1.
Worthington S, Worthington S, Sealy LS. Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law. Eleventh edition. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
3.
Ferran E, Look CH, Oxford University Press. Principles of corporate finance law [Internet]. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.001.0001
4.
Kraakman RH. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach [Internet]. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
5.
PSL /Corporate/ Company Incorporation/Forms of Business Vehicle [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/corporate/synopsis/94462:94463/Company-incorporation/Forms-of-business-vehicle/BCT
7.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 c. 8Arrangement of Act.
8.
Salomon v A. Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22.
9.
Russell v Northern Bank Development Corpn. [1992] 3 All ER. 1992.
10.
Ferran E, Look CH, Oxford University Press. Principles of corporate finance law [Internet]. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.001.0001
11.
Armour J. Legal Capital: an Outdated Concept? European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) [Internet]. 2006 Mar;7(01). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1017%2FS156675290600005X
12.
Davies PL. Introduction to company law [Internet]. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198854913.001.0001
13.
Morse G. Partnership and LLP law [Internet]. Ninth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198832799.001.0001
14.
Coase RH. The Nature of the Firm. Economica [Internet]. 1937 Nov;4(16). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626876
15.
Partnership Act 1890.
16.
Limited Partnerships Act 1907.
17.
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000.
19.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
20.
Ferran E, Look CH, Oxford University Press. Principles of corporate finance law [Internet]. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.001.0001
21.
PSL Corporate/Share Capital/Allotment Issue and Pre-emption [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/6203376f-d87d-4ae2-b6d7-8ed9406fb2ee/?context=1001073&federationidp=8K7S4M60073
22.
Lowry J. Eliminating obstacles to freedom of establishment: the competitive edge of UK company law. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2004 Jun 18;63(2):331–345.
23.
Second EC Company Law Directive (77/91/EC, OJ L 26/1) article 29.
26.
Lord Halsbury L.C., Lord Watson, Lord Herschell, Lord Macnaghten, Lord Morris 1892 March 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. Ooregum Gold Mining Co. of India Ltd v Roper [1892] AC 125.
27.
Re Wragg Ltd [1897] 1 Ch 796.
28.
Hilder v Dexter [1902] AC 474.
29.
Re Bradford Investments plc (no 2) 1991 BCLC 688.
30.
Re Sunrise Radio Ltd (Kohli v Lit) [2009] EWHC 2893.
31.
Centros Ltd v Ehvers og Selskabsstyrelsen (Case C-212/97) [1999] ECR I-1459, [2000] WLR 1048.
32.
Centros Ltd v Ehrvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen, [1999] B.C.C. 983.
33.
Chamber of Commerce Amsterdam v Inspire Art (Case C-167/01) [2003] ECR I-10155.
34.
Pre-emption Group, Statement of Principles on Pre-emption [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pre-emptiongroup.org.uk/getmedia/655a6ec5-fecc-47e4-80a0-7aea04433421/Revised-PEG-Statement-of-Principles-2015.pdf.aspx
35.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
36.
Ferran E, Look CH, Oxford University Press. Principles of corporate finance law [Internet]. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.001.0001
37.
Kraakman RH. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach [Internet]. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
38.
Armour J. Share Capital and Creditor Protection: Efficient Rules for a Modern Company Law. Modern Law Review. 2000 May;63(3):355–378.
39.
PSL Corporate/Share Capital/Reduction of Capital/Share buybacks [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/1e9f17b1-d51d-43e0-87f2-4f61e9af88b7/?context=1001073&federationidp=8K7S4M60073
40.
Rickford J. Reforming Capital, Report of the Interdisciplinary Group on Capital Maintenance. European business law review. London: Graham & Trotman; 2004;921–1024.
42.
Trevor v Whitworth [1887] 12 AC 409.
43.
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd. [1982] 3 All ER 1016.
44.
MacPherson v European Strategic Bureau Ltd [2000] 2 BCLC 683, CA.
45.
Re Ransomes plc [1999] 1 BCLC 775.
46.
Re Ransomes plc [1999] (affirmed [1999] 2 BCLC 591, CA).
47.
Re Northern Engineering Industries plc [1994] BCC 618, CA.
48.
Re Holders Investment Trust [1971] 1 WLR 583.
49.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
50.
Ferran E, Look CH, Oxford University Press. Principles of corporate finance law [Internet]. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671342.001.0001
51.
Worthington S, Worthington S, Sealy LS. Sealy and Worthington’s text, cases, and materials in company law. Eleventh edition. Oxford United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
52.
