1.
Viaggi G. Reawakening: From the Origins of Economic Ideas to the Challenges of Our Time’ [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/VAGGI-INET-2017-vaggi.pdf
2.
Economics: An Illustrated Timeline - Economic Questions [Internet]. Available from: https://economicquestions.org/history-economics-made-simple/
3.
Roncaglia A. The Wealth of Ideas: A History of Economic Thought [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492341
4.
Galbraith JK. A history of economics: the past as the present. London: Penguin Books Ltd; 1991.
5.
Mirowski P. More heat than light: economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
6.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics [Internet]. Seventh edition. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning; 2015. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f4c80497-e640-e911-80cd-005056af4099
7.
Arnsperger C, Varoufakis Y. What is neoclassical economics? The three axioms responsible for its theoretical oeuvre, practical irrelevance and, thus, discursive power. Panoeconomicus. 2006;53(1):5–18.
8.
Boerger L. Neoclassical Economics. Exploring Economics [Internet]. 18AD; Available from: https://www.exploring-economics.org/en/orientation/neoclassical-economics/
9.
Dixit AK. Microeconomics: a very short introduction. First edition. Vol. 386. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
10.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. Eighth edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2018.
11.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. Eighth edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2018.
12.
Olah D. The Amazing Arab Scholar Who Beat Adam Smith by Half a Millennium. Evonomics [Internet]. Available from: http://evonomics.com/amazing-north-african-scholar-beat-adam-smith-half-millennium/
13.
Thorsen D. The Neoliberal Challenge - What is Neoliberalism. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice [Internet]. 2010;2(2). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conreadlsj2&id=372
14.
Coase RH. The firm, the market and the law. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
15.
Hodgson GM. Institutional economics: surveying the "old” and the "new”. Metroeconomica. 1993 Feb;44(1):1–28.
16.
Posner RA. Economic analysis of law [Internet]. 5th ed. New York: Aspen Law & Business; 1998. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f18f1c9e-e640-e911-80cd-005056af4099
17.
Coase RH. The Lighthouse in Economics. The Journal of Law & Economics [Internet]. 1974;17(2):357–76. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/724895
18.
Dimmelmeier A, Heussner F. Institutionalist Economics. Exploring Economics [Internet]. 18AD; Available from: https://www.exploring-economics.org/en/orientation/institutionalist-economics/
19.
Hayek FA von. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1967.
20.
Samuels WJ. The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1995 Aug;19(4):569–90.
21.
Black J. Reconceiving Financial Markets—From the Economic to the Social. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2013 Oct;13(2):401–42.
22.
Beckert J. The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2007;
23.
Shiller RJ. Speculative Asset Prices (Nobel Prize Lecture) [Internet]. Available from: http://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d19/d1936.pdf
24.
Callon M. The Embeddedness of Markets in Economics. The Sociological review monograph. 1998;46.
25.
Callon M. The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review; 1998.
26.
Fligstein N. The architecture of markets: an economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2002.
27.
Sunstein CR. Behavioral law and economics. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
28.
Lang ATF. The Legal Construction of Economic Rationalities? Journal of Law and Society. 2013 Mar;40(1):155–71.
29.
Deakin S, Gindis D, Hodgson GM, Huang K, Pistor K. Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2017 Feb;45(1):188–200.
30.
Hodgson GM. Institutional economics: surveying the ‘old’ and the ‘new’. Metroeconomica. 1993 Feb;44(1):1–28.
31.
Frerichs S. The Legal Constitution of Market Society: Probing the Economic Sociology of Law. Economic Sociology – European Electronic Newsletter [Internet]. 2009;10(3):20–5. Available from: http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/econ_soc_10-3.pdf
32.
Swedberg R. The Case for an Economic Sociology of Law. Theory and Society [Internet]. 2003;32(1):1–37. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108499
33.
Fink EM. Post-Realism, or the Jurisprudential Logic of Late Capitalism: A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Rise and Diffusion of Law and Economics. Hastings Law Journal [Internet]. 2004;55. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hastlj55&id=963
34.
Hodgson GM. The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature [Internet]. 1998;36(1):166–92. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564954
35.
Hodgson GM. What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics? Journal of Economic Issues [Internet]. 2000;34(2):317–29. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4227559
36.
Edelman LB. Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality. Law & Society Review [Internet]. 2004;38(2):181–98. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555100
37.
