1
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: : Routledge 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
2
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today. Second edition. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
3
Matthew Johnson. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
4
Praetzellis A. Archaeological theory in a nutshell. Walnut Creek, California: : Left Coast Press, Inc 2015.
5
Barbara Bender, editor. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Providence, R.I.: : Berg 1993.
6
Greene K, Moore T, Taylor & Francis Group. Archaeology: an introduction. Fifth edition. London: : Routledge 2010. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203835975
7
Hodder I, Hutson S, ProQuest (Firm). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
8
Ian Hodder, editor. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. London: : Routledge 1991.
9
Ian Hodder. Theory and practice in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1995. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_431038_0
10
Ian Hodder. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
11
Hodder I, Hutson S, Dawson Books. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511562136
12
Ian Hodder... [et al.], editor. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1995.
13
Andrew Jones. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
14
Lucas G. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
15
Meskell L, Preucel RW. A companion to social archaeology. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004.
16
Bintliff JL, Pearce M. The death of archaeological theory? Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2011.
17
Robert W. Preucel and Stephen A. Mrozowski, editor. Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. 2nd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
18
Julian Thomas, editor. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000.
19
Julian Thomas. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: : Routledge 1996.
20
Tilley C, editor. Interpretative archaeology. Providence, R.I.: : Berg 1993.
21
Bruce Graham Trigger. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
22
David S. Whitley, editor. Reader in archaeological theory: post-processual and cognitive approaches. London: : Routledge 1998.
23
Downes J, Pollard T, Scottish Archaeological Forum. The loved body’s corruption: archaeological contributions to the study of human mortality. Glasgow: : Cruithne Press 1999.
24
Scott R. Death by design: the true story of the Glasgow Necropolis. Edinburgh: : Black & White 2005.
25
Tarlow S. Landscapes of Memory: the Nineteenth-Century Garden Cemetery. European Journal of Archaeology 2000;3:217–39. doi:10.1177/146195710000300204
26
Matthew Johnson. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
27
Hodder I, Hutson S, ProQuest (Firm). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
28
Randall H. McGuire. A Marxist archaeology. San Diego: : Academic Press 1992. https://www.academia.edu/485201/A_Marxist_archaeology
29
Bourdieu P, Nice R. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1977.
30
Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. Cambridge: : Polity 1990.
31
Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: : Macmillan 1979.
32
Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1984.
33
Barnes B. Understanding agency: social theory and responsible action. London: : SAGE Publications 2000.
34
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today. Second edition. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
35
Dobres M-A, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000.
36
Dobres M-A, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000.
37
Jennifer L. Dornan. Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2002;9:303–29.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177466
38
Gardner A. Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: : UCL Press 2004.
39
Dobres M-A, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000.
40
Ortner SB. Commentary. Journal of Social Archaeology 2001;1:271–8. doi:10.1177/146960530100100207
41
Ortner SB. Practice,power and the past. Journal of Social Archaeology 2001;1:271–8. doi:10.1177/146960530100100207
42
Dobres M-A, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000.
43
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology. Anthropological Theory 2001;1:73–98. doi:10.1177/146349960100100105
44
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Blackwell 1987.
45
Smith AT. The limitations of doxa. Journal of Social Archaeology 2001;1:155–71. doi:10.1177/146960530100100201
46
Melford E. Spiro. Is the Western Conception of the Self ‘Peculiar’ within the Context of the World Cultures? Ethos 1993;21:107–53.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/640371
47
Spencer CS. Human Agency, Biased Transmission, and the Cultural Evolution of Chiefly Authority. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1993;12:41–74. doi:10.1006/jaar.1993.1002
48
Arnold B. The limits of agency in the analysis of elite Iron Age Celtic burials. Journal of Social Archaeology 2001;1:210–24. doi:10.1177/146960530100100204
49
Barrett J. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: : B. Blackwell 1994.
50
Pierre Bodu, Frieda Vereekcen -Odell and Frieda Vereecken-Odell. LES CHASSEURS MAGDALENIENS DE PINCEVENT; QUELQUES ASPECTS DE LEURS COMPORTEMENTS / THE MAGDALENIAN HUNTERS OF PINCEVENT ASPECTS OF THEIR BEHAVIOR. Lithic Technology 1996;21:48–70.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23273127
51
Dobres M-A. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford, UK: : Blackwell Publishers 2000.
