1.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d99d7e90-cfbd-e911-80cd-005056af4099
2.
Perspectives on Energy YouTube playlist [Internet]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP8tQ2Aq5bV07poSQy-XhuZQS3R9PhLgr
3.
Bradshaw MJ. Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective. The Geographical Journal [Internet]. 2010;176(4). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40929610
4.
Dannreuther R. Geopolitics and International Relations of Resources. In: Dannreuther R, Ostrowski W, editors. Global Resources [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2013. p. 79–97. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137349149_5
5.
Felder FA. ‘Why can’t we all get along?” A conceptual analysis and case study of contentious energy problems. Energy Policy. 2016 Sep;96:711–6.
6.
Lesage D, van de Graaf T, Westphal K. Global energy governance in a multipolar world. Farnham: Ashgate; 2016.
7.
Sovacool BK. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science. 2014 Mar;1:1–29.
8.
Victor Valentine S, Sovacool BK, Brown MA. Frame envy in energy policy ideology: A social constructivist framework for wicked energy problems. Energy Policy. 2017 Oct;109:623–30.
9.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
10.
Bradshaw MJ, Askews & Holts Library Services. Global energy dilemmas: energy, security, globalization, and climate change [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2014. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780745679075
11.
Aklin M, Urpelainen J. Renewable Energy: Past, Present, and Future. In p. 21–42. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8333044
12.
Smil V. Power density: a key to understanding energy sources and uses [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=7120891
13.
Sovacool BK. Energy & ethics: Justice and the global energy challenge [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137298669
14.
Smil V. Energy and Civilization: A History [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2017. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/book/7982996
15.
European Commission (2015) Country Factsheets on the State of the Energy Union [Internet]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/national-factsheets-state-energy-union_en
16.
International Energy Agency (2016), ‘Fundamentals of Energy Statistics’, July 7th [Internet]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dvo0c4KhV4
17.
International Renewable Energy Agency – Country Profiles [Internet]. Available from: http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/#
18.
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies of IEA Countries [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-of-iea-countries_19900082
19.
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies Beyond IEA Countries [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-beyond-iea-countries_23070897
20.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Analysis of specific countries [Internet]. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm
21.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
22.
Belyi AV, Talus K, editors. States and markets in hydrocarbon sectors [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781137434074
23.
Helm D. Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition. Energy Policy. 2002 Feb;30(3):173–84.
24.
Rutledge I. New Labour, energy policy and ‘competitive markets’. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2007 Oct 4;31(6):901–25.
25.
Fudge S, Peters M, Mulugetta Y, Jackson T. Paradigms, Policy and Governance: The Politics of Energy Regulation in the UK Post-2000. Environmental Policy and Governance. 2011 Jul;21(4):291–302.
26.
Kern F, Kuzemko C, Mitchell C. Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics. 2014 Oct 1;42(4):513–30.
27.
Keay M. UK energy policy – Stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy. 2016 Jul;94:247–52.
28.
Scrase I, MacKerron G, editors. Energy for the future: a new agenda [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230235441
29.
Stoddard E. Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 2013 Dec;22(4):437–63.
30.
Strange S. States and Markets. 2nd ed. London: Pinter; 1994.
31.
Van de Graaf T. Morphogenesis of the Energy Regime Complex. In: The Politics and Institutions of global Energy Governance [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2013. p. 44–63. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137320735_3
32.
Mitchell T. Carbon Democracy. Economy and Society. 2009 Aug;38(3):399–432.
33.
Balmaceda MM. Differentiation, materiality, and power: Towards a political economy of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 May;39:130–40.
34.
Kuzemko C. Energy Depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying Political Capacity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2016 Feb;18(1):107–24.
35.
Erensü S. Powering neoliberalization: Energy and politics in the making of a new Turkey. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jul;41:148–57.
36.
Boersma T, Goldthau A. Wither the EU’s Market Making Project in Energy: From Liberalization to Securitization? In: Andersen SS, Goldthau A, Sitter N, editors. Energy Union [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2017. p. 99–113. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-59104-3_6
37.
Goldthau A. From the State to the Market and Back: Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms. Global Policy. 2012 May;3(2):198–210.
38.
Hoffmann C. Beyond the resource curse and pipeline conspiracies: Energy as a social relation in the Middle East. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jul;41:39–47.
39.
Kuzemko C. Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy. 2014 Jan 2;21(1):58–75.
40.
Mitchell T. Carbon democracy: political power in the age of oil. Paperback edition. London: Verso; 2013.
41.
Purcell TF, Martinez E. Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jul;41:12–21.
