1
Royal Institute of International Affairs. International affairs. 1944.
2
Thomas J. Watson, Jr. Institute for International Studies (Brown University), EBSCO Publishing (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Brown journal of world affairs. 1994.
3
British International Studies Association, Cambridge University Press. Review of international studies. 1981.
4
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. International security.
6
Global environmental politics. 2001.
7
Environmental politics.
8
International Institute for Strategic Studies, Oxford University Press. Survival.
9
Cambridge review of international affairs.
10
Contemporary politics.
12
International politics. 1996.
13
International feminist journal of politics.
14
Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, EBSCO Publishing (Firm). British journal of politics and international relations. 1999.
15
European Consortium for Political Research. European journal of international relations. 1995.
16
Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. 1995.
17
International Studies Association. International studies quarterly. 1967.
18
International Studies Association. International studies review.
19
International Studies Association. Foreign policy analysis. 2005.
20
London School of Economics and Political Science. Millennium: journal of international studies.
21
American Political Science Association. Perspectives on politics. 2003.
22
E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/
23
Foreign Policy. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199345
24
Foreign Affairs. https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2199344
25
Duck of Minerva. http://duckofminerva.com/
26
Political Violence @ a Glance. http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/
27
The Disorder Of Things. http://thedisorderofthings.com/
28
Robert A. Pape. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review 2003;97:343–61.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3117613
29
Abrahms M. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security 2006;31:42–78. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.42
30
Hoffman B, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Inside terrorism. Reised and expanded edition. New York: : Columbia University Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=908254
31
Crenshaw M. Explaining terrorism: causes, processes, and consequences. New York: : Routledge 2011.
32
Juergensmeyer M. Terror in the mind of God: the global rise of religious violence. 3rd ed., rev.updated. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2003.
33
Krueger, Alan B.1Malecková, Jitka2. Does Poverty Cause Terrorism? New Republic 2002;226:27–33.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=6822052&site=ehost-live
34
Neumann PR, Smith MLR. Strategic terrorism: The framework and its fallacies. Journal of Strategic Studies 2005;28:571–95. doi:10.1080/01402390500300923
35
Zaidise E, Canetti-Nisim D, Pedahzur A. Politics of God or Politics of Man? The Role of Religion and Deprivation in Predicting Support for Political Violence in Israel. Political Studies 2007;55:499–521. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00673.x
36
McCauley C, Moskalenko S. Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 2008;20:415–33. doi:10.1080/09546550802073367
37
Rogers MB. The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry 2009;19:253–62.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540260701349399
38
Victoroff J. The Mind of the Terrorist: A Review and Critique of Psychological Approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2005;49:3–42. doi:10.1177/0022002704272040
39
Jaggar AM. What Is Terrorism, Why Is It Wrong, and Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible? Journal of Social Philosophy 2005;36:202–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00267.x
40
Byman, Daniel. Why Drones Work. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug 2013;92:32–43.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=88213865&site=ehost-live
41
Cronin, Audrey Kurth. Why Drones Fail. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug 2013;92:44–54.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=88213866&site=ehost-live
42
Gregory T. Drones, Targeted Killings, and the Limitations of International Law. International Political Sociology 2015;9:197–212. doi:10.1111/ips.12093
43
Brunstetter DR. Can We Wage a Just Drone War? The Atlantic Published Online First: 19 July 2012.https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/can-we-wage-a-just-drone-war/260055/
44
Brunstetter D, Braun M. The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition. Ethics & International Affairs 2011;25:337–58. doi:10.1017/S0892679411000281
45
Gregory D. From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society 2011;28:188–215. doi:10.1177/0263276411423027
46
MAYER M. The new killer drones: understanding the strategic implications of next-generation unmanned combat aerial vehicles. International Affairs 2015;91:765–80. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12342
47
Schulzke M. The Morality of Remote Warfare: Against the Asymmetry Objection to Remote Weaponry. Political Studies 2014;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12155
48
Dunn DH. Drones: disembodied aerial warfare and the unarticulated threat. International Affairs 2013;89:1237–46. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12069
49
BOYLE MJ. The costs and consequences of drone warfare. International Affairs 2013;89:1–29. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12002
50
Holmqvist C. Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2013;41:535–52. doi:10.1177/0305829813483350
51
Cavallaro J, Sonnenberg S, Knuckey S. Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/living-under-drones-death-injury-and-trauma-to-civilians-from-us-drone-practices-in-pakistan/
52
Pinker, Steven. A History of Violence. New Republic 2007;236:18–21.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=24353575&site=ehost-live
53
Goldstein J, Pinker S. War Really Is Going Out of Style. The New York Timeshttps://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A275154865/AONE?u=glasuni&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=21e34dd6
54
Mitzen J. The Irony of Pinkerism. Perspectives on Politics 2013;11:525–8. doi:10.1017/S1537592713001114
55
Herman ES, Peterson D. Steven Pinker on the Alleged Decline of Violence. Dissident Voice Published Online First: 5 December 2012.https://dissidentvoice.org/2012/12/steven-pinker-on-the-alleged-decline-of-violence/
56
Pinker S. The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. New York, NY: : Viking 2011.
