1.
Moore, M.: Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2017).
2.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
3.
Mallin, C.A.: Corporate governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
4.
Baker, H.K., Anderson, R. eds: Corporate Governance: A Synthesis of Theory, Research, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J. (2010).
5.
Talbot, L.: Progressive Corporate Governance for the 21st Century. Routledge, London (2013).
6.
Bratton, W.W.: The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History, http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1832&context=faculty_scholarship, (1989).
7.
Dignam, A.J., Galanis, M.: The Globalization of Corporate Governance. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, England (2009).
8.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
9.
Davies, P.L., Gower, L.C.B., Worthington, S.: Gower’s principles of modern company law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2016).
10.
Kraakman, R.H.: The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
11.
Companies Act 2006.
12.
UKLA, Listing Rules, https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR.pdf.
13.
Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cuninghame [1906] 2 ch 35.
14.
Bushell v Faith [1970] A C 1099.
15.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
16.
MacNeil, I., Li, X.: Comply or Explain: Market Discipline and Non-Compliance With the Combined Code. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 14, 486–497 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00524.x.
17.
Developments in Corporate Governance and Stewardship 2016, https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/Developments-in-Corporate-Governance-and-Stewa-(2).pdf.
18.
Moore, M.: Corporate Governance: Law, Regulation and Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2017).
19.
Esser, I.-M.: Corporate Governance: Soft Law Regulation and Disclosure—The Cases of the United Kingdom and South Africa. In: du Plessis, J.J. and Low, C.K. (eds.) Corporate Governance Codes for the 21st Century. pp. 233–260. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51868-8_11.
20.
Keay, A.: Comply or Explain in Corporate Governance Codes: in Need of Greater Regulatory Oversight? Legal Studies. 34, 279–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12014.
21.
Kingford Smith, D.: Governing the Corporation: The role of Soft Regulation. 35, (2010).
22.
Keay, A.: Assessing accountability of boards under the UK Corporate Governance Code. Journal of Business Law. 7,.
23.
Wymeersch, E.O.: The Corporate Governance ‘Codes of Conduct’ between State and Private Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1032596.
24.
UK Corporate Governance Code, https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Codes-Standards/Corporate-governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code.aspx.
25.
What Constitutes an Explanation Under ‘comply or explain?’, https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/What-constitutes-an-explanation-under-comply-or-ex.pdf.
26.
LR 9.8 Annual Financial Report - FCA Handbook, https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/LR/9/8.html.
27.
NYSE Listed Company Manual, Corporate Governance Standards, http://wallstreet.cch.com/LCM/.
28.
Company Law Review Steering Group: Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Final Report. Department of Trade and Industry, London (2001).
29.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
30.
Davies, P.L., Gower, L.C.B., Worthington, S.: Gower’s principles of modern company law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2016).
31.
Corporate Governance Green Paper (2016) and the Response of the Government, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform, (2016).
32.
Corporate Governance - Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee - House of Commons, https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmbeis/702/70202.htm.
33.
Compliance and Reporting Under the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive, http://www.purposeofcorporation.org/documents/project_outputs/briefing-eu-non-financial-reporting-directive.pdf.
34.
Deryn Fisher: The Enlightened Shareholder - Leaving Stakeholders in the Dark: Will Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006 Make Directors Consider the Impact of Their Decisions on third parties? International Company and Commercial Law Review.
35.
Keay, A.: Tackling the Issue of the Corporate Objective: An Analysis of the United Kingdom’s Enlightened Shareholder Value Approach. Sydney Law Review. 29, 577–612 (2007).
36.
The Wrongful Trading Remedy in UK Law: Classification, Application and Practical Significance. 2004,.
37.
Keay, A.: The Duty of Directors to Take Account of Creditors’ Interests: Has it any Role to Play? (2002).
38.
Sealy, L.S.: Bona Fides and Proper Purposes in Corporate Decision. Law Journal Library Monash University Law Review - HeinOnline.org. 15, (1989).
39.
Blair, M.M., Stout, L.A.: A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review. 85, (1999).
40.
Keay, A.: Ascertaining The Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model. Modern Law Review. 71, 663–698 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00711.x.
41.
Stout, L.: Bad and Not-so-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy. Law Journal Library Search. 75, 1189–1210 (2002).
42.
Lombard, S., Joubert, T.: The Legislative Response to the Shareholders V Stakeholders Debate: A Comparative Overview. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 14, 211–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5235/14735970.14.1.211.
43.
Lynch, E.: Section 172: A Ground-Breaking Reform of Director’s Duties, or the Emperor’s New Clothes? Company Lawyer. 33, (2012).
44.
Keay, A.: Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value, and More: Much Ado about Little? European Business Law Review. 22, 1–49.
