1
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018.
2
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. London: : Routledge 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
3
Banakar R, Travers M. Law and social theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=64a769a9-e440-e911-80cd-005056af4099
4
Poggi G. The development of the modern state: a sociological introduction. London: : Hutchinson 1978.
5
Campesi G, Taylor & Francis Group. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. London: : Routledge 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317484547
6
Habermas J. The theory of communicative action: Vol.2: Lifeworld and system : a critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: : Polity 1987.
7
Jessop B. The capitalist state: Marxist theories and methods. Oxford: : Robertson 1982.
8
Poulantzas NA. State, power, socialism. London: : Verso 2014.
9
Unger RM. Law in modern society: toward a criticism of social theory. 1st Free Press pbk. ed. New York, N.Y.: : Free Press 1977.
10
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018.
11
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. London: : Routledge 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
12
Weber M, Roth G, Wittich C. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1978.
13
Weber M, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: : Routledge 2001. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_485048_0
14
Cotterrell R, Oxford University Press. Law’s community: legal theory in sociological perspective. Oxford: : Clarendon 1995. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264903.001.0001
15
Sally Ewing. Formal Justice and the Spirit of Capitalism: Max Weber’s Sociology of Law. Law & Society Review 1987;21:487–512.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3053379
16
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Max Weber, rationality and modernity. Hoboken, New Jersey: : Routledge, Taylor and Francis 2014. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1665841
17
Turner BS. For Weber: essays on the sociology of fate. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE Publications 1996.
18
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018.
19
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. London: : Routledge 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
20
Foucault M, Gordon C. Power-knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: : Harvester Press 1980.
21
Dreyfus HL, Rabinow P. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1983.
22
Post R, University of California Press. Law and the order of culture. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1991. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft9q2nb693&brand=ucpress
23
Golder B. Foucault and the politics of rights. Stanford, California: : Stanford University Press 2015.
24
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018.
25
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. London: : Routledge 2018. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
26
Foucault M, Faubion JD. Power. London: : Allen Lane 2001.
27
Garland D. Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1990.
28
Foucault M, Faubion JD. Power. London: : Allen Lane 2001.
29
Foucault M, Hurley R. The history of sexuality: Vol.1: The will to knowledge. London: : Penguin 1978.
30
Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, et al. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991.
31
Campesi G, Taylor & Francis Group. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. London: : Routledge 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317484547
32
Dean M. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE 2010.
33
Golder B. Foucault and the politics of rights. Stanford, California: : Stanford University Press 2015.
34
Jessop B. From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography 2007;26:34–40. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.002
35
Joyce P. The rule of freedom: liberalism and the modern city. London: : Verso 2003.
36
Burchell G, Gordon C, Miller P, et al. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1991.
37
Campesi G, Taylor & Francis Group. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. London: : Routledge 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317484547
38
Dodsworth FM. The Idea of Police in Eighteenth-Century England: Discipline, Reformation, Superintendence, c. 1780-1800. Journal of the History of Ideas 2008;69.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40208080
39
Dubber MD. The police power: patriarchy and the foundations of American government. New York: : Columbia University Press 2005.
40
Neocleous M. The fabrication of social order: a critical theory of police power. London: : Pluto Press 2000.
41
Dubber MD, Valverde M. Police and the liberal state. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford General 2008. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804759328.001.0001
42
Gilles Deleuze. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 1992;59.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/778828
43
Harcourt BE. Exposed: desire and disobedience in the digital age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : Harvard University Press 2015.
44
Kelly MGE. Discipline is control: Foucault contra Deleuze. 2015;:148–62.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/597737
45
Fuglsang M, Sørensen BM. Deleuze and the social. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2006. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748620920.001.0001
46
Loader I, Walker N. Civilizing security. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611117
47
Manokha I. Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society 2018;16:219–37.https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/8346
48
Neocleous M. Critique of security. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2008. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748633289.001.0001
49
Bart Simon. The Return of Panopticism: Supervision, Subjection and the New Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 2005;3.https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3317
50
Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself. Theory, Culture & Society 2001;18:1–30. doi:10.1177/02632760122052020
51
Dean M. The Malthus Effect: population and the liberal government of life. Economy and Society 2015;44:18–39. doi:10.1080/03085147.2014.983832
52
Foucault M, Bertani M, Fontana A, et al. Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1965-76. London: : Penguin 2003.
