1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs. International affairs. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1944;
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs. Providence, RI: Brown Journal of World Affairs; 1994;
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. Kent, England: Butterworths; 1981;
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. International security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press;
5.
Security studies. London: Frank Cass;
6.
Global environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001;
7.
Environmental politics. Bath, England: Ingenta plc;
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press;
9.
Cambridge review of international affairs. [London: S.n.];
10.
Contemporary politics. London: Carfax Pub;
11.
Politics. Plainsboro, N.J.: Political World Communications; 2008;
12.
International politics. Hague: Kluwer Law International; 1996;
13.
International feminist journal of politics. London, UK: Routledge;
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 1999;
15.
European Consortium for Political Research. European journal of international relations. London: Sage Publications; 1995;
16.
Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc; 1995;
17.
International Studies Association. International studies quarterly. Detroit, Mich: Wayne State University Press; 1967;
18.
International Studies Association. International studies review. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers;
19.
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. [Oxford]: Blackwell Pub; 2005;
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies. [London]: London School of Economics;
21.
American Political Science Association. Perspectives on politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 2003;
22.
E-International Relations [Internet]. Available from: http://www.e-ir.info/
23.
Foreign Policy. Available from: https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199345
24.
Foreign Affairs. Available from: https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199344
25.
Duck of Minerva [Internet]. Available from: http://duckofminerva.com/
26.
Political Violence @ a Glance [Internet]. Available from: http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27.
The Disorder Of Things [Internet]. Available from: http://thedisorderofthings.com/
28.
Robert A. Pape. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2003;97(3):343–361. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117613
29.
Abrahms M. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security. 2006 Oct;31(2):42–78.
30.
Hoffman B, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Inside terrorism [Internet]. Reised and expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=908254
31.
Crenshaw M. Explaining terrorism: causes, processes, and consequences. New York: Routledge; 2011.
32.
Juergensmeyer M. Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence. 3rd ed., rev.updated. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.
33.
Krueger, Alan B.1Malecková, Jitka2. Does Poverty Cause Terrorism? New Republic [Internet]. 2002;226(24):27–33. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=6822052&site=ehost-live
34.
Neumann PR, Smith MLR. Strategic terrorism: The framework and its fallacies. Journal of Strategic Studies. 2005 Aug;28(4):571–595.
35.
Zaidise E, Canetti-Nisim D, Pedahzur A. Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies. 2007 Oct;55(3):499–521.
36.
McCauley C, Moskalenko S. Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2008 Jul;20(3):415–433.
37.
Rogers MB. The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2009 Jul 11;19(3):253–262. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540260701349399
38.
Victoroff J. The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2005 Feb 1;49(1):3–42.
39.
Jaggar AM. What Is Terrorism, Why Is It Wrong, and Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible? Journal of Social Philosophy. 2005 May;36(2):202–217.
40.
Byman, Daniel. Why Drones Work. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug [Internet]. 2013;92(4):32–43. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=88213865&site=ehost-live
41.
Cronin, Audrey Kurth. Why Drones Fail. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug [Internet]. 2013;92(4):44–54. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=88213866&site=ehost-live
42.
Gregory T. Drones, Targeted Killings, and the Limitations of International Law. International Political Sociology. 2015 Sep;9(3):197–212.
43.
Brunstetter DR. Can We Wage a Just Drone War? The Atlantic [Internet]. 2012 Jul 19; Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/can-we-wage-a-just-drone-war/260055/
44.
Brunstetter D, Braun M. The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition. Ethics & International Affairs. 2011 Sep;25(03):337–358.
45.
Gregory D. From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011 Dec 1;28(7–8):188–215.
46.
MAYER M. The new killer drones: understanding the strategic implications of next-generation unmanned combat aerial vehicles. International Affairs. 2015 Jul;91(4):765–780.
47.
Schulzke M. The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry. Political Studies. 2014 Sep;n/a-n/a.
48.
Dunn DH. Drones: disembodied aerial warfare and the unarticulated threat. International Affairs. 2013 Sep;89(5):1237–1246.
49.
BOYLE MJ. The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs. 2013 Jan;89(1):1–29.
50.
Holmqvist C. Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2013 Jun 1;41(3):535–552.
51.
Cavallaro J, Sonnenberg S, Knuckey S. Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan [Internet]. International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic, Stanford Law School; NYU School of Law, Global Justice Clinic; Available from: https://law.stanford.edu/publications/living-under-drones-death-injury-and-trauma-to-civilians-from-us-drone-practices-in-pakistan/
52.
Pinker, Steven. A History of Violence. New Republic [Internet]. 2007;236(12):18–21. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=24353575&site=ehost-live
53.
Goldstein J, Pinker S. War Really Is Going Out of Style. The New York Times [Internet]. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A275154865/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=21e34dd6
54.
Mitzen J. The Irony of Pinkerism. Perspectives on Politics. 2013 Jun;11(02):525–528.
55.
Herman ES, Peterson D. Steven Pinker on the Alleged Decline of Violence. Dissident Voice [Internet]. 2012 Dec 5; Available from: https://dissidentvoice.org/2012/12/steven-pinker-on-the-alleged-decline-of-violence/
56.
Pinker S. The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking; 2011.
57.
Dead Wrong?: Battle Deaths, Military Medicine, and Exaggerated Reports of War’s Demise. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 39(1):95–125. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v039/39.1.fazal.html
58.
JOHN MUELLER. War Has Almost Ceased to Exist: An Assessment. Political Science Quarterly [Internet]. 2009;124(2):297–321. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655656
59.
Gat A. Is war declining - and why? Journal of Peace Research. 2013 Mar 1;50(2):149–157.
60.
Aronson R. PINKER AND PROGRESS. History and Theory. 2013 May;52(2):246–264.
61.
Waltz, Kenneth N. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug [Internet]. 2012;91(4):2–5. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=76591794&site=ehost-live
62.
KAHL, COLIN H. Iran and the Bomb. Foreign Affairs Sep/Oct [Internet]. 2012;91(5):157–162. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=78859927&site=ehost-live
63.
Pillar, Paul R. We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran. Washington Monthly Mar/Apr [Internet]. 2012;44(3):13–19. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=73166560&site=ehost-live
64.
BOWEN W, MORAN M. Living with nuclear hedging: the implications of Iran’s nuclear strategy. International Affairs. 2015 Jul;91(4):687–707.
65.
Abulof U. Revisiting Iran’s nuclear rationales. International Politics. 2014 May;51(3):404–415.
66.
Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible?: An Analytical Framework for the Iran Nuclear Negotiations. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 37(3):52–91. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v037/37.3.sebenius.html
67.
Matthew Kroenig. Time to attack Iran: why a strike is the least bad option. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2012;91(1). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A277436600&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=526ae7150fceedc3e92e2302a087ee5e
68.
Pocida F. Overblown: Why an Iranian Nuclear Bomb is not the End of the World. 2009 Jun 9; Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2009-06-09/overblown
69.
Why States Won’t Give Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 38(1):80–104. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v038/38.1.lieber.html
70.
Duncombe C. Representation, recognition and foreign policy in the Iran-US relationship. European Journal of International Relations. 2015 Sep 8;
71.
Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security [Internet]. The MIT Press; 39(2):52–91. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v039/39.2.liff.html
72.
Feffer J, Bleicher SA. China: Superpower or Basket Case? Foreign Policy In Focus [Internet]. 2008 Aug 5; Available from: https://fpif.org/china_superpower_or_basket_case/
73.
Turner O. ‘Threatening’ China and US security: the international politics of identity. Review of International Studies. 2013 Oct;39(04):903–924.
74.
Pei M. Everything You Think You Know About China Is Wrong. Foreign policy [Internet]. 2012 Aug 29; Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/08/29/everything-you-think-you-know-about-china-is-wrong/
75.
Vogt R. Europe and China: strategic partners or rivals? [Internet]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083879.001.0001
76.
Christensen TJ. Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security. 2006 Jul;31(1):81–126.
77.
Johnston AI. Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security. 2003 Apr;27(4):5–56.
78.
Nathan AJ, Scobell A. How China Sees America. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2012;91:32–47. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=78859907&site=ehost-live
79.
Beslin S. China and the global order: signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs. 2013 May;89(3):615–634.
80.
Samantha Power. Bystanders to genocide: why the United States let the Rwandan tragedy happen. The Atlantic [Internet]. 2001;288(2). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A30067738&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=3466e9800c4576bf10a44d33b79c2139
81.
Evans G, Shahnoun M. The Responsibility to Protect. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20033347
82.
Evans G, Sahnoun M. The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2002;81(6). Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA92827778&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=3b76f3e741ca1e4caeb166deadf6b35b
83.
Stansfield G. The Islamic State, the Kurdistan Region and the future of Iraq: assessing UK policy options. International Affairs. 2014 Nov;90(6):1329–1350.
84.
Morris J. Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs. 2013 Sep;89(5):1265–1283.
85.
Averre D, Davies L. Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs. 2015 Jul;91(4):813–834.
86.
Bellamy AJ. The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs. 2008 Jul;84(4):615–639.
87.
Chandler D. Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping. 2004 Mar;11(1):59–81.
88.
Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 73:20–33. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9411180049&site=ehost-live
89.
Owens P. Accidents Don’t Just Happen: The Liberal Politics of High-Technology `Humanitarian’ War. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2003 Dec 1;32(3):595–616.
90.
Bellamy AJ, Williams PD. The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs. 2011 Jul;87(4):825–850.
91.
O’Neill K. The environment and international relations [Internet]. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107448087
92.
The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. The MIT Press; 14(4):36–54. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/global_environmental_politics/v014/14.4.wapner.html
93.
Klein N. This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. London: Allen Lane; 2014.
94.
Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy. Global Environmental Politics [Internet]. The MIT Press; 14(2):82–101. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/global_environmental_politics/v014/14.2.hayes.html
95.
Skovgaard J. EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics. 2014 Jan 2;23(1):1–17.
96.
Clapp J, Swanston L. Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics. 2009 May;18(3):315–332.
97.
Tienhaara K. Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics. 2014 Mar 4;23(2):187–204.
98.
Betsill MM, Hochstetler K, Stevis D. Advances in international environmental politics [Internet]. 2nd New ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137338976
99.
Thiele LP. Indra’s net and the Midas touch: living sustainably in a connected world [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780262298858
100.
Forsyth T, ProQuest (Firm). Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2003. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=215025
101.
McKibben B. Oil and honey. First St. Martin’s Griffin edition. New York, N.Y.: St. Martin’s Griffin; 2014.
102.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, editors. Global politics: a new introduction [Internet]. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
103.
Piketty T, Goldhammer A. Capital in the twenty-first century [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780674369542
104.
IFS. Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2014 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7274
105.
Beitz CR. Does Global Inequality Matter? Metaphilosophy. 2001 Jan;32(1–2):95–112.
106.
Alesina A, Glaeser EL, Oxford University Press. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
107.
Bartels LM. Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2008.
108.
Birdsall N. Why Inequality Matters: Some Economic Issues. Ethics & International Affairs. 2001 Sep;15(02):3–28.
109.
Cammack P. What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy. 2004 Jun;9(2):189–211.
110.
Kaya A. Global inequality [Internet]. [New York]: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0025
111.
Martins N. Globalisation, Inequality and the Economic Crisis. New Political Economy. 2011 Feb;16(1):1–18.
112.
Wolf M. Why globalization works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2005.
113.
Collier P, Dawson Books. The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780198042549
114.
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations [Internet]. Second edition. Shepherd LJ, editor. London: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1744166
115.
Basaran T. The saved and the drowned: Governing indifference in the name of security. Security Dialogue. 2015 Jun 1;46(3):205–220.
116.
Nail T. The figure of the migrant. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2015.
117.
Bleiker R, Campbell D, Hutchison E, Nicholson X. The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science. 2013 Dec;48(4):398–416.
118.
Adamson FB. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security. 2006 Jul;31(1):165–199.
119.
Muller BJ. (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies. 2004 Sep;8(3):279–294.
120.
Basaran T. Security, Law, Borders: Spaces of Exclusion. International Political Sociology. 2008 Dec;2(4):339–354.
121.
Latham R. Border formations: security and subjectivity at the border. Citizenship Studies. 2010 Apr;14(2):185–201.
122.
Salter MB. When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies. 2008 Aug;12(4):365–380.
123.
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, editors. Global politics: a new introduction [Internet]. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
124.
Caso F, Hamilton C, editors. Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies [Internet]. E-International Relations Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/publication/popular-culture-and-world-politics/
125.
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
126.
Robinson N. Have You Won the War on Terror? Military Videogames and the State of American Exceptionalism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2015 Jan 1;43(2):450–470.
127.
Dittmer J, Gray N. Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass. 2010 Nov;4(11):1664–1677.
128.
Franklin M. Resounding international relations: on music, culture, and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
129.
Power M. Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue. 2007 Jun 1;38(2):271–288.
130.
Grayson K, Davies M, Philpott S. Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics. 2009 Oct;29(3):155–163.
131.
Robinson N. Videogames, Persuasion and the War on Terror: Escaping or Embedding the Military-Entertainment Complex? Political Studies. 2012 Oct;60(3):504–522.
132.
Weldes J. Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1999 Mar 1;28(1):117–134.
133.
Jhally S, Earp J, Shaheen JG, Media Education Foundation. Reel bad Arabs: how Hollywood vilifies a people. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation; 2006.
134.
Sylvester C. Art/museums: international relations where we least expect it. Boulder, Colo: Paradigm Publishers; 2009.
135.
Bleiker R. Aesthetics and world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
136.
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2014.
137.
Nexon DH, Neumann IB. Harry Potter and international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006.
