1
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 1996;44:936–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
2
Finifter AW, American Political Science Association. Political science: the state of the discipline II. Washington, DC: : American Political Science Association 1993.
3
Powell GB, Dalton RJ, Strøm K, editors. Comparative politics today: a world view. Global edition, Eleventh edition. Boston: : Pearson 2015.
4
David Collier and Steven Levitsky. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 1997;49:430–51.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054009
5
Caramani D. Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
6
Abraham Diskin, Hanna Diskin and Reuven Y. Hazan. Why Democracies Collapse: The Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique 2005;26:291–309.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30039034
7
Rosefielde S, Hlouskova R. Why Russia is Not a Democracy. Comparative Strategy 2007;26:215–29. doi:10.1080/01495930701454454
8
White S. Understanding Russian politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011.
9
Dickson BJ. The dictator’s dilemma: the Chinese Communist Party’s strategy for survival. New York: : Oxford University Press 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4706147
10
Hess S. Decentralized Meritocracy: Resilience, Decay, and Adaptation in the CCP’s Threat-Management System. Problems of Post-Communism 2016;:1–12. doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1145064
11
Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy 2002;13:5–21. doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0003
12
Diamond LJ. Consolidating the third wave democracies: themes and perspectives. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1997.
13
Seymour Martin Lipset. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 1959;53:69–105.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1951731
14
Overbeek H, Apeldoorn B van. Neoliberalism in crisis. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137002471