[1]
O. J. T. Harris, C. N. Cipolla, and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
[2]
I. Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory today, Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
[3]
Matthew Johnson, Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[4]
A. Praetzellis, Archaeological theory in a nutshell. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc, 2015.
[5]
Barbara Bender, Ed., Landscape: politics and perspectives, vol. Series: Explorations in anthropology. Providence, R.I.: Berg, 1993.
[6]
K. Greene, T. Moore, and Taylor & Francis Group, Archaeology: an introduction, Fifth edition. London: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203835975
[7]
I. Hodder, S. Hutson, and ProQuest (Firm), Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
[8]
Ian Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades, vol. Series: Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1991.
[9]
Ian Hodder, Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_431038_0
[10]
Ian Hodder, The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
[11]
I. Hodder, S. Hutson, and Dawson Books, Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511562136
[12]
Ian Hodder... [et al.], Ed., Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge, 1995.
[13]
Andrew Jones, Archaeological theory and scientific practice, vol. Series: Topics in contemporary archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[14]
G. Lucas, Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
[15]
L. Meskell and R. W. Preucel, A companion to social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004.
[16]
J. L. Bintliff and M. Pearce, The death of archaeological theory? Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2011.
[17]
Robert W. Preucel and Stephen A. Mrozowski, Ed., Contemporary archaeology in theory: the new pragmatism, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[18]
Julian Thomas, Ed., Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000.
[19]
Julian Thomas, Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology, vol. Series: Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1996.
[20]
C. Tilley, Ed., Interpretative archaeology, vol. Series: Explorations in anthropology. Providence, R.I.: Berg, 1993.
[21]
Bruce Graham Trigger, A history of archaeological thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[22]
David S. Whitley, Ed., Reader in archaeological theory: post-processual and cognitive approaches, vol. Series: Routledge readers in archaeology. London: Routledge, 1998.
[23]
J. Downes, T. Pollard, and Scottish Archaeological Forum, The loved body’s corruption: archaeological contributions to the study of human mortality. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, 1999.
[24]
R. Scott, Death by design: the true story of the Glasgow Necropolis. Edinburgh: Black & White, 2005.
[25]
S. Tarlow, ‘Landscapes of Memory: the Nineteenth-Century Garden Cemetery’, European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 217–239, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1177/146195710000300204.
[26]
Matthew Johnson, Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[27]
I. Hodder, S. Hutson, and ProQuest (Firm), Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 3rd ed. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=221176
[28]
Randall H. McGuire, A Marxist archaeology. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/485201/A_Marxist_archaeology
[29]
P. Bourdieu and R. Nice, Outline of a theory of practice, vol. Cambridge studies in social anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[30]
P. Bourdieu, The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
[31]
A. Giddens, Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan, 1979.
[32]
A. Giddens, The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
[33]
B. Barnes, Understanding agency: social theory and responsible action. London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
[34]
I. Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory today, Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
[35]
M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000.
[36]
M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000.
[37]
Jennifer L. Dornan, ‘Agency and Archaeology: Past, Present, and Future Directions’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 303–329, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177466
[38]
A. Gardner, Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: UCL Press, 2004.
[39]
M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000.
[40]
S. B. Ortner, ‘Commentary’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 271–278, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146960530100100207.
[41]
S. B. Ortner, ‘Practice,power and the past’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 271–278, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146960530100100207.
[42]
M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, Agency in archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000.
[43]
T. R. Pauketat, ‘Practice and history in archaeology’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–98, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146349960100100105.
[44]
M. Shanks and C. Y. Tilley, Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987.
[45]
A. T. Smith, ‘The limitations of doxa’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 155–171, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146960530100100201. [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/146960530100100201
[46]
Melford E. Spiro, ‘Is the Western Conception of the Self “Peculiar” within the Context of the World Cultures?’, Ethos, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 107–153, 1993 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/640371
[47]
C. S. Spencer, ‘Human Agency, Biased Transmission, and the Cultural Evolution of Chiefly Authority’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 41–74, Mar. 1993, doi: 10.1006/jaar.1993.1002.
[48]
B. Arnold, ‘The limits of agency in the analysis of elite Iron Age Celtic burials’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 210–224, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146960530100100204.
[49]
J. Barrett, Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900-1200 BC, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1994.
