1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs, EBSCO Publishing (Firm), JSTOR (Organization): International affairs. (1944).
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: The Brown journal of world affairs.
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press: Review of international studies. (1981).
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, JSTOR (Organization), M.I.T. Press, Project MUSE., Thomson Gale (Firm): International security.
6.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm), Project MUSE.: Global environmental politics. (2001).
7.
Environmental politics.
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press: Survival.
9.
Cambridge review of international affairs.
10.
Contemporary politics.
11.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom: Politics.
12.
SpringerLink (Online service): International politics.
13.
International feminist journal of politics.
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm): British journal of politics and international relations.
15.
European journal of international relations.
16.
EBSCO Publishing (Firm), Thomson Gale (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. (1995).
17.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization), Oxford University Press: International studies quarterly. (1967).
18.
International Studies Association, JSTOR (Organization), Oxford University Press: International studies review.
19.
International Studies Association, Oxford University Press: Foreign policy analysis.
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science: Millennium: journal of international studies.
21.
American Political Science Association, JSTOR (Organization): Perspectives on politics.
22.
E-International Relations - The world’s leading open access website for students and scholars of international politics, http://www.e-ir.info/.
23.
Foreign Policy | the Global Magazine of News and Ideas, http://foreignpolicy.com/.
24.
Foreign Affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/.
25.
Duck of Minerva, http://duckofminerva.com/.
26.
Political Violence at a Glance, http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/.
27.
The Disorder Of Things | For the Relentless Criticism of All Existing Conditions Since 2010, https://thedisorderofthings.com/.
28.
Gilbert, S.: Why Studying the Humanities Is So Vital in the Information Age.
29.
Very Bad Wizards Episode 136: The Good Life (with Laurie Santos), https://verybadwizards.fireside.fm/136?t=12.
30.
Joshua Forstenzer: We are losing sight of higher education’s true purpose. The Conversation.
31.
David Foster Wallace: Kenyon Commencement Speech 2005.
32.
Winterhalter, B.: The Morbid Fascination With the Death of the Humanities.
33.
O’Sullivan, N.: Terrorism, ideology and revolution. Wheatsheaf, Brighton (1985).
34.
Faisal Devji: The Terrorist as Humanitarian. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice. 53, (2009).
35.
Pape, R.A.: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review. 97, 343–361 (2003).
36.
Max Abrahms: Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security. 31, 42–78 (2006).
37.
Lutz, J.M., Lutz, B.J.: How Successful Is Terrorism? Forum on Public Policy. 2009, (2009).
38.
Hoffman, B., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New York (2006).
39.
Crenshaw, M.: Explaining terrorism: causes, processes and consequences. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2011).
40.
Juergensmeyer, M.: Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence. University of California Press, Berkeley (2003).
41.
Krueger, A.B.: Does Poverty Cause Terrorism? New Republic. 226, 27–33 (2002).
42.
Neumann, P.R., Smith, M.L.R.: Strategic terrorism: The framework and its fallacies. Journal of Strategic Studies. 28, 571–595 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390500300923.
43.
Zaidise, E., Canetti-Nisim, D., Pedahzur, A.: Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies. 55, 499–521 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00673.x.
44.
McCauley, C., Moskalenko, S.: Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 20, 415–433 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550802073367.
45.
Rogers, M.B., Loewenthal, K.M., Lewis, C.A., Amlôt, R., Cinnirella, M., Ansari, H.: The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry. 19, 253–262 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349399.
46.
Victoroff, J.: The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 49, 3–42 (2005).
47.
Jaggar, A.M.: What Is Terrorism, Why Is It Wrong, and Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible? Journal of Social Philosophy. 36, 202–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00267.x.
48.
Kahn, P.W.: Imagining Warfare. European Journal of International Law. 24, 199–226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs086.
49.
Moyn, S.: Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law. 24, 227–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht011.
50.
Brunstetter, D.: Can We Wage a Just Drone War? - The Atlantic. (2012).
51.
Brunstetter, D., Braun, M.: The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition. Ethics & International Affairs. 25, 337–358 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679411000281.
52.
Gregory, D.: From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society. 28, 188–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411423027.
53.
Mayer, M.: The new killer drones: understanding the strategic implications of next-generation unmanned combat aerial vehicles. International Affairs. 91, 765–780 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12342.
54.
Schulzke, M.: The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry. Political Studies. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12155.
55.
Dunn, D.H.: Drones: disembodied aerial warfare and the unarticulated threat. International Affairs. 89, 1237–1246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12069.
56.
Boyle, M.J.: The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs. 89, 1–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12002.
57.
Holmqvist, C.: Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 41, 535–552 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813483350.
