1.
The American Political Science Review. Published online 1906. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/amerpoliscierevi
2.
American Journal of Political Science. Published online 1973. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/amerjpoliscie
3.
Annual Review of Political Science. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?sid=11ba6554-2e01-4540-86ff-3827cf64e75a%40sessionmgr4007&vid=0&hid=4201&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#jid=84B&db=buh
4.
Annual Review of Sociology. Published online 1975. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/annurevisoci
5.
British Journal of Political Science. Published online 1971. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/britjpoliscie
6.
Comparative Political Studies. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2197554
7.
European Journal of Political Research. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-6765
8.
European Union Politics. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199096
9.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fbep20
10.
Political Analysis. Published online 1989. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/polianalysis
11.
Political Behavior. Published online 1979. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/polibeha
12.
Political Psychology. Published online 1979. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/polipsyc
13.
The Public Opinion Quarterly. Published online 1937. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/journal/publopinquar
14.
Aldridge A, Levine K, Dawson Books. Surveying the Social World: Principles and Practice in Survey Research. Vol Understanding social research. Open University Press; 2001. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780335230471
15.
Denscombe M, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. Vol Open UP study skills. Fifth edition. Open University Press; 2014. http://gla.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1910221
16.
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. SAGE; 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206515
17.
Rae Atkeson L, Alvarez RM. Introduction to Political Analysis Mini-Symposium on Advances in Survey Methodology. Political Analysis. 2014;22(3):281-284. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu006
18.
Massey DS, Tourangeau R. Introduction: New Challenges to Social Measurement. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013;645(1):6-22. doi:10.1177/0002716212463314
19.
Murphy J, Link MW, Childs JH, et al. Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014;78(4):788-794. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu053
20.
Barrington LW. Fragile Snapshot or Stable Relationships?: What the Orange and Rose Revolutions Reveal About the Stability of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. Comparative Political Studies. 2012;45(3):312-340. doi:10.1177/0010414011421311
21.
Soroka SN, Wlezien C. Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35(4):665-689. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092416
22.
Toshkov D. Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics. 2011;12(2):169-191. doi:10.1177/1465116510395043
23.
Franklin MN, Wlezien C. The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1997;9(3):347-363. doi:10.1177/0951692897009003005
24.
Wlezien C. The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39(4). doi:10.2307/2111666
25.
Nicholson-Crotty S, Peterson DAM, Ramirez MD. Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood. Political Behavior. 2009;31(4):629-655. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40587302
26.
Jennings W. The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994-2007. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39(4):847-870. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742775
27.
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. SAGE; 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206515
28.
Norris P. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press; 2011. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
29.
Hetherington MJ. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton University Press; 2005.
30.
Armingeon K, Guthmann K. Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007-2011. European Journal of Political Research. 2014;53(3):423-442. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12046
31.
Teixeira CP, Tsatsanis E, Belchior AM. Support for Democracy in Times of Crisis: Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Portugal and Greece. South European Society and Politics. 2014;19(4):501-518. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.975770
32.
Dahlberg S, Holmberg S. Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction. West European Politics. 2014;37(3):515-537. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.830468
33.
Marien S, Hooghe M. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research. 2011;50(2):267-291. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
34.
Esaiasson P, Gilljam M, Persson M. Which decision-making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment. European Journal of Political Research. 2012;51(6):785-808. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.x
35.
Natalia Letki. Investigating the Roots of Civic Morality: Trust, Social Capital, and Institutional Performance. Political Behavior. 2006;28(4):305-325. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500227
36.
Anderson CJ, Tverdova YV. Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 2003;47(1). doi:10.2307/3186095
37.
Anderson CJ, Tverdova YV. Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 2001;22(4):321-338. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601210
38.
Rohrschneider R. Institutional Quality and Perceptions of Representation in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. 2005;38(7):850-874. doi:10.1177/0010414005276305
39.
Norris P, Oxford University Press. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press; 1999. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.001.0001
40.
Dalton RJ, Oxford University Press. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press; 2004. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001
41.
Hobolt SB, de Vries CE. Public Support for European Integration. Annual Review of Political Science. 2016;19(1):413-432. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
42.
Hobolt SB, Wratil C. Public opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of support for the euro. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22(2):238-256. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.994022
43.
Curtice PJ. In or Out? How Britain Decided. http://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/research/politics/stevensontrust/videos/
44.
Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities | JRF. https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/brexit-vote-explained-poverty-low-skills-and-lack-opportunities
45.