PSL Corporate/Share Capital/Dividends and distributions [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/uk/practicalguidanceroot?plid=37bff81a-0471-4f78-970c-8a19052d7828&federationidp=8K7S4M60073
53.
Rickford J. Legal Approaches to Restricting Distributions to Shareholders: Balance Sheet Tests and Solvency Tests. European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR). 2006 Mar;7(01).
55.
Re Exchange Banking Co, Flitcroft’s Case (1882) 21 Ch D 519.
56.
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd. [1982] 3 All ER 1016.
57.
Precision Dippings Ltd v Precision Dippings Marketing Ltd [1986] Ch 447, CA.
58.
Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd [1989] BCLC 626.
59.
Progress Property v Moorgarth Group [2010] UKSC 55.
60.
Bairstow v Queens Moat House plc [2001] 2 BCLC 531, CA.
61.
It’s a Wrap (UK) Ltd v Gula [2006] BCC 626.
62.
Charterhouse Investment Trust v Tempest Diesels Ltd (1985) 1 BCC 99.
63.
Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock [1968] 1 WLR 1555.
64.
Chaston v SWP Group plc [2003] 1 BCLC 675, CA.
65.
MT Realisations Ltd v Digital Equipment Co Ltd [2003] 2 BCLC 117, CA.
66.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
67.
Siems MM. The Foundations of Securities Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2008;
68.
BIS. SME Access to External Finance (BIS Economics Paper, No 16) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32263/12-539-sme-access-external-finance.pdf
69.
European Commission. Report of the chairman of the Expert group on the cross-border matching of innovative firms with suitable investors [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=6008&no=1
70.
Gilson, R. J.; Kraakman, R. The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency Twenty Years Later: The Hindsight Bias. Journal of Corporation Law [Internet]. 2003;28(4):715–742. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jcorl28&start_page=715&collection=journals&id=725
71.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
72.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
73.
Enriques L, Gilotta S. Disclosure and Financial Market Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2014;
74.
PSL Corporate/Equity Capital Markets [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/uk/practicalguidanceroot?plid=37bff81a-0471-4f78-970c-8a19052d7828&federationidp=8K7S4M60073
75.
PSL Financial Services/Markets/Listing, prospectus, disclosure and transparency [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/uk/practicalguidanceroot?plid=75c954c8-05e0-4ddf-90f1-88d1101645fd&federationidp=8K7S4M60073
76.
Coffee, J. Market Failure and the Economic Case for a Mandatory Disclosure System. Virginia Law Review [Internet]. 1984;70(4):717–754. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr70&start_page=717&collection=journals&id=727
77.
Kraakman RH. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach [Internet]. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
78.
Financial Conduct Authority. Feedback on CP12/25: Enhancing the effectiveness of the Listing Regime and further consultation (Consultation paper, CP13/15**) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/consultation/cp13-15.pdf
79.
Ferran E. Cross-Border Offers of Securities in the EU: The Standard Life Flotation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2006;
80.
Armour J, Mayer C, Polo A. Regulatory Sanctions and Reputational Damage in Financial Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2011;
81.
ESMA. Comparison of liability regimes in Member States in relation to the Prospectus Directive [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/comparison-liability-regimes-in-member-states-in-relation-prospectus-directive
82.
Securities prospectus | European Commission [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-markets/securities-markets/securities-prospectus_en#prospectus-regulation
83.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
84.
FCA Handbook - FCA Handbook [Internet]. Available from: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook
85.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
86.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
87.
Davies PL. Davies Review of Issuer Liability: Final Report [Internet]. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100407170721/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/davies_review_finalreport_040607.pdf
88.
Davies PL. Liability for Misstatements to the Market: Some Reflections. Journal of Corporate Law Studies [Internet]. Routledge; 2009;9(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14735970.2009.11421543
89.
Moore MT, Walker-Arnott E. A Fresh Look at Stock Market Short-termism. Journal of Law and Society. 2014 Sep;41(3):416–445.
90.
Transparency Directive (consolidated version) [Internet]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02004L0109-20131126&from=IT
91.
Transparency requirements for listed companies | European Commission [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/transparency-requirements-listed-companies_en
92.
Ensuring the integrity of securities markets | European Commission [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-markets/securities-markets/ensuring-integrity-securities-markets_en
93.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
94.
Coffee Jr. JC. Racing Towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2002;
95.
SEC. Accessing the U.S. Capital Markets — A Brief Overview for Foreign Private Issuers [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/internatl/foreign-private-issuers-overview.shtml
96.
MacNeil I. Competition and Convergence in Corporate Regulation: The Case of Overseas Listed Companies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2001;
97.
