1.
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
2.
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
3.
Matthew Johnson. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
4.
Praetzellis A. Archaeological theory in a nutshell. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc; 2015.
5.
Barbara Bender, editor. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Providence, R.I.: Berg; 1993.
6.
Greene K, Moore T, Taylor & Francis Group. Archaeology: an introduction [Internet]. Fifth edition. London: Routledge; 2010. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203835975
7.
Hodder I, Hutson S, ProQuest (Firm). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
8.
Ian Hodder, editor. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. London: Routledge; 1991.
9.
Ian Hodder. Theory and practice in archaeology [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1995. Available from: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_431038_0
10.
Ian Hodder. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
11.
Hodder I, Hutson S, Dawson Books. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511562136
12.
Ian Hodder... [et al.], editor. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1995.
13.
Andrew Jones. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
14.
Lucas G. Understanding the Archaeological Record [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
15.
Meskell L, Preucel RW. A companion to social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub. Ltd; 2004.
16.
Bintliff JL, Pearce M. The death of archaeological theory? Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2011.
17.
Robert W. Preucel and Stephen A. Mrozowski, editor. Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
18.
Julian Thomas, editor. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000.
19.
Julian Thomas. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge; 1996.
20.
Tilley C, editor. Interpretative archaeology. Providence, R.I.: Berg; 1993.
21.
Bruce Graham Trigger. A history of archaeological thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
22.
David S. Whitley, editor. Reader in archaeological theory: post-processual and cognitive approaches. London: Routledge; 1998.
23.
Downes J, Pollard T, Scottish Archaeological Forum. The loved body’s corruption: archaeological contributions to the study of human mortality. Glasgow: Cruithne Press; 1999.
24.
Scott R. Death by design: the true story of the Glasgow Necropolis. Edinburgh: Black & White; 2005.
25.
Tarlow S. Landscapes of Memory: the Nineteenth-Century Garden Cemetery. European Journal of Archaeology. 2000 Aug 1;3(2):217–239.
26.
Matthew Johnson. Archaeological theory: an introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
27.
Hodder I, Hutson S, ProQuest (Firm). Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
28.
Randall H. McGuire. A Marxist archaeology [Internet]. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/485201/A_Marxist_archaeology
29.
Bourdieu P, Nice R. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.
30.
Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity; 1990.
31.
Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan; 1979.
32.
Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984.
33.
Barnes B. Understanding agency: social theory and responsible action. London: SAGE Publications; 2000.
34.
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
35.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000.
36.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000.
37.
Jennifer L. Dornan. Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. Springer; 2002;9(4):303–329. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177466
38.
Gardner A. Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: UCL Press; 2004.
39.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000.
40.
Ortner SB. Commentary. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2001 Oct;1(2):271–278.
41.
Ortner SB. Practice,power and the past. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2001 Oct;1(2):271–278.
42.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge; 2000.
43.
Pauketat TR. Practice and history in archaeology. Anthropological Theory. 2001 Mar;1(1):73–98.
44.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987.
45.
Smith AT. The limitations of doxa. Journal of Social Archaeology [Internet]. 2001 Oct;1(2):155–171. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146960530100100201
46.
Melford E. Spiro. Is the Western Conception of the Self ‘Peculiar’ within the Context of the World Cultures? Ethos [Internet]. Wiley; 1993;21(2):107–153. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/640371
47.
Spencer CS. Human Agency, Biased Transmission, and the Cultural Evolution of Chiefly Authority. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1993 Mar;12(1):41–74.
48.
Arnold B. The limits of agency in the analysis of elite Iron Age Celtic burials. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2001 Oct 1;1(2):210–224.
49.
Barrett J. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC. Oxford: B. Blackwell; 1994.
50.
Pierre Bodu, Frieda Vereekcen -Odell and Frieda Vereecken-Odell. LES CHASSEURS MAGDALENIENS DE PINCEVENT; QUELQUES ASPECTS DE LEURS COMPORTEMENTS / THE MAGDALENIAN HUNTERS OF PINCEVENT ASPECTS OF THEIR BEHAVIOR. Lithic Technology [Internet]. Maney Publishing; 1996;21(1):48–70. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23273127
51.
Dobres MA. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers; 2000.
52.
Marcia-Anne Dobres and Christopher R. Hoffman. Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. Springer; 1994;1(3):211–258. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177312
53.
The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain | Fewster | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology [Internet]. Available from: http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/3759/2380
54.
Gardner A. Social identity and the duality of structure in late Roman-period Britain. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2002 Oct 1;2(3):323–351.
55.
Knapp AB, van Dommelen P. Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2008 Feb;18(01).
56.
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff. Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity [Internet]. Society for American Archaeology; 1998;63(2):199–222. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2694694
57.
Robb J. The early Mediterranean village: agency, material culture, and social change in Neolithic Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
58.
Robin C. Outside of houses: The practices of everyday life at Chan Noohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2002 Jun 1;2(2):245–268.
59.
Silliman S. Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2001 Oct 1;1(2):190–209.
60.
