Bibliography for JH8 Metaphysics BETA

Armstrong, David M. ‘Selection from “Universals”’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0df9effc-ed40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Bailey, Andrew M. ‘No Bare Particulars’. Philosophical Studies 158.1 (2012): 31–41. Web.

BLACK, MAX. ‘I.—THE IDENTITY OF INDISCERNIBLES’. Mind LXI.242 (1952): 153–164. Web.

Broad, C.D. Scientific Thought: A Philosophical Analysis of Some of Its Fundamental Concepts. London: Routledge, 2010. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8bc96f19-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Crane, Tim, and Katalin Farkas. Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Dainton, Barry. Time and Space. 2nd ed. Durham: Acumen, 2010. Print.

Dasgupta, Shamik. ‘Individuals: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics’. Philosophical Studies 145.1 (2009): 35–67. Web.

David Lewis. ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’. American Philosophical Quarterly 13.2 (1976): 145–152. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009616>.

Demirli, Sun. ‘Indiscernibility and Bundles in a Structure’. Philosophical Studies 151.1 (2010): 1–18. Web.

Donald C. Williams. ‘The Myth of Passage’. The Journal of Philosophy 48.15 (1951): 457–472. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2021694>.

Dummett, Michael. ‘A Defense of McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time’. The Philosophical Review 69.4 (1960): 497–504. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2183483>.

Edwin B. Allaire. ‘Bare Particulars’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 14.1 (1963): 1–8. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4318430>.

Effingham, Nikk. ‘Undermining Motivations for Universalism’. Noûs 45.4 (2011): 696–713. Web.

Effingham, Nikk and Askews & Holts Library Services. An Introduction to Ontology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745665474>.

Eric T. Olson. ‘The Paradox of Increase’. The Monist 89.3 (2006): 390–417. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27903994>.

Fine, Kit. Modality and Tense. Oxford University Press, 2005. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199278709.001.0001/acprof-9780199278701>.

Frank Jackson. ‘Statements about Universals’. Mind 86.343 (1977): 427–429. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253615>.

Ingram, David. ‘The Virtues of Thisness Presentism’. Philosophical Studies 173.11 (2016): 2867–2888. Web.

J. Ellis McTaggart. ‘The Unreality of Time’. Mind 17.68 (1908): 457–474. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2248314>.

James Van Cleve. ‘Three Versions of the Bundle Theory’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 47.1 (1985): 95–107. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4319731>.

John O’Leary-Hawthorne. ‘The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles’. Analysis 55.3 (1995): 191–196. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3328579>.

John O’Leary-Hawthorne and J. A. Cover. ‘A World of Universals’. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 91.3 (1998): 205–219. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320871>.

Jubien, Michael. Contemporary Metaphysics: An Introduction. Contemporary philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 1997. Print.

Kim, Jaegwon, and Ernest Sosa. Metaphysics: An Anthology. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

Korman, Daniel Z. ‘The Argument from Vagueness’. Philosophy Compass 5.10 (2010): 891–901. Web.

Laurence, Stephen, and Cynthia Macdonald. Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998. Print.

Le Poidevin, Robin, and Murray MacBeath. The Philosophy of Time. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. Print.

Lewis, David. ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61.4 (1983): 343–377. Web.

Lewis, David, and Stephanie Lewis. ‘Holes’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48.2 (1970): 206–212. Web.

Loux, Michael J. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. 2nd ed. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.

Lowe, E. J. A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print.

Macdonald, Cynthia. Varieties of Things: Foundations of Contemporary Metaphysics. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Print.

McDaniel, Kris. ‘Parts and Wholes’. Philosophy Compass 5.5 (2010): 412–425. Web.

Mellor, D. H. Real Time II. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998. Print.

Merricks, Trenton. Objects and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0199245363.001.0001>.

Michael B. Burke. ‘Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54.3 (1994): 591–624. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2108583>.

Nolan, Daniel. ‘Vagueness, Multiplicity and Parts’. Nous 40.4 (2006): 716–737. Web.

OLIVER, A. ‘The Metaphysics of Properties’. Mind 105.417 (1996): 1–80. Web.

Price, H. H. Thinking and Experience. 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson, 1977. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/251179>.

Prior, A.N. ‘Changes in Events and Changes in Things’. Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas: N.p. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9761ca0b-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Rea, Michael C. Arguing about Metaphysics. Arguing about philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2009. Print.

---. Material Constitution. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997. Print.

Rennick, S. ‘Things Mere Mortals Can Do, but Philosophers Can’t’. Analysis 75.1 (2015): 22–26. Web.

Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.

Sider, T. ‘Van Inwagen and the Possibility of Gunk’. Analysis 53.4 (1993): 285–289. Web.

Sider, Theodore. ‘“Bare Particulars”’. Philosophical Perspectives 20.1 (2006): 387–397. Web.

Sider, Theodore, John Hawthorne, and Dean W. Zimmerman. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1204068>.

Thomasson, Amie L. ‘The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects’. Philosophy Compass 5.7 (2010): 591–601. Web.

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. ‘Mctaggart on Time’. Nous 35.s15 (2001): 229–252. Web.

‘Time and Tense - Philosophy - Oxford Bibliographies -’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0051.xml#obo-9780195396577-0051-bibItem-0002>.

Urmson, J. O. ‘Russell on Universals’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 20 (1986): 245–258. Web.

Van Inwagen, Peter. Material Beings. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990. Print.

van Inwagen, Peter. ‘When Are Objects Parts?’ Philosophical Perspectives 1 (1987): 21–47. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2214142>.

Van Inwagen, Peter, and Dean W. Zimmerman. Metaphysics: The Big Questions. 2nd, rev.expanded ed ed. Philosophy : the big questions. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67509405-ee40-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Willard V. Quine. ‘On What There Is’. The Review of Metaphysics 2.5 (1948): 21–38. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117>.

Williams, Donald C. ‘On the Elements of Being: I’. The Review of Metaphysics 7.1 (1953): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123348>.