52
Marcia-Anne Dobres and Christopher R. Hoffman. Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:211–58.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177312
53
The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain | Fewster | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/3759/2380
54
Gardner A. Social identity and the duality of structure in late Roman-period Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology 2002;2:323–51. doi:10.1177/146960530200200303
55
Knapp AB, van Dommelen P. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2008;18. doi:10.1017/S0959774308000024
56
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity 1998;63:199–222.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2694694
57
Robb J. The early Mediterranean village: agency, material culture, and social change in Neolithic Italy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
58
Robin C. Outside of houses: The practices of everyday life at Chan Noohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology 2002;2:245–68. doi:10.1177/1469605302002002397
59
Silliman S. Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 2001;1:190–209. doi:10.1177/146960530100100203
60
Stephen W. Silliman. Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England. American Antiquity 2009;74:211–30.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20622424
61
Silliman S. Indigenous traces in colonial spaces: Archaeologies of ambiguity, origin, and practice. Journal of Social Archaeology 2010;10:28–58. doi:10.1177/1469605309353127
62
Stahl AB. Colonial Entanglements and the Practices of Taste: An Alternative to Logocentric Approaches. American Anthropologist 2002;104:827–45. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.827
63
Steadman SR, Ross JC, editors. Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. London: : Routledge 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315539256
64
Thomas JT, McCall G, Lillios K. Revisiting the Individual in Prehistory: Idiosyncratic Engraving Variation and the Neolithic Slate Plaques of the Iberian Peninsula. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2009;19. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000031
65
Entangled Objects and Hybrid Practices: Colonial Contacts and Elite Connections at Monte Prama, Sardinia | Tronchetti | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/2431/1651
66
Bond GC, Gilliam A. Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: : Routledge 1994.
67
Brumfiel EM. Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist 1992;94:551–67.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
68
Margaret W. Conkey and Joan M. Gero. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1997;26:411–37.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952529
69
Gilchrist R. Gender and archaeology: contesting the past. London: : Routledge 1999. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203007976
70
Geoff Emberling. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research 1997;5:295–344.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053148
71
Atkinson. Through the looking glass: Nationalism and archaeology. Antiquity 1996;70.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293755391/fulltextPDF/9BC1D1B10CA54BA8PQ/31?accountid=14540
72
Jones S. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: : Routledge 1997. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=178610
73
Knapp AB. Who’s come a long way, baby? Archaeological Dialogues 1998;5. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001215
74
Meskell L. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.
75
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today. Second edition. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2012. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
76
Bond GC, Gilliam A. Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: : Routledge 1994.
77
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel. Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist 1992;94.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
78
Sørensen MLS. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology 1997;5:93–114. doi:10.1179/096576697800703656
79
Gero JM, Conkey MW. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1991.
80
Nelson SM. Worlds of gender: the archaeology of women’s lives around the globe. Lanham: : AltaMira Press 2007.
81
Audi R. Belief, justification, and knowledge: an introduction to epistemology. Belmont, Calif: : Wadsworth Publishing Company 1988.
82
Sven Bernecker and Fred Dretske, editor. Knowledge: readings in contemporary epistemology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
83
Edmund L. Gettier. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 1963;23:121–3.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3326922
84
Bender B. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: : Berg 1998.
85
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues 2005;12. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583
86
Cummings V, Whittle AWR. Places of special virtue: megaliths in the Neolithic landscapes of Wales. Oxford: : Oxbow 2004.
87
Edmonds MR. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: : Routledge 1999.
88
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeology: the key concepts. London: : Routledge 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=182617
89
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, et al. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a ‘Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 2006;9:31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704
90
Hawkes C. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference: Archeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist 1954;56:155–68.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357
91
Hodder I. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1995.
92
Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: : Routledge 2000. http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_471369_0
93
Johnson M. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Second edition. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=819454
94
Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past. Archaeological Dialogues 1997;4. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001045
95
Hicks D, McAtackney L, Fairclough GJ, et al. Envisioning landscape: situations and standpoints in archaeology and heritage. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.
96
McFadyen L. Building technologies, quick architecture and early Neolithic long barrow sites in southern Britain. Archaeological review from Cambridge 2006;21:117–34.
97
Semple S. Perceptions of the prehistoric in Anglo-Saxon England: religion, ritual, and rulership in the landscape. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683109.001.0001
98
Hodder I. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1995.
99
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity in association with Blackwell 1987.
100
Thomas J. Archaeology and modernity. London: : Routledge 2004.
101
Thomas J. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000.
102
Tilley CY. Interpretative archaeology. Providence, R.I.: : Berg 1993.
103
Trigger BG. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
104
Tilley CY. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994.
105
Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past. Archaeological Dialogues 1997;4. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001045
106
Edmonds MR. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: : Routledge 1999.
107
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: : Routledge 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
108
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today. Second edition. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
109
Lucas G. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
110
BjØrnar Olsen. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 2003;36:87–104. doi:10.1080/00293650310000650
111
D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry, editor. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
112
Linda Hurcombe. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. Hoboken: : Taylor and Francis 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1688922
113
Tim Ingold. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 2007;14. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127
114
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x
115
Chapman R, Wylie A, editors. Material evidence: learning from archaeological practice. London: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1883849
116
Knappett C. Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2005.