57
Dead Wrong?: Battle Deaths, Military Medicine, and Exaggerated Reports of War’s Demise. International Security;39:95–125.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v039/39.1.fazal.html
58
JOHN MUELLER. War Has Almost Ceased to Exist: An Assessment. Political Science Quarterly 2009;124:297–321.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655656
59
Gat A. Is war declining - and why? Journal of Peace Research 2013;50:149–57. doi:10.1177/0022343312461023
60
Aronson R. PINKER AND PROGRESS. History and Theory 2013;52:246–64. doi:10.1111/hith.10666
61
Waltz, Kenneth N. Why Iran Should Get the Bomb. Foreign Affairs Jul/Aug 2012;91:2–5.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=76591794&site=ehost-live
62
KAHL, COLIN H. Iran and the Bomb. Foreign Affairs Sep/Oct 2012;91:157–62.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=78859927&site=ehost-live
63
Pillar, Paul R. We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran. Washington Monthly Mar/Apr 2012;44:13–9.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=73166560&site=ehost-live
64
BOWEN W, MORAN M. Living with nuclear hedging: the implications of Iran’s nuclear strategy. International Affairs 2015;91:687–707. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12337
65
Abulof U. Revisiting Iran’s nuclear rationales. International Politics 2014;51:404–15. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.9
66
Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible?: An Analytical Framework for the Iran Nuclear Negotiations. International Security;37:52–91.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v037/37.3.sebenius.html
67
Matthew Kroenig. Time to attack Iran: why a strike is the least bad option. Foreign Affairs 2012;91.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A277436600&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=526ae7150fceedc3e92e2302a087ee5e
68
Pocida F. Overblown: Why an Iranian Nuclear Bomb is not the End of the World. Published Online First: 9 June 2009.https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2009-06-09/overblown
69
Why States Won’t Give Nuclear Weapons to Terrorists. International Security;38:80–104.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v038/38.1.lieber.html
70
Duncombe C. Representation, recognition and foreign policy in the Iran-US relationship. European Journal of International Relations Published Online First: 8 September 2015. doi:10.1177/1354066115597049
71
Racing toward Tragedy?: China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma. International Security;39:52–91.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v039/39.2.liff.html
72
Feffer J, Bleicher SA. China: Superpower or Basket Case? Foreign Policy In Focus Published Online First: 5 August 2008.https://fpif.org/china_superpower_or_basket_case/
73
Turner O. ‘Threatening’ China and US security: the international politics of identity. Review of International Studies 2013;39:903–24. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000599
74
Pei M. Everything You Think You Know About China Is Wrong. Foreign policy Published Online First: 29 August 2012.https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/08/29/everything-you-think-you-know-about-china-is-wrong/
75
Vogt R. Europe and China: strategic partners or rivals? Hong Kong: : Hong Kong University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083879.001.0001
76
Christensen TJ. Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster? The Rise of China and U.S. Policy toward East Asia. International Security 2006;31:81–126. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.81
77
Johnston AI. Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security 2003;27:5–56. doi:10.1162/016228803321951081
78
Nathan AJ, Scobell A. How China Sees America. Foreign Affairs 2012;91:32–47.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=78859907&site=ehost-live
79
Beslin S. China and the global order: signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs 2013;89:615–34. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12036
80
Samantha Power. Bystanders to genocide: why the United States let the Rwandan tragedy happen. The Atlantic 2001;288.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A30067738&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=3466e9800c4576bf10a44d33b79c2139
81
Evans G, Shahnoun M. The Responsibility to Protect. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20033347
82
Evans G, Sahnoun M. The Responsibility to Protect. Foreign Affairs 2002;81.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA92827778&v=2.1&u=glasuni&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=3b76f3e741ca1e4caeb166deadf6b35b
83
Stansfield G. The Islamic State, the Kurdistan Region and the future of Iraq: assessing UK policy options. International Affairs 2014;90:1329–50. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12167
84
Morris J. Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs 2013;89:1265–83. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12071
85
Averre D, Davies L. Russia, humanitarian intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: the case of Syria. International Affairs 2015;91:813–34. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12343
86
Bellamy AJ. The Responsibility to Protect and the problem of military intervention. International Affairs 2008;84:615–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00729.x
87
Chandler D. Imposing the ‘Liberal Peace’. International Peacekeeping 2004;11:59–81. doi:10.1080/1353331042000228454
88
Betts RK. The Delusion of Impartial Intervention. Foreign Affairs;73:20–33.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9411180049&site=ehost-live
89
Owens P. Accidents Don’t Just Happen: The Liberal Politics of High-Technology `Humanitarian’ War. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2003;32:595–616. doi:10.1177/03058298030320031101
90
Bellamy AJ, Williams PD. The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs 2011;87:825–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x
91
O’Neill K. The environment and international relations. Second edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2017. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107448087
92
The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics;14:36–54.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/global_environmental_politics/v014/14.4.wapner.html
93
Klein N. This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. London: : Allen Lane 2014.