42.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
43.
Aklin M, Bayer P, Harish SP, Urpelainen J, ProQuest (Firm). Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2018. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5597783
44.
Bazilian M, Nakhooda S, Van de Graaf T. Energy governance and poverty. Energy Research & Social Science. 2014 Mar;1:217–25.
45.
Aklin M, Bayer P, Harish SP, Urpelainen J. The political economy of energy access: Survey evidence from India on state intervention and public opinion. Energy Research & Social Science. 2015 Nov;10:250–8.
46.
Aklin M, Bayer P, Harish SP, Urpelainen J, ProQuest (Firm). Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor [Internet]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 2018. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=5597783
47.
Goldthau A, editor. The handbook of global energy policy [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1155382
48.
Halff A, Sovacool BK, Rozhon J, editors. Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682362.001.0001
49.
Johnson OW, Gerber V, Muhoza C. Gender, culture and energy transitions in rural Africa. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Mar;49:169–79.
50.
Listo R. Gender myths in energy poverty literature: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Apr;38:9–18.
51.
Monyei CG, Oyedele LO, Akinade OO, Ajayi AO, Luo XJ. Benchmarks for energy access: Policy vagueness and incoherence as barriers to sustainable electrification of the global south. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Aug;54:113–6.
52.
Osunmuyiwa O, Ahlborg H. Inclusiveness by design? Reviewing sustainable electricity access and entrepreneurship from a gender perspective. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Jul;53:145–58.
53.
Pueyo A, Maestre M. Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Jul;53:170–81.
54.
Sharma V. Access for adaptation? Reviewing the linkages between energy, disasters, and development in India. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Jun;52:10–9.
55.
Halff A, Sovacool BK, Rozhon J, editors. Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682362.001.0001
56.
Winther T, Ulsrud K, Saini A. Solar powered electricity access: Implications for women’s empowerment in rural Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Oct;44:61–74.
57.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
58.
Michael L. Ross. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics [Internet]. 2001;53(3). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054153
59.
Dannreuther R. Energy security [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4929683
60.
Betz MR, Partridge MD, Farren M, Lobao L. Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics. 2015 Jul;50:105–16.
61.
Paul Collier. The political economy of natural resources. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&u=glasuni&id=GALE|A253056451&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon
62.
Douglas S, Walker A. Coal mining and the resource curse in the Eastern United States. Journal of Regional Science. 2017 Sep;57(4):568–90.
63.
Gochberg W, Menaldo V. The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work. In: Van de Graaf T, Sovacool BK, Ghosh A, Kern F, Klare MT, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. p. 505–25. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_21
64.
Ryan Kennedy and Lydia Tiede. Economic Development Assumptions and the Elusive Curse of Oil. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2013;57(4). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24014648
65.
Liou Y-M, Musgrave P. Oil, Autocratic Survival, and the Gendered Resource Curse: When Inefficient Policy Is Politically Expedient. International Studies Quarterly. 2016 Sep;60(3):440–56.
66.
Jones Luong P, Weinthal E. Oil is not a curse: ownership structure and institutions in Soviet successor states [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779435
67.
Mitchell T. Carbon democracy. Economy and Society. 2009 Aug;38(3):399–432.
68.
Review by:   Kevin M. Morrison. Review: Whither the Resource Curse? Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2013;11(4). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43280933
69.
Moses JW, Letnes B. Managing resource abundance and wealth: the Norwegian experience [Internet]. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787174.001.0001
70.
Ross ML. The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations [Internet]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781400841929
71.
Ross ML. What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse? Annual Review of Political Science. 2015 May 11;18(1):239–59.
72.
Rosser A. The political economy of the resource curse : a literature survey | Institute of Development Studies [Internet]. IDS Working Paper 268. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies; 2006. Available from: https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/the-political-economy-of-the-resource-curse-a-literature-survey-2/
73.
Rudra N, Jensen NM. Globalization and the Politics of Natural Resources. Comparative Political Studies. 2011 Jun;44(6):639–61.
74.
Nicholas Shaxson. Oil, Corruption and the Resource Curse. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2007;83(6). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4541914
75.
Stevens P, Lahn G, Kooroshy J. The Resource Curse Revisited [Internet]. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; Available from: https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/resource-curse-revisited
76.
Torvik R. Why do some resource-abundant countries succeed while others do not? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2009 Jun 1;25(2):241–56.
77.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
78.
Mills R. Risky Routes: Energy Transit in the Middle East. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/en-energy-transit-security-mills-2.pdf
79.
