1.
Hall, P.A., Taylor, R.C.R.: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 936–957 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
2.
Finifter, A.W., American Political Science Association: Political science: the state of the discipline II. American Political Science Association, Washington, DC (1993).
3.
Powell, G.B., Dalton, R.J., Strøm, K. eds: Comparative politics today: a world view. Pearson, Boston (2015).
4.
David Collier and Steven Levitsky: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics. 49, 430–451 (1997).
5.
Caramani, D.: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
6.
Abraham Diskin, Hanna Diskin and Reuven Y. Hazan: Why Democracies Collapse: The Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique. 26, 291–309 (2005).
7.
Rosefielde, S., Hlouskova, R.: Why Russia is Not a Democracy. Comparative Strategy. 26, 215–229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930701454454.
8.
White, S.: Understanding Russian politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
9.
Dickson, B.J.: The dictator’s dilemma: the Chinese Communist Party’s strategy for survival. Oxford University Press, New York (2016).
10.
Hess, S.: Decentralized Meritocracy: Resilience, Decay, and Adaptation in the CCP’s Threat-Management System. Problems of Post-Communism. 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1145064.
11.
Carothers, T.: The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy. 13, 5–21 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0003.
12.
Diamond, L.J.: Consolidating the third wave democracies: themes and perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md (1997).
13.
Seymour Martin Lipset: Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review. 53, 69–105 (1959).
14.
Overbeek, H., Apeldoorn, B. van: Neoliberalism in crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