Degeorge F, Maug EG. Corporate Finance in Europe: A Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2006;
98.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
99.
FCA Handbook - FCA Handbook [Internet]. Available from: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook
100.
Morrison v National Australia Bank, US Supreme Court decision [Internet]. Available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1191.ZS.html
101.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
102.
MacNeil I. An introduction to the law on financial investment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2012.
103.
MacNeil I. Editorial. Law and Financial Markets Review [Internet]. 2011 Jul;5(4):253–255. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lawfinancmr5&id=253
104.
MacNeil I. The evolution of regulatory enforcement action in the UK capital markets: a case of ‘less is more’? Capital Markets Law Journal. 2007 Sep 24;2(4):345–369.
105.
McVea H. What’s wrong with insider dealing? Legal Studies. 1995 Nov;15(3):390–414.
106.
Conceicao C. The FSA’s approach to taking action against market abuse. Company Lawyer [Internet]. 2007;28(2):43–45. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI20830F319F7D11DB95EEAC25780548A8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
107.
Alcock A. Five years of market abuse. Company Lawyer [Internet]. 2007;28(6):163–171. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI7230F0A1FF5311DB890AD2939FCE442A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
108.
Ensuring the integrity of securities markets | European Commission [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-markets/securities-markets/ensuring-integrity-securities-markets_en
109.
Criminal Justice Act 1993 Part V (Insider dealing). Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1993/36/part/V
110.
FCA Handbook - FCA Handbook [Internet]. Available from: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook
111.
R v SFA ex p Fleurose [2001] EWHC Admin 1085.
112.
FSA v Davidson and Tatham.
113.
Spector Photo Group NV v Commissie Voor Het Bank-Financie-En Assurantiewezen (CBFA) (Case C-45/08) [2010] C.M.L.R. 30.
114.
Gullifer L, Payne J. Corporate finance law: principles and policy [Internet]. Second edition. London: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781782259596
115.
Fischel DR, Ross DJ. Should the Law Prohibit ‘Manipulation’ in Financial Markets? Harvard Law Review [Internet]. 1991 Dec;105(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1341697
116.
Siems MM. The EU Market Abuse Directive: a case-based analysis. Law and Financial Markets Review [Internet]. Routledge; 2007;2(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17521440.2008.11427939
117.
Ensuring the integrity of securities markets | European Commission [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-markets/securities-markets/ensuring-integrity-securities-markets_en
118.
Kershaw D. Company law in context: text and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
119.
Coffee JC. Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer’s Role in Corporate Governance. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. 1984 Jun;84(5). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1122351
120.
Roe MJ. Delaware’s Competition. Harvard Law Review [Internet]. 2003 Dec;117(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3651948
121.
Ventoruzzo M. Europe’s Thirteenth Directive and U.S. Takeover Regulation: Regulatory Means and Political and Economic Ends. Texas International Law Journal [Internet]. 2006;41(2):171–222. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tilj41&start_page=171&collection=journals&id=177
123.
The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, The City Code on Takeovers and Mergers [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf?v=12Sep2016
124.
Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover Bids [Internet]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:142:0012:0023:EN:PDF
125.
Kershaw D. Company law in context: text and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
126.
Armour J, Skeel D. Who Writes the Rules for Hostile Takeovers, and Why - The Peculiar Divergence of U.S. and U.K. Takeover Regulation. Georgetown Law Journal [Internet]. 2007;95(6):1727–1794. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj95&start_page=1727&collection=journals&id=1739
127.
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten;Kershaw, David;Solinas, Matteo. Is the Board Neutrality Rule Trivial? Amnesia about Corporate Law in European Takeover Regulation. European Business Law Review [Internet]. Kluwer Law International; 22(5):559–622. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EULR2011030
128.
Coffee JC. Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer’s Role in Corporate Governance. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. 1984 Jun;84(5). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1122351
129.
Re Ransomes plc [1999] 1 BCLC 775 (affirmed [1999] 2 BCLC 591, CA).
130.
Trevor v Whitworth [1887] 12 AC 409.
131.
Charterhouse Investment Trust v Tempest Diesels Ltd (1985) 1 BCC 99.
132.
Chaston v SWP Group plc [2003] 1 BCLC 675, CA.
133.
MT Realisations Ltd v Digital Equipment Co Ltd [2003] 2 BCLC 117, CA.
134.
MBR - Takeover Code [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf?v=20Jul2017
135.
TOD - Takeover Code [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf?v=20Jul2017
136.
Directive 2004/25/EC on Takeover Bids [Internet]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:142:0012:0023:EN:PDF