A. Mitchell Polinsky. Law, Economic Analysis of. :7670–89. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2440
38.
Posner EA. Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure. Yale Law Journal [Internet]. 2003;829–80. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ylr112&i=851
39.
SpringerLink (Online service). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics [Internet]. Third Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2018. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5
40.
Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press; 1985.
41.
Friedman DD. Law’s order: what economics has to do with law and why it matters. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2000.
42.
Macneil, I. R. Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law. Northwestern University Law Review [Internet]. 1978;(6). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/illlr72&id=870
43.
Diamond PA, Maskin E. An Equilibrium Analysis of Search and Breach of Contract, I: Steady States. The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979 Spring;10(1).
44.
Ayres I, Gertner R. Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules. The Yale Law Journal [Internet]. 99(1):87–130. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/796722.pdf
45.
Shavell S. On the Writing and the Interpretation of Contracts. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2006 Oct 1;22(2):289–314.
46.
Hart O, Moore J. Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation. Econometrica. 1988 Jul;56(4).
47.
Bolton P, Dewatripont M. Contract theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2005.
48.
Hale RL. Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State. Political Science Quarterly. 1923 Sep;38(3).
49.
Deakin S. ‘Capacitas’: Contract Law and the Institutional Preconditions of a Market Economy. European Review of Contract Law. 2006 Jan 1;2(3).
50.
Farber, D. A. Contract Law and Modern Economic Theory. Northwestern University Law Review [Internet]. 1984;(2). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/illlr78&id=311
51.
Kennedy D, Michelman F. Are Property and Contract Efficient. Hofstra Law Review [Internet]. 1980;8(3):711–70. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hoflr8&i=737
52.
Fried C. Contract as promise: a theory of contractual obligation [Internet]. [Second edition]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190240158.001.0001
53.
Suchman MC. The Contract as Social Artifact. Law & Society Review [Internet]. 2003;37(1):91–142. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1555071
54.
Coase RH. The Nature of the Firm. Economica. 1937 Nov;4(16):386–405.
55.
Putterman LG, Kroszner R. The economic nature of the firm: a reader [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410
56.
Foss NJ. Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1993 Jun;3(2):127–44.
57.
Archibald GC. Firm, Theory of the. :4719–29. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_25
58.
Putterman LG, Kroszner R. The economic nature of the firm: a reader [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410
59.
Alchian AA, Demsetz H. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review [Internet]. 1972;62(5). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815199
60.
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 1976 Oct;3(4):305–60.
61.
Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press; 1985.
62.
Hart, O. Economist’s Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, An. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. 1989; Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clr89&id=1775
63.
Cheung SNS. The Contractual Nature of the Firm. The Journal of Law & Economics [Internet]. 1983;26(1):1–21. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/725182
64.
Coase RH. Industrial organization: a proposal for research [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7618.pdf
65.
Lawson T. The nature of the firm and peculiarities of the corporation. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2015 Jan 1;39(1):1–32.
66.
Deakin S. The Corporation as Commons: Rethinking Property Rights, Governance and Sustainability in the Business Enterprise. Queen’s Law Journal [Internet]. 2012;37:339–81. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/queen37&i=343
67.
Ganesh Sitaraman. We must hold capitalism accountable. Elizabeth Warren shows how. Guardian [Internet]. 2018 Aug 18; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/18/capitalism-accountable-elizabeth-warren-ganesh-sitaraman
68.
Denning S. Did Ronald Coase Get Economics Wrong? Forbes [Internet]. 25AD; Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/09/25/did-ronald-coase-get-economics-wrong/#5b57007c1fb2
69.
Coase’s theory of the firm. The Economist [Internet]. 20170727; Available from: https://www.economist.com/economics-brief/2017/07/27/coases-theory-of-the-firm
70.
Blair MM, Stout LA. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review [Internet]. 1999 Mar;85(2). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1073662
71.
Danielsen D. Corporate Power and Instrumental States: Toward A Critical Reassessment of the Role of Firms, States and Regulation in Global Governance [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://lsr.nellco.org/nusl_faculty/1/
72.
Baars G, Spicer A, editors. The corporation: a critical, multi-disciplinary handbook [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139681025
73.
Foss NJ. Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1993 Jun;3(2):127–44.
74.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2018.
75.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2018.
76.
Friedman DD. Law’s order: what economics has to do with law and why it matters. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2000.