94
Security in Climate Change Discourse: Analyzing the Divergence between US and EU Approaches to Policy. Global Environmental Politics;14:82–101.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/global_environmental_politics/v014/14.2.hayes.html
95
Skovgaard J. EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics 2014;23:1–17. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.818304
96
Clapp J, Swanston L. Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics 2009;18:315–32. doi:10.1080/09644010902823717
97
Tienhaara K. Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics 2014;23:187–204. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.821828
98
Betsill MM, Hochstetler K, Stevis D. Advances in international environmental politics. 2nd New ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137338976
99
Thiele LP. Indra’s net and the Midas touch: living sustainably in a connected world. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : MIT Press 2011. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780262298858
100
Forsyth T, ProQuest (Firm). Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. London: : Routledge 2003. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=215025
101
McKibben B. Oil and honey. First St. Martin’s Griffin edition. New York, N.Y.: : St. Martin’s Griffin 2014.
102
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, editors. Global politics: a new introduction. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
103
Piketty T, Goldhammer A. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780674369542
104
IFS. Living standards, poverty and inequality in the UK: 2014. http://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/7274
105
Beitz CR. Does Global Inequality Matter? Metaphilosophy 2001;32:95–112. doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00177
106
Alesina A, Glaeser EL, Oxford University Press. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
107
Bartels LM. Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age. New York: : Russell Sage Foundation 2008.
108
Birdsall N. Why Inequality Matters: Some Economic Issues. Ethics & International Affairs 2001;15:3–28. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00356.x
109
Cammack P. What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy 2004;9:189–211. doi:10.1080/1356346042000218069
110
Kaya A. Global inequality. [New York]: : Oxford University Press 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199756223-0025
111
Martins N. Globalisation, Inequality and the Economic Crisis. New Political Economy 2011;16:1–18. doi:10.1080/13563461003789761
112
Wolf M. Why globalization works. New Haven, CT: : Yale University Press 2005.
113
Collier P, Dawson Books. The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780198042549
114
Ebooks Corporation Limited. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Second edition. London: : Routledge 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1744166
115
Basaran T. The saved and the drowned: Governing indifference in the name of security. Security Dialogue 2015;46:205–20. doi:10.1177/0967010614557512
116
Nail T. The figure of the migrant. Stanford: : Stanford University Press 2015.
117
Bleiker R, Campbell D, Hutchison E, et al. The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science 2013;48:398–416. doi:10.1080/10361146.2013.840769
118
Adamson FB. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security 2006;31:165–99. doi:10.1162/isec.2006.31.1.165
119
Muller BJ. (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies 2004;8:279–94. doi:10.1080/1362102042000257005
120
Basaran T. Security, Law, Borders: Spaces of Exclusion. International Political Sociology 2008;2:339–54. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00055.x
121
Latham R. Border formations: security and subjectivity at the border. Citizenship Studies 2010;14:185–201. doi:10.1080/13621021003594858
122
Salter MB. When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship. Citizenship Studies 2008;12:365–80. doi:10.1080/13621020802184234
123
Edkins J, Zehfuss M, editors. Global politics: a new introduction. Third edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5638898
124
Caso F, Hamilton C, editors. Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing 2015. https://www.e-ir.info/publication/popular-culture-and-world-politics/
125
Smith S, Hadfield A, Dunne T, editors. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
126
Robinson N. Have You Won the War on Terror? Military Videogames and the State of American Exceptionalism. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2015;43:450–70. doi:10.1177/0305829814557557
127
Dittmer J, Gray N. Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday. Geography Compass 2010;4:1664–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00399.x
128
Franklin M. Resounding international relations: on music, culture, and politics. New York: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
129
Power M. Digitized Virtuosity: Video War Games and Post-9/11 Cyber-Deterrence. Security Dialogue 2007;38:271–88. doi:10.1177/0967010607078552
130
Grayson K, Davies M, Philpott S. Pop Goes IR? Researching the Popular Culture-World Politics Continuum. Politics 2009;29:155–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x
131
Robinson N. Videogames, Persuasion and the War on Terror: Escaping or Embedding the Military-Entertainment Complex? Political Studies 2012;60:504–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00923.x
132
Weldes J. Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 1999;28:117–34. doi:10.1177/03058298990280011201
133
Jhally S, Earp J, Shaheen JG, et al. Reel bad Arabs: how Hollywood vilifies a people. 2006.
134
Sylvester C. Art/museums: international relations where we least expect it. Boulder, Colo: : Paradigm Publishers 2009.
135
Bleiker R. Aesthetics and world politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
136
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. 4th ed. London: : Routledge 2014.
137
Nexon DH, Neumann IB. Harry Potter and international relations. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield 2006.
