[1]
Willard V. Quine, ‘On What There Is’, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 21–38, 1948 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
[2]
B. Russell, The problems of philosophy, [2nd ed.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[3]
Frank Jackson, ‘Statements about Universals’, Mind, vol. 86, no. 343, pp. 427–429, 1977 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253615
[4]
J. O. Urmson, ‘Russell on Universals’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, vol. 20, pp. 245–258, Mar. 1986, doi: 10.1017/S0957042X00004168.
[5]
H. H. Price, Thinking and experience, 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson, 1977 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/251179
[6]
D. M. Armstrong, ‘Selection from “Universals”’, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0df9effc-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[7]
D. Lewis and S. Lewis, ‘Holes’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 206–212, Aug. 1970, doi: 10.1080/00048407012341181.
[8]
D. Lewis, ‘New work for a theory of universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 343–377, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1080/00048408312341131.
[9]
D. C. Williams, ‘On the Elements of Being: I’, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 7, no. 1, 1953 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123348
[10]
A. OLIVER, ‘The Metaphysics of Properties’, Mind, vol. 105, no. 417, pp. 1–80, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1093/mind/105.417.1.
[11]
James Van Cleve, ‘Three Versions of the Bundle Theory’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 95–107, 1985 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4319731
[12]
Edwin B. Allaire, ‘Bare Particulars’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1963 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4318430
[13]
P. van Inwagen, ‘When Are Objects Parts?’, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 1, pp. 21–47, 1987 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214142
[14]
T. Sider, ‘“Bare particulars”’, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 387–397, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00112.x.
[15]
A. M. Bailey, ‘No bare particulars’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 31–41, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11098-010-9665-2.
[16]
S. Demirli, ‘Indiscernibility and bundles in a structure’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9420-8.
[17]
John O’Leary-Hawthorne and J. A. Cover, ‘A World of Universals’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 205–219, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320871
[18]
Eric T. Olson, ‘The Paradox of Increase’, The Monist, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 390–417, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27903994
[19]
John O’Leary-Hawthorne, ‘The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles’, Analysis, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 191–196, 1995 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328579
[20]
Michael B. Burke, ‘Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 591–624, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2108583
[21]
M. C. Rea, Material constitution. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.
[22]
D. Z. Korman, ‘The Argument from Vagueness’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 891–901, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00327.x.
[23]
D. Nolan, ‘Vagueness, Multiplicity and Parts’, Nous, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 716–737, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2006.00630.x.
[24]
P. Van Inwagen, Material beings. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990.
[25]
K. McDaniel, ‘Parts and Wholes’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 412–425, May 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00238.x.
[26]
A. L. Thomasson, ‘The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 591–601, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00303.x.
[27]
T. Sider, ‘Van Inwagen and the Possibility of Gunk’, Analysis, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 285–289, Oct. 1993, doi: 10.1093/analys/53.4.285.
[28]
N. Effingham, ‘Undermining Motivations for Universalism’, Noûs, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 696–713, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00779.x.
[29]
T. Merricks, Objects and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0199245363.001.0001
[30]
S. Dasgupta, ‘Individuals: an essay in revisionary metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 35–67, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9390-x.
[31]
M. BLACK, ‘I.—THE IDENTITY OF INDISCERNIBLES’, Mind, vol. LXI, no. 242, pp. 153–164, 1952, doi: 10.1093/mind/LXI.242.153.
[32]
M. Dummett, ‘A Defense of McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 497–504, 1960 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183483
[33]
J. Ellis McTaggart, ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind, vol. 17, no. 68, pp. 457–474, 1908 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2248314
[34]
C. D. Broad, Scientific thought: a philosophical analysis of some of its fundamental concepts. London: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8bc96f19-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[35]
A. N. Prior, ‘Changes in Events and Changes in Things’, Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[36]
Donald C. Williams, ‘The Myth of Passage’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 457–472, 1951 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2021694
[37]
J. J. Thomson, ‘Mctaggart on Time’, Nous, vol. 35, no. s15, pp. 229–252, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.12.
[38]
D. H. Mellor, Real time II, vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998.
[39]
B. Dainton, Time and space, 2nd ed. Durham: Acumen, 2010.
[40]
R. Le Poidevin and M. MacBeath, The Philosophy of time, vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[41]
K. Fine, Modality and Tense. Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199278709.001.0001/acprof-9780199278701
[42]
‘Time and Tense - Philosophy - Oxford Bibliographies -’. [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0051.xml#obo-9780195396577-0051-bibItem-0002
[43]
N. Effingham and Askews & Holts Library Services, An introduction to ontology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745665474
[44]
David Lewis, ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 1976 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009616
[45]
D. Ingram, ‘The Virtues of Thisness Presentism’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 173, no. 11, pp. 2867–2888, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11098-016-0641-3.
[46]
S. Rennick, ‘Things mere mortals can do, but philosophers can’t’, Analysis, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 22–26, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1093/analys/anu097.
[47]
C. Macdonald, Varieties of things: foundations of contemporary metaphysics. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
[48]
M. J. Loux, Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction, 2nd ed., vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 2002.
[49]
E. J. Lowe, A survey of metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[50]
M. Jubien, Contemporary metaphysics: an introduction, vol. Contemporary philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 1997.
[51]
M. C. Rea, Arguing about metaphysics, vol. Arguing about philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2009.
[52]
T. Crane and K. Farkas, Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[53]
J. Kim and E. Sosa, Metaphysics: an anthology, vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 1999.
[54]
T. Sider, J. Hawthorne, and D. W. Zimmerman, Contemporary debates in metaphysics, vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1204068
[55]
P. Van Inwagen and D. W. Zimmerman, Metaphysics: the big questions, 2nd, rev.expanded ed ed., vol. Philosophy : the big questions. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67509405-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[56]
S. Laurence and C. Macdonald, Contemporary readings in the foundations of metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998.