45.
Keay, A.: Shareholder Primacy in Corporate Law: Can it Survive? Should it Survive? European Company and Financial Law Review. 7, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr.2010.369.
46.
Companies Act 2006.
47.
Regentcrest v Cohen [2001] 2 BCLC 80.
48.
Peskin v Anderson [2001] 1 BCLC 372.
49.
Hogg v Cramphron [1967] Ch 254.
50.
Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821.
51.
Criterion Properties plc v Stratford UK Properties EWHC per Hart J.
52.
CA [2002] EWCA Civ 1883.
53.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
54.
Parkinson, J.E.: Corporate Power and Responsibility: Issues in the Theory of Company Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993).
55.
Riley, C.A.: The Company Director’s Duty of Care and Skill: The Case for an Onerous but Subjective Standard. Modern Law Review. 62, 697–724 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00232.
56.
Companies Act 2006.
57.
Insolvency Act 1986.
58.
Re D’Jan of London Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 561.
59.
Smith v Van Gorkom 488 A 2d 858 (Del 1985).
60.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
61.
John Lowry: The Duty of Loyalty of Company Directors: Bridging the Accountability Gap through Efficient Disclosure. The Cambridge Law Journal. 68, 607–622 (2009).
62.
Sarah Worthington: Reforming Directors’ Duties. The Modern Law Review. 64, 439–458 (2001).
63.
Flannigan, R.: The Strict Character of Fiduciary Liability. Law Journal Library New Zealand Law Review. (2006).
64.
Kershaw, D.: Lost in Translation: Corporate Opportunities in Comparative Perspective. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 25, 603–627 (2005).
65.
Aberdeen Rail Co v Blaikie Brothers [1854] Macq HL 461.
66.
Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134. (1967).
67.
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241.
68.
Broz and RFB Cellular Inc v Cellular Information Systems 673 A 2d 148 (Del. 1996).
69.
Companies Act 2006.
70.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
71.
Directors’ remuneration reforms FAQ, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/directors-remuneration-reforms-frequently-asked-questions.
72.
Corporate Governance Green Paper (2016) and the Response of the Government, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/corporate-governance-reform, (2016).
73.
KPMG’s Guide to Directors’ Remuneration 2015, https://home.kpmg.com/uk/en/home/insights/2015/09/kpmgs-guide-to-directors-remuneration-2015.html.
74.
Ferrarini, G.: Executive Remuneration in Crisis: A Critical Assessment of Reforms in Europe. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 10, (2010).
75.
Bebchuk, L.A., Fried, J.M., Walker, D.I.: Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive Compensation. The University of Chicago Law Review. 69, (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/1600632.
76.
McCahery, J.A.: Managerial Remuneration: The Indirect Pay-for-Performance Relation. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 1, 317–332.
77.
Companies Act 2006.
78.
George Newman & Co. [1895] 1 Ch. 674.
79.
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd. (1982).
80.
Guinness Plc. v Saunders [1990] 2 W.L.R. 324.
81.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
82.
Wedderburn, K.W.: Shareholders’ Rights and the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle. The Cambridge Law Journal. 15, (1957). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300082064.
83.
Cheffins, B.R.: Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1997).
84.
Worthington, S.: Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors’ Breaches’. Law Quarterly Review. 638–675 (2000).
85.
Coffee, J.C., Schwartz, D.E.: The Survival of the Derivative Suit: An Evaluation and a Proposal for Legislative Reform. Columbia Law Review. 81, (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/1122149.
86.
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 462.
87.
Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All E R 1064. (1950).
88.
Companies Act 2006.
89.
Kershaw, D.: Company Law in Context: texts and materials. Oxford University Press (2012).
90.
Northwest Transportation Company Ltd v Beatty (1887). (1887).
91.
Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554. (1916).
92.
Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378. (1942).
93.
Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa Ltd [1900-03] All ER Rep 746.
94.
Shuttleworth v Cox Bros Ltd [1926] All ER Rep 498.
95.
Dafen Tinplate Company Ltd v Llanelly Steel Company [1920] 2 Ch 124. (1920).
96.
Citco Banking Corporation NV v Pusser’s Ltd [2007] UKPC 13.
97.
Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1971] AC 360.
98.
Citybranch Group Ltd [2004] 4 All E R 735, CA. (2004).
99.
Saul D Harrison [1995] 1 BCLC 14, CA.
100.
O’Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092, HL. (1999).
101.
McGuinness v Bremner [1988] BCLC 673.
102.
Anderson v Hogg 2002 SLT 354, Inner House.
103.
Re Macro Ipswich Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 354.
104.
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241.
105.
Companies Act 2006.
106.
Section 122, Insolvency Act 1986, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/section/122.