1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization). International affairs. Published online 1944. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200321
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196878
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Published online 1981. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204860
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Project MUSE., Thomson Gale (Firm). International security. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200670
5.
Security studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2229313
6.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm), Project MUSE. Global environmental politics. Published online 2001. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199550
7.
Environmental politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2198883
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2205588
9.
Cambridge review of international affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228528
10.
Contemporary politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2228615
11.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. Politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2204089
12.
SpringerLink (Online service). International politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b3269906
13.
International feminist journal of politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200360
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2196849
15.
European journal of international relations. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199017
16.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm), Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. Published online 1995. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199554
17.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization), Oxford University Press. International studies quarterly. Published online 1967. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200679
18.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization), Oxford University Press. International studies review. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2200680
19.
International Studies Association, Oxford University Press. Foreign policy analysis. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2244344
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2289212
21.
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization). Perspectives on politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2203859
22.
E-International Relations  - The world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics. http://www.e-ir.info/
23.
Foreign Policy | the Global Magazine of News and Ideas. http://foreignpolicy.com/
24.
Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/
25.
Duck of Minerva. http://duckofminerva.com/
26.
Political Violence at a Glance. http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27.
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010. https://thedisorderofthings.com/
28.
Gilbert S. Why Studying the Humanities Is So Vital in the Information Age. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/06/learning-to-be-human/489659/
29.
Very Bad Wizards Episode 136: The Good Life (with Laurie Santos). https://verybadwizards.fireside.fm/136?t=12
30.
Joshua Forstenzer. We are losing sight of higher education’s true purpose. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/we-are-losing-sight-of-higher-educations-true-purpose-73637
31.
David Foster Wallace. Kenyon Commencement Speech 2005. https://www.1843magazine.com/story/david-foster-wallace-in-his-own-words
32.
Winterhalter B. The Morbid Fascination With the Death of the Humanities. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/06/the-morbid-fascination-with-the-death-of-the-humanities/372216/
33.
O’Sullivan N. Terrorism, Ideology and Revolution. Wheatsheaf; 1985. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6ba5ec25-ef40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
34.
Faisal Devji. The Terrorist as Humanitarian. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice. 2009;53(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23182467
35.
Pape RA. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review. 2003;97(3):343-361. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117613
36.
Max Abrahms. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security. 2006;31(2):42-78. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/205102
37.
Lutz JM, Lutz BJ. How Successful Is Terrorism? Forum on Public Policy. 2009;2009(1). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.515.9336
38.
Hoffman B, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Inside Terrorism. Reised and expanded edition. Columbia University Press; 2006. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=908254
39.
Crenshaw M. Explaining Terrorism: Causes, Processes and Consequences. Routledge; 2011.
40.
Juergensmeyer M. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Vol Comparative studies in religion and society. 3rd ed., rev.updated. University of California Press; 2003. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.33058
41.
Krueger AB. Does Poverty Cause Terrorism? New Republic. 2002;226:27-33. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=6822052&site=ehost-live
42.
Neumann PR, Smith MLR. Strategic terrorism: The framework and its fallacies. Journal of Strategic Studies. 2005;28(4):571-595. doi:10.1080/01402390500300923
43.
Zaidise E, Canetti-Nisim D, Pedahzur A. Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies. 2007;55(3):499-521. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00673.x
44.
McCauley C, Moskalenko S. Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2008;20(3):415-433. doi:10.1080/09546550802073367
45.
Rogers MB, Loewenthal KM, Lewis CA, Amlôt R, Cinnirella M, Ansari H. The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry. 2007;19(3):253-262. doi:10.1080/09540260701349399
46.
Victoroff J. The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2005;49(1):3-42. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/30045097
47.
Jaggar AM. What Is Terrorism, Why Is It Wrong, and Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible? Journal of Social Philosophy. 2005;36(2):202-217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00267.x
48.
