Aberdeen Rail Co v Blaikie Brothers [1854] Macq HL 461. N.p. Print.
Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900-03] All ER Rep 746. N.p. Print.
Anderson v Hogg 2002 SLT 354, Inner House. N.p. Print.
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cuninghame [1906] 2 Ch 35. N.p. Print.
Baker, H. Kent, and Ronald Anderson, eds. Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research, and Practice. The Robert W. Kolb series in finance. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=589109>.
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, Jesse M. Fried, and David I. Walker. ‘Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation’. The University of Chicago Law Review 69.3 (2002): n. pag. Web.
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241. N.p. Print.
---. N.p. Print.
Blair, Margaret M, and Lynn A Stout. ‘A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law’. Virginia Law Review 85 (1999): n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals/valr&collection=journals>.
Bratton, William W. ‘The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History’. 1989. Web. <http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1832&context=faculty_scholarship>.
Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v Cellular Information Systems 673 A 2d 148 (Del. 1996). N.p. Print.
Bushell v Faith [1970] A C 1099. N.p. Print.
CA [2002] EWCA Civ 1883. N.p. Print.
Cheffins, Brian R. Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Print.
Citco Banking Corporation NV v Pusser’s Ltd [2007] UKPC 13. N.p. Print.
Citybranch Group Ltd [2004] 4 All E R 735, CA. N.p., 2004. Print.
Coffee, John C., and Donald E. Schwartz. ‘The Survival of the Derivative Suit: An Evaluation and a Proposal for Legislative Reform’. Columbia Law Review 81.2 (1981): n. pag. Web.
Companies Act 2006. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents>.
Company Law Review Steering Group. Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report. Company law reform. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 2001. Print.
‘Compliance and Reporting Under the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive’. Web. <http://www.purposeofcorporation.org/documents/project_outputs/briefing-eu-non-financial-reporting-directive.pdf>.
Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554. N.p., 1916. Print.
‘Corporate Governance - Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee - House of Commons’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmbeis/702/70202.htm>.
‘Corporate Governance Green Paper (2016) and the Response of the Government’. 2016. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform>.
‘---’. 2016. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform>.
Criterion Properties Plc v Stratford UK Properties EWHC per Hart J. N.p. Print.
Dafen Tinplate Company Ltd v Llanelly Steel Company [1920] 2 Ch 124. N.p., 1920. Print.
Davies, P. L., L. C. B. Gower, and Sarah Worthington. Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law. Tenth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2016. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299>.
---. Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law. Tenth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2016. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299>.
Deryn Fisher. ‘The Enlightened Shareholder - Leaving Stakeholders in the Dark: Will Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 Make Directors Consider the Impact of Their Decisions on Third Parties?’ International Company and Commercial Law Review n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?sp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=I524FDE30BAF611DD8F93EE5287864437>.
‘Developments in Corporate Governance and Stewardship 2016’. Web. <https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/Developments-in-Corporate-Governance-and-Stewa-(2).pdf>.
Dignam, Alan J., and Michael Galanis. The Globalization of Corporate Governance. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2009. Print.
‘Directors’ Remuneration Reforms FAQ’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/directors-remuneration-reforms-frequently-asked-questions>.
Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1971] AC 360. N.p. Print.
Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All E R 1064. Vol. 2. N.p., 1950. Print.
Esser, Irene-Marie. ‘Corporate Governance: Soft Law Regulation and Disclosure—The Cases of the United Kingdom and South Africa’. Corporate Governance Codes for the 21st Century. Ed. Jean J. du Plessis and Chee Keong Low. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. 233–260. Web. <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-51868-8_11>.
Ferrarini, Guido. ‘Executive Remuneration in Crisis: A Critical Assessment of Reforms in Europe’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 10.1 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www-tandfonline-com/doi/abs/10.1080/14735970.2010.11419821>.
Flannigan, Robert. ‘The Strict Character of Fiduciary Liability’. Law Journal Library New Zealand Law Review 2 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/newzlndlr2006&id=221&collection=journals&index=journals/newzlndlr>.
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 462. N.p. Print.
George Newman & Co. [1895] 1 Ch. 674. N.p. Print.
Guinness Plc. v Saunders [1990] 2 W.L.R. 324. N.p. Print.
Hogg v Cramphron [1967] Ch 254. N.p. Print.
Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821. N.p. Print.
Insolvency Act 1986. N.p. Print.
John Lowry. ‘The Duty of Loyalty of Company Directors: Bridging the Accountability Gap through Efficient Disclosure’. The Cambridge Law Journal 68.3 (2009): 607–622. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40388837>.
Keay, A. ‘Tackling the Issue of the Corporate Objective: An Analysis of the United Kingdom’s Enlightened Shareholder Value Approach’. Sydney Law Review 29.4 (2007): 577–612. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/sydney29&id=577>.
Keay, Andrew. ‘Ascertaining The Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model’. Modern Law Review 71.5 (2008): 663–698. Web.
---. ‘Assessing Accountability of Boards under the UK Corporate Governance Code’. Journal of Business Law 7 n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?sp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=I1A05C82055BB11E5A81AE7D9787A2D81>.
---. ‘Comply or Explain in Corporate Governance Codes: In Need of Greater Regulatory Oversight?’ Legal Studies 34.2 (2014): 279–304. Web.