Stephen W. Silliman. Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England. American Antiquity [Internet]. Society for American Archaeology; 2009;74(2):211–230. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20622424
61.
Silliman S. Indigenous traces in colonial spaces: Archaeologies of ambiguity, origin, and practice. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2010 Feb 1;10(1):28–58.
62.
Stahl AB. Colonial Entanglements and the Practices of Taste: An Alternative to Logocentric Approaches. American Anthropologist. 2002 Sep;104(3):827–845.
63.
Steadman SR, Ross JC, editors. Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315539256
64.
Thomas JT, McCall G, Lillios K. Revisiting the Individual in Prehistory: Idiosyncratic Engraving Variation and the Neolithic Slate Plaques of the Iberian Peninsula. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2009 Feb;19(01).
65.
Entangled Objects and Hybrid Practices: Colonial Contacts and Elite Connections at Monte Prama, Sardinia | Tronchetti | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology [Internet]. Available from: http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/2431/1651
66.
Bond GC, Gilliam A. Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: Routledge; 1994.
67.
Brumfiel EM. Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist [Internet]. Wiley; 1992;94(3):551–567. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
68.
Margaret W. Conkey and Joan M. Gero. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology [Internet]. Annual Reviews; 1997;26:411–437. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952529
69.
Gilchrist R. Gender and archaeology: contesting the past [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203007976
70.
Geoff Emberling. Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Research [Internet]. Springer; 1997;5(4):295–344. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053148
71.
Atkinson. Through the looking glass: Nationalism and archaeology. Antiquity [Internet]. 1996;70(270). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293755391/fulltextPDF/9BC1D1B10CA54BA8PQ/31?accountid=14540
72.
Jones S. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1997. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=178610
73.
Knapp AB. Who’s come a long way, baby? Archaeological Dialogues. 1998 Dec;5(02).
74.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
75.
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
76.
Bond GC, Gilliam A. Social construction of the past: representation as power. London: Routledge; 1994.
77.
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel. Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show. American Anthropologist [Internet]. Wiley; 1992;94(3). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
78.
Sørensen MLS. Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology. 1997 Mar;5(1):93–114.
79.
Gero JM, Conkey MW. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1991.
80.
Nelson SM. Worlds of gender: the archaeology of women’s lives around the globe. Lanham: AltaMira Press; 2007.
81.
Audi R. Belief, justification, and knowledge: an introduction to epistemology. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1988.
82.
Sven Bernecker and Fred Dretske, editor. Knowledge: readings in contemporary epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
83.
Edmund L. Gettier. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1963;23(6):121–123. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3326922
84.
Bender B. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg; 1998.
85.
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues. 2005 Aug 30;12(01).
86.
Cummings V, Whittle AWR. Places of special virtue: megaliths in the Neolithic landscapes of Wales. Oxford: Oxbow; 2004.
87.
Edmonds MR. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: Routledge; 1999.
88.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeology: the key concepts [Internet]. Renfrew C, Bahn PG, editors. London: Routledge; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=182617
89.
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, Combes P, Herring E, Thomas MS. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a ‘Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology. 2006 Apr;9(1):31–71.
90.
Hawkes C. Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference: Archeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist [Internet]. Wiley; 1954;56(2):155–168. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357
91.
Hodder I. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1995.
92.
Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2000. Available from: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_471369_0
93.
Johnson M. Archaeological theory: an introduction [Internet]. Second edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=819454
94.
Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past. Archaeological Dialogues. 1997 Dec;4(02).
95.
Hicks D, McAtackney L, Fairclough GJ, World Archaeological Congress. Envisioning landscape: situations and standpoints in archaeology and heritage. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007.
96.
McFadyen L. Building technologies, quick architecture and early Neolithic long barrow sites in southern Britain. Archaeological review from Cambridge. [Cambridge]: Archaeological Review from Cambridge, Department of Archaeology; 2006;21(1):117–134.
97.
Semple S. Perceptions of the prehistoric in Anglo-Saxon England: religion, ritual, and rulership in the landscape [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683109.001.0001
98.
Hodder I. Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge; 1995.
99.
Shanks M, Tilley CY. Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987.
100.
Thomas J. Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge; 2004.
101.
Thomas J. Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press; 2000.
102.
Tilley CY. Interpretative archaeology. Providence, R.I.: Berg; 1993.
103.
Trigger BG. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
104.
Tilley CY. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg; 1994.
105.
Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past. Archaeological Dialogues. 1997 Dec;4(02).
106.
Edmonds MR. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: Routledge; 1999.
107.
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
108.
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
109.
Lucas G. Understanding the Archaeological Record [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
110.
BjØrnar Olsen. Material culture after text: re‐membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 2003 Oct;36(2):87–104.
111.
D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry, editor. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
112.
Linda Hurcombe. Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture [Internet]. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1688922
113.
Tim Ingold. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues. 2007 Jun;14(01).
114.
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry. 2004 Aug;46(3):327–338.
115.
Chapman R, Wylie A, editors. Material evidence: learning from archaeological practice [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1883849
116.
Knappett C. Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2005.
117.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
118.
