Genetic Relatedness. Bioethics. 2006;20(6):308-318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00509.x
291.
Camporesi S, Boniolo G. Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;34(11):821-825. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.024877
292.
Harris J. Cloning and Human Dignity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 7(2):163-167. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/cloning-and-human-dignity/8013F6CB7E353AFCB55711F75DD2B79B
293.
Havstad JC. Human Reproductive Cloning: A Conflict of Liberties. Bioethics. 2010;24(2):71-77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00692.x
294.
Matti Häyry. Response to Special Section: "Cloning: Technology, Policy, and Ethics” (CQ Vol 7, No 2): But What If We <span class="italic">Feel</span> That Cloning Is Wrong? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 10(2):205-208. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/response-to-special-section-cloning-technology-policy-and-ethics-cq-vol-7-no-2/9A19907ED4C4458D97F2849B269569C6
295.
Holm S. A Life in the Shadow: One Reason Why We Should Not Clone Humans. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 7(2):160-162. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/life-in-the-shadow-one-reason-why-we-should-not-clone-humans/C7041CE009D24E27729F64BD329938D2
296.
Hansen JES. Embryonic stem cell production through therapeutic cloning has fewer ethical problems than stem cell harvest from surplus IVF embryos. (Original Article). Journal of Medical Ethics. 2002;28:86-88. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A85370632&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authCount=1
297.
Jensen DA. Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;34(8):619-623. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.021980
298.
McDougall R. A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;34(4):259-261. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018804
299.
Strong C. Cloning and Infertility. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 7(3):279-293. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/cloning-and-infertility/E5D1B6551037AD9AB07C0858419546BA
300.
R (On the Application of Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health (HL) [2003] UKHL 13.
301.
Mason JK. Clones and Cell Nuclear Replacements: A Saga. Edinburgh Law Review. 2003;7(3):379-387. doi:10.3366/elr.2003.7.3.379
302.
World’s first gene-edited babies created in China, claims scientist. Guardian. Published online 26 November 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/26/worlds-first-gene-edited-babies-created-in-china-claims-scientist
303.
Second woman carrying gene-edited baby, Chinese authorities confirm. Guardian. Published online 22 January 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jan/22/second-woman-carrying-gene-edited-baby-chinese-authorities-confirm
304.
Hannah Devlin. Gene-edited babies: why are scientists so appalled? – Science Weekly podcast. Guardian. Published online 7 December 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/science/audio/2018/dec/07/gene-edited-babies-why-are-scientists-so-appalled-science-weekly-podcast
305.
Ian Sample. UK doctors select first women to have ‘three-person babies’. Guardian. Published online 1 February 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/01/permission-given-to-create-britains-first-three-person-babies
306.
Holtug N. Altering Humans—The Case For and Against Human Gene Therapy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1997;6(02). doi:10.1017/S0963180100007787
307.
Sarah Barber. Mitochondrial Donation. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06833
308.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics Genome editing and human reproduction short guide. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-short-guide-website.pdf
309.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics Genome editing and human reproduction. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-FINAL-website.pdf
310.
Harris J. Germline Modification and the Burden of Human Existence. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2016;25(01):6-18. doi:10.1017/S0963180115000237
311.
De Melo-Martin I. When the Milk of Human Kindness Becomes a Luxury (and Untested) Good. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2017;26(01):159-165. doi:10.1017/S0963180116000724
312.
Harris J. How To Welcome New Technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2017;26(01):166-172. doi:10.1017/S0963180116000736
313.
Baylis F. Human Nuclear Genome Transfer (So-Called Mitochondrial Replacement): Clearing the Underbrush. Bioethics. 2017;31(1):7-19. doi:10.1111/bioe.12309
314.
Chau PL, Herring J. Three parents and a baby. 2015;45(8):861-1020. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5K8D-GM21-DYHX-92J6&csi=432082&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
315.
Herbrand C. Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Who are the Potential Users and will they Benefit? Bioethics. 2017;31(1):46-54. doi:10.1111/bioe.12311
316.
Jones DA. The other woman: Evaluating the language of ‘three parent’ embryos. Clinical Ethics. 2015;10(4):97-106. doi:10.1177/1477750915599721
317.
Varvaštian S. UK’s Legalisation of Mitochondrial Donation in IVF Treatment: A Challenge to the International Community or a Promotion of Life-saving Medical Innovation to Be Followed by Others? European Journal of Health Law. 2015;22(5):405-425. doi:10.1163/15718093-12341366
http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/10.1163/15718093-12341366
318.
Brandt R. Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016;42(10):678-684. doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103587
319.
Gyngell C, Douglas T, Savulescu J. The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2017;34(4):498-513. doi:10.1111/japp.12249
320.
Wrigley A, Wilkinson S, Appleby JB. Mitochondrial Replacement: Ethics and Identity. Bioethics. 2015;29(9):631-638. doi:10.1111/bioe.12187
321.
Rulli T. The Mitochondrial Replacement ‘Therapy’ Myth. Bioethics. 2017;31(5):368-374. doi:10.1111/bioe.12332
322.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015.
323.
HFEA Code of Practice. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2793/2019-01-03-code-of-practice-9th-edition-v2.pdf
324.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
