1
The American Political Science Review. Published Online First: 1906.
2
American Journal of Political Science. Published Online First: 1973.
3
Annual Review of Political Science.
4
Annual Review of Sociology. Published Online First: 1975.
5
British Journal of Political Science. Published Online First: 1971.
6
Comparative Political Studies.
7
European Journal of Political Research.
8
European Union Politics.
9
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
10
Political Analysis. Published Online First: 1989.
11
Political Behavior. Published Online First: 1979.
12
Political Psychology. Published Online First: 1979.
13
The Public Opinion Quarterly. Published Online First: 1937.
14
Aldridge A, Levine K, Dawson Books. Surveying the social world: principles and practice in survey research. Buckingham: Open University Press 2001.
15
Denscombe M, Ebooks Corporation Limited. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Fifth edition. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press 2014.
16
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2008.
17
Rae Atkeson L, Alvarez RM. Introduction to Political Analysis Mini-Symposium on Advances in Survey Methodology. Political Analysis. 2014;22:281–4. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpu006
18
Massey DS, Tourangeau R. Introduction: New Challenges to Social Measurement. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2013;645:6–22. doi: 10.1177/0002716212463314
19
Murphy J, Link MW, Childs JH, et al. Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014;78:788–94. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu053
20
Barrington LW. Fragile Snapshot or Stable Relationships?: What the Orange and Rose Revolutions Reveal About the Stability of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. Comparative Political Studies. 2012;45:312–40. doi: 10.1177/0010414011421311
21
Soroka SN, Wlezien C. Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35:665–89.
22
Toshkov D. Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics. 2011;12:169–91. doi: 10.1177/1465116510395043
23
Franklin MN, Wlezien C. The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1997;9:347–63. doi: 10.1177/0951692897009003005
24
Wlezien C. The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science. 1995;39. doi: 10.2307/2111666
25
Nicholson-Crotty S, Peterson DAM, Ramirez MD. Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood. Political Behavior. 2009;31:629–55.
26
Jennings W. The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994-2007. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39:847–70.
27
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2008.
28
Norris P. Democratic deficit: critical citizens revisited. Leiden: Cambridge University Press 2011.
29
Hetherington MJ. Why trust matters: declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2005.
30
Armingeon K, Guthmann K. Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007-2011. European Journal of Political Research. 2014;53:423–42. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12046
31
Teixeira CP, Tsatsanis E, Belchior AM. Support for Democracy in Times of Crisis: Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Portugal and Greece. South European Society and Politics. 2014;19:501–18. doi: 10.1080/13608746.2014.975770
32
Dahlberg S, Holmberg S. Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction. West European Politics. 2014;37:515–37. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830468
33
Marien S, Hooghe M. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research. 2011;50:267–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
34
Esaiasson P, Gilljam M, Persson M. Which decision-making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment. European Journal of Political Research. 2012;51:785–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.x
35
Natalia Letki. Investigating the Roots of Civic Morality: Trust, Social Capital, and Institutional Performance. Political Behavior. 2006;28:305–25.
36
Anderson CJ, Tverdova YV. Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 2003;47. doi: 10.2307/3186095
37
Anderson CJ, Tverdova YV. Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 2001;22:321–38.
38
Rohrschneider R. Institutional Quality and Perceptions of Representation in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Comparative Political Studies. 2005;38:850–74. doi: 10.1177/0010414005276305
39
Norris P, Oxford University Press. Critical citizens: global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.
40
Dalton RJ, Oxford University Press. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
41
Hobolt SB, de Vries CE. Public Support for European Integration. Annual Review of Political Science. 2016;19:413–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
42
Hobolt SB, Wratil C. Public opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of support for the euro. Journal of European Public Policy. 2015;22:238–56. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.994022
43
Curtice PJ. In or Out? How Britain Decided.
44
Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities | JRF.