Van de Graaf T, Colgan JD. Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science. 2017 Feb;24:59–64.
80.
Casier T. Great Game or Great Confusion: The Geopolitical Understanding of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 2016 Oct;21(4):763–78.
81.
EIA. World Oil Transit Chokepoints [Internet]. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.php?RegionTopicID=WOTC
82.
Judge A, Maltby T, Sharples JD. Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 2016 Oct;21(4):751–62.
83.
Krickovic A. When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU–Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy. 2015 Jan 2;36(1):3–26.
84.
Le Coq C, Paltseva E. Assessing gas transit risks: Russia vs. the EU. Energy Policy. 2012 Mar;42:642–50.
85.
Goldthau A, editor. The handbook of global energy policy [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1155382
86.
Omonbude EJ. Cross-border oil and gas pipelines and the role of the transit country: Economics, challenges and solutions [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9781137274526
87.
Kuzemko C, Belyi AV, Goldthau A, Keating MF. Dynamics of energy governance in Europe and Russia [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230370944
88.
Taylor & Francis Group. EU-Russia relations in crisis: understanding diverging perceptions [Internet]. Casier T, DeBardeleben J, editors. London: Routledge; 2018. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315444567
89.
Future energy trends : innovation, markets and geopolitics. Abu Dhabi, UAE; 2015.
90.
Ahmed Siddiky I. Towards a new framework for cross-border pipelines: The International Pipeline Agency (IPA). Energy Policy. 2011 Sep;39(9):5344–6.
91.
Silvast A. Making electricity resilient: risk and security in a liberalized infrastructure. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.
92.
Stern J, Pirani S, Yafimava K. The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment. Available from: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/the-russo-ukrainian-gas-dispute-of-january-2009-a-comprehensive-assessment/
93.
Stulberg AN. Strategic bargaining and pipeline politics: Confronting the credible commitment problem in Eurasian energy transit. Review of International Political Economy. 2012 Dec;19(5):808–36.
94.
Stulberg AN. Natural gas and the Russia-Ukraine crisis: Strategic restraint and the emerging Europe-Eurasia gas network. Energy Research & Social Science. 2017 Feb;24:71–85.
95.
Kuzemko C, Keating MF, Goldthau A. The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan Education; 2016.
96.
Duffield JS. The Return of Energy Insecurity in the Developed Democracies. Contemporary Security Policy. 2012 Apr;33(1):1–26.
97.
Judge A, Maltby T. European Energy Union? Caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’. European Journal of International Security. 2017 Jul;2(2):179–202.
98.
Brown MA, Wang Y, Sovacool BK, Agostino AL D’. Forty years of energy security trends: A comparative assessment of 22 industrialized countries. Energy Research & Social Science. 2014 Dec;4:64–77.
99.
Cherp A, Jewell J. The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy. 2014 Dec;75:415–21.
100.
Ciută F. Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security? Security Dialogue. 2010 Apr;41(2):123–44.
101.
Heinrich A. Securitisation in the Gas Sector: Energy Security Debates Concerning the Example of the Nord Stream Pipeline. In: Szulecki K, editor. Energy Security in Europe [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 61–91. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_3
102.
Heinrich A, Szulecki K. Energy Securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s Framework to Energy. In: Szulecki K, editor. Energy Security in Europe [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 33–59. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_2
103.
Hofmann SC, Staeger U. Frame contestation and collective securitisation: the case of EU energy policy. West European Politics. 2019 Feb 23;42(2):323–45.
104.
Judge A, Maltby T, Szulecki K. Energy Securitisation: Avenues for Future Research. In: Szulecki K, editor. Energy Security in Europe [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 149–73. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_6
105.
Kester J, Sovacool BK. Torn between war and peace: Critiquing the use of war to mobilize peaceful climate action. Energy Policy. 2017 May;104:50–5.
106.
Kuzemko C. Politicising UK energy: what ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy & Politics. 2014 Apr 1;42(2):259–74.
107.
Lis A. Politics and Knowledge Production: Between Securitisation and Riskification of the Shale Gas Issue in Poland and Germany. In: Szulecki K, editor. Energy Security in Europe [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 93–115. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_4
108.
Meierding E. Oil War Narratives: Mad Max and El Dorado. 2019;
109.
Nyman J. ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US–China Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2014 Sep;43(1):43–65.
110.
Stoddard E. Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 2013 Dec;22(4):437–63.
111.
Szulecki K, Kusznir J. Energy Security and Energy Transition: Securitisation in the Electricity Sector. In: Szulecki K, editor. Energy Security in Europe [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 117–48. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_5
112.