Gifford C. The rise of post-imperial populism: The case of right-wing Euroscepticism in Britain. European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45(5):851-869. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00638.x
46.
Bruter M. Time Bomb?: The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42(12):1498-1536. doi:10.1177/0010414009332465
47.
Sigalas E. Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the ERASMUS year abroad. European Union Politics. 2010;11(2):241-265. doi:10.1177/1465116510363656
48.
Jackson JE, Mach BW, Miller-Gonzalez JL. Buying support and regime change: the evolution of Polish attitudes towards the EU and voting between accession and 2008. European Union Politics. 2011;12(2):147-167. doi:10.1177/1465116511400197
49.
Clements B. The sociological and psychological influences on public support for the European Union in Britain, 1983–2005. British Politics. 2009;4(1):47-82. doi:10.1057/bp.2008.39
50.
van Elsas EJ, Hakhverdian A, van der Brug W. United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens. West European Politics. 2016;39(6):1181-1204. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1175244
51.
Hooghe L, Marks G. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39(1):1-23. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27568377
52.
Down I, Wilson CJ. A rising generation of Europeans? Life-cycle and cohort effects on support for ‘Europe’. European Journal of Political Research. 2013;52(4):431-456. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12001
53.
Rohrschneider R, Loveless M. Macro Salience: How Economic and Political Contexts Mediate Popular Evaluations of the Democracy Deficit in the European Union. The Journal of Politics. 2010;72(4):1029-1045. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000514
54.
Munoz J, Torcal M, Bonet E. Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics. 2011;12(4):551-574. doi:10.1177/1465116511419250
55.
Elenbaas M, De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG, Schuck ART. The impact of information acquisition on EU performance judgements. European Journal of Political Research. 2012;51(6):728-755. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02055.x
56.
Stoeckel F. Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. European Union Politics. 2013;14(1):23-45. doi:10.1177/1465116512460736
57.
McLaren LM. Identity, Interests, and Attitudes to European Integration. Vol Palgrave studies in European Union politics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
58.
Carey S. Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration? European Union Politics. 2002;3(4):387-413. doi:10.1177/1465116502003004001
59.
Hooghe L. Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics. 2005;6(4):419-443. doi:10.1177/1465116505057816
60.
Ilonszki G. Perceptions of the European Union in New Member States: A Comparative Perspective. Vol Routledge Europe-Asia studies series. Routledge; 2010.
61.
Hooghe L, Marks G. Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration? PS: Political Science and Politics. 2004;37(3):415-420. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4488854
62.
Hooghe M, Stolle D, eds. Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781403979544
63.
Field J. Social Capital. Vol Key ideas. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2008. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203930519
64.
Stolle D, Hooghe M. Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35(1):149-167. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4092284
65.
Reeskens T, Wright M. Nationalism and the Cohesive Society: A Multilevel Analysis of the Interplay Among Diversity, National Identity, and Social Capital Across 27 European Societies. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46(2):153-181. doi:10.1177/0010414012453033
66.
Kittilson MC, Dalton RJ. Virtual Civil Society: The New Frontier of Social Capital? Political Behavior. 2011;33(4):625-644. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41488879
67.
Hall PA. Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 1999;29(3):417-461. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/194145
68.
Hooghe M, Quintelier E. Do All Associations Lead to Lower Levels of Ethnocentrism? A Two-Year Longitudinal Test of the Selection and Adaptation Model. Political Behavior. 2013;35(2):289-309. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9201-5
69.
Hopkins DJ, Williamson T. Inactive by Design? Neighborhood Design and Political Participation. Political Behavior. 2012;34(1):79-101. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41488052
70.
Paraskevopoulos CJ. Social Capital: Summing up the Debate on a Conceptual Tool of Comparative Politics and Public Policy. Comparative Politics. 2010;42(4):475-494. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25741377
71.
Berman S. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics. 1997;49(03):401-429. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008
72.
Freitag M, Buhlmann M. Crafting Trust: The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42(12):1537-1566. doi:10.1177/0010414009332151
73.
Delhey J, Newton K, Welzel C. How General Is Trust in ‘Most People’? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review. 2011;76(5):786-807. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23019220
74.
Bekkers R. Trust and Volunteering: Selection or Causation? Evidence From a 4 Year Panel Study. Political Behavior. 2012;34(2):225-247. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23262445
75.
Pichler F, Wallace C. Social Capital and Social Class in Europe: The Role of Social Networks in Social Stratification. European Sociological Review. 2009;25(3):319-332. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25548330
76.