45
Gifford C. The rise of post-imperial populism: The case of right-wing Euroscepticism in Britain. European Journal of Political Research. 2006;45:851–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00638.x
46
Bruter M. Time Bomb?: The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:1498–536. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332465
47
Sigalas E. Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the ERASMUS year abroad. European Union Politics. 2010;11:241–65. doi: 10.1177/1465116510363656
48
Jackson JE, Mach BW, Miller-Gonzalez JL. Buying support and regime change: the evolution of Polish attitudes towards the EU and voting between accession and 2008. European Union Politics. 2011;12:147–67. doi: 10.1177/1465116511400197
49
Clements B. The sociological and psychological influences on public support for the European Union in Britain, 1983–2005. British Politics. 2009;4:47–82. doi: 10.1057/bp.2008.39
50
van Elsas EJ, Hakhverdian A, van der Brug W. United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens. West European Politics. 2016;39:1181–204. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1175244
51
Hooghe L, Marks G. A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39:1–23.
52
Down I, Wilson CJ. A rising generation of Europeans? Life-cycle and cohort effects on support for ‘Europe’. European Journal of Political Research. 2013;52:431–56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12001
53
Rohrschneider R, Loveless M. Macro Salience: How Economic and Political Contexts Mediate Popular Evaluations of the Democracy Deficit in the European Union. The Journal of Politics. 2010;72:1029–45. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000514
54
Munoz J, Torcal M, Bonet E. Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics. 2011;12:551–74. doi: 10.1177/1465116511419250
55
Elenbaas M, De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG, et al. The impact of information acquisition on EU performance judgements. European Journal of Political Research. 2012;51:728–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02055.x
56
Stoeckel F. Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. European Union Politics. 2013;14:23–45. doi: 10.1177/1465116512460736
57
McLaren LM. Identity, interests, and attitudes to European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2006.
58
Carey S. Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration? European Union Politics. 2002;3:387–413. doi: 10.1177/1465116502003004001
59
Hooghe L. Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics. 2005;6:419–43. doi: 10.1177/1465116505057816
60
Ilonszki G. Perceptions of the European Union in new member states: a comparative perspective. London: Routledge 2010.
61
Hooghe L, Marks G. Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration? PS: Political Science and Politics. 2004;37:415–20.
62
Hooghe M, Stolle D, editors. Generating social capital: civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
63
Field J. Social capital. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge 2008.
64
Stolle D, Hooghe M. Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35:149–67.
65
Reeskens T, Wright M. Nationalism and the Cohesive Society: A Multilevel Analysis of the Interplay Among Diversity, National Identity, and Social Capital Across 27 European Societies. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46:153–81. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453033
66
Kittilson MC, Dalton RJ. Virtual Civil Society: The New Frontier of Social Capital? Political Behavior. 2011;33:625–44.
67
Hall PA. Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 1999;29:417–61.
68
Hooghe M, Quintelier E. Do All Associations Lead to Lower Levels of Ethnocentrism? A Two-Year Longitudinal Test of the Selection and Adaptation Model. Political Behavior. 2013;35:289–309. doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9201-5
69
Hopkins DJ, Williamson T. Inactive by Design? Neighborhood Design and Political Participation. Political Behavior. 2012;34:79–101.
70
Paraskevopoulos CJ. Social Capital: Summing up the Debate on a Conceptual Tool of Comparative Politics and Public Policy. Comparative Politics. 2010;42:475–94.
71
Berman S. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics. 1997;49:401–29. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0008
72
Freitag M, Buhlmann M. Crafting Trust: The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:1537–66. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332151
73
Delhey J, Newton K, Welzel C. How General Is Trust in ‘Most People’? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review. 2011;76:786–807.
74
Bekkers R. Trust and Volunteering: Selection or Causation? Evidence From a 4 Year Panel Study. Political Behavior. 2012;34:225–47.
75
Pichler F, Wallace C. Social Capital and Social Class in Europe: The Role of Social Networks in Social Stratification. European Sociological Review. 2009;25:319–32.
76
Almond GA, Verba S. The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. [New ed.]. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage 1989.
77
Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1994.
78
Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York, N.Y.: Simon & Schuster 2000.
