[1]
Allinson, J. 2015. The Necropolitics of Drones. International Political Sociology. 9, 2 (Jun. 2015), 113–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12086.
[2]
Banakar, R. and Travers, M. 2013. Law and social theory. Hart Publishing.
[3]
Barron, A. 2002. Introduction to jurisprudence and legal theory: commentary and materials. Butterworths.
[4]
Bart Simon 2005. The Return of Panopticism: Supervision, Subjection and the New Surveillance. Surveillance & Society. 3, 1 (2005).
[5]
Bijker, W.E. et al. 1992. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press.
[6]
Burchell, G. et al. 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[7]
Burchell, G. et al. 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[8]
Callon, M. ed. 1998. The laws of the markets. Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.
[9]
Callon, M. and Muniesa, F. 2005. Peripheral Vision. Organization Studies. 26, 8 (Aug. 2005), 1229–1250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393.
[10]
Campesi, G. and Taylor & Francis Group 2016. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. Routledge.
[11]
Campesi, G. and Taylor & Francis Group 2016. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. Routledge.
[12]
Campesi, G. and Taylor & Francis Group 2016. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. Routledge.
[13]
Campesi, G. and Taylor & Francis Group 2016. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. Routledge.
[14]
Christodoulidis, E.A. 1998. Law and reflexive politics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[15]
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. 2007. Law and disorder in the postcolony. Social Anthropology. 15, 2 (Nov. 2007), 133–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0964-0282.2007.00010.x.
[16]
Cotterrell, R. and Oxford University Press 1995. Law’s community: legal theory in sociological perspective. Clarendon.
[17]
Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. SAGE.
[18]
Dean, M. 2015. The Malthus Effect: population and the liberal government of life. Economy and Society. 44, 1 (Feb. 2015), 18–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.983832.
[19]
Dodsworth, F.M. 2008. The Idea of Police in Eighteenth-Century England: Discipline, Reformation, Superintendence, c. 1780-1800. Journal of the History of Ideas. 69, 4 (2008).
[20]
Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P. 1983. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press.
[21]
Dubber, M.D. 2005. The police power: patriarchy and the foundations of American government. Columbia University Press.
[22]
Dubber, M.D. and Valverde, M. 2008. Police and the liberal state. Stanford General.
[23]
Ebooks Corporation Limited 2014. Max Weber, rationality and modernity. Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
[24]
Faulkner, A. et al. 2012. Introduction: Material Worlds: Intersections of Law, Science, Technology, and Society. Journal of Law and Society. 39, 1 (2012).
[25]
Foucault, M. et al. 2003. Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1965-76. Penguin.
[26]
Foucault, M. and Faubion, J.D. 2001. Power. Allen Lane.
[27]
Foucault, M. and Faubion, J.D. 2001. Power. Allen Lane.
[28]
Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. 1980. Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Press.
[29]
Foucault, M. and Hurley, R. 1978. The history of sexuality: Vol.1: The will to knowledge. Penguin.
[30]
Fuglsang, M. and Sørensen, B.M. 2006. Deleuze and the social. Edinburgh University Press.
[31]
Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. Clarendon Press.
[32]
Gilles Deleuze 1992. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October. 59, (1992).
[33]
Golder, B. 2015. Foucault and the politics of rights. Stanford University Press.
[34]
Golder, B. 2015. Foucault and the politics of rights. Stanford University Press.
[35]
Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action: Vol.2: Lifeworld and system : a critique of functionalist reason. Polity.
[36]
Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action: Vol.2: Lifeworld and system : a critique of functionalist reason. Polity.
[37]
Harcourt, B.E. 2015. Exposed: desire and disobedience in the digital age. Harvard University Press.
[38]
Jessop, B. 2007. From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography. 26, 1 (Jan. 2007), 34–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.002.
[39]
Jessop, B. 1982. The capitalist state: Marxist theories and methods. Robertson.
[40]
Johns, F. 2012. Annelise Riles. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. European Journal of International Law. 23, 4 (Nov. 2012), 1194–1199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs077.
[41]
Joyce, P. 2003. The rule of freedom: liberalism and the modern city. Verso.
[42]
Kelly, M.G.E. 2015. Discipline is control: Foucault contra Deleuze. (2015), 148–162.
[43]
Lamble, S. 2013. Queer Necropolitics and the Expanding Carceral State: Interrogating Sexual Investments in Punishment. Law and Critique. 24, 3 (Nov. 2013), 229–253. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-013-9125-1.
[44]
Latour, B. 2010. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Polity Press.
[45]
Law, J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice. 5, 4 (Aug. 1992), 379–393. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830.
[46]
Law, J. ed. 1986. Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[47]
Law, J. and Hassard, J. 1999. Actor network theory and after. Blackwell.