Almond GA, Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. [New ed.]. Sage; 1989.
77.
Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press; 1994. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400820740
78.
Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster; 2000.
79.
Uslaner EM. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
80.
Muller EN, Seligson MA. Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships. American Political Science Review. 1994;88(03):635-652. doi:10.2307/2944800
81.
Radnitz S, Wheatley J, Zurcher C. The Origins of Social Capital: Evidence From a Survey of Post-Soviet Central Asia. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42(6):707-732. doi:10.1177/0010414008329893
82.
Baker W, Faulkner RR. Social Capital, Double Embeddedness, and Mechanisms of Stability and Change. American Behavioral Scientist. 2009;52(11):1531-1555. doi:10.1177/0002764209331525
83.
van Deth JW, Zmerli S. Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy--A ‘Dark Side’ of Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53(5):631-639. doi:10.1177/0002764209350827
84.
Sturgis P, Read S, Hatemi PK, et al. A Genetic Basis for Social Trust? Political Behavior. 2010;32(2):205-230. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40587316
85.
Portes A, Vickstrom E. Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology. 2011;37(1):461-479. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150022
86.
Uslaner EM. Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026758
87.
Gerritsen D, Lubbers M. Unknown is unloved? Diversity and inter-population trust in Europe. European Union Politics. 2010;11(2):267-287. doi:10.1177/1465116510363311
88.
Sturgis P, Brunton-Smith I, Read S, Allum N. Does ethnic diversity erode trust?: Putnam’s ‘hunkering-down’ thesis reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science. 41(1):57-82. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/does-ethnic-diversity-erode-trust-putnams-hunkering-down-thesis-reconsidered/DC0DA871517729C51D08C4C7FF34E03B
89.
Sturgis P, Brunton-Smith I, Kuha J, Jackson J. Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2014;37(8):1286-1309. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.831932
90.
Hooghe M, Reeskens T, Stolle D, Trappers A. Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe: A Cross-National Multilevel Study. Comparative Political Studies. 2008;42(2):198-223. doi:10.1177/0010414008325286
91.
You J sung. Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Homogeneity. Political Psychology. 2012;33(5):701-721. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23324182
92.
Reeskens T, Wright M. Nationalism and the Cohesive Society: A Multilevel Analysis of the Interplay Among Diversity, National Identity, and Social Capital Across 27 European Societies. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46(2):153-181. doi:10.1177/0010414012453033
93.
Walzer M, Askews & Holts Library Services. On Toleration. Vol The Castle lectures in ethics, politics, and economics. Yale University Press; 1997. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780300127737
94.
Mendus S, Edwards D, MyiLibrary. On Toleration. Clarendon Press; 1987. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=81097&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
95.
Iyengar S, McGuire WJ. Explorations in Political Psychology. Vol Duke studies in political psychology. Duke University Press; 1993.
96.
Hainmueller J, Hopkins DJ. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science. 2014;17(1):225-249. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818
97.
Quillian L. New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology. 2006;32:299-328. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737741
98.
Gilens M, Dawson Books. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Vol Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. University of Chicago Press; 1999. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226293660
99.
Schmidt-Catran AW, Spies DC. Immigration and Welfare Support in Germany. American Sociological Review. 2016;81(2):242-261. doi:10.1177/0003122416633140
100.
Iyengar S, McGuire WJ. Explorations in Political Psychology. Vol Duke studies in political psychology. Duke University Press; 1993.
101.
Hainmueller J, Hangartner D. Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination. American Political Science Review. 107(1):159-187. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
102.
Abrajano M, Hajnal Z. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics. Princeton University Press; 2015.
103.
Newman BJ, Hartman TK, Taber CS. Social Dominance and the Cultural Politics of Immigration. Political Psychology. 2014;35(2):165-186. doi:10.1111/pops.12047
104.
Filindra A, Kaplan NJ. Racial Resentment and Whites’ Gun Policy Preferences in Contemporary America. Political Behavior. 2016;38(2):255-275. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9326-4
105.
The Political Quarterly. Volume 85(Issue 3). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/poqu.2014.85.issue-3/issuetoc
106.
Banks AJ. The Public’s Anger: White Racial Attitudes and Opinions Toward Health Care Reform. Political Behavior. 2014;36(3):493-514. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3
107.
Ford R. Acceptable and Unacceptable Immigrants: How Opposition to Immigration in Britain is Affected by Migrants’ Region of Origin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2011;37(7):1017-1037. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.572423
108.