79
Uslaner EM. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
80
Muller EN, Seligson MA. Civic Culture and Democracy: The Question of Causal Relationships. American Political Science Review. 1994;88:635–52. doi: 10.2307/2944800
81
Radnitz S, Wheatley J, Zurcher C. The Origins of Social Capital: Evidence From a Survey of Post-Soviet Central Asia. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:707–32. doi: 10.1177/0010414008329893
82
Baker W, Faulkner RR. Social Capital, Double Embeddedness, and Mechanisms of Stability and Change. American Behavioral Scientist. 2009;52:1531–55. doi: 10.1177/0002764209331525
83
van Deth JW, Zmerli S. Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy--A ‘Dark Side’ of Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53:631–9. doi: 10.1177/0002764209350827
84
Sturgis P, Read S, Hatemi PK, et al. A Genetic Basis for Social Trust? Political Behavior. 2010;32:205–30.
85
Portes A, Vickstrom E. Diversity, Social Capital, and Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology. 2011;37:461–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150022
86
Uslaner EM. Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
87
Gerritsen D, Lubbers M. Unknown is unloved? Diversity and inter-population trust in Europe. European Union Politics. 2010;11:267–87. doi: 10.1177/1465116510363311
88
Sturgis P, Brunton-Smith I, Read S, et al. Does ethnic diversity erode trust?: Putnam’s ‘hunkering-down’ thesis reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science. ;41:57–82.
89
Sturgis P, Brunton-Smith I, Kuha J, et al. Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2014;37:1286–309. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2013.831932
90
Hooghe M, Reeskens T, Stolle D, et al. Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe: A Cross-National Multilevel Study. Comparative Political Studies. 2008;42:198–223. doi: 10.1177/0010414008325286
91
You J. Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Homogeneity. Political Psychology. 2012;33:701–21.
92
Reeskens T, Wright M. Nationalism and the Cohesive Society: A Multilevel Analysis of the Interplay Among Diversity, National Identity, and Social Capital Across 27 European Societies. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46:153–81. doi: 10.1177/0010414012453033
93
Walzer M, Askews & Holts Library Services. On toleration. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press 1997.
94
Mendus S, Edwards D, MyiLibrary. On toleration. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987.
95
Iyengar S, McGuire WJ. Explorations in political psychology. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 1993.
96
Hainmueller J, Hopkins DJ. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science. 2014;17:225–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818
97
Quillian L. New Approaches to Understanding Racial Prejudice and Discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology. 2006;32:299–328.
98
Gilens M, Dawson Books. Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 1999.
99
Schmidt-Catran AW, Spies DC. Immigration and Welfare Support in Germany. American Sociological Review. 2016;81:242–61. doi: 10.1177/0003122416633140
100
Iyengar S, McGuire WJ. Explorations in political psychology. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 1993.
101
Hainmueller J, Hangartner D. Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination. American Political Science Review. ;107:159–87. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000494URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
102
Abrajano M, Hajnal Z. White backlash: immigration, race, and American politics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2015.
103
Newman BJ, Hartman TK, Taber CS. Social Dominance and the Cultural Politics of Immigration. Political Psychology. 2014;35:165–86. doi: 10.1111/pops.12047
104
Filindra A, Kaplan NJ. Racial Resentment and Whites’ Gun Policy Preferences in Contemporary America. Political Behavior. 2016;38:255–75. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9326-4
105
The Political Quarterly. ;Volume 85.
106
Banks AJ. The Public’s Anger: White Racial Attitudes and Opinions Toward Health Care Reform. Political Behavior. 2014;36:493–514. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3
107
Ford R. Acceptable and Unacceptable Immigrants: How Opposition to Immigration in Britain is Affected by Migrants’ Region of Origin. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2011;37:1017–37. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2011.572423
108
Sniderman PM, Hagendoorn L, Prior M. Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities. The American Political Science Review. 2004;98:35–49.
109
Sides J, Citrin J. European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information. British Journal of Political Science. 2007;37:477–504.
