1
Willard V. Quine. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics 1948;2:21–38.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
2
Russell B. The problems of philosophy. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998.
3
Frank Jackson. Statements about Universals. Mind 1977;86:427–9.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253615
4
Urmson JO. Russell on Universals. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 1986;20:245–58. doi:10.1017/S0957042X00004168
5
Price HH. Thinking and experience. 2nd ed. London: : Hutchinson 1977. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/251179
6
Armstrong DM. Selection from ‘Universals’. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0df9effc-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
7
Lewis D, Lewis S. Holes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1970;48:206–12. doi:10.1080/00048407012341181
8
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983;61:343–77. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
9
Williams DC. On the Elements of Being: I. The Review of Metaphysics 1953;7.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123348
10
OLIVER A. The Metaphysics of Properties. Mind 1996;105:1–80. doi:10.1093/mind/105.417.1
11
James Van Cleve. Three Versions of the Bundle Theory. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1985;47:95–107.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4319731
12
Edwin B. Allaire. Bare Particulars. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1963;14:1–8.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4318430
13
van Inwagen P. When Are Objects Parts? Philosophical Perspectives 1987;1:21–47.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214142
14
Sider T. ‘Bare particulars’. Philosophical Perspectives 2006;20:387–97. doi:10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00112.x
15
Bailey AM. No bare particulars. Philosophical Studies 2012;158:31–41. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9665-2
16
Demirli S. Indiscernibility and bundles in a structure. Philosophical Studies 2010;151:1–18. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9420-8
17
John O’Leary-Hawthorne and J. A. Cover. A World of Universals. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1998;91:205–19.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320871
18
Eric T. Olson. The Paradox of Increase. The Monist 2006;89:390–417.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27903994
19
John O’Leary-Hawthorne. The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles. Analysis 1995;55:191–6.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328579
20
Michael B. Burke. Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1994;54:591–624.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2108583
21
Rea MC. Material constitution. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 1997.
22
Korman DZ. The Argument from Vagueness. Philosophy Compass 2010;5:891–901. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00327.x
23
Nolan D. Vagueness, Multiplicity and Parts. Nous 2006;40:716–37. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2006.00630.x
24
Van Inwagen P. Material beings. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1990.
25
McDaniel K. Parts and Wholes. Philosophy Compass 2010;5:412–25. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00238.x
26
Thomasson AL. The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects. Philosophy Compass 2010;5:591–601. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00303.x
27
Sider T. Van Inwagen and the Possibility of Gunk. Analysis 1993;53:285–9. doi:10.1093/analys/53.4.285
28
Effingham N. Undermining Motivations for Universalism. Noûs 2011;45:696–713. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00779.x
29
Merricks T. Objects and persons. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0199245363.001.0001
30
Dasgupta S. Individuals: an essay in revisionary metaphysics. Philosophical Studies 2009;145:35–67. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9390-x
31
BLACK M. I.—THE IDENTITY OF INDISCERNIBLES. Mind 1952;LXI:153–64. doi:10.1093/mind/LXI.242.153
32
Dummett M. A Defense of McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time. The Philosophical Review 1960;69:497–504.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183483
33
J. Ellis McTaggart. The Unreality of Time. Mind 1908;17:457–74.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2248314
34
Broad CD. Scientific thought: a philosophical analysis of some of its fundamental concepts. London: : Routledge 2010. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8bc96f19-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
35
Prior AN. Changes in Events and Changes in Things. Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
36
Donald C. Williams. The Myth of Passage. The Journal of Philosophy 1951;48:457–72.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2021694
37
Thomson JJ. Mctaggart on Time. Nous 2001;35:229–52. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.12
38
Mellor DH. Real time II. London: : Routledge 1998.
39
Dainton B. Time and space. 2nd ed. Durham: : Acumen 2010.
40
Le Poidevin R, MacBeath M. The Philosophy of time. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1993.
41
Fine K. Modality and Tense. Oxford University Press 2005. doi:10.1093/0199278709.001.0001
42
Time and Tense - Philosophy - Oxford Bibliographies -. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0051.xml#obo-9780195396577-0051-bibItem-0002
43
Effingham N, Askews & Holts Library Services. An introduction to ontology. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745665474
44
David Lewis. The Paradoxes of Time Travel. American Philosophical Quarterly 1976;13:145–52.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009616
45
Ingram D. The Virtues of Thisness Presentism. Philosophical Studies 2016;173:2867–88. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0641-3
46
Rennick S. Things mere mortals can do, but philosophers can’t. Analysis 2015;75:22–6. doi:10.1093/analys/anu097
47
Macdonald C. Varieties of things: foundations of contemporary metaphysics. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishing 2005.
48
Loux MJ. Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 2002.
49
Lowe EJ. A survey of metaphysics. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
50
Jubien M. Contemporary metaphysics: an introduction. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 1997.
51
Rea MC. Arguing about metaphysics. New York: : Routledge 2009.
52
Crane T, Farkas K. Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
53
Kim J, Sosa E. Metaphysics: an anthology. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 1999.
54
Sider T, Hawthorne J, Zimmerman DW. Contemporary debates in metaphysics. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1204068
55
Van Inwagen P, Zimmerman DW. Metaphysics: the big questions. 2nd, rev.expanded ed ed. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishing 2008. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67509405-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
56
Laurence S, Macdonald C. Contemporary readings in the foundations of metaphysics. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 1998.
