1.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
2.
Perspectives on Energy YouTube playlist, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLP8tQ2Aq5bV07poSQy-XhuZQS3R9PhLgr.
3.
Bradshaw, M.J.: Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective. The Geographical Journal. 176, (2010).
4.
Dannreuther, R.: Geopolitics and International Relations of Resources. In: Dannreuther, R. and Ostrowski, W. (eds.) Global Resources. pp. 79–97. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349149_5.
5.
Felder, F.A.: "Why can’t we all get along?” A conceptual analysis and case study of contentious energy problems. Energy Policy. 96, 711–716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.038.
6.
Lesage, D., Graaf, T. van de, Westphal, K.: Global energy governance in a multipolar world. Ashgate, Farnham (2016).
7.
Sovacool, B.K.: What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, 1–29 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003.
8.
Victor Valentine, S., Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A.: Frame envy in energy policy ideology: A social constructivist framework for wicked energy problems. Energy Policy. 109, 623–630 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.028.
9.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
10.
Bradshaw, M.J.: Global energy dilemmas: energy, security, globalization, and climate change. Polity Press, Cambridge (2014).
11.
Aklin, M., Urpelainen, J.: Renewable Energy: Past, Present, and Future. Presented at the .
12.
Smil, V.: Power density: a key to understanding energy sources and uses. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2015).
13.
Sovacool, B.K.: Energy & ethics: Justice and the global energy challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
14.
Smil, V.: Energy and Civilization: A History. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2017).
15.
European Commission (2015) Country Factsheets on the State of the Energy Union, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/national-factsheets-state-energy-union_en.
16.
International Energy Agency (2016), ‘Fundamentals of Energy Statistics’, July 7th, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dvo0c4KhV4.
17.
International Renewable Energy Agency – Country Profiles, http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/#.
18.
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies of IEA Countries, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-of-iea-countries_19900082.
19.
OECD iLibrary, Energy Policies Beyond IEA Countries, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/energy-policies-beyond-iea-countries_23070897.
20.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Analysis of specific countries, https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm.
21.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
22.
Belyi, A.V., Talus, K. eds: States and markets in hydrocarbon sectors. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2015).
23.
Helm, D.: Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition. Energy Policy. 30, 173–184 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00141-0.
24.
Rutledge, I.: New Labour, energy policy and ‘competitive markets’. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 31, 901–925 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem025.
25.
Fudge, S., Peters, M., Mulugetta, Y., Jackson, T.: Paradigms, Policy and Governance: The Politics of Energy Regulation in the UK Post-2000. Environmental Policy and Governance. 21, 291–302 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.574.
26.
Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C.: Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy. Policy & Politics. 42, 513–530 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655765.
27.
Keay, M.: UK energy policy – Stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy. 94, 247–252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.022.
28.
Scrase, I., MacKerron, G. eds: Energy for the future: a new agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2009).
29.
Stoddard, E.: Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 22, 437–463 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.775122.
30.
Strange, S.: States and Markets. Pinter, London (1994).
31.
Van de Graaf, T.: Morphogenesis of the Energy Regime Complex. In: The Politics and Institutions of global Energy Governance. pp. 44–63. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320735_3.
32.
Mitchell, T.: Carbon Democracy. Economy and Society. 38, 399–432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598.
33.
Balmaceda, M.M.: Differentiation, materiality, and power: Towards a political economy of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science. 39, 130–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.052.
34.
Kuzemko, C.: Energy Depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying Political Capacity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 18, 107–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12068.
35.
Erensü, S.: Powering neoliberalization: Energy and politics in the making of a new Turkey. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, 148–157 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.037.
36.
Boersma, T., Goldthau, A.: Wither the EU’s Market Making Project in Energy: From Liberalization to Securitization? In: Andersen, S.S., Goldthau, A., and Sitter, N. (eds.) Energy Union. pp. 99–113. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59104-3_6.
37.
Goldthau, A.: From the State to the Market and Back: Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms. Global Policy. 3, 198–210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00145.x.
38.
Hoffmann, C.: Beyond the resource curse and pipeline conspiracies: Energy as a social relation in the Middle East. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, 39–47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.025.
39.
Kuzemko, C.: Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy. 21, 58–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.835062.
40.
Mitchell, T.: Carbon democracy: political power in the age of oil. Verso, London (2013).
41.
Purcell, T.F., Martinez, E.: Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, 12–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.003.
42.
Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S.P., Urpelainen, J., ProQuest (Firm): Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2018).
43.
Johnson, O.W., Gerber, V., Muhoza, C.: Gender, culture and energy transitions in rural Africa. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, 169–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.11.004.
44.
Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S.P., Urpelainen, J.: The political economy of energy access: Survey evidence from India on state intervention and public opinion. Energy Research & Social Science. 10, 250–258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.006.
45.
Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S.P., Urpelainen, J., ProQuest (Firm): Escaping the energy poverty trap: when and how governments power the lives of the poor. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2018).
46.
Bazilian, M., Nakhooda, S., Van de Graaf, T.: Energy governance and poverty. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, 217–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.006.
47.
Goldthau, A. ed: The handbook of global energy policy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2013).
48.
Halff, A., Sovacool, B.K., Rozhon, J. eds: Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015).
49.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
50.
Listo, R.: Gender myths in energy poverty literature: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Energy Research & Social Science. 38, 9–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.010.