53
Rabinow P, Rose N. Biopower Today. BioSocieties 2006;1:195–217. doi:10.1017/S1745855206040014
54
Villadsen K, Wahlberg A. The government of life: managing populations, health and scarcity. Economy and Society 2015;44:1–17. doi:10.1080/03085147.2014.983831
55
Mbembe A. Necropolitics. Public Culture 2003;15:11–40. doi:10.1215/08992363-15-1-11
56
Allinson J. The Necropolitics of Drones. International Political Sociology 2015;9:113–27. doi:10.1111/ips.12086
57
Comaroff J, Comaroff J. Law and disorder in the postcolony. Social Anthropology 2007;15:133–52. doi:10.1111/j.0964-0282.2007.00010.x
58
Lamble S. Queer Necropolitics and the Expanding Carceral State: Interrogating Sexual Investments in Punishment. Law and Critique 2013;24:229–53. doi:10.1007/s10978-013-9125-1
59
Campesi G, Taylor & Francis Group. A genealogy of public security: the theory and history of modern police powers. London: : Routledge 2016. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317484547
60
Marx K, McLellan D. Karl Marx: selected writings. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1977. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=65a769a9-e440-e911-80cd-005056af4099
61
Bijker WE, Law J, American Council of Learned Societies. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1992. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01128
62
Law J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 1992;5:379–93. doi:10.1007/BF01059830
63
Faulkner A, Lange B, Lawless C. Introduction: Material Worlds: Intersections of Law, Science, Technology, and Society. Journal of Law and Society 2012;39.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41350295
64
McGee K, editor. Latour and the passage of law. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697908.001.0001
65
Pottage A, Mundy M, editors. Law, anthropology, and the constitution of the social: making persons and things. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493751
66
Law J, editor. Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1986.
67
McGee K. The Fragile Force of Law: Mediation, Stratification, and Law’s Material Life. Law, Culture and the Humanities 2015;11:467–90. doi:10.1177/1743872112447144
68
Pottage A. The Materiality of What? Journal of Law and Society 2012;39:167–83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00576.x
69
Levi R, Valverde M. Studying Law by Association: Bruno Latour Goes to the Conseil d’État. Law & Social Inquiry 2008;33:805–25. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00122.x
70
Latour B. The making of law: an ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 2010.
71
Lezaun J. Creating a New Object of Government: Making Genetically Modified Organisms Traceable. Social Studies of Science 2006;36.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25474458
72
Riles A. A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities. 2005;Paper 782.https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/782/
73
Barron A. Introduction to jurisprudence and legal theory: commentary and materials. London: : Butterworths 2002. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4869e49d-e440-e911-80cd-005056af4099
74
Teubner G. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law. Law & Society Review 1989;23. doi:10.2307/3053760
75
Christodoulidis EA. Law and reflexive politics. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cdeb11b6-e440-e911-80cd-005056af4099
76
Luhmann N. The Third Question: The Creative Use of Paradoxes in Law and Legal History. Journal of Law and Society 1988;15. doi:10.2307/1410051
77
Teubner G, editor. Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlin: : Walter de Gruyter 1988. http://GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3042050
78
Teubner G. The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by ‘Private’ Transnational Actors. Modern Law Review 2006;69:327–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00587.x
79
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M, et al. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
80
Teubner G. Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In: A reader on regulation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198765295.001.0001/acprof-9780198765295-chapter-15
81
Rottleuthner H. The Limits of the Law: The Myth of a Regulatory Crisis. International journal of the sociology of law 1989;17:273–85.
82
Smith SC. Beyond ‘Mega-Theory’ and ‘Multiple Sociology’: A Reply to Rottleuthner. International journal of the sociology of law 1991;19:321–40.
83
Teubner G. Regulatory Law : Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Social & Legal Studies 1992;1:451–75. doi:10.1177/096466399200100401
84
Habermas J. The theory of communicative action: Vol.2: Lifeworld and system : a critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: : Polity 1987.
85
Veitch S, Christodoulidis EA, Goldoni M, et al. Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2018. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315795997
86
Riles A. The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State. The American Journal of Comparative Law 2008;56.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20454632
87
Riles A. Collateral knowledge: legal reasoning in the global financial markets. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2011. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226719344.001.0001/upso-9780226719320
88
Johns F. Annelise Riles. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. European Journal of International Law 2012;23:1194–9. doi:10.1093/ejil/chs077
89
Riles A. Models and Documents: Artefacts of International Legal Knowledge. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1999;48.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/761735
90
Riles A. A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities. 2005;Paper 782.https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/782/
91
Mackenzie D. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2006;28. doi:10.1080/10427710500509722
92
MacKenzie DA. An engine, not a camera: how financial models shape markets. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2006. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262134606.001.0001
93
Law J, Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
94
Callon M, editor. The laws of the markets. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review 1998.
95
Preda A. Socio-Technical Agency in Financial Markets: The Case of the Stock Ticker. Social Studies of Science 2006;36.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25474473
96
Callon M, Muniesa F. Peripheral Vision. Organization Studies 2005;26:1229–50. doi:10.1177/0170840605056393