[50]
Pierre Bodu, Frieda Vereekcen -Odell and Frieda Vereecken-Odell, ‘LES CHASSEURS MAGDALENIENS DE PINCEVENT; QUELQUES ASPECTS DE LEURS COMPORTEMENTS / THE MAGDALENIAN HUNTERS OF PINCEVENT ASPECTS OF THEIR BEHAVIOR’, Lithic Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 48–70, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23273127
[51]
M.-A. Dobres, Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
[52]
Marcia-Anne Dobres and Christopher R. Hoffman, ‘Social Agency and the Dynamics of Prehistoric Technology’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–258, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177312
[53]
‘The Role of Agency and Material Culture in Remembering and Forgetting: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study from Central Spain | Fewster | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology’. [Online]. Available: http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/3759/2380
[54]
A. Gardner, ‘Social identity and the duality of structure in late Roman-period Britain’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 323–351, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1177/146960530200200303.
[55]
A. B. Knapp and P. van Dommelen, ‘Past Practices: Rethinking Individuals and Agents in Archaeology’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 18, no. 01, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0959774308000024.
[56]
Kent G. Lightfoot, Antoinette Martinez and Ann M. Schiff, ‘Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California’, American Antiquity, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 199–222, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2694694
[57]
J. Robb, The early Mediterranean village: agency, material culture, and social change in Neolithic Italy, vol. Cambridge studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[58]
C. Robin, ‘Outside of houses: The practices of everyday life at Chan Noohol, Belize’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 245–268, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1469605302002002397.
[59]
S. Silliman, ‘Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 190–209, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/146960530100100203.
[60]
Stephen W. Silliman, ‘Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England’, American Antiquity, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 211–230, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20622424
[61]
S. Silliman, ‘Indigenous traces in colonial spaces: Archaeologies of ambiguity, origin, and practice’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–58, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1469605309353127.
[62]
A. B. Stahl, ‘Colonial Entanglements and the Practices of Taste: An Alternative to Logocentric Approaches’, American Anthropologist, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 827–845, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.827.
[63]
S. R. Steadman and J. C. Ross, Eds., Agency and identity in the ancient Near East: new paths forward. London: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315539256
[64]
J. T. Thomas, G. McCall, and K. Lillios, ‘Revisiting the Individual in Prehistory: Idiosyncratic Engraving Variation and the Neolithic Slate Plaques of the Iberian Peninsula’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 19, no. 01, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0959774309000031.
[65]
‘Entangled Objects and Hybrid Practices: Colonial Contacts and Elite Connections at Monte Prama, Sardinia | Tronchetti | Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology’. [Online]. Available: http://www.equinoxpub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/2431/1651
[66]
G. C. Bond and A. Gilliam, Social construction of the past: representation as power, vol. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1994.
[67]
E. M. Brumfiel, ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show’, American Anthropologist, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 551–567, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
[68]
Margaret W. Conkey and Joan M. Gero, ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 26, pp. 411–437, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952529
[69]
R. Gilchrist, Gender and archaeology: contesting the past. London: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203007976
[70]
Geoff Emberling, ‘Ethnicity in Complex Societies: Archaeological Perspectives’, Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 295–344, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053148
[71]
Atkinson, ‘Through the looking glass: Nationalism and archaeology’, Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 270, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293755391/fulltextPDF/9BC1D1B10CA54BA8PQ/31?accountid=14540
[72]
S. Jones, The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=178610
[73]
A. B. Knapp, ‘Who’s come a long way, baby?’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 5, no. 02, Dec. 1998, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800001215.
[74]
L. Meskell, Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
[75]
I. Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory today, Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
[76]
G. C. Bond and A. Gilliam, Social construction of the past: representation as power, vol. 24. London: Routledge, 1994.
[77]
Elizabeth M. Brumfiel, ‘Distinguished Lecture in Archeology: Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem - Gender, Class, and Faction Steal the Show’, American Anthropologist, vol. 94, no. 3, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/680562
[78]
M. L. S. Sørensen, ‘Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe’, Journal of European Archaeology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–114, Mar. 1997, doi: 10.1179/096576697800703656.
[79]
J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey, Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
[80]
S. M. Nelson, Worlds of gender: the archaeology of women’s lives around the globe. Lanham: AltaMira Press, 2007.
[81]
R. Audi, Belief, justification, and knowledge: an introduction to epistemology, vol. The Wadsworth basic issues in philosophy series. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1988.
[82]
Sven Bernecker and Fred Dretske, Ed., Knowledge: readings in contemporary epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[83]
Edmund L. Gettier, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 121–123, 1963 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3326922
[84]
B. Bender, Stonehenge: making space, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 1998.
[85]
J. Brück, ‘Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 12, no. 01, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S1380203805001583.