110
Blinder S, Ford R, Ivarsflaten E. The Better Angels of Our Nature: How the Antiprejudice Norm Affects Policy and Party Preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science. 2013;57:841–57.
111
Rydgren J, Sofi D, Hällsten M. Interethnic Friendship, Trust, and Tolerance: Findings from Two North Iraqi Cities1. American Journal of Sociology. 2013;118:1650–94.
112
Simon RJ. Old Minorities, New Immigrants: Aspirations, Hopes, and Fears. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1993;530:61–73.
113
Whitley BE. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Published Online First: 1999.
114
Tausch N, Hewstone M, Kenworthy J, et al. Cross-Community Contact, Perceived Status Differences, and Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Roles of Individual-level versus Group-level Threats and the Moderating Role of Social Identification. Political Psychology. 2007;28:53–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00551.x
115
McLaren L, Johnson M. Resources, Group Conflict and Symbols: Explaining Anti-Immigration Hostility in Britain. Political Studies. 2007;55:709–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00680.x
116
McLaren LM. Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces. 2003;81:909–36. doi: 10.1353/sof.2003.0038
117
Tesler M. The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race. American Journal of Political Science. 2012;56:690–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x
118
Rocha RR, Espino R. Racial Threat, Residential Segregation, and the Policy Attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly. 2009;62:415–26.
119
Bowyer BT. The Contextual Determinants of Whites’ Racial Attitudes in England. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39:559–86.
120
Poteat PV. The socialization of dominance: Peer group contextual effects on homophobic and dominance attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Published Online First: 2007.
121
Andersen R, Fetner T. Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72:311–30.
122
Loftus J. America’s Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review. 2001;66:762–82.
123
Haider-Markel DP, Joslyn MR. Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Support for Gay Rights: An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72:291–310.
124
Olson LR, Cadge W, Harrison JT. Religion and Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage. Social Science Quarterly. 2006;87:340–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
125
Miceli MS. Morality Politics vs. Identity Politics: Framing Processes and Competition among Christian Right and Gay Social Movement Organizations. Sociological Forum. 2005;20:589–612.
126
Ohlander J, Batalova J, Treas J. Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations. Social Science Research. 2005;34:781–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.12.004
127
Brewer J. Sexuality in the Church: toward a sociology of the Bible. Sociological Research Online. 2003;8. doi: 10.5153/sro.840
128
Crockett A, Voas D. A Divergence of Views: Attitude change and the religious crisis over homosexuality. A divergence of views: Attitude change and the religious crisis over homosexuality. ;8.
129
Herek GM. Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2002;66:40–66.
130
Walzer M, Askews & Holts Library Services. On toleration. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press 1997.
131
Mendus S, Edwards D, MyiLibrary. On toleration. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987.
132
Gibson JL. Alternative Measures of Political Tolerance: Must Tolerance be ‘Least-Liked’? American Journal of Political Science. 1992;36. doi: 10.2307/2111491
133
Peterson M, Slothuus R, Stubager R, et al. Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance. British Journal of Political Science. ;41:581–97. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000451URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
134
Gibson JL. Political Intolerance and Political Repression During the McCarthy Red Scare. The American Political Science Review. 1988;82. doi: 10.2307/1957398
135
Gibson JL. Intolerance and Political Repression in the United States: A Half Century after McCarthyism. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52:96–108.
136
Gibson JL, Gouws A. Making Tolerance Judgments: The Effects of Context, Local and National. The Journal of Politics. 2001;63:1067–90.
137
Hinckley RA. Personality and Political Tolerance: The Limits of Democratic Learning in Postcommunist Europe. Comparative Political Studies. 2010;43:188–207. doi: 10.1177/0010414009349327
138
Crawford JT, Pilanski JM. Political Intolerance, Right and Left. Political Psychology. 2014;35:841–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
139
Djupe PA, Calfano BR. American Muslim Investment in Civil Society: Political Discussion, Disagreement, and Tolerance. Political Research Quarterly. 2012;65:516–28.
140
Bobo L, Licari FC. Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1989;53:285–308.
