[1]
Ahmed Siddiky, I. 2011. Towards a new framework for cross-border pipelines: The International Pipeline Agency (IPA). Energy Policy. 39, 9 (Sep. 2011), 5344–5346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.030.
[2]
Aklin, M. et al. 2018. Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor. The MIT Press.
[3]
Aklin, M. et al. 2018. Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor. The MIT Press.
[4]
Aklin, M. et al. 2015. The political economy of energy access: Survey evidence from India on state intervention and public opinion. Energy Research & Social Science. 10, (Nov. 2015), 250–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.006.
[5]
Aklin, M. and Urpelainen, J. Renewable Energy: Past, Present, and Future. 21–42.
[6]
Araújo, K. 2014. The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, (Mar. 2014), 112–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002.
[7]
Balmaceda, M.M. 2018. Differentiation, materiality, and power: Towards a political economy of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science. 39, (May 2018), 130–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.052.
[8]
Bazilian, M. et al. 2014. Energy governance and poverty. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, (Mar. 2014), 217–225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.006.
[9]
Belyi, A.V. and Talus, K. eds. 2015. States and markets in hydrocarbon sectors. Palgrave Macmillan.
[10]
Betz, M.R. et al. 2015. Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics. 50, (Jul. 2015), 105–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.005.
[11]
Blanchet, T. 2015. Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: How do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making? Energy Policy. 78, (Mar. 2015), 246–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.001.
[12]
Boersma, T. and Goldthau, A. 2017. Wither the EU’s Market Making Project in Energy: From Liberalization to Securitization? Energy Union. S.S. Andersen et al., eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 99–113.
[13]
Bradshaw, M.J. 2010. Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective. The Geographical Journal. 176, 4 (2010).
[14]
Bradshaw, M.J. 2014. Global energy dilemmas: energy, security, globalization, and climate change. Polity Press.
[15]
Bridge, G. et al. 2013. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy. 53, (Feb. 2013), 331–340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.
[16]
Brown, M.A. et al. 2014. Forty years of energy security trends: A comparative assessment of 22 industrialized countries. Energy Research & Social Science. 4, (Dec. 2014), 64–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.008.
[17]
Burke, M.J. and Stephens, J.C. 2018. Corrigendum to "Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions” [Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017) 35–48]. Energy Research & Social Science. 42, (Aug. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.030.
[18]
Burke, M.J. and Stephens, J.C. 2017. Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 33, (Nov. 2017), 35–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024.
[19]
Burke, M.J. and Stephens, J.C. 2018. Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. 35, (Jan. 2018), 78–93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
[20]
Casier, T. 2016. Great Game or Great Confusion: The Geopolitical Understanding of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 21, 4 (Oct. 2016), 763–778. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1185607.
[21]
Casier, T. and DeBardeleben, J. eds. 2018. EU-Russia relations in crisis: understanding diverging perceptions. Routledge.
[22]
Cherp, A. and Jewell, J. 2014. The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy. 75, (Dec. 2014), 415–421. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005.
[23]
Ciută, F. 2010. Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security? Security Dialogue. 41, 2 (Apr. 2010), 123–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610361596.
[24]
Criekemans, D. 2018. Geopolitics of the Renewable Energy Game and Its Potential Impact upon Global Power Relations. The Geopolitics of Renewables. D. Scholten, ed. Springer International Publishing. 37–73.
[25]
Dannreuther, R. 2017. Energy security. Polity Press.
[26]
Dannreuther, R. 2013. Geopolitics and International Relations of Resources. Global Resources. R. Dannreuther and W. Ostrowski, eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 79–97.
[27]
Delina, L.L. 2018. Energy democracy in a continuum: Remaking public engagement on energy transitions in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science. 42, (Aug. 2018), 53–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.008.
[28]
Douglas, S. and Walker, A. 2017. Coal mining and the resource curse in the Eastern United States. Journal of Regional Science. 57, 4 (Sep. 2017), 568–590. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12310.