Sniderman PM, Hagendoorn L, Prior M. Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. The American Political Science Review. 2004;98(1):35-49. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4145295
109.
Sides J, Citrin J. European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information. British Journal of Political Science. 2007;37(3):477-504. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4497304
110.
Blinder S, Ford R, Ivarsflaten E. The Better Angels of Our Nature: How the Antiprejudice Norm Affects Policy and Party Preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science. 2013;57(4):841-857. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23496660
111.
Rydgren J, Sofi D, Hällsten M. Interethnic Friendship, Trust, and Tolerance: Findings from Two North Iraqi Cities1. American Journal of Sociology. 2013;118(Issue 6):1650-1694. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669854
112.
Simon RJ. Old Minorities, New Immigrants: Aspirations, Hopes, and Fears. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1993;530:61-73. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1047677
113.
Whitley BE. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;(1). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1999-05981-009&site=ehost-live
114.
Tausch N, Hewstone M, Kenworthy J, Cairns E, Christ O. Cross-Community Contact, Perceived Status Differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Roles of Individual-level versus Group-level Threats and the Moderating Role of Social Identification. Political Psychology. 2007;28(1):53-68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x
115.
McLaren L, Johnson M. Resources, Group Conflict and Symbols: Explaining Anti-Immigration Hostility in Britain. Political Studies. 2007;55(4):709-732. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00680.x
116.
McLaren LM. Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces. 2003;81(3):909-936. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0038
117.
Tesler M. The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race. American Journal of Political Science. 2012;56(3):690-704. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x
118.
Rocha RR, Espino R. Racial Threat, Residential Segregation, and the Policy Attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly. 2009;62(2):415-426. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759878
119.
Bowyer BT. The Contextual Determinants of Whites’ Racial Attitudes in England. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39(3):559-586. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27742758
120.
Poteat PV. The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;(6). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2007-07951-006&site=ehost-live
121.
Andersen R, Fetner T. Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72(2):311-330. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25167627
122.
Loftus J. America’s Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review. 2001;66(5):762-782. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088957
123.
Haider-Markel DP, Joslyn MR. Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72(2):291-310. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25167626
124.
Olson LR, Cadge W, Harrison JT. Religion and Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage. Social Science Quarterly. 2006;87(2):340-360. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
125.
Miceli MS. Morality Politics vs. Identity Politics: Framing Processes and Competition among Christian Right and Gay Social Movement Organizations. Sociological Forum. 2005;20(4):589-612. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4540917
126.
Ohlander J, Batalova J, Treas J. Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations. Social Science Research. 2005;34(4):781-799. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.12.004
127.
Brewer J. Sexuality in the Church: toward a sociology of the Bible. Sociological Research Online. 2003;8(4). doi:10.5153/sro.840
128.
Crockett A, Voas D. A Divergence of Views: Attitude change and the religious crisis over homosexuality. A divergence of views: Attitude change and the religious crisis over homosexuality. 8(4). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/4/crockett.html
129.
Herek GM. Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2002;66(1):40-66. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078695
130.
Walzer M, Askews & Holts Library Services. On Toleration. Vol The Castle lectures in ethics, politics, and economics. Yale University Press; 1997. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780300127737
131.
Mendus S, Edwards D, MyiLibrary. On Toleration. Clarendon Press; 1987. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=81097&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
132.
Gibson JL. Alternative Measures of Political Tolerance: Must Tolerance be ‘Least-Liked’? American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36(2). doi:10.2307/2111491
133.
Peterson M, Slothuus R, Stubager R, Togeby L. Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance. British Journal of Political Science. 41:581-597. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
134.
Gibson JL. Political Intolerance and Political Repression During the McCarthy Red Scare. The American Political Science Review. 1988;82(2). doi:10.2307/1957398
135.
Gibson JL. Intolerance and Political Repression in the United States: A Half Century after McCarthyism. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52(1):96-108. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25193799
136.
Gibson JL, Gouws A. Making Tolerance Judgments: The Effects of Context, Local and National. The Journal of Politics. 2001;63(4):1067-1090. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2691807
137.
Hinckley RA. Personality and Political Tolerance: The Limits of Democratic Learning in Postcommunist Europe. Comparative Political Studies. 2010;43(2):188-207. doi:10.1177/0010414009349327
138.
Crawford JT, Pilanski JM. Political Intolerance, Right and Left. Political Psychology. 2014;35(6):841-851. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
139.