141
Sniderman PM, Fletcher JF, Russell PH, et al. The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties. British Journal of Political Science. 1991;21:349–70.
142
Stouffer SA. Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: a cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transactions Publishers 1992.
143
Sullivan JL, Piereson J, Marcus GE. Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1989.
144
Gibson JL. A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate. American Journal of Political Science. 1998;42. doi: 10.2307/2991731
145
Peffley M, Rohrschneider R. Democratization and Political Tolerance in Seventeen Countries: A Multi-Level Model of Democratic Learning. Political Research Quarterly. 2003;56. doi: 10.2307/3219786
146
Shamir M, Sullivan J. The Political Context of Tolerance: The United States and Israel. American Political Science Review. 1983;77:911–28. doi: 10.2307/1957566
147
Shamir M. Political Intolerance among Masses and Elites in Israel: A Reevaluation of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. The Journal of Politics. 1991;53:1018–43.
148
Inglehart R. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1990.
149
Woodward I, Skrbis Z, Bean C. Attitudes towards globalization and cosmopolitanism: cultural diversity, personal consumption and the national economy. The British Journal of Sociology. 2008;59:207–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00190.x
150
Bishop BH. Focusing Events and Public Opinion: Evidence from the Deepwater Horizon Disaster. Political Behavior. 2014;36:1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9223-7
151
Barker DC, Bearce DH. End-Times Theology, the Shadow of the Future, and Public Resistance to Addressing Global Climate Change. Political Research Quarterly. 2013;66:267–79.
152
Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N. ‘Global warming’ or ‘climate change’?: Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011;75:115–24. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq073
153
Haller M, Hadler M. Dispositions to Act in Favor of the Environment: Fatalism and Readiness to Make Sacrifices in a Cross-National Perspective. Sociological Forum. 2008;23:281–311.
154
Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A. Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis. 2008;28:113–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
155
Norris P, Inglehart R, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Cosmopolitan communications: cultural diversity in a globalized world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2009.
156
Hellwig T. Economic openness, policy uncertainty, and the dynamics of government support. Electoral Studies. 2007;26:772–86. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.005
157
Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review. 1971;65:991–1017. doi: 10.2307/1953494
158
Dalton RJ. Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, California: SAGE/CQ Press 2014.
159
Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1997.
160
Edwards MS. Public Opinion regarding Economic and Cultural Globalization: Evidence from a Cross-National Survey. Review of International Political Economy. 2006;13:587–608.
161
Skrbis Z, Woodward I. The ambivalence of ordinary cosmopolitanism: Investigating the limits of cosmopolitan openness. The Sociological Review. 2007;55:730–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00750.x
162
Straker J. Youth, Globalisation, and Millennial Reflection in a Guinean Forest Town. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 2007;45:299–319.
163
Pervasive Uncertainty in Second Modernity: an Empirical Test. Published Online First: 2005.
164
Olofsson A, Ohman S. Cosmopolitans and Locals: An Empirical Investigation of Transnationalism. Current Sociology. 2007;55:877–95. doi: 10.1177/0011392107081991
165
Davis DW. Individual Level Examination of Postmaterialism in the U.S.: Political Tolerance, Racial Attitudes, Environmentalism, and Participatory Norms. Political Research Quarterly. ;53.
166
Clarke HD. Refutations Affirmed: Conversations Concerning the Euro-Barometer Values Battery. Political Research Quarterly. ;53.
167
Clarke HD, Kornberg A, McIntyre C, et al. The Effect of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence. American Political Science Review.
168
Davis DW, Davenport C. Assessing the Validity of the Postmaterialism Index. American Political Science Review.
169
Clarke HD, Dutt N, Rapkin J. Conversations in Context: The (Mis) Measurement of Value Change in Advanced Industrial Societies. Political Behavior. 1997;19:19–39.
170
Abramson PR, Ellis S, Inglehart R. Research in Context: Measuring Value Change. Political Behavior. 1997;19:41–59.