117
Meskell L. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishing 2005.
118
Miller D. Materiality. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2005.
119
Olsen B. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2010.
120
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today. Second edition. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
121
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE Publications 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
122
Christopher L. Witmore. Symmetrical Archaeology: Excerpts of a Manifesto. World Archaeology 2007;39.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40026148
123
Bennett J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham, North Carolina: : Duke University Press 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822391623
124
Boivin N, Owoc MA, editors. Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world. London: : Routledge 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315066622
125
Nicole Boivin. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
126
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2005;12:193–211.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177516
127
Hicks D, Beaudry MC. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
128
Latour B. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
129
Cumberpatch CG, Blinkhorn P. Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997.
130
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Annual Visiting Scholar Conference. Making senses of the past: toward a sensory archaeology. Carbondale: : Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University 2013.
131
Hamilakis Y, Askews & Holts Library Services. Archaeology and the senses: human experience, memory, and affect. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781139894180
132
Jones A, MacGregor G. Colouring the past: the significance of colour in archaeological research. Oxford: : Berg 2002.
133
Merleau-Ponty M. The world of perception. London: : Routledge 2009.
134
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE Publications 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
135
Appadurai, Arjun, 1949-. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press 2013. https://quod-lib-umich-edu.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb32141
136
Crielaard JP. The cultural biography of material goods in Homer’s epics. Gaia : revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque 2003;7:49–62. doi:10.3406/gaia.2003.1402
137
Nevett LC, Whitley J, editors. An age of experiment: classical archaeology transformed (1976-2014). Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2018.
138
Chris Gosden and Yvonne Marshall. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 1999;31:169–78.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/125055
139
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: : Routledge 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
140
Holtorf C. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture 2002;7:49–71. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001305
141
Holtorf CJ. The life‐histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology 1998;30:23–38. doi:10.1080/00438243.1998.9980395
142
Joy J. Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology 2009;41:540–56. doi:10.1080/00438240903345530
143
Appadurai A, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, et al. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
144
Harold Mytum. Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy. The Journal of Irish Archaeology 2004;12.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
145
Saunders NJ. Biographies of brilliance: Pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492. World Archaeology 1999;31:243–57. doi:10.1080/00438243.1999.9980444
146
Whitley J. Objects with Attitude: Biographical Facts and Fallacies in the Study of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Warrior Graves. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2002;12:217–32. doi:10.1017/S0959774302000112
147
Barad KM. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2007.
148
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: : Routledge 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
149
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:154–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x
150
Hodder I, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester, West Sussex: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=821899
151
Mytum H. Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy. The Journal of Irish Archaeology 2004;12.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
152
van der Veen M. The materiality of plants: plant–people entanglements. World Archaeology 2014;46:799–812. doi:10.1080/00438243.2014.953710
153
Whitley J. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2013;23:395–416. doi:10.1017/S095977431300053X
154
University College London. Institute of Archaeology. Cultures of commodity branding. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2016.
155
Momente de Transformation: Die Erzeugang und Zerstörung von Wert (Workshop), Embodying Value: The Transformation of Objects in and from the Roman World (Panel), Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Embodying value?: the transformation of objects in and from the ancient world. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2014.
156
Douglas M, Isherwood B. The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. [Rev. ed]. London: : Routledge 1996.
157
Osborne R, Cunliffe BW. Mediterranean urbanization 800-600 BC. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263259.001.0001
158
Graeber D. It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:219–43. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.012
159
Graeber D, Dawson Books. Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams. New York, N.Y.: : Palgrave 2001. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780312299064
160
Harris S. From value to desirability: the allure of worldly things. World Archaeology 2017;49:681–99. doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1413416
161
Richards JE, Van Buren M. Order, legitimacy and wealth in ancient states. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
162
Christopher M. Monroe. Sunk Costs at Late Bronze Age Uluburun. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 2010;:19–33.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27805158
163
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA. The construction of value in the ancient world. Los Angeles: : Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press 2012.
164
Appadurai A, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, et al. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
165
Simmel G, Frisby D. The philosophy of money. Third revised edition. London: : Routledge 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=200754
166
Stork L. Systems of Value and the Changing Perception of Metal Commodities, ca. 4000–2600. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 2015;74:115–32. doi:10.1086/679651
167
William H. Walker and Michael Brian Schiffer. The Materiality of Social Power: The Artifact-Acquisition Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2006;13.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177534
168
Wengrow D. Prehistories of Commodity Branding. Current Anthropology 2008;49:7–34. doi:10.1086/523676
169
van Wijngaarden G-J. An archaeological approach to the concept of value. Archaeological Dialogues 1999;6. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001306
