1.
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 1996;44(5):936-957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
2.
Finifter AW, American Political Science Association. Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. American Political Science Association; 1993.
3.
Powell GB, Dalton RJ, Strøm K, eds. Comparative Politics Today: A World View. Global edition, Eleventh edition. Pearson; 2015.
4.
David Collier and Steven Levitsky. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics. 1997;49(3):430-451. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054009
5.
Caramani D. Comparative Politics. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
6.
Abraham Diskin, Hanna Diskin and Reuven Y. Hazan. Why Democracies Collapse: The Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 2005;26(3):291-309. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039034
7.
Rosefielde S, Hlouskova R. Why Russia is Not a Democracy. Comparative Strategy. 2007;26(3):215-229. doi:10.1080/01495930701454454
8.
White S. Understanding Russian Politics. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
9.
Dickson BJ. The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival. Oxford University Press; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4706147
10.
Hess S. Decentralized Meritocracy: Resilience, Decay, and Adaptation in the CCP’s Threat-Management System. Problems of Post-Communism. Published online 25 May 2016:1-12. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1145064
11.
Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 2002;13(1):5-21. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0003
12.
Diamond LJ. Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives. Vol Journal of democracy book. Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.
13.
Seymour Martin Lipset. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review. 1959;53(1):69-105. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1951731
14.
Overbeek H, Apeldoorn B van. Neoliberalism in Crisis. Vol International political economy series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137002471