171
Duch RM, Taylor MA. Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition. American Journal of Political Science. 1993;37. doi: 10.2307/2111573
172
Abramson PR, Inglehart R. Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European Societies. British Journal of Political Science. 1992;22:183–228.
173
Clarke HD, Dutt N. Measuring Value Change in Western Industrialized Societies: The Impact of Unemployment. The American Political Science Review. 1991;85. doi: 10.2307/1963855
174
Davis DW, Dowley KM, Silver BD. Postmaterialism in World Societies: Is It Really a Value Dimension? American Journal of Political Science. 1999;43. doi: 10.2307/2991841
175
Inglehart R, Abramson PR. Measuring Postmaterialism. American Political Science Review.
176
Donsbach W, Traugott MW, Dawson Books. The SAGE handbook of public opinion research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2008.
177
Kinder DR. Communication and Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science. 1998;1.
178
Bruter M. Time Bomb?: The Dynamic Effect of News and Symbols on the Political Identity of European Citizens. Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42:1498–536. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332465
179
Morris JS. Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88:707–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00479.x
180
Prior M. News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science. 2005;49:577–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
181
Baum MA. Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit. American Journal of Political Science. 2005;49. doi: 10.2307/3647673
182
Kull S, Ramsay C, Lewis E. Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly. 2004;118:569–98.
183
Mutz DC, Reeves B. The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. The American Political Science Review. 2005;99:1–15.
184
Lau RR, Sigelman L, Rovner IB. The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment. The Journal of Politics. 2007;69:1176–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
185
Soroka S, McAdams S. News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication. 2015;32:1–22. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
186
Borah P. Interactions of News Frames and Incivility in the Political Blogosphere: Examining Perceptual Outcomes. Political Communication. 2013;30:456–73. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737426
187
Wolf MR, Strachan JC, Shea DM. Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division. PS: Political Science and Politics. 2012;45:428–34.
188
Schmitt-Beck R. Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science. 2003;33:233–59.
189
Lawson C, McCann JA. Television News, Mexico’s 2000 Elections and Media Effects in Emerging Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35:1–30.
190
White S, Oates S, McAllister I. Media Effects and Russian Elections, 1999–2000. British Journal of Political Science. 2005;35:191–208. doi: 10.1017/S0007123405000116
191
Baker WD, Oneal JR. Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the ‘Rally 'Round the Flag’ Effect. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2001;45:661–87.
192
Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S, Simon A, et al. Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? The American Political Science Review. 1994;88:829–38.
193
Kahn KF, Kenney PJ. Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation. American Political Science Review. 1999;93:877–89. doi: 10.2307/2586118
194
Ansolabehere SD, Iyengar S, Simon A. Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout. The American Political Science Review. 1999;93:901–9.
195
Goldstein K, Freedman P. Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect. The Journal of Politics. 2002;64:721–40.
196
Norris P. Did the Media Matter? Agenda-Setting, Persuasion and Mobilization Effects in the British General Election Campaign. British Politics. 2006;1:195–221. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200022
197
Druckman JN. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics. 2001;63:1041–66.
198
Kellstedt PM. Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences. American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44. doi: 10.2307/2669308
199
Stevens D. The Relationship between Negative Political Advertising and Public Mood: Effects and Consequences. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. 2008;18:153–77. doi: 10.1080/17457280801987876
200
Levendusky M. Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition. Political Communication. 2013;30:565–81. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
201
Gilens M, Dawson Books. Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 1999.
202
Miller JM, Krosnick JA. News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source. American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44. doi: 10.2307/2669312
203
Nelson TE, Clawson RA, Oxley ZM. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. The American Political Science Review. 1997;91:567–83.
204
Druckman JN, Fein J, Leeper TJ. A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability. The American Political Science Review. 2012;106:430–54.
205
Haider-Markel DP, Joslyn MR. Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames. The Journal of Politics. 2001;63:520–43.
206
Druckman JN. Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. The American Political Science Review. 2004;98:671–86.
207
Baum MA. Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public. The American Political Science Review. 2002;96:91–109.
208
Hartman TK, Weber CR. Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames. Political Behavior. 2009;31:537–58.
