1.
Ashcraft, M.H., Radvansky, G.A.: Cognition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2010).
2.
Eysenck, M.W., Keane, M.T.: Cognitive psychology: a student’s handbook. Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex (2010).
3.
Ashcraft, M.H., Radvansky, G.A.: Cognition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2010).
4.
Brysbaert, M.: Historical and conceptual issues in psychology. Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex (2013).
5.
Schultz, D.P., Schultz, S.E.: Modern psychology: a history. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Andover (2012).
6.
Field, Tiffany: The amazing infant. Blackwell Pub, Oxford, UK (2007).
7.
The scientific study of general intelligence: tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. Pergamon, Amsterdam (2003).
8.
Russell, Elbert W., ScienceDirect (Online service): The scientific foundation of neuropsychological assessment: with applications to forensic evaluation. Elsevier, London (2012).
9.
Keele, S.M., Bell, R.C.: The factorial validity of emotional intelligence: An unresolved issue. Personality and Individual Differences. 44, 487–500 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.013.
10.
Ghisletta, P., Rabbitt, P., Lunn, M., Lindenberger, U.: Two thirds of the age-based changes in fluid and crystallized intelligence, perceptual speed, and memory in adulthood are shared. Intelligence. 40, 260–268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.008.
11.
Sorjonen, K., Hemmingsson, T., Lundin, A., Falkstedt, D., Melin, B.: Intelligence, socioeconomic background, emotional capacity, and level of education as predictors of attained socioeconomic position in a cohort of Swedish men. Intelligence. 40, 269–277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.009.
12.
Block, J.: A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin. 117, 187–215 (1995).
13.
Bouchard, T.J., McGue, M.: Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology. 54, 4–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10160.
14.
Buss, D.M.: Evolutionary Personality Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. 42, 459–491 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331.
15.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Swami, V., Furnham, A., Maakip, I.: The Big Five Personality Traits and Uses of Music. Journal of Individual Differences. 30, 20–27 (2009).
16.
Stolerman, I.P.: Encyclopedia of psychopharmacology. Springer, Berlin (2010).
17.
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., Lero Vie, M.: How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 104, 354–370 (2013).
18.
Johnson, D.L., Wiebe, J.S., Gold, S.M., Andreasen, N.C., Hichwa, R.D., Watkins, G.L., Boles Ponto, L.L.: Cerebral Blood Flow and Personality: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 156, 252–257 (1999).
19.
Davis, K.L., Panksepp, J.: The brain’s emotional foundations of human personality and the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 35, 1946–1958 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.004.
20.
McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr.: Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist. 52, 509–516 (1997).
21.
Cramer, P.: Personality change in later adulthood is predicted by defense mechanism use in early adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, 76–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00528-7.
22.
Roberts, B.W., DelVecchio, W.F.: The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin. 126, 3–25 (2000).
23.
Lamers, S.M.A., Westerhof, G.J., Kovács, V., Bohlmeijer, E.T.: Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality. 46, 517–524 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.012.
24.
Moritz, S., Kempke, S., Luyten, P., Randjbar, S., Jelinek, L.: Was Freud partly right on obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)? Investigation of latent aggression in OCD. Psychiatry Research. 187, 180–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.007.
25.
Goldstein, E. Bruce: Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning, Australia (2010).
26.
Goldstein, E. Bruce: Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning, Australia (2010).
27.
DeAngelis, G.C.: Seeing in three dimensions: the neurophysiology of stereopsis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 80–90 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01443-6.
28.
Ponce, C.R., Born, R.T.: Stereopsis. Current Biology. 18, R845–R850 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.006.
29.
Parker, A.J.: Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 8, 379–391 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2131.
30.
Burr, D., Thompson, P.: Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010. Vision Research. 51, 1431–1456 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.008.
31.
Britten, K.H.: Mechanisms of Self-Motion Perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 31, 389–410 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112953.
32.
Kowler, E.: Eye movements: The past 25years. Vision Research. 51, 1457–1483 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.014.
33.
Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S.L., Hubel, D.H.: The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 5, 229–240 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1348.
34.
Gregory, R.L.: Seeing after blindness. Nature Neuroscience. 6, 909–910 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0903-909.
35.
Harris, H., Gliksberg, M., Sagi, D.: Generalized Perceptual Learning in the Absence of Sensory Adaptation. Current Biology. 22, 1813–1817 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.059.
36.
Shams, L., Seitz, A.R.: Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12, 411–417 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006.
37.
Luck, S.J., Zhang, W.: Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature. 453, 233–235.
38.
Magnussen, S.: Low-level memory processes in vision. Trends in Neurosciences. 23, 247–251 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01569-1.
39.
Olsson, H., Poom, L.: Visual memory needs categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102, 8776–8780 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500810102.
40.
Goldstein, E.B.: Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning, Australia (2010).
41.
Goldstein, E.B.: Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning, Australia (2010).
42.
Scott, S.K., Johnsrude, I.S.: The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences. 26, 100–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00037-1.
43.
Belin, P., Fecteau, S., Bédard, C.: Thinking the voice: neural correlates of voice perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 8, 129–135 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.008.