58.
International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Centre: Living Under Drones, https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Stanford-NYU-Living-Under-Drones.pdf, (2012).
59.
Wheeler, N.J.: Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).
60.
Rengger, N.J.: Just war and international order: the uncivil condition in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
61.
Stansfield, G.: The Islamic State, the Kurdistan Region and the future of Iraq: assessing UK policy options. International Affairs. 90, 1329–1350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12167.
62.
Brown, C.: The antipolitical theory of responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect. 5, 423–442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00504004.
63.
Morris, J.: Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs. 89, 1265–1283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12071.
64.
Averre, D., Davies, L.: Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs. 91, 813–834 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12343.
65.
Bellamy, A.J.: The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 84, 615–639 (2008).
66.
Chandler, D.: The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping. 11, 59–81 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1353331042000228454.
67.
Betts, R.K.: The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. 73, 20–33 (1994).
68.
Owens, P.: Accidents Don’t Just Happen: The Liberal Politics of High-Technology ‘Humanitarian’ War. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 32, 595–616 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298030320031101.
69.
Bellamy, A.J., Williams, P.D.: The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs. 87, 825–850 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x.
70.
Richmond, O.P.: A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday. Review of International Studies. 35, 557–580 (2009).
71.
Paris, R.: Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies. 36, 337–365 (2010).
72.
Chandler, D.: The uncritical critique of ‘liberal peace’. Review of International Studies. 36, 137–155 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000823.
73.
Paris, R.: Bringing the Leviathan Back In: Classical versus Contemporary Studies of the Liberal Peace. International Studies Review. 8, 425–440 (2006).
74.
Mac Ginty, R., Richmond, O.P.: The Local Turn in Peace Building: a critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly. 34, 763–783 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.
75.
Richmond, O.P., Mac Ginty, R.: Where now for the critique of the liberal peace? Cooperation and Conflict. 50, 171–189 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836714545691.
76.
Mac Ginty, R.: Hybrid Peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue. 41, 391–412 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610374312.
77.
Randazzo, E.: The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: scrutinising the local turn in peace building. Third World Quarterly. 37, 1351–1370 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1120154.
78.
Sabaratnam, M.: Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue. 44, 259–278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613485870.
79.
Chandler, D.: Resilience and the ‘everyday’: beyond the paradox of ‘liberal peace’. Review of International Studies. 41, 27–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000533.
80.
Project on Middle East Political Science: The Gulf’s Escalating Sectarianism, http://pomeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/POMEPS_BriefBooklet28_Sectarianism_Web.pdf, (2016).
81.
Clausen, M.-L.: Understanding the crisis in Yemen: Evaluating competing narratives. The International Spectator. 50, 16–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2015.1053707.
82.
Mohammed Ayoob: Review: The Security Problematic of the Third World. World Politics. 43, 257–283 (1991).
83.
Dingli, S.: Explained: how the Arab Spring led to an increasingly vicious civil war in Yemen. The Conversation.
84.
Fraihat, I.: Unfinished revolutions: Yemen, Libya, and Tunisia after the Arab Spring. Yale University Press, New Haven (2016).
85.
Alwazir, A.: It’s not a Sunni- Shi’a Conflict, dummy!, https://atiafalwazir.wordpress.com/2015/01/28/its-not-a-sunni-shia-conflict-dummy/.
86.
Cordesman, A.H.: Yemen and warfare in failed states | Center for Strategic and International Studies, https://www.csis.org/analysis/yemen-and-warfare-failed-states.
87.
Shuster, M.: The Origins Of The Shiite-Sunni Split : Parallels : NPR, http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2007/02/12/7332087/the-origins-of-the-shiite-sunni-split.
88.
Center for International and Regional Studies: Sectarian Politics in the Gulf - Summary Report, https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/558538/CIRSSummaryReport7SectarianPoliticsintheGulf2012.pdf, (2012).
89.
Salloukh, B.F.: The Arab uprisings and the geopolitics of the Middle East. The International Spectator. 48, 32–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2013.787830.
90.
Gause III, F.G.: Beyond Secatarianism: The New Middle East Cold War, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/English-PDF-1.pdf, (2014).
91.
Nasr, V.: The War for Islam | Foreign Policy, http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/22/the-war-for-islam-sunni-shiite-iraq-syria/.
92.
Wehrey, F.M.: The roots and future of sectarianism in the Gulf, http://pomeps.org/2014/03/21/the-roots-and-future-of-sectarianism-in-the-gulf/.
93.
Salloukh, B.F.: Overlapping contests and Middle East international relations: The Return of the Weak Arab State. 16, 47–51 (2015).
