1
Moore M. Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. 1st ed. 2017. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2017.
2
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
3
Mallin CA. Corporate governance. Sixth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780192538734
4
Baker HK, Anderson R, editors. Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research, and Practice. Hoboken, N.J.: : John Wiley & Sons 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=589109
5
Talbot L. Progressive Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. London: : Routledge 2013.
6
Bratton WW. The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History. 1989.http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1832&context=faculty_scholarship
7
Dignam AJ, Galanis M. The Globalization of Corporate Governance. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate 2009.
8
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
9
Davies PL, Gower LCB, Worthington S. Gower’s principles of modern company law. Tenth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
10
Kraakman RH. The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2017. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
11
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
12
UKLA, Listing Rules. https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR.pdf
13
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cuninghame [1906] 2 ch 35.
14
Bushell v Faith [1970] A C 1099.
15
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
16
MacNeil I, Li X. Comply or Explain: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance With the Combined Code. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2006;14:486–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00524.x
17
Developments in Corporate Governance and Stewardship 2016. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/Developments-in-Corporate-Governance-and-Stewa-(2).pdf
18
Moore M. Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. 1st ed. 2017. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2017.
19
Esser I-M. Corporate Governance: Soft Law Regulation and Disclosure—The Cases of the United Kingdom and South Africa. In: du Plessis JJ, Low CK, eds. Corporate Governance Codes for the 21st Century. Cham: : Springer International Publishing 2017. 233–60. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51868-8_11
20
Keay A. Comply or Explain in Corporate Governance Codes: in Need of Greater Regulatory Oversight? Legal Studies 2014;34:279–304. doi:10.1111/lest.12014
21
Kingford Smith D. Governing the Corporation: The role of Soft Regulation. 2010;35.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/LuceneSearch?typea=title&termsa=Governing+the+corporation+%3A+the+role+of+%27soft+regulation%27&operator=AND&searchtype=field&collection=journals&sections=any&submit=Search
22
Keay A. Assessing accountability of boards under the UK Corporate Governance Code. Journal of Business Law;7.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?sp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=I1A05C82055BB11E5A81AE7D9787A2D81
23
Wymeersch EO. The Corporate Governance ‘Codes of Conduct’ between State and Private Law. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2007. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1032596
24
UK Corporate Governance Code. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Codes-Standards/Corporate-governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code.aspx
25
What Constitutes an Explanation Under ‘comply or explain?’ https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/What-constitutes-an-explanation-under-comply-or-ex.pdf
26
LR 9.8 Annual Financial Report - FCA Handbook. https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR/9/8.html
27
NYSE Listed Company Manual, Corporate Governance Standards. http://wallstreet.cch.com/LCM/
28
Company Law Review Steering Group. Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report. London: : Department of Trade and Industry 2001.
29
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
30
Davies PL, Gower LCB, Worthington S. Gower’s principles of modern company law. Tenth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2016. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780414056299
31
Corporate Governance Green Paper (2016) and the Response of the Government. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform
32
Corporate Governance - Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee - House of Commons. https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmbeis/702/70202.htm
33
Compliance and Reporting Under the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive. http://www.purposeofcorporation.org/documents/project_outputs/briefing-eu-non-financial-reporting-directive.pdf
34
Deryn Fisher. The Enlightened Shareholder - Leaving Stakeholders in the Dark: Will Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 Make Directors Consider the Impact of Their Decisions on third parties? International Company and Commercial Law Reviewhttp://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?sp=ukuniglasg-1&docguid=I524FDE30BAF611DD8F93EE5287864437
35
Keay, A. Tackling the Issue of the Corporate Objective: An Analysis of the United Kingdom’s Enlightened Shareholder Value Approach. Sydney Law Review 2007;29:577–612.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/sydney29&id=577
36
The Wrongful Trading Remedy in UK Law: Classification, Application and Practical Significance. ;2004.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ecomflr1&i=71
37
Keay A. The Duty of Directors to Take Account of Creditors’ Interests: Has it any Role to Play? Published Online First: 2002.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIC3930461E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
38
Sealy LS. Bona Fides and Proper Purposes in Corporate Decision. Law Journal Library Monash University Law Review - HeinOnline.org 1989;15.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/monash15&id=279&collection=journals&index=journals/monash
39
Blair MM, Stout LA. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review 1999;85.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals/valr&collection=journals
40
Keay A. Ascertaining The Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model. Modern Law Review 2008;71:663–98. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00711.x
41
Stout L. Bad and Not-so-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy. Law Journal Library Search 2002;75:1189–210.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.heinonline.org./HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/scal75&div=37&start_page=1189&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
42
Lombard S, Joubert T. The Legislative Response to the Shareholders V Stakeholders Debate: A Comparative Overview. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 2014;14:211–40. doi:10.5235/14735970.14.1.211
43
Lynch E. Section 172: A Ground-Breaking Reform of Director’s Duties, or the Emperor’s New Clothes? Company Lawyer 2012;33.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI40B86F40B5E611E1B7C6E5F4CE7945D1%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
44
Keay A. Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value, and More: Much Ado about Little? European Business Law Review;22:1–49.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EULR2011001
45
Keay A. Shareholder Primacy in Corporate Law: Can it Survive? Should it Survive? European Company and Financial Law Review 2010;7. doi:10.1515/ecfr.2010.369
46
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
47
Regentcrest v Cohen [2001] 2 BCLC 80.