77.
Williamson OE. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press; 1985.
78.
Du Boff RB, Herman ES. Mergers, Concentration, and the Erosion of Democracy. Monthly Review [Internet]. 2001;53(1):14–29. Available from: https://monthlyreview.org/2001/05/01/mergers-concentration-and-the-erosion-of-democracy/
79.
Hayashi J. An Overview of the Evolution and Enforcement of Antitrust Laws in the European Union and United States [Internet]. The American Bar Association. Available from: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/tyl/topics/antitrust/an-overview-the-evolution-and-enforcement-antitrust-laws-the-european-union-and-united-states/
80.
Claassen R, Gerbrandy A. Rethinking European Competition Law: From a Consumer Welfare to a Capability Approach. Utrecht Law Review. 2016 Jan 30;12(1):1–15.
81.
Shaikh A. Capitalism: competition, conflict, crises [Internet]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199390632.001.0001
82.
Mueller DC. The Oxford handbook of capitalism [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391176.001.0001
83.
Sokol DD, Cheng TK, Lianos I, editors. Competition law and development [Internet]. Stanford, California: Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804785716.001.0001
84.
Redmond W. Three Modes of Competition in the Marketplace. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2013 Apr;72(2):423–46.
85.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2018.
86.
Coase RH. The firm, the market and the law. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
87.
The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics [Internet]. 56(4). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/674872?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
88.
Mankiw NG. Principles of economics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage; 2018.
89.
Coase RH. The firm, the market and the law. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
90.
The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation. The Journal of Law and Economics. 1973 Apr;16(1):11–33.
91.
Cox RHJ, Manton E. Revolution justified. 1st edition. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Planet Prosperity Foundation; 2012.
92.
Dahlman CJ. The Problem of Externality. The Journal of Law and Economics. 1979 Apr;22(1):141–62.
93.
Cox RHJ, Manton E. Revolution justified. 1st edition. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Planet Prosperity Foundation; 2012.
94.
Ventura A, Cafiero C, Montibeller M. Pareto Efficiency, the Coase Theorem, and Externalities: A Critical View. Journal of Economic Issues. 2016 Jul 2;50(3):872–95.
95.
CLAASSEN R. Externalities as a basis for regulation: a philosophical view. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2016 Sep;12(03):541–63.
96.
Sanjay reddy, Institute for New Economic Thinking. Externalities and Public Goods: Theory OR Society? 2015 Nov 19; Available from: https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/externalities-and-public-goods-theory-or-society
97.
Campbell D. The ‘Market’ in the Theory of Regulation. Social & Legal Studies. 2018 Oct;27(5):545–71.
98.
Callon M. An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology. The Sociological Review [Internet]. 1998 May;46(1_suppl):244–69. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=95936504&site=ehost-live
99.
Salomon ME, Arnott C. Better Development Decision-making: Applying International Human Rights Law to Neoclassical Economics. Nordic Journal of Human Rights. 2014 Jan 2;32(1):44–74.
100.
Coase RH. The firm, the market and the law. Paperback ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
101.
Coase RH. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics. 2013 Nov;56(4):837–77.
102.
My Bookmarks | University of Glasgow [Internet]. Available from: https://glasgow.rl.talis.com/users/36B73502-D222-393E-4346-CBDF597724A0/bookmarks.html
103.
Results for ‘hale coercion’ - Search [Internet]. Available from: https://glasgow.summon.serialssolutions.com/?s.q=hale+coercion&s.cmd=addFacetValueFilters%28ContentType%2CNewspaper+Article%2Ct%7CContentType%2CBook+Review%2Ct%29#!/search?ho=t&fvf=ContentType,Newspaper%20Article,t%7CContentType,Book%20Review,t&l=en-UK&q=hale%20coercion
104.
Fried C. Contract as promise: a theory of contractual obligation [Internet]. [Second edition]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190240158.001.0001
105.
Farber, D. A. Contract Law and Modern Economic Theory. Northwestern University Law Review [Internet]. 1984;(2). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/illlr78&id=311
106.
Deakin S. ‘Capacitas’: Contract Law and the Institutional Preconditions of a Market Economy. European Review of Contract Law. 2006 Jan 1;2(3).
107.
Lawson T. The nature of the firm and peculiarities of the corporation. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2015 Jan 1;39(1):1–32.