[29]
Duffield, J.S. 2012. The Return of Energy Insecurity in the Developed Democracies. Contemporary Security Policy. 33, 1 (Apr. 2012), 1–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.659571.
[30]
Erensü, S. 2018. Powering neoliberalization: Energy and politics in the making of a new Turkey. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, (Jul. 2018), 148–157. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.037.
[31]
European Commission (2015) Country Factsheets on the State of the Energy Union: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/national-factsheets-state-energy-union_en.
[32]
Felder, F.A. 2016. "Why can’t we all get along?” A conceptual analysis and case study of contentious energy problems. Energy Policy. 96, (Sep. 2016), 711–716. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.038.
[33]
Fischhendler, I. et al. 2015. Marketing Renewable Energy through Geopolitics: Solar Farms in Israel. Global Environmental Politics. 15, 2 (May 2015), 98–120. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00300.
[34]
Fischhendler, I. 2018. The Use of Intangible Benefits for Promoting Contested Policies: The Case of Geopolitical Benefits and the Israeli Gas Policy. Geopolitics. 23, 4 (Oct. 2018), 929–953. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1350842.
[35]
Froggatt, A. and Levi, M.A. 2009. Climate and Energy Security Policies and Measures: Synergies and Conflicts. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 85, 6 (2009).
[36]
Fudge, S. et al. 2011. Paradigms, Policy and Governance: The Politics of Energy Regulation in the UK Post-2000. Environmental Policy and Governance. 21, 4 (Jul. 2011), 291–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.574.
[37]
Gochberg, W. and Menaldo, V. 2016. The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. T. Van de Graaf et al., eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 505–525.
[38]
Goldthau, A. 2012. From the State to the Market and Back: Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms. Global Policy. 3, 2 (May 2012), 198–210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00145.x.
[39]
Goldthau, A. ed. 2013. The handbook of global energy policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[40]
Goldthau, A. ed. 2013. The handbook of global energy policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[41]
Haas, R. et al. 2011. A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15, 2 (Feb. 2011), 1003–1034. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015.
[42]
Halff, A. et al. eds. 2015. Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. Oxford University Press.
[43]
Halff, A. et al. eds. 2015. Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. Oxford University Press.
[44]
Heinrich, A. 2018. Securitisation in the Gas Sector: Energy Security Debates Concerning the Example of the Nord Stream Pipeline. Energy Security in Europe. K. Szulecki, ed. Springer International Publishing. 61–91.
[45]
Heinrich, A. and Szulecki, K. 2018. Energy Securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s Framework to Energy. Energy Security in Europe. K. Szulecki, ed. Springer International Publishing. 33–59.
[46]
Helm, D. 2002. Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition. Energy Policy. 30, 3 (Feb. 2002), 173–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00141-0.
[47]
Hess, D.J. 2018. Energy democracy and social movements: A multi-coalition perspective on the politics of sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 40, (Jun. 2018), 177–189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.003.
[48]
Hoffmann, C. 2018. Beyond the resource curse and pipeline conspiracies: Energy as a social relation in the Middle East. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, (Jul. 2018), 39–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.025.
[49]
Hofmann, S.C. and Staeger, U. 2019. Frame contestation and collective securitisation: the case of EU energy policy. West European Politics. 42, 2 (Feb. 2019), 323–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510197.
[50]
Huber, M. 2015. Theorizing Energy Geographies. Geography Compass. 9, 6 (Jun. 2015), 327–338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12214.
[51]
International Renewable Energy Agency – Country Profiles: http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/#.
[52]
Johansson, B. 2013. Security aspects of future renewable energy systems–A short overview. Energy. 61, (Nov. 2013), 598–605. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.023.
[53]
Johnson, O.W. et al. 2019. Gender, culture and energy transitions in rural Africa. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, (Mar. 2019), 169–179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.004.