Kahn PW. Imagining Warfare. European Journal of International Law. 2013;24(1):199-226. doi:10.1093/ejil/chs086
49.
Moyn S. Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 2013;24(1):227-233. doi:10.1093/ejil/cht011
50.
Brunstetter D. Can We Wage a Just Drone War? - The Atlantic. Published online 2012. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/can-we-wage-a-just-drone-war/260055/
51.
Brunstetter D, Braun M. The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition. Ethics & International Affairs. 2011;25(03):337-358. doi:10.1017/S0892679411000281
52.
Gregory D. From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011;28(7-8):188-215. doi:10.1177/0263276411423027
53.
Mayer M. The new killer drones: understanding the strategic implications of next-generation unmanned combat aerial vehicles. International Affairs. 2015;91(4):765-780. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12342
54.
Schulzke M. The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry. Political Studies. Published online September 2014:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12155
55.
Dunn DH. Drones: disembodied aerial warfare and the unarticulated threat. International Affairs. 2013;89(5):1237-1246. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12069
56.
Boyle MJ. The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs. 2013;89(1):1-29. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12002
57.
Holmqvist C. Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2013;41(3):535-552. doi:10.1177/0305829813483350
58.
International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Centre. Living Under Drones. Published online 2012. https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Stanford-NYU-Living-Under-Drones.pdf
59.
Wheeler NJ. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford University Press; 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199253102.001.0001
60.
Rengger NJ. Just War and International Order: The Uncivil Condition in World Politics. Cambridge University Press; 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382670
61.
Stansfield G. The Islamic State, the Kurdistan Region and the future of Iraq: assessing UK policy options. International Affairs. 2014;90(6):1329-1350. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12167
62.
Brown C. The antipolitical theory of responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2013;5(4):423-442. doi:10.1163/1875984X-00504004
63.
Morris J. Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs. 2013;89(5):1265-1283. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12071
64.
Averre D, Davies L. Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs. 2015;91(4):813-834. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12343
65.
Bellamy AJ. The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 2008;84(4):615-639. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25144868
66.
Chandler D. The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping. 2004;11(1):59-81. doi:10.1080/1353331042000228454
67.
Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. 1994;73(6):20-33. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/fora73&i=986
68.
Owens P. Accidents Don’t Just Happen: The Liberal Politics of High-Technology ‘Humanitarian’ War. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2003;32(3):595-616. doi:10.1177/03058298030320031101
69.
Bellamy AJ, Williams PD. The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs. 2011;87(4):825-850. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x
70.
Richmond OP. A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday. Review of International Studies. 2009;35(3):557-580. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20542804
71.
Paris R. Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies. 2010;36(2):337-365. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40783202
72.
Chandler D. The uncritical critique of ‘liberal peace’. Review of International Studies. 2010;36(S1):137-155. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000823
73.
Paris R. Bringing the Leviathan Back In: Classical versus Contemporary Studies of the Liberal Peace. International Studies Review. 2006;8(3):425-440. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3880255
74.
Mac Ginty R, Richmond OP. The Local Turn in Peace Building: a critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly. 2013;34(5):763-783. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.800750
75.
Richmond OP, Mac Ginty R. Where now for the critique of the liberal peace? Cooperation and Conflict. 2015;50(2):171-189. doi:10.1177/0010836714545691
76.
Mac Ginty R. Hybrid Peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue. 2010;41(4):391-412. doi:10.1177/0967010610374312
77.
Randazzo E. The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: scrutinising the local turn in peace building. Third World Quarterly. 2016;37(8):1351-1370. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1120154
78.
Sabaratnam M. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 2013;44(3):259-278. doi:10.1177/0967010613485870
79.
Chandler D. Resilience and the ‘everyday’: beyond the paradox of ‘liberal peace’. Review of International Studies. 2015;41(01):27-48. doi:10.1017/S0260210513000533
80.