---. ‘Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value, and More: Much Ado about Little?’ European Business Law Review 22.1 1–49. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EULR2011001>.
---. ‘Shareholder Primacy in Corporate Law: Can It Survive? Should It Survive?’ European Company and Financial Law Review 7.3 (2010): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘The Duty of Directors to Take Account of Creditors’ Interests: Has It Any Role to Play?’ (2002): n. pag. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIC3930461E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.
Kershaw, David. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. Company Law in Context: Texts and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938>.
---. ‘Lost in Translation: Corporate Opportunities in Comparative Perspective’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25.4 (2005): 603–627. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600611>.
Kingford Smith, D. ‘Governing the Corporation: The Role of Soft Regulation’. 35.1 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/LuceneSearch?typea=title&termsa=Governing+the+corporation+%3A+the+role+of+%27soft+regulation%27&operator=AND&searchtype=field&collection=journals&sections=any&submit=Search>.
‘KPMG’s Guide to Directors’ Remuneration 2015’. N.p., 2016. Web. <https://home.kpmg.com/uk/en/home/insights/2015/09/kpmgs-guide-to-directors-remuneration-2015.html>.
Kraakman, Reinier H. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001>.
Lombard, Sulette, and Tronel Joubert. ‘The Legislative Response to the Shareholders V Stakeholders Debate: A Comparative Overview’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 14.1 (2014): 211–240. Web.
‘LR 9.8 Annual Financial Report - FCA Handbook’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR/9/8.html>.
Lynch, Elaine. ‘Section 172: A Ground-Breaking Reform of Director’s Duties, or the Emperor’s New Clothes?’ Company Lawyer 33.7 (2012): n. pag. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI40B86F40B5E611E1B7C6E5F4CE7945D1%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.
MacNeil, Iain, and Xiao Li. ‘Comply or Explain: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance With the Combined Code’. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14.5 (2006): 486–497. Web.
Mallin, Chris A. Corporate Governance. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780192538734>.
McCahery, Joseph A. ‘Managerial Remuneration: The Indirect Pay-for-Performance Relation’. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 1.part 2 317–332. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/corplstd1&id=319>.
McGuinness v Bremner [1988] BCLC 673. N.p. Print.
Moore, Marc. Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. 1st ed. 2017. Palgrave Corporate and Financial Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Print.
---. Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. 1st ed. 2017. Palgrave Corporate and Financial Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Print.
Northwest Transportation Company Ltd v Beatty (1887). Vol. 12. N.p., 1887. Print.
‘NYSE Listed Company Manual, Corporate Governance Standards’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://wallstreet.cch.com/LCM/>.
‘O’Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092, HL’. (1999): n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5F3S-9PV1-F00Y-N08M&csi=417192&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.
Parkinson, J. E. Corporate Power and Responsibility: Issues in the Theory of Company Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. Print.
Peskin v Anderson [2001] 1 BCLC 372. N.p. Print.
Re D’Jan of London Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 561. N.p. Print.
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd. Vol. 3. N.p., 1982. Print.
Re Macro Ipswich Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 354. N.p. Print.
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134. Vol. 2. N.p., 1967. Print.
Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378. N.p., 1942. Print.
Regentcrest v Cohen [2001] 2 BCLC 80. N.p. Print.
Riley, C.A. ‘The Company Director’s Duty of Care and Skill: The Case for an Onerous but Subjective Standard’. Modern Law Review 62.5 (1999): 697–724. Web.
Sarah Worthington. ‘Reforming Directors’ Duties’. The Modern Law Review 64.3 (2001): 439–458. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097009>.
Saul D Harrison [1995] 1 BCLC 14, CA. N.p. Print.
Sealy, L. S. ‘Bona Fides and Proper Purposes in Corporate Decision’. Law Journal Library Monash University Law Review - HeinOnline.org 15 (1989): n. pag. Web. <https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/monash15&id=279&collection=journals&index=journals/monash>.
‘Section 122, Insolvency Act 1986’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/122>.
Shuttleworth v Cox Bros Ltd [1926] All ER Rep 498. N.p. Print.
Smith v Van Gorkom 488 A 2d 858 (Del 1985). N.p. Print.
Stout, Lynn. ‘Bad and Not-so-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy’. Law Journal Library Search 75.5 (2002): 1189–1210. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.heinonline.org./HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/scal75&div=37&start_page=1189&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.
Talbot, Lorraine. Progressive Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. Routledge research in corporate law. London: Routledge, 2013. Print.
‘The Wrongful Trading Remedy in UK Law: Classification, Application and Practical Significance’. 2004 n. pag. Web. <http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ecomflr1&i=71>.
‘UK Corporate Governance Code’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Codes-Standards/Corporate-governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code.aspx>.
‘UKLA, Listing Rules’. Web. <https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR.pdf>.
Wedderburn, K. W. ‘Shareholders’ Rights and the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle’. The Cambridge Law Journal 15.02 (1957): n. pag. Web.
‘What Constitutes an Explanation Under “Comply or Explain?”’ Web. <https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/What-constitutes-an-explanation-under-comply-or-ex.pdf>.
Worthington, Sarah. ‘Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors’ Breaches’’. Law Quarterly Review (2000): 638–675. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICCB8C891E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue>.
Wymeersch, Eddy O. ‘The Corporate Governance “Codes of Conduct” between State and Private Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal (2007): n. pag. Web.