Wilson JD. A securitisation approach to international energy politics. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Mar;49:114–25.
113.
A New World: The Geopolitics of Energy Transition [Internet]. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency; Available from: http://geopoliticsofrenewables.org/Report
114.
Fischhendler I, Nathan D, Boymel D. Marketing Renewable Energy through Geopolitics: Solar Farms in Israel. Global Environmental Politics. 2015 May;15(2):98–120.
115.
Overland I. The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Mar;49:36–40.
116.
Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M, Eyre N. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy. 2013 Feb;53:331–40.
117.
Criekemans D. Geopolitics of the Renewable Energy Game and Its Potential Impact upon Global Power Relations. In: Scholten D, editor. The Geopolitics of Renewables [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 37–73. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_2
118.
Fischhendler I. The Use of Intangible Benefits for Promoting Contested Policies: The Case of Geopolitical Benefits and the Israeli Gas Policy. Geopolitics. 2018 Oct 2;23(4):929–53.
119.
Froggatt A, Levi MA. Climate and Energy Security Policies and Measures: Synergies and Conflicts. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) [Internet]. 2009;85(6). Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40389008
120.
Huber M. Theorizing Energy Geographies. Geography Compass. 2015 Jun;9(6):327–38.
121.
Johansson B. Security aspects of future renewable energy systems–A short overview. Energy. 2013 Nov;61:598–605.
122.
O’Sullivan M, Overland I, Sandalow D. ’The Geopolitics of Renewable Energy’, Working paper for the Centre for Energy Policy, at the University of Columbia. 2017; Available from: https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/CGEPTheGeopoliticsOfRenewables.pdf
123.
Paltsev S. The complicated geopolitics of renewable energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2016 Nov;72(6):390–5.
124.
Scholten D, Bosman R. The geopolitics of renewables; exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016 Feb;103:273–83.
125.
Scholten D, Bosman R. The Strategic Realities of the Emerging Energy Game—Conclusion and Reflection. In: Scholten D, editor. The Geopolitics of Renewables [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 307–28. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_12
126.
Smith Stegen K. Redrawing the Geopolitical Map: International Relations and Renewable Energies. In: Scholten D, editor. The Geopolitics of Renewables [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 75–95. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_3
127.
Van de Graaf T. Battling for a Shrinking Market: Oil Producers, the Renewables Revolution, and the Risk of Stranded Assets. In: Scholten D, editor. The Geopolitics of Renewables [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 97–121. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_4
128.
Kern F, Markard J. Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy. In: Van de Graaf T, Sovacool BK, Ghosh A, Kern F, Klare MT, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. p. 291–318. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_12
129.
Tarasova E. (Non-) Alternative energy transitions: Examining neoliberal rationality in official nuclear energy discourses of Russia and Poland. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jul;41:128–35.
130.
Thombs RP. When democracy meets energy transitions: A typology of social power and energy system scale. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019 Jun;52:159–68.
131.
Araújo K. The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science. 2014 Mar;1:112–21.
132.
Blanchet T. Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: How do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making? Energy Policy. 2015 Mar;78:246–54.
133.
Burke MJ, Stephens JC. Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 2017 Nov;33:35–48.
134.
Burke MJ, Stephens JC. Corrigendum to "Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions” [Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017) 35–48]. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Aug;42.
135.
Burke MJ, Stephens JC. Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jan;35:78–93.
136.
Delina LL. Energy democracy in a continuum: Remaking public engagement on energy transitions in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Aug;42:53–60.
137.
Haas R, Panzer C, Resch G, Ragwitz M, Reece G, Held A. A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011 Feb;15(2):1003–34.
138.
Hess DJ. Energy democracy and social movements: A multi-coalition perspective on the politics of sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018 Jun;40:177–89.
139.
Scrase I, MacKerron G, editors. Energy for the future: a new agenda [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230235441
140.
Miller CA, Richter J, O’Leary J. Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 2015 Mar;6:29–40.
141.
Miller CA, O’Leary J, Graffy E, Stechel EB, Dirks G. Narrative futures and the governance of energy transitions. Futures. 2015 Jun;70:65–74.
142.
Moss T, Becker S, Naumann M. Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment. 2015 Dec 2;20(12):1547–63.
143.
Ratinen M, Lund PD. Democracy and Transitions: European Experiences of Policy Inclusiveness and Changes in the Electricity Industry. In: Van de Graaf T, Sovacool BK, Ghosh A, Kern F, Klare MT, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2016. p. 341–62. Available from: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_14
144.
Stirling A. Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science. 2014 Mar;1:83–95.