[86]
V. Cummings and A. W. R. Whittle, Places of special virtue: megaliths in the Neolithic landscapes of Wales, vol. Cardiff studies in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow, 2004.
[87]
M. R. Edmonds, Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: Routledge, 1999.
[88]
Ebooks Corporation Limited, Archaeology: the key concepts, vol. Routledge key guides. London: Routledge, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=182617
[89]
S. Hamilton, R. Whitehouse, K. Brown, P. Combes, E. Herring, and M. S. Thomas, ‘Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a Methodology for a “Subjective” Approach’, European Journal of Archaeology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–71, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461957107077704.
[90]
C. Hawkes, ‘Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference: Archeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World’, American Anthropologist, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 1954 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/664357
[91]
I. Hodder, Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge, 1995.
[92]
T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.GLA.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_471369_0
[93]
M. Johnson, Archaeological theory: an introduction, Second edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=819454
[94]
‘Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 4, no. 02, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800001045.
[95]
D. Hicks, L. McAtackney, G. J. Fairclough, and World Archaeological Congress, Envisioning landscape: situations and standpoints in archaeology and heritage, vol. One world archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007.
[96]
L. McFadyen, ‘Building technologies, quick architecture and early Neolithic long barrow sites in southern Britain’, Archaeological review from Cambridge, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 117–134, 2006.
[97]
S. Semple, Perceptions of the prehistoric in Anglo-Saxon England: religion, ritual, and rulership in the landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683109.001.0001
[98]
I. Hodder, Interpreting Archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: Routledge, 1995.
[99]
M. Shanks and C. Y. Tilley, Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987.
[100]
J. Thomas, Archaeology and modernity. London: Routledge, 2004.
[101]
J. Thomas, Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: Leicester University Press, 2000.
[102]
C. Y. Tilley, Interpretative archaeology. Providence, R.I.: Berg, 1993.
[103]
B. G. Trigger, A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[104]
C. Y. Tilley, A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1994.
[105]
‘Relativism, Objectivity and the Politics of the Past’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 4, no. 02, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800001045.
[106]
M. R. Edmonds, Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscape, monuments, and memory. London: Routledge, 1999.
[107]
O. J. T. Harris, C. N. Cipolla, and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
[108]
I. Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory today, Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
[109]
G. Lucas, Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845772
[110]
BjØrnar Olsen, ‘Material culture after text: re‐membering things’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 87–104, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1080/00293650310000650.
[111]
D. Hicks & M. C. Beaudry, Ed., The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
[112]
Linda Hurcombe, Archaeological Artefacts as Material Culture. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1688922
[113]
Tim Ingold, ‘Materials against materiality’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 14, no. 01, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S1380203807002127.
[114]
A. Jones, ‘Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice’, Archaeometry, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 327–338, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x.
[115]
R. Chapman and A. Wylie, Eds., Material evidence: learning from archaeological practice. London: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1883849
[116]
C. Knappett, Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.
[117]
L. Meskell, Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
[118]
D. Miller, Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.
[119]
B. Olsen, In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press, 2010.
[120]
I. Hodder, Ed., Archaeological theory today, Second edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745681009
[121]
Ebooks Corporation Limited, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE Publications, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
[122]
Christopher L. Witmore, ‘Symmetrical Archaeology: Excerpts of a Manifesto’, World Archaeology, vol. 39, no. 4, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40026148
[123]
J. Bennett, Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780822391623
[124]
N. Boivin and M. A. Owoc, Eds., Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315066622
[125]
Nicole Boivin, Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[126]
Chris Gosden, ‘What Do Objects Want?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 193–211, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177516
[127]
D. Hicks and M. C. Beaudry, The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
[128]
B. Latour, Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[129]
C. G. Cumberpatch and P. Blinkhorn, Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology, vol. Oxbow monograph. Oxford: Oxbow, 1997.
[130]
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations and Annual Visiting Scholar Conference, Making senses of the past: toward a sensory archaeology, vol. 40. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, 2013.
[131]
Y. Hamilakis and Askews & Holts Library Services, Archaeology and the senses: human experience, memory, and affect. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781139894180
[132]
A. Jones and G. MacGregor, Colouring the past: the significance of colour in archaeological research. Oxford: Berg, 2002.