[54]
Jones Luong, P. and Weinthal, E. 2010. Oil is not a curse: ownership structure and institutions in Soviet successor states. Cambridge University Press.
[55]
Judge, A. et al. 2016. Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 21, 4 (Oct. 2016), 751–762. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1222520.
[56]
Judge, A. et al. 2018. Energy Securitisation: Avenues for Future Research. Energy Security in Europe. K. Szulecki, ed. Springer International Publishing. 149–173.
[57]
Judge, A. and Maltby, T. 2017. European Energy Union? Caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’. European Journal of International Security. 2, 2 (Jul. 2017), 179–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.3.
[58]
Keay, M. 2016. UK energy policy – Stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy. 94, (Jul. 2016), 247–252. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.022.
[59]
Kern, F. et al. 2014. Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics. 42, 4 (Oct. 2014), 513–530. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655765.
[60]
Kern, F. and Markard, J. 2016. Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. T. Van de Graaf et al., eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 291–318.
[61]
Kester, J. and Sovacool, B.K. 2017. Torn between war and peace: Critiquing the use of war to mobilize peaceful climate action. Energy Policy. 104, (May 2017), 50–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.026.
[62]
Krickovic, A. 2015. When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU–Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy. 36, 1 (Jan. 2015), 3–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1012350.
[63]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2012. Dynamics of energy governance in Europe and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan.
[64]
Kuzemko, C. 2016. Energy Depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying Political Capacity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 18, 1 (Feb. 2016), 107–124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12068.
[65]
Kuzemko, C. 2014. Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy. 21, 1 (Jan. 2014), 58–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.835062.
[66]
Kuzemko, C. 2014. Politicising UK energy: what ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy & Politics. 42, 2 (Apr. 2014), 259–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655990.
[67]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[68]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[69]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[70]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[71]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[72]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[73]
Kuzemko, C. et al. 2016. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education.
[74]
Le Coq, C. and Paltseva, E. 2012. Assessing gas transit risks: Russia vs. the EU. Energy Policy. 42, (Mar. 2012), 642–650. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.037.
[75]
Lesage, D. et al. 2016. Global energy governance in a multipolar world. Ashgate.
[76]
Liou, Y.-M. and Musgrave, P. 2016. Oil, Autocratic Survival, and the Gendered Resource Curse: When Inefficient Policy Is Politically Expedient. International Studies Quarterly. 60, 3 (Sep. 2016), 440–456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw021.
[77]
Lis, A. 2018. Politics and Knowledge Production: Between Securitisation and Riskification of the Shale Gas Issue in Poland and Germany. Energy Security in Europe. K. Szulecki, ed. Springer International Publishing. 93–115.
[78]
Listo, R. 2018. Gender myths in energy poverty literature: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Energy Research & Social Science. 38, (Apr. 2018), 9–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.010.
[79]
Meierding, E. 2019. Oil War Narratives: Mad Max and El Dorado. (2019).
[80]
Michael L. Ross 2001. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics. 53, 3 (2001).
[81]
Miller, C.A. et al. 2015. Narrative futures and the governance of energy transitions. Futures. 70, (Jun. 2015), 65–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.12.001.
[82]
Miller, C.A. et al. 2015. Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 6, (Mar. 2015), 29–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.004.
[83]
Mills, R. Risky Routes: Energy Transit in the Middle East.
[84]
Mitchell, T. 2009. Carbon Democracy. Economy and Society. 38, 3 (Aug. 2009), 399–432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598.
[85]
Mitchell, T. 2009. Carbon democracy. Economy and Society. 38, 3 (Aug. 2009), 399–432. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598.
[86]
Mitchell, T. 2013. Carbon democracy: political power in the age of oil. Verso.
[87]
Monyei, C.G. et al. 2019. Benchmarks for energy access: Policy vagueness and incoherence as barriers to sustainable electrification of the global south. Energy Research & Social Science. 54, (Aug. 2019), 113–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.005.