Project on Middle East Political Science. The Gulf’s Escalating Sectarianism. Published online 2016. http://pomeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/POMEPS_BriefBooklet28_Sectarianism_Web.pdf
81.
Clausen ML. Understanding the crisis in Yemen: Evaluating competing narratives. The International Spectator. 2015;50(3):16-29. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1053707
82.
Mohammed Ayoob. Review: The Security Problematic of the Third World. World Politics. 1991;43(2):257-283. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010473
83.
Dingli S. Explained: how the Arab Spring led to an increasingly vicious civil war in Yemen. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/explained-how-the-arab-spring-led-to-an-increasingly-vicious-civil-war-in-yemen-55968
84.
Fraihat I. Unfinished Revolutions: Yemen, Libya, and Tunisia after the Arab Spring. Yale University Press; 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300215632.001.0001
85.
Alwazir A. It’s not a Sunni- Shi’a Conflict, dummy! Published 2015. https://atiafalwazir.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/its-not-a-sunni-shia-conflict-dummy/
86.
Cordesman AH. Yemen and warfare in failed states | Center for Strategic and International Studies. Published 2015. https://www.csis.org/analysis/yemen-and-warfare-failed-states
87.
Shuster M. The Origins Of The Shiite-Sunni Split : Parallels : NPR. Published 2007. http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2007/02/12/7332087/the-origins-of-the-shiite-sunni-split
88.
Center for International and Regional Studies. Sectarian Politics in the Gulf - Summary Report. Published online 2012. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/558538/CIRSSummaryReport7SectarianPoliticsintheGulf2012.pdf
89.
Salloukh BF. The Arab uprisings and the geopolitics of the Middle East. The International Spectator. 2013;48(2):32-46. doi:10.1080/03932729.2013.787830
90.
Gause III FG. Beyond Secatarianism: The New Middle East Cold War. Published online 2014. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/English-PDF-1.pdf
91.
Nasr V. The War for Islam | Foreign Policy. Published 2016. http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/22/the-war-for-islam-sunni-shiite-iraq-syria/
92.
Wehrey FM. The roots and future of sectarianism in the Gulf. Published 2014. http://pomeps.org/2014/03/21/the-roots-and-future-of-sectarianism-in-the-gulf/
93.
Salloukh BF. Overlapping contests and Middle East international relations: The Return of the Weak Arab State. 2015;16:47-51. https://pomeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/POMEPS_Studies_16_IR_Web1.pdf
94.
Byman D. Sectarianism afflicts the new Middle East. Survival. 2014;56(1):79-100. doi:10.1080/00396338.2014.882157
95.
Anand R. International Environmental Justice: A North-South Dimension. Routledge; 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315252049
96.
Klein N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Allen Lane; 2014. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=85a6632c-ef40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
97.
O’Neill K. The Environment and International Relations. Second edition. Cambridge University Press; 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107448087
98.
Wapner P. The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics. 2014;14(4):36-54. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/558307
99.
Hayes J, Knox-Hayes J. Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy. Global Environmental Politics. 2014;14(2):82-101. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/545869
100.
Skovgaard J. EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics. 2014;23(1):1-17. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.818304
101.
Clapp J, Swanston L. Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics. 2009;18(3):315-332. doi:10.1080/09644010902823717
102.
Tienhaara K. Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics. 2014;23(2):187-204. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.821828
103.
Betsill MM, Hochstetler K, Stevis D. Advances in International Environmental Politics. 2nd New ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137338976
104.
Thiele LP. Indra’s Net and the Midas Touch: Living Sustainably in a Connected World. MIT Press; 2011. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780262298858
105.
Forsyth T, ProQuest (Firm). Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. Routledge; 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=215025
106.
McKibben B. Oil and Honey. First St. Martin’s Griffin edition. St. Martin’s Griffin; 2014.
107.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, eds. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Third edition. Routledge; 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
108.
Piketty T, Goldhammer A. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780674369542
109.