44.
Calvo, Paco, Gomila, Antoni: Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2008).
45.
Shergill, S.S.: Evidence for Sensory Prediction Deficits in Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 162, 2384–2386 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2384.
46.
Wilson, M.: Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 9, 625–636 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.
47.
Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z., Flanagan, J.R.: Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5, 487–494 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01773-3.
48.
Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S.: Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 415, 429–433 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415429a.
49.
Petrini, K., Russell, M., Pollick, F.: When knowing can replace seeing in audiovisual integration of actions. Cognition. 110, 432–439 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.015.
50.
Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999).
51.
Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I.: The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 223–233 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0.
52.
Latinus, M., Belin, P.: Human voice perception. Current Biology. 21, R143–R145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.033.
53.
Johnson, K.L., Shiffrar, M.: People watching: social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception. Oxford University Press, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393705.001.0001.
54.
Sinha, P., Balas, B., Ostrovsky, Y., Russell, R.: Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About. Proceedings of the IEEE. 94, 1948–1962 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.884093.
55.
Chun, M.M., Golomb, J.D., Turk-Browne, N.B.: A Taxonomy of External and Internal Attention. Annual Review of Psychology. 62, 73–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427.
56.
Driver, J., Spence, C.: Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2, 254–262 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01188-7.
57.
Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception. 28, 1059–1074 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1068/p2952.
58.
Wolfe, J.M., Võ, M.L.-H., Evans, K.K., Greene, M.R.: Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15, 77–84 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001.
59.
Lamme, V.A.F.: Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 12–18 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00013-X.
60.
Logothetis, N.K.: Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 353, 1801–1818 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0333.
61.
Pins, D.: The Neural Correlates of Conscious Vision. Cerebral Cortex. 13, 461–474 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.5.461.
62.
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M.: Essentials of neural science and behavior. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, Conn (1995).
63.
DeBruine, L.: Beyond ‘just-so stories’. Psychologist. 22, 930–932.
64.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., Dickins, T.E., West, S.A.: Evolutionary Theory and the Ultimate-Proximate Distinction in the Human Behavioral Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6, 38–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528.
65.
Jackson, R.E., Cormack, L.K.: Evolved navigation theory and the descent illusion. Perception & Psychophysics. 69, 353–362 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193756.
66.
DeBruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., Little, A.C., Perrett, D.I.: Social Perception of Facial Resemblance in Humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 37, 64–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9266-0.
67.
Tybur, J.M., Gangestad, S.W.: Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 366, 3375–3388 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0136.
68.
Nassi, J.J., Callaway, E.M.: Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 10, 360–372.
69.
Luo, D.-G., Xue, T., Yau, K.-W.: How vision begins: An odyssey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105, 9855–9862 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708405105.
70.
Hubel, David H.: Eye, brain, and vision. Harvard Medical School, Boston (1995).
71.
Rolls, E.T.: Functions of the Primate Temporal Lobe Cortical Visual Areas in Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition. Neuron. 27, 205–218 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00030-1.
72.
Tanaka, K.: Columns for Complex Visual Object Features in the Inferotemporal Cortex: Clustering of Cells with Similar but Slightly Different Stimulus Selectivities. Cerebral Cortex. 13, 90–99 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.1.90.
73.
Bushnell, I.W.R.: Life after university: a personal development programme. Pearson Custom Publishing, [S.l.] (2007).
74.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
75.
Wilson, S., MacLean, R.: Research methods and data analysis for psychology. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, London (2011).
76.
Hogg, Michael A., 1954- author: Social psychology: Hogg: Graham M. Vaughan. Pearson, Harlow, England (2013).
77.
Srinivasan, S.-S., Maruping, L.M., Robert, L.P.: Mechanisms Underlying Social Loafing in Technology Teams: An Empirical, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/183/.
78.
Shiue, Y.-C., Chiu, C.-M., Chang, C.-C.: Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior. 26, 768–777 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.014.
79.
Herberg, J.S., Levin, D.T., Saylor, M.M.: Social audiences can disrupt learning by teaching. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48, 213–219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.004.
80.
Cockrell, C., Stone, D.N.: Team discourse explains media richness and anonymity effects in audit fraud cue brainstorming. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 12, 225–242 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.04.001.
81.
Kerr, N.L., Rumble, A.C., Park, E.S., Ouwerkerk, J.W., Parks, C.D., Gallucci, M., van Lange, P.A.M.: "How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?”: Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 45, 603–613 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.017.
82.
Graziano, W.G., Habashi, M.M.: Motivational Processes Underlying Both Prejudice and Helping. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 14, 313–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361239.
83.
Davies, K., Tropp, L.R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T.F., Wright, S.C.: Cross-Group Friendships and Intergroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 15, 332–351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103.
84.
Fiske, S.T.: Journey to the edges: Social structures and neural maps of inter-group processes. British Journal of Social Psychology. 51, 1–12.
85.
Manstead, A.S.R.: The benefits of a critical stance: A reflection on past papers on the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 366–373 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02043.x.
86.
Miller, J., Haden, P.: Statistical Analysis with The General Linear Model, http://www.uv.es/~friasnav/librofactorial.pdf, (2006).