[88]
Moses, J.W. and Letnes, B. 2017. Managing resource abundance and wealth: the Norwegian experience. Oxford University Press.
[89]
Moss, T. et al. 2015. Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment. 20, 12 (Dec. 2015), 1547–1563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
[90]
Nicholas Shaxson 2007. Oil, Corruption and the Resource Curse. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 83, 6 (2007).
[91]
Nyman, J. 2014. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US–China Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 1 (Sep. 2014), 43–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814525495.
[92]
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies Beyond IEA Countries: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-beyond-iea-countries_23070897.
[93]
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies of IEA Countries: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-of-iea-countries_19900082.
[94]
Omonbude, E.J. 2012. Cross-border oil and gas pipelines and the role of the transit country: Economics, challenges and solutions. Palgrave Macmillan.
[95]
O’Sullivan, M. et al. 2017. 'The Geopolitics of Renewable Energy’, Working paper for the Centre for Energy Policy, at the University of Columbia. (2017).
[96]
Osunmuyiwa, O. and Ahlborg, H. 2019. Inclusiveness by design? Reviewing sustainable electricity access and entrepreneurship from a gender perspective. Energy Research & Social Science. 53, (Jul. 2019), 145–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.010.
[97]
Overland, I. 2019. The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, (Mar. 2019), 36–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018.
[98]
Paltsev, S. 2016. The complicated geopolitics of renewable energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72, 6 (Nov. 2016), 390–395. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1240476.
[99]
Paul Collier The political economy of natural resources.
[100]
Perspectives on Energy YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP8tQ2Aq5bV07poSQy-XhuZQS3R9PhLgr.
[101]
Pueyo, A. and Maestre, M. 2019. Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy. Energy Research & Social Science. 53, (Jul. 2019), 170–181. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.019.
[102]
Purcell, T.F. and Martinez, E. 2018. Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, (Jul. 2018), 12–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.003.
[103]
Ratinen, M. and Lund, P.D. 2016. Democracy and Transitions: European Experiences of Policy Inclusiveness and Changes in the Electricity Industry. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. T. Van de Graaf et al., eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 341–362.
[104]
Review by: Kevin M. Morrison 2013. Review: Whither the Resource Curse? Perspectives on Politics. 11, 4 (2013).
[105]
Ross, M.L. 2012. The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton University Press.
[106]
Ross, M.L. 2015. What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse? Annual Review of Political Science. 18, 1 (May 2015), 239–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052213-040359.
[107]
Rosser, A. 2006. The political economy of the resource curse : a literature survey | Institute of Development Studies. Institute of Development Studies.
[108]
Rudra, N. and Jensen, N.M. 2011. Globalization and the Politics of Natural Resources. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 6 (Jun. 2011), 639–661. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011401207.
[109]
Rutledge, I. 2007. New Labour, energy policy and ‘competitive markets’. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 31, 6 (Oct. 2007), 901–925. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem025.
[110]
Ryan Kennedy and Lydia Tiede 2013. Economic Development Assumptions and the Elusive Curse of Oil. International Studies Quarterly. 57, 4 (2013).
[111]
Scholten, D. and Bosman, R. 2016. The geopolitics of renewables; exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 103, (Feb. 2016), 273–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.014.
[112]
Scholten, D. and Bosman, R. 2018. The Strategic Realities of the Emerging Energy Game—Conclusion and Reflection. The Geopolitics of Renewables. D. Scholten, ed. Springer International Publishing. 307–328.
[113]
Scrase, I. and MacKerron, G. eds. 2009. Energy for the future: a new agenda. Palgrave Macmillan.
[114]
Scrase, I. and MacKerron, G. eds. 2009. Energy for the future: a new agenda. Palgrave Macmillan.
[115]
Sharma, V. 2019. Access for adaptation? Reviewing the linkages between energy, disasters, and development in India. Energy Research & Social Science. 52, (Jun. 2019), 10–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.025.