94.
Byman, D.: Sectarianism afflicts the new Middle East. Survival. 56, 79–100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.882157.
95.
Anand, R.: International environmental justice: a North-South dimension. Routledge, London (2016).
96.
Klein, N.: This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. Allen Lane, London (2014).
97.
O’Neill, K.: The environment and international relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).
98.
Wapner, P.: The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics. 14, 36–54 (2014).
99.
Hayes, J., Knox-Hayes, J.: Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy. Global Environmental Politics. 14, 82–101 (2014).
100.
Skovgaard, J.: EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics. 23, 1–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.818304.
101.
Clapp, J., Swanston, L.: Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics. 18, 315–332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823717.
102.
Tienhaara, K.: Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics. 23, 187–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.821828.
103.
Betsill, M.M., Hochstetler, K., Stevis, D.: Advances in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
104.
Thiele, L.P.: Indra’s net and the Midas touch: living sustainably in a connected world. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2011).
105.
Forsyth, T., ProQuest (Firm): Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Routledge, London (2003).
106.
McKibben, B.: Oil and honey. St. Martin’s Griffin, New York, N.Y. (2014).
107.
Edkins, J., Zehfuss, M. eds: Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2019).
108.
Piketty, T., Goldhammer, A.: Capital in the twenty-first century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2014).
109.
Belfied, C., Cribb, J., Hood, A., Joyce, R.: Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2014, https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/comms/r96.pdf, (2014).
110.
Beitz, C.R.: Does Global Inequality Matter? Metaphilosophy. 32, 95–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00177.
111.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.L.: Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
112.
Bartels, L.M.: Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008).
113.
Birdsall, N.: Why inequality matters: some economic issues. Ethics & International Affairs. 15, 3–28 (2001).
114.
Cammack, P.: What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy. 9, 189–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1356346042000218069.
115.
Held, D., Kaya, A.: Global inequality: patterns and explanations. Polity Press, Cambridge (2007).
116.
Martins, N.: Globalisation, Inequality and the Economic Crisis. New Political Economy. 16, 1–18 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563461003789761.
117.
Wolf, M.: Why globalization works. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2005).
118.
Onis, Z.: Democracy in uncertain times: Inequality and democratic development in the global North and global South. METU Studies in Development. 23, 317–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641477.
119.
Collier, P.: The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
120.
Fukuyama, F.: Identity, immigration, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy. 17, 5–20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2006.0028.
121.
Basaran, T.: The saved and the drowned: Governing indifference in the name of security. Security Dialogue. 46, 205–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614557512.
122.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge, London (2015).
123.
Nail, T.: The figure of the migrant. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calidornia (2015).
124.
Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E., Nicholson, X.: The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science. 48, 398–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769.
125.
Fiona B. Adamson: Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security. 31, 165–199 (2006).
126.
Muller, B.J.: (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies. 8, 279–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102042000257005.
127.
Basaran, T.: Security, Law, Borders: Spaces of Exclusion. International Political Sociology. 2, 339–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x.
128.
Latham, R.: Border formations: security and subjectivity at the border. Citizenship Studies. 14, 185–201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13621021003594858.
129.
Salter, M.B.: When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies. 12, 365–380 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802184234.
130.
Edkins, J., Zehfuss, M. eds: Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2019).
131.
Caso, F., Hamilton, C. eds: Popular culture and world politics: theories, methods, pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol (2015).
132.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T. eds: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
133.
Robinson, N.: Have You Won the War on Terror? Military Videogames and the State of American Exceptionalism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 43, 450–470 (2015).
134.
Dittmer, J., Gray, N.: Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass. 4, 1664–1677 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x.
135.
Franklin, M. ed: Resounding international relations: on music, culture, and politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, N.Y. (2005).
136.
Power, M.: Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue. 38, 271–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078552.
137.
Grayson, K., Davies, M., Philpott, S.: Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics. 29, 155–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x.
138.
Robinson, N.: Videogames, Persuasion and the War on Terror: Escaping or Embedding the Military-Entertainment Complex? Political Studies. 60, 504–522 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00923.x.
139.
Weldes, J.: Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 28, 117–134 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298990280011201.
140.
Jhally, S., Earp, J., Shaheen, J.G., Media Education Foundation: Reel bad Arabs: how Hollywood vilifies a people, (2006).
141.
Sylvester, C.: Art/museums: international relations where we least expect it. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2009).
142.
Bleiker, R.: Aesthetics and world politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
143.
Weber, C.: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2014).
144.
Nexon, D.H., Neumann, I.B.: Harry Potter and international relations. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2006).
145.
Shepherd, L.J., Hamilton, C. eds: Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2016).