Miller D. Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2005.
119.
Olsen B. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press; 2010.
120.
Hodder I, editor. Archaeological theory today [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
121.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. Tilley CY, Keane W, Küchler S, Rowlands M, Spyer P, editors. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
122.
Christopher L. Witmore. Symmetrical Archaeology: Excerpts of a Manifesto. World Archaeology [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.; 2007;39(4). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40026148
123.
Bennett J. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things [Internet]. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822391623
124.
Boivin N, Owoc MA, editors. Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315066622
125.
Nicole Boivin. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
126.
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. Springer; 2005;12(3):193–211. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177516
127.
Hicks D, Beaudry MC. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
128.
Latour B. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1999.
129.
Cumberpatch CG, Blinkhorn P. Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow; 1997.
130.
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Annual Visiting Scholar Conference. Making senses of the past: toward a sensory archaeology. Day J, editor. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University; 2013.
131.
Hamilakis Y, Askews & Holts Library Services. Archaeology and the senses: human experience, memory, and affect [Internet]. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781139894180
132.
Jones A, MacGregor G. Colouring the past: the significance of colour in archaeological research. Oxford: Berg; 2002.
133.
Merleau-Ponty M. The world of perception. London: Routledge; 2009.
134.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. Tilley CY, Keane W, Küchler S, Rowlands M, Spyer P, editors. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
135.
Appadurai, Arjun, 1949-. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://quod-lib-umich-edu.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb32141
136.
Crielaard JP. The cultural biography of material goods in Homer’s epics. Gaia : revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque. 2003;7(1):49–62.
137.
Nevett LC, Whitley J, editors. An age of experiment: classical archaeology transformed (1976-2014). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2018.
138.
Chris Gosden and Yvonne Marshall. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology [Internet]. 1999;31(2):169–178. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/125055
139.
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
140.
Holtorf C. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture. 2002 Mar;7(1):49–71.
141.
Holtorf CJ. The life‐histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology. 1998 Jun;30(1):23–38.
142.
Joy J. Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology. 2009 Dec;41(4):540–556.
143.
Appadurai A, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, Symposium on the Relationship between Commodities and Culture. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
144.
Harold Mytum. Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy. The Journal of Irish Archaeology [Internet]. Wordwell Ltd.; 2004;12. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
145.
Saunders NJ. Biographies of brilliance: Pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492. World Archaeology. 1999 Oct;31(2):243–257.
146.
Whitley J. Objects with Attitude: Biographical Facts and Fallacies in the Study of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Warrior Graves. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2002 Oct;12(2):217–232.
147.
Barad KM. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2007.
148.
Harris OJT, Cipolla CN, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
149.
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2011 Mar;17(1):154–177.
150.
Hodder I, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=821899
151.
Mytum H. Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy. The Journal of Irish Archaeology [Internet]. Wordwell Ltd.; 2004;12. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
152.
van der Veen M. The materiality of plants: plant–people entanglements. World Archaeology. 2014 Oct 20;46(5):799–812.
153.
Whitley J. Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2013 Oct;23(03):395–416.
154.
University College London. Institute of Archaeology. Cultures of commodity branding. Bevan A, Wengrow D, editors. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2016.
155.
Momente de Transformation: Die Erzeugang und Zerstörung von Wert (Workshop), Embodying Value: The Transformation of Objects in and from the Roman World (Panel), Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference. Embodying value?: the transformation of objects in and from the ancient world. Bokern A, Rowan C, editors. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2014.
156.
Douglas M, Isherwood B. The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. [Rev. ed]. London: Routledge; 1996.
157.
Osborne R, Cunliffe BW. Mediterranean urbanization 800-600 BC [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263259.001.0001
158.
Graeber D. It is value that brings universes into being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013 Jun;3(2):219–243.
159.
Graeber D, Dawson Books. Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams [Internet]. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave; 2001. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780312299064
160.
Harris S. From value to desirability: the allure of worldly things. World Archaeology. 2017 Oct 20;49(5):681–699.
161.
Richards JE, Van Buren M. Order, legitimacy and wealth in ancient states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
162.
Christopher M. Monroe. Sunk Costs at Late Bronze Age Uluburun. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research [Internet]. 2010;(357):19–33. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27805158
163.
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA. The construction of value in the ancient world. Papadopoulos JK, Urton G, editors. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press; 2012.
164.
Appadurai A, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, Symposium on the Relationship between Commodities and Culture. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
165.
Simmel G, Frisby D. The philosophy of money [Internet]. Third revised edition. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=200754
166.
Stork L. Systems of Value and the Changing Perception of Metal Commodities, ca. 4000–2600. Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 2015 Apr;74(1):115–132.
167.
William H. Walker and Michael Brian Schiffer. The Materiality of Social Power: The Artifact-Acquisition Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. Springer; 2006;13(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177534
168.
Wengrow D. Prehistories of Commodity Branding. Current Anthropology. 2008 Feb;49(1):7–34.
169.
van Wijngaarden GJ. An archaeological approach to the concept of value. Archaeological Dialogues. 1999 Jul;6(01).