[116]
Silvast, A. 2017. Making electricity resilient: risk and security in a liberalized infrastructure. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[117]
Smil, V. 2017. Energy and Civilization: A History. The MIT Press.
[118]
Smil, V. 2015. Power density: a key to understanding energy sources and uses. The MIT Press.
[119]
Smith Stegen, K. 2018. Redrawing the Geopolitical Map: International Relations and Renewable Energies. The Geopolitics of Renewables. D. Scholten, ed. Springer International Publishing. 75–95.
[120]
Sovacool, B.K. 2013. Energy & ethics: Justice and the global energy challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
[121]
Sovacool, B.K. 2014. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, (Mar. 2014), 1–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003.
[122]
Stern, J. et al. The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment.
[123]
Stevens, P. et al. The Resource Curse Revisited. Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[124]
Stirling, A. 2014. Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, (Mar. 2014), 83–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001.
[125]
Stoddard, E. 2013. Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 22, 4 (Dec. 2013), 437–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.775122.
[126]
Stoddard, E. 2013. Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 22, 4 (Dec. 2013), 437–463. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.775122.
[127]
Strange, S. 1994. States and Markets. Pinter.
[128]
Stulberg, A.N. 2017. Natural gas and the Russia-Ukraine crisis: Strategic restraint and the emerging Europe-Eurasia gas network. Energy Research & Social Science. 24, (Feb. 2017), 71–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.017.
[129]
Stulberg, A.N. 2012. Strategic bargaining and pipeline politics: Confronting the credible commitment problem in Eurasian energy transit. Review of International Political Economy. 19, 5 (Dec. 2012), 808–836. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.603662.
[130]
Szulecki, K. and Kusznir, J. 2018. Energy Security and Energy Transition: Securitisation in the Electricity Sector. Energy Security in Europe. K. Szulecki, ed. Springer International Publishing. 117–148.
[131]
Tarasova, E. 2018. (Non-) Alternative energy transitions: Examining neoliberal rationality in official nuclear energy discourses of Russia and Poland. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, (Jul. 2018), 128–135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.008.
[132]
Thombs, R.P. 2019. When democracy meets energy transitions: A typology of social power and energy system scale. Energy Research & Social Science. 52, (Jun. 2019), 159–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.020.
[133]
Torvik, R. 2009. Why do some resource-abundant countries succeed while others do not? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 25, 2 (Jun. 2009), 241–256. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp015.
[134]
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Analysis of specific countries: https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm.
[135]
Van de Graaf, T. 2018. Battling for a Shrinking Market: Oil Producers, the Renewables Revolution, and the Risk of Stranded Assets. The Geopolitics of Renewables. D. Scholten, ed. Springer International Publishing. 97–121.
[136]
Van de Graaf, T. 2013. Morphogenesis of the Energy Regime Complex. The Politics and Institutions of global Energy Governance. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 44–63.
[137]
Van de Graaf, T. and Colgan, J.D. 2017. Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science. 24, (Feb. 2017), 59–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.018.
[138]
Victor Valentine, S. et al. 2017. Frame envy in energy policy ideology: A social constructivist framework for wicked energy problems. Energy Policy. 109, (Oct. 2017), 623–630. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.028.
[139]
Wilson, J.D. 2019. A securitisation approach to international energy politics. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, (Mar. 2019), 114–125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.024.
[140]
Winther, T. et al. 2018. Solar powered electricity access: Implications for women’s empowerment in rural Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science. 44, (Oct. 2018), 61–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.017.
[141]
World Oil Transit Chokepoints: https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.php?RegionTopicID=WOTC.
[142]
2019. A New World: The Geopolitics of Energy Transition. International Renewable Energy Agency.
[143]
2015. Future energy trends : innovation, markets and geopolitics.
[144]
International Energy Agency (2016), ‘Fundamentals of Energy Statistics’, July 7th.