Djupe PA, Calfano BR. American Muslim Investment in Civil Society: Political Discussion, Disagreement, and Tolerance. Political Research Quarterly. 2012;65(3):516-528. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41635252
140.
Bobo L, Licari FC. Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1989;53(3):285-308. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2749123
141.
Sniderman PM, Fletcher JF, Russell PH, Tetlock PE, Gaines BJ. The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties. British Journal of Political Science. 1991;21(3):349-370. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/193731
142.
Stouffer SA. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. Transactions Publishers; 1992.
143.
Sullivan JL, Piereson J, Marcus GE. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Vol Midway reprints. University of Chicago Press; 1989.
144.
Gibson JL. A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate. American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42(3). doi:10.2307/2991731
145.
Peffley M, Rohrschneider R. Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-Level Model of Democratic Learning. Political Research Quarterly. 2003;56(3). doi:10.2307/3219786
146.
Shamir M, Sullivan J. The Political Context of Tolerance: The United States and Israel. American Political Science Review. 1983;77(04):911-928. doi:10.2307/1957566
147.
Shamir M. Political Intolerance among Masses and Elites in Israel: A Reevaluation of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. The Journal of Politics. 1991;53(4):1018-1043. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2131865
148.
Inglehart R. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press; 1990.
149.
Woodward I, Skrbis Z, Bean C. Attitudes towards globalization and cosmopolitanism: cultural diversity, personal consumption and the national economy. The British Journal of Sociology. 2008;59(2):207-226. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00190.x
150.
Bishop BH. Focusing Events and Public Opinion: Evidence from the Deepwater Horizon Disaster. Political Behavior. 2014;36(1):1-22. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9223-7
151.
Barker DC, Bearce DH. End-Times Theology, the Shadow of the Future, and Public Resistance to Addressing Global Climate Change. Political Research Quarterly. 2013;66(2):267-279. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23563143
152.
Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N. ‘Global warming’ or ‘climate change’?: Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011;75(1):115-124. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq073
153.
Haller M, Hadler M. Dispositions to Act in Favor of the Environment: Fatalism and Readiness to Make Sacrifices in a Cross-National Perspective. Sociological Forum. 2008;23(2):281-311. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110265
154.
Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A. Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis. 2008;28(1):113-126. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
155.
Norris P, Inglehart R, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. Cambridge University Press; 2009. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=461088
156.
Hellwig T. Economic openness, policy uncertainty, and the dynamics of government support. Electoral Studies. 2007;26(4):772-786. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.005
157.
Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review. 1971;65(04):991-1017. doi:10.2307/1953494
158.
Dalton RJ. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Sixth edition. SAGE/CQ Press; 2014.
159.
Inglehart R. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press; 1997.
160.
Edwards MS. Public Opinion regarding Economic and Cultural Globalization: Evidence from a Cross-National Survey. Review of International Political Economy. 2006;13(4):587-608. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25124090
161.
Skrbis Z, Woodward I. The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness. The Sociological Review. 2007;55(4):730-747. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00750.x
162.
Straker J. Youth, Globalisation, and Millennial Reflection in a Guinean Forest Town. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 2007;45(2):299-319. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4501283
163.
Pervasive Uncertainty in Second Modernity: an Empirical Test. Published online 2005. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/4/taylor-gooby.html
164.
Olofsson A, Ohman S. Cosmopolitans and Locals: An Empirical Investigation of Transnationalism. Current Sociology. 2007;55(6):877-895. doi:10.1177/0011392107081991
165.
Davis DW. Individual Level Examination of Postmaterialism in the U.S.: Political Tolerance, Racial Attitudes, Environmentalism, and Participatory Norms. Political Research Quarterly. 53(3). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1291667466?pq-origsite=summon
166.
Clarke HD. Refutations Affirmed: Conversations Concerning the Euro-Barometer Values Battery. Political Research Quarterly. 53(3). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1291667482?pq-origsite=summon
167.
Clarke HD, Kornberg A, McIntyre C, Bauer-kaase P, Kaase M. The Effect of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence. American Political Science Review. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A63716367&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&userGroup=glasuni&authCount=1
168.
Davis DW, Davenport C. Assessing the Validity of the Postmaterialism Index. American Political Science Review. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A63716368&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&userGroup=glasuni
169.
Clarke HD, Dutt N, Rapkin J. Conversations in Context: The (Mis) Measurement of Value Change in Advanced Industrial Societies. Political Behavior. 1997;19(1):19-39. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/586548
170.