Belfied C, Cribb J, Hood A, Joyce R. Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2014. Published online 2014. https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/comms/r96.pdf
110.
Beitz CR. Does Global Inequality Matter? Metaphilosophy. 2001;32(1-2):95-112. doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00177
111.
Alesina A, Glaeser EL. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford University Press; 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
112.
Bartels LM. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Russell Sage Foundation; 2008.
113.
Birdsall N. Why inequality matters: some economic issues. Ethics & International Affairs. 2001;15(2):3-28. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A80802930/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=AONE&xid=f12a02f1
114.
Cammack P. What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy. 2004;9(2):189-211. doi:10.1080/1356346042000218069
115.
Held D, Kaya A. Global Inequality: Patterns and Explanations. Polity Press; 2007.
116.
Martins N. Globalisation, Inequality and the Economic Crisis. New Political Economy. 2011;16(1):1-18. doi:10.1080/13563461003789761
117.
Wolf M. Why Globalization Works. Vol Yale Nota bene. Yale University Press; 2005.
118.
Onis Z. Democracy in uncertain times: Inequality and democratic development in the global North and global South. METU Studies in Development. 2016;23:317-336. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2641477
119.
Collier P. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done about It. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780198042549
120.
Fukuyama F. Identity, immigration, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy. 2006;17(2):5-20. doi:10.1353/jod.2006.0028
121.
Basaran T. The saved and the drowned: Governing indifference in the name of security. Security Dialogue. 2015;46(3):205-220. doi:10.1177/0967010614557512
122.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. (Shepherd LJ, ed.). Routledge; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1744166
123.
Nail T. The Figure of the Migrant. Stanford University Press; 2015.
124.
Bleiker R, Campbell D, Hutchison E, Nicholson X. The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science. 2013;48(4):398-416. doi:10.1080/10361146.2013.840769
125.
Fiona B. Adamson. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security. 2006;31(1):165-199. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/201244
126.
Muller BJ. (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies. 2004;8(3):279-294. doi:10.1080/1362102042000257005
127.
Basaran T. Security, Law, Borders: Spaces of Exclusion. International Political Sociology. 2008;2(4):339-354. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x
128.
Latham R. Border formations: security and subjectivity at the border. Citizenship Studies. 2010;14(2):185-201. doi:10.1080/13621021003594858
129.
Salter MB. When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies. 2008;12(4):365-380. doi:10.1080/13621020802184234
130.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, eds. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Third edition. Routledge; 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
131.
Caso F, Hamilton C, eds. Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing; 2015.
132.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, eds. Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=86a6632c-ef40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
133.
Robinson N. Have You Won the War on Terror? Military Videogames and the State of American Exceptionalism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2015;43(2):450-470. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0305829814557557
134.
Dittmer J, Gray N. Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass. 2010;4(11):1664-1677. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x
135.
Franklin M, ed. Resounding International Relations: On Music, Culture, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
136.
Power M. Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue. 2007;38(2):271-288. doi:10.1177/0967010607078552
137.
Grayson K, Davies M, Philpott S. Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics. 2009;29(3):155-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x
138.
Robinson N. Videogames, Persuasion and the War on Terror: Escaping or Embedding the Military-Entertainment Complex? Political Studies. 2012;60(3):504-522. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00923.x
139.
Weldes J. Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1999;28(1):117-134. doi:10.1177/03058298990280011201
140.
Jhally S, Earp J, Shaheen JG, Media Education Foundation. Reel bad Arabs: how Hollywood vilifies a people. Published online 2006.
141.
Sylvester C. Art/Museums: International Relations Where We Least Expect It. Vol Media and power. Paradigm Publishers; 2009.
142.
Bleiker R. Aesthetics and World Politics. Vol Rethinking peace and conflict studies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
143.
Weber C. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Fourth edition. Routledge; 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781315882291
144.
Nexon DH, Neumann IB. Harry Potter and International Relations. Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
145.
Shepherd LJ, Hamilton C, eds. Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.