[133]
M. Merleau-Ponty, The world of perception. London: Routledge, 2009.
[134]
Ebooks Corporation Limited, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE Publications, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1024140
[135]
Appadurai, Arjun, 1949-, The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://quod-lib-umich-edu.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb32141
[136]
J. P. Crielaard, ‘The cultural biography of material goods in Homer’s epics’, Gaia : revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2003, doi: 10.3406/gaia.2003.1402.
[137]
L. C. Nevett and J. Whitley, Eds., An age of experiment: classical archaeology transformed (1976-2014). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2018.
[138]
Chris Gosden and Yvonne Marshall, ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’, World Archaeology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/125055
[139]
O. J. T. Harris, C. N. Cipolla, and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
[140]
C. Holtorf, ‘Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–71, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1359183502007001305.
[141]
C. J. Holtorf, ‘The life‐histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern (Germany)’, World Archaeology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23–38, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1080/00438243.1998.9980395.
[142]
J. Joy, ‘Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives’, World Archaeology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 540–556, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00438240903345530.
[143]
A. Appadurai, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, and Symposium on the Relationship between Commodities and Culture, The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
[144]
Harold Mytum, ‘Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy’, The Journal of Irish Archaeology, vol. 12, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
[145]
N. J. Saunders, ‘Biographies of brilliance: Pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492’, World Archaeology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 243–257, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1080/00438243.1999.9980444.
[146]
J. Whitley, ‘Objects with Attitude: Biographical Facts and Fallacies in the Study of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Warrior Graves’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 217–232, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1017/S0959774302000112.
[147]
K. M. Barad, Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2007.
[148]
O. J. T. Harris, C. N. Cipolla, and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Archaeological theory in the new millennium: introducing current perspectives. London: Routledge, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4865820
[149]
I. Hodder, ‘Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 154–177, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
[150]
I. Hodder and Ebooks Corporation Limited, Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=821899
[151]
H. Mytum, ‘Artefact Biography as an Approach to Material Culture: Irish Gravestones as a Material Form of Genealogy’, The Journal of Irish Archaeology, vol. 12, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20650834
[152]
M. van der Veen, ‘The materiality of plants: plant–people entanglements’, World Archaeology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 799–812, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00438243.2014.953710.
[153]
J. Whitley, ‘Homer’s Entangled Objects: Narrative, Agency and Personhood In and Out of Iron Age Texts’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 23, no. 03, pp. 395–416, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1017/S095977431300053X.
[154]
University College London. Institute of Archaeology, Cultures of commodity branding. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2016.
[155]
Momente de Transformation: Die Erzeugang und Zerstörung von Wert (Workshop), Embodying Value: The Transformation of Objects in and from the Roman World (Panel), and Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Embodying value?: the transformation of objects in and from the ancient world, vol. 2592. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2014.
[156]
M. Douglas and B. Isherwood, The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption, [Rev. ed]. London: Routledge, 1996.
[157]
R. Osborne and B. W. Cunliffe, Mediterranean urbanization 800-600 BC, vol. 126. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263259.001.0001
[158]
D. Graeber, ‘It is value that brings universes into being’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 219–243, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.012.
[159]
D. Graeber and Dawson Books, Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780312299064
[160]
S. Harris, ‘From value to desirability: the allure of worldly things’, World Archaeology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 681–699, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00438243.2017.1413416.
[161]
J. E. Richards and M. Van Buren, Order, legitimacy and wealth in ancient states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[162]
Christopher M. Monroe, ‘Sunk Costs at Late Bronze Age Uluburun’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 357, pp. 19–33, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27805158
[163]
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, The construction of value in the ancient world. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2012.
[164]
A. Appadurai, American Council of Learned Societies, Ethnohistory Workshop, and Symposium on the Relationship between Commodities and Culture, The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32141
[165]
G. Simmel and D. Frisby, The philosophy of money, Third revised edition. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=200754
[166]
L. Stork, ‘Systems of Value and the Changing Perception of Metal Commodities, ca. 4000–2600’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 115–132, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1086/679651.
[167]
William H. Walker and Michael Brian Schiffer, ‘The Materiality of Social Power: The Artifact-Acquisition Perspective’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 13, no. 2, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177534
[168]
D. Wengrow, ‘Prehistories of Commodity Branding’, Current Anthropology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 7–34, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1086/523676.
[169]
G.-J. van Wijngaarden, ‘An archaeological approach to the concept of value’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 6, no. 01, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800001306.