Abramson PR, Ellis S, Inglehart R. Research in Context: Measuring Value Change. Political Behavior. 1997;19(1):41-59. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/586549
171.
Duch RM, Taylor MA. Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition. American Journal of Political Science. 1993;37(3). doi:10.2307/2111573
172.
Abramson PR, Inglehart R. Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies. British Journal of Political Science. 1992;22(2):183-228. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/194059
173.
Clarke HD, Dutt N. Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment. The American Political Science Review. 1991;85(3). doi:10.2307/1963855
174.
Davis DW, Dowley KM, Silver BD. Postmaterialism in World Societies: Is It Really a Value Dimension? American Journal of Political Science. 1999;43(3). doi:10.2307/2991841
175.
Inglehart R, Abramson PR. Measuring Postmaterialism. American Political Science Review. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A63716369&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&userGroup=glasuni
176.
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. SAGE; 2008. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781446206515
177.
Kinder DR. Communication and Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science. 1998;1. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5365185&site=ehost-live
178.
Bruter M. Time Bomb?: The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42(12):1498-1536. doi:10.1177/0010414009332465
179.
Morris JS. Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88(3):707-728. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00479.x
180.
Prior M. News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science. 2005;49(3):577-592. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
181.
Baum MA. Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit. American Journal of Political Science. 2005;49(2). doi:10.2307/3647673
182.
Kull S, Ramsay C, Lewis E. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly. 2004;118(4):569-598. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035697
183.
Mutz DC, Reeves B. The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. The American Political Science Review. 2005;99(1):1-15. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/30038915
184.
Lau RR, Sigelman L, Rovner IB. The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment. The Journal of Politics. 2007;69(4):1176-1209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
185.
Soroka S, McAdams S. News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication. 2015;32(1):1-22. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
186.
Borah P. Interactions of News Frames and Incivility in the Political Blogosphere: Examining Perceptual Outcomes. Political Communication. 2013;30(3):456-473. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737426
187.
Wolf MR, Strachan JC, Shea DM. Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2012;45(3):428-434. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41691357
188.
Schmitt-Beck R. Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science. 2003;33(2):233-259. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092340
189.
Lawson C, McCann JA. Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35(1):1-30. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092278
190.
White S, Oates S, McAllister I. Media Effects and Russian Elections, 1999–2000. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35(2):191-208. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000116
191.
Baker WD, Oneal JR. Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the ‘Rally 'Round the Flag’ Effect. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2001;45(5):661-687. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3176318
192.
Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S, Simon A, Valentino N. Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? The American Political Science Review. 1994;88(4):829-838. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2082710
193.
Kahn KF, Kenney PJ. Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation. American Political Science Review. 1999;93(04):877-889. doi:10.2307/2586118
194.
Ansolabehere SD, Iyengar S, Simon A. Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout. The American Political Science Review. 1999;93(4):901-909. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586120
195.
Goldstein K, Freedman P. Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect. The Journal of Politics. 2002;64(3):721-740. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1520110
196.
Norris P. Did the Media Matter? Agenda-Setting, Persuasion and Mobilization Effects in the British General Election Campaign. British Politics. 2006;1(2):195-221. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200022
197.
Druckman JN. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics. 2001;63(4):1041-1066. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2691806
198.
Kellstedt PM. Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences. American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44(2). doi:10.2307/2669308
199.
Stevens D. The Relationship between Negative Political Advertising and Public Mood: Effects and Consequences. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. 2008;18(2):153-177. doi:10.1080/17457280801987876
200.
Levendusky M. Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition. Political Communication. 2013;30(4):565-581. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
201.
Gilens M, Dawson Books. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Vol Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. University of Chicago Press; 1999. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226293660
202.
Miller JM, Krosnick JA. News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source. American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44(2). doi:10.2307/2669312
203.
Nelson TE, Clawson RA, Oxley ZM. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. The American Political Science Review. 1997;91(3):567-583. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952075
204.
Druckman JN, Fein J, Leeper TJ. A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability. The American Political Science Review. 2012;106(2):430-454. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41495086
205.
Haider-Markel DP, Joslyn MR. Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames. The Journal of Politics. 2001;63(2):520-543. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2691763
206.
Druckman JN. Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. The American Political Science Review. 2004;98(4):671-686. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4145331
207.
Baum MA. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96(1):91-109. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117812
208.
Hartman TK, Weber CR. Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames. Political Behavior. 2009;31(4):537-558. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40587298