48
Peskin v Anderson [2001] 1 BCLC 372.
49
Hogg v Cramphron [1967] Ch 254.
50
Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821.
51
Criterion Properties plc v Stratford UK Properties EWHC per Hart J.
52
CA [2002] EWCA Civ 1883.
53
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
54
Parkinson JE. Corporate Power and Responsibility: Issues in the Theory of Company Law. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1993.
55
Riley CA. The Company Director’s Duty of Care and Skill: The Case for an Onerous but Subjective Standard. Modern Law Review 1999;62:697–724. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00232
56
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
58
Re D’Jan of London Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 561.
59
Smith v Van Gorkom 488 A 2d 858 (Del 1985).
60
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
61
John Lowry. The Duty of Loyalty of Company Directors: Bridging the Accountability Gap through Efficient Disclosure. The Cambridge Law Journal 2009;68:607–22.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40388837
62
Sarah Worthington. Reforming Directors’ Duties. The Modern Law Review 2001;64:439–58.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097009
63
Flannigan R. The Strict Character of Fiduciary Liability. Law Journal Library New Zealand Law Review Published Online First: 2006.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/newzlndlr2006&id=221&collection=journals&index=journals/newzlndlr
64
Kershaw D. Lost in Translation: Corporate Opportunities in Comparative Perspective. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2005;25:603–27.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600611
65
Aberdeen Rail Co v Blaikie Brothers [1854] Macq HL 461.
66
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134. 1967.
67
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241.
68
Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v Cellular Information Systems 673 A 2d 148 (Del. 1996).
69
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
70
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
71
Directors’ remuneration reforms FAQ. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/directors-remuneration-reforms-frequently-asked-questions
72
Corporate Governance Green Paper (2016) and the Response of the Government. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform
73
KPMG’s Guide to Directors’ Remuneration 2015. 2016.https://home.kpmg.com/uk/en/home/insights/2015/09/kpmgs-guide-to-directors-remuneration-2015.html
74
Ferrarini G. Executive Remuneration in Crisis: A Critical Assessment of Reforms in Europe. Journal of Corporate Law Studies 2010;10.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www-tandfonline-com/doi/abs/10.1080/14735970.2010.11419821
75
Bebchuk LA, Fried JM, Walker DI. Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation. The University of Chicago Law Review 2002;69. doi:10.2307/1600632
76
McCahery JA. Managerial Remuneration: The Indirect Pay-for-Performance Relation. Journal of Corporate Law Studies;1:317–32.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/corplstd1&id=319
77
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
78
George Newman & Co. [1895] 1 Ch. 674.
79
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd. 1982.
80
Guinness Plc. v Saunders [1990] 2 W.L.R. 324.
81
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
82
Wedderburn KW. Shareholders’ Rights and the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle. The Cambridge Law Journal 1957;15. doi:10.1017/S0008197300082064
83
Cheffins BR. Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1997.
84
Worthington S. Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors’ Breaches’. Law Quarterly Review 2000;:638–75.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FICCB8C891E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
85
Coffee JC, Schwartz DE. The Survival of the Derivative Suit: An Evaluation and a Proposal for Legislative Reform. Columbia Law Review 1981;81. doi:10.2307/1122149
86
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 462.
87
Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All E R 1064. 1950.
88
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
89
Kershaw D. Company Law in Context: texts and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press 2012. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/125938
90
Northwest Transportation Company Ltd v Beatty (1887). 1887.
91
Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554. 1916.
92
Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378. 1942.
93
Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900-03] All ER Rep 746.
94
Shuttleworth v Cox Bros Ltd [1926] All ER Rep 498.
95
Dafen Tinplate Company Ltd v Llanelly Steel Company [1920] 2 Ch 124. 1920.
96
Citco Banking Corporation NV v Pusser’s Ltd [2007] UKPC 13.
97
Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1971] AC 360.
98
Citybranch Group Ltd [2004] 4 All E R 735, CA. 2004.
99
Saul D Harrison [1995] 1 BCLC 14, CA.
100
O’Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092, HL. Published Online First: 1999.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5F3S-9PV1-F00Y-N08M&csi=417192&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
101
McGuinness v Bremner [1988] BCLC 673.
102
Anderson v Hogg 2002 SLT 354, Inner House.
103
Re Macro Ipswich Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 354.
104
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241.
105
Companies Act 2006. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents
106
Section 122, Insolvency Act 1986. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/122