[48]
Levi, R. and Valverde, M. 2008. Studying Law by Association: Bruno Latour Goes to the Conseil d’État. Law & Social Inquiry. 33, 3 (Sep. 2008), 805–825. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00122.x.
[49]
Lezaun, J. 2006. Creating a New Object of Government: Making Genetically Modified Organisms Traceable. Social Studies of Science. 36, 4 (2006).
[50]
Loader, I. and Walker, N. 2007. Civilizing security. Cambridge University Press.
[51]
Luhmann, N. 1988. The Third Question: The Creative Use of Paradoxes in Law and Legal History. Journal of Law and Society. 15, 2 (Summer 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1410051.
[52]
Mackenzie, D. 2006. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 28, 01 (Mar. 2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710500509722.
[53]
MacKenzie, D.A. 2006. An engine, not a camera: how financial models shape markets. MIT Press.
[54]
Manokha, I. 2018. Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society. 16, 2 (2018), 219–237.
[55]
Marx, K. and McLellan, D. 1977. Karl Marx: selected writings. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Mbembe, A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture. 15, 1 (Jan. 2003), 11–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11.
[57]
McGee, K. ed. 2017. Latour and the passage of law. Edinburgh University Press.
[58]
McGee, K. 2015. The Fragile Force of Law: Mediation, Stratification, and Law’s Material Life. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 11, 3 (Oct. 2015), 467–490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872112447144.
[59]
Neocleous, M. 2008. Critique of security. Edinburgh University Press.
[60]
Neocleous, M. 2000. The fabrication of social order: a critical theory of police power. Pluto Press.
[61]
Poggi, G. 1978. The development of the modern state: a sociological introduction. Hutchinson.
[62]
Post, R. and University of California Press 1991. Law and the order of culture. University of California Press.
[63]
Pottage, A. 2012. The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society. 39, 1 (Mar. 2012), 167–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00576.x.
[64]
Pottage, A. and Mundy, M. eds. 2004. Law, anthropology, and the constitution of the social: making persons and things. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Poulantzas, N.A. 2014. State, power, socialism. Verso.
[66]
Preda, A. 2006. Socio-Technical Agency in Financial Markets: The Case of the Stock Ticker. Social Studies of Science. 36, 5 (2006).
[67]
Rabinow, P. and Rose, N. 2006. Biopower Today. BioSocieties. 1, 2 (Jun. 2006), 195–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855206040014.
[68]
Riles, A. 2005. A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities. Paper 782, (2005).
[69]
Riles, A. 2005. A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities. Paper 782, (2005).
[70]
Riles, A. 2011. Collateral knowledge: legal reasoning in the global financial markets. University of Chicago Press.
[71]
Riles, A. 1999. Models and Documents: Artefacts of International Legal Knowledge. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 48, 4 (1999).
[72]
Riles, A. 2008. The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 56, 3 (2008).
[73]
Rose, N. 2001. The Politics of Life Itself. Theory, Culture & Society. 18, 6 (Dec. 2001), 1–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122052020.
[74]
Rottleuthner, H. 1989. The Limits of the Law: The Myth of a Regulatory Crisis. International journal of the sociology of law. 17, (1989), 273–285.
[75]
Sally Ewing 1987. Formal Justice and the Spirit of Capitalism: Max Weber’s Sociology of Law. Law & Society Review. 21, 3 (1987), 487–512.
[76]
Smith, S.C. 1991. Beyond ‘Mega-Theory’ and ‘Multiple Sociology’: A Reply to Rottleuthner. International journal of the sociology of law. 19, (1991), 321–340.
[77]
Teubner, G. ed. 1988. Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Walter de Gruyter.
[78]
Teubner, G. 1989. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law. Law & Society Review. 23, 5 (1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053760.
[79]
Teubner, G. 1998. Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. A reader on regulation. Oxford University Press.
[80]
Teubner, G. 1992. Regulatory Law : Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Social & Legal Studies. 1, 4 (Dec. 1992), 451–475. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399200100401.
[81]
Teubner, G. 2006. The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by ‘Private’ Transnational Actors. Modern Law Review. 69, 3 (May 2006), 327–346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00587.x.
[82]
Turner, B.S. 1996. For Weber: essays on the sociology of fate. SAGE Publications.
[83]
Unger, R.M. 1977. Law in modern society: toward a criticism of social theory. Free Press.
[84]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[85]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[86]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[87]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[88]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[89]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[90]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[91]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[92]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[93]
Veitch, S. et al. 2018. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Routledge.
[94]
Villadsen, K. and Wahlberg, A. 2015. The government of life: managing populations, health and scarcity. Economy and Society. 44, 1 (Feb. 2015), 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.983831.
[95]
Weber, M. et al. 1978. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.
[96]
Weber, M. and Ebooks Corporation Limited 2001. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge.