1.
Royal Institute of International Affairs: International affairs. (1944).
2.
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: The Brown journal of world affairs. (1994).
3.
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press: Review of international studies. (1981).
4.
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs: International security.
6.
Global environmental politics. (2001).
7.
Environmental politics.
8.
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press: Survival.
9.
Cambridge review of international affairs.
10.
Contemporary politics.
12.
International politics. (1996).
13.
International feminist journal of politics.
14.
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm): British journal of politics and international relations. (1999).
15.
European Consortium for Political Research: European journal of international relations. (1995).
16.
Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. (1995).
17.
International Studies Association: International studies quarterly. (1967).
18.
International Studies Association: International studies review.
19.
International Studies Association: Foreign policy analysis. (2005).
20.
London School of Economics and Political Science: Millennium: journal of international studies.
21.
American Political Science Association: Perspectives on politics. (2003).
22.
E-International Relations, http://www.e-ir.info/.
25.
Duck of Minerva, http://duckofminerva.com/.
26.
Political Violence @ a Glance, http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/.
27.
The Disorder Of Things, http://thedisorderofthings.com/.
28.
Robert A. Pape: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review. 97, 343–361 (2003).
29.
Abrahms, M.: Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security. 31, 42–78 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.42.
30.
Hoffman, B., Ebooks Corporation Limited: Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press, New York (2006).
31.
Crenshaw, M.: Explaining terrorism: causes, processes, and consequences. Routledge, New York (2011).
32.
Juergensmeyer, M.: Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence. University of California Press, Berkeley (2003).
33.
Krueger, Alan B.1Malecková, Jitka2: Does Poverty Cause Terrorism? New Republic. 226, 27–33 (2002).
34.
Neumann, P.R., Smith, M.L.R.: Strategic terrorism: The framework and its fallacies. Journal of Strategic Studies. 28, 571–595 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390500300923.
35.
Zaidise, E., Canetti-Nisim, D., Pedahzur, A.: Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies. 55, 499–521 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00673.x.
36.
McCauley, C., Moskalenko, S.: Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 20, 415–433 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550802073367.
37.
Rogers, M.B.: The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry. 19, 253–262 (2009).
38.
Victoroff, J.: The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 49, 3–42 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704272040.
39.
Jaggar, A.M.: What Is Terrorism, Why Is It Wrong, and Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible? Journal of Social Philosophy. 36, 202–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00267.x.
40.
Byman, Daniel: Why Drones Work. Foreign Affairs. Jul/Aug. 92, 32–43 (2013).
41.
Cronin, Audrey Kurth: Why Drones Fail. Foreign Affairs. Jul/Aug. 92, 44–54 (2013).
42.
Gregory, T.: Drones, Targeted Killings, and the Limitations of International Law. International Political Sociology. 9, 197–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12093.
43.
Brunstetter, D.R.: Can We Wage a Just Drone War? The Atlantic. (2012).
44.
Brunstetter, D., Braun, M.: The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition. Ethics & International Affairs. 25, 337–358 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679411000281.
45.
Gregory, D.: From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society. 28, 188–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411423027.
46.
MAYER, M.: The new killer drones: understanding the strategic implications of next-generation unmanned combat aerial vehicles. International Affairs. 91, 765–780 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12342.
47.
Schulzke, M.: The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry. Political Studies. n/a-n/a (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12155.
48.
Dunn, D.H.: Drones: disembodied aerial warfare and the unarticulated threat. International Affairs. 89, 1237–1246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12069.
49.
BOYLE, M.J.: The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs. 89, 1–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12002.
50.
Holmqvist, C.: Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 41, 535–552 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813483350.
51.
Cavallaro, J., Sonnenberg, S., Knuckey, S.: Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan, https://law.stanford.edu/publications/living-under-drones-death-injury-and-trauma-to-civilians-from-us-drone-practices-in-pakistan/.
52.
Pinker, Steven: A History of Violence. New Republic. 236, 18–21 (2007).
53.
Goldstein, J., Pinker, S.: War Really Is Going Out of Style. The New York Times.
54.
Mitzen, J.: The Irony of Pinkerism. Perspectives on Politics. 11, 525–528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713001114.
55.
Herman, E.S., Peterson, D.: Steven Pinker on the Alleged Decline of Violence. Dissident Voice. (2012).
56.
Pinker, S.: The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. Viking, New York, NY (2011).
57.
Dead Wrong?: Battle Deaths, Military Medicine, and Exaggerated Reports of War’s Demise. International Security. 39, 95–125.
58.
JOHN MUELLER: War Has Almost Ceased to Exist: An Assessment. Political Science Quarterly. 124, 297–321 (2009).
59.
Gat, A.: Is war declining - and why? Journal of Peace Research. 50, 149–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312461023.
60.
Aronson, R.: PINKER AND PROGRESS. History and Theory. 52, 246–264 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10666.
61.
Waltz, Kenneth N.: Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Foreign Affairs. Jul/Aug. 91, 2–5 (2012).
62.
KAHL, COLIN H.: Iran and the Bomb. Foreign Affairs. Sep/Oct. 91, 157–162 (2012).
63.
Pillar, Paul R.: We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran. Washington Monthly. Mar/Apr. 44, 13–19 (2012).
64.
BOWEN, W., MORAN, M.: Living with nuclear hedging: the implications of Iran’s nuclear strategy. International Affairs. 91, 687–707 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12337.
65.
Abulof, U.: Revisiting Iran’s nuclear rationales. International Politics. 51, 404–415 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.9.
66.
Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible?: An Analytical Framework for the Iran Nuclear Negotiations. International Security. 37, 52–91.
67.
Matthew Kroenig: Time to attack Iran: why a strike is the least bad option. Foreign Affairs. 91, (2012).
68.
Pocida, F.: Overblown: Why an Iranian Nuclear Bomb is not the End of the World. (2009).
69.
Why States Won’t Give Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists. International Security. 38, 80–104.
70.
Duncombe, C.: Representation, recognition and foreign policy in the Iran-US relationship. European Journal of International Relations. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115597049.
71.
Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security. 39, 52–91.
72.
Feffer, J., Bleicher, S.A.: China: Superpower or Basket Case? Foreign Policy In Focus. (2008).
73.
Turner, O.: ‘Threatening’ China and US security: the international politics of identity. Review of International Studies. 39, 903–924 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000599.
74.
Pei, M.: Everything You Think You Know About China Is Wrong. Foreign policy. (2012).
75.
Vogt, R.: Europe and China: strategic partners or rivals? Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong (2012).
76.
Christensen, T.J.: Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security. 31, 81–126 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.81.
77.
Johnston, A.I.: Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security. 27, 5–56 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951081.
78.
Nathan, A.J., Scobell, A.: How China Sees America. Foreign Affairs. 91, 32–47 (2012).
79.
Beslin, S.: China and the global order: signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs. 89, 615–634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12036.
80.
Samantha Power: Bystanders to genocide: why the United States let the Rwandan tragedy happen. The Atlantic. 288, (2001).
81.
Evans, G., Shahnoun, M.: The Responsibility to Protect.
82.
Evans, G., Sahnoun, M.: The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs. 81, (2002).
83.
Stansfield, G.: The Islamic State, the Kurdistan Region and the future of Iraq: assessing UK policy options. International Affairs. 90, 1329–1350 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12167.
84.
Morris, J.: Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs. 89, 1265–1283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12071.
85.
Averre, D., Davies, L.: Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs. 91, 813–834 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12343.
86.
Bellamy, A.J.: The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs. 84, 615–639 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00729.x.
87.
Chandler, D.: Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping. 11, 59–81 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1353331042000228454.
88.
Betts, R.K.: The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs. 73, 20–33.
89.
Owens, P.: Accidents Don’t Just Happen: The Liberal Politics of High-Technology `Humanitarian’ War. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 32, 595–616 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298030320031101.
90.
Bellamy, A.J., Williams, P.D.: The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs. 87, 825–850 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x.
91.
O’Neill, K.: The environment and international relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).
92.
The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics. 14, 36–54.
93.
Klein, N.: This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. Allen Lane, London (2014).
94.
Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy. Global Environmental Politics. 14, 82–101.
95.
Skovgaard, J.: EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics. 23, 1–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.818304.
96.
Clapp, J., Swanston, L.: Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics. 18, 315–332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010902823717.
97.
Tienhaara, K.: Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics. 23, 187–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.821828.
98.
Betsill, M.M., Hochstetler, K., Stevis, D.: Advances in international environmental politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
99.
Thiele, L.P.: Indra’s net and the Midas touch: living sustainably in a connected world. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2011).
100.
Forsyth, T., ProQuest (Firm): Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Routledge, London (2003).
101.
McKibben, B.: Oil and honey. St. Martin’s Griffin, New York, N.Y. (2014).
102.
Edkins, J., Zehfuss, M. eds: Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2019).
103.
Piketty, T., Goldhammer, A.: Capital in the twenty-first century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2014).
104.
IFS: Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2014, http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7274.
105.
Beitz, C.R.: Does Global Inequality Matter? Metaphilosophy. 32, 95–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00177.
106.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.L., Oxford University Press: Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
107.
Bartels, L.M.: Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008).
108.
Birdsall, N.: Why Inequality Matters: Some Economic Issues. Ethics & International Affairs. 15, 3–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00356.x.
109.
Cammack, P.: What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy. 9, 189–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1356346042000218069.
110.
Kaya, A.: Global inequality. Oxford University Press, [New York] (2012).
111.
Martins, N.: Globalisation, Inequality and the Economic Crisis. New Political Economy. 16, 1–18 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563461003789761.
112.
Wolf, M.: Why globalization works. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2005).
113.
Collier, P., Dawson Books: The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
114.
Ebooks Corporation Limited: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge, London (2015).
115.
Basaran, T.: The saved and the drowned: Governing indifference in the name of security. Security Dialogue. 46, 205–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614557512.
116.
Nail, T.: The figure of the migrant. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2015).
117.
Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E., Nicholson, X.: The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science. 48, 398–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840769.
118.
Adamson, F.B.: Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security. 31, 165–199 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.165.
119.
Muller, B.J.: (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies. 8, 279–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102042000257005.
120.
Basaran, T.: Security, Law, Borders: Spaces of Exclusion. International Political Sociology. 2, 339–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x.
121.
Latham, R.: Border formations: security and subjectivity at the border. Citizenship Studies. 14, 185–201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13621021003594858.
122.
Salter, M.B.: When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies. 12, 365–380 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802184234.
123.
Edkins, J., Zehfuss, M. eds: Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2019).
124.
Caso, F., Hamilton, C. eds: Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing (2015).
125.
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., Dunne, T. eds: Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
126.
Robinson, N.: Have You Won the War on Terror? Military Videogames and the State of American Exceptionalism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 43, 450–470 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814557557.
127.
Dittmer, J., Gray, N.: Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass. 4, 1664–1677 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x.
128.
Franklin, M.: Resounding international relations: on music, culture, and politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2005).
129.
Power, M.: Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue. 38, 271–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607078552.
130.
Grayson, K., Davies, M., Philpott, S.: Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics. 29, 155–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x.
131.
Robinson, N.: Videogames, Persuasion and the War on Terror: Escaping or Embedding the Military-Entertainment Complex? Political Studies. 60, 504–522 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00923.x.
132.
Weldes, J.: Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 28, 117–134 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298990280011201.
133.
Jhally, S., Earp, J., Shaheen, J.G., Media Education Foundation: Reel bad Arabs: how Hollywood vilifies a people, (2006).
134.
Sylvester, C.: Art/museums: international relations where we least expect it. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2009).
135.
Bleiker, R.: Aesthetics and world politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
136.
Weber, C.: International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, London (2014).
137.
Nexon, D.H., Neumann, I.B.: Harry Potter and international relations. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2006).