51.
Monyei, C.G., Oyedele, L.O., Akinade, O.O., Ajayi, A.O., Luo, X.J.: Benchmarks for energy access: Policy vagueness and incoherence as barriers to sustainable electrification of the global south. Energy Research & Social Science. 54, 113–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.005.
52.
Osunmuyiwa, O., Ahlborg, H.: Inclusiveness by design? Reviewing sustainable electricity access and entrepreneurship from a gender perspective. Energy Research & Social Science. 53, 145–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.010.
53.
Pueyo, A., Maestre, M.: Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy. Energy Research & Social Science. 53, 170–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.019.
54.
Sharma, V.: Access for adaptation? Reviewing the linkages between energy, disasters, and development in India. Energy Research & Social Science. 52, 10–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.025.
55.
Halff, A., Sovacool, B.K., Rozhon, J. eds: Energy poverty: global challenges and local solutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015).
56.
Winther, T., Ulsrud, K., Saini, A.: Solar powered electricity access: Implications for women’s empowerment in rural Kenya. Energy Research & Social Science. 44, 61–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.017.
57.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
58.
Michael L. Ross: Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics. 53, (2001).
59.
Dannreuther, R.: Energy security. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2017).
60.
Betz, M.R., Partridge, M.D., Farren, M., Lobao, L.: Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics. 50, 105–116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.005.
61.
Paul Collier: The political economy of natural resources.
62.
Douglas, S., Walker, A.: Coal mining and the resource curse in the Eastern United States. Journal of Regional Science. 57, 568–590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12310.
63.
Gochberg, W., Menaldo, V.: The Resource Curse Puzzle Across Four Waves of Work. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B.K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., and Klare, M.T. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. pp. 505–525. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_21.
64.
Ryan Kennedy and Lydia Tiede: Economic Development Assumptions and the Elusive Curse of Oil. International Studies Quarterly. 57, (2013).
65.
Liou, Y.-M., Musgrave, P.: Oil, Autocratic Survival, and the Gendered Resource Curse: When Inefficient Policy Is Politically Expedient. International Studies Quarterly. 60, 440–456 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw021.
66.
Jones Luong, P., Weinthal, E.: Oil is not a curse: ownership structure and institutions in Soviet successor states. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010).
67.
Mitchell, T.: Carbon democracy. Economy and Society. 38, 399–432 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020598.
68.
Review by: Kevin M. Morrison: Review: Whither the Resource Curse? Perspectives on Politics. 11, (2013).
69.
Moses, J.W., Letnes, B.: Managing resource abundance and wealth: the Norwegian experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
70.
Ross, M.L.: The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (2012).
71.
Ross, M.L.: What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse? Annual Review of Political Science. 18, 239–259 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052213-040359.
72.
Rosser, A.: The political economy of the resource curse : a literature survey | Institute of Development Studies, https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/the-political-economy-of-the-resource-curse-a-literature-survey-2/, (2006).
73.
Rudra, N., Jensen, N.M.: Globalization and the Politics of Natural Resources. Comparative Political Studies. 44, 639–661 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011401207.
74.
Nicholas Shaxson: Oil, Corruption and the Resource Curse. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 83, (2007).
75.
Stevens, P., Lahn, G., Kooroshy, J.: The Resource Curse Revisited, https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/resource-curse-revisited.
76.
Torvik, R.: Why do some resource-abundant countries succeed while others do not? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 25, 241–256 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp015.
77.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
78.
Mills, R.: Risky Routes: Energy Transit in the Middle East.
79.
Van de Graaf, T., Colgan, J.D.: Russian gas games or well-oiled conflict? Energy security and the 2014 Ukraine crisis. Energy Research & Social Science. 24, 59–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.018.
80.
Casier, T.: Great Game or Great Confusion: The Geopolitical Understanding of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 21, 763–778 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1185607.
81.
EIA: World Oil Transit Chokepoints, https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.php?RegionTopicID=WOTC.
82.
Judge, A., Maltby, T., Sharples, J.D.: Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics. 21, 751–762 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1222520.
83.
Krickovic, A.: When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU–Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma. Contemporary Security Policy. 36, 3–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1012350.
84.
Le Coq, C., Paltseva, E.: Assessing gas transit risks: Russia vs. the EU. Energy Policy. 42, 642–650 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.037.
85.
Goldthau, A. ed: The handbook of global energy policy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2013).
86.
Omonbude, E.J.: Cross-border oil and gas pipelines and the role of the transit country: Economics, challenges and solutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
87.
Kuzemko, C., Belyi, A.V., Goldthau, A., Keating, M.F.: Dynamics of energy governance in Europe and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
88.
Casier, T., DeBardeleben, J. eds: EU-Russia relations in crisis: understanding diverging perceptions. Routledge, London (2018).
89.
Future energy trends : innovation, markets and geopolitics. , Abu Dhabi, UAE (2015).
90.
Ahmed Siddiky, I.: Towards a new framework for cross-border pipelines: The International Pipeline Agency (IPA). Energy Policy. 39, 5344–5346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.030.
91.
Silvast, A.: Making electricity resilient: risk and security in a liberalized infrastructure. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2017).
92.
Stern, J., Pirani, S., Yafimava, K.: The Russo-Ukrainian gas dispute of January 2009: a comprehensive assessment.
93.
Stulberg, A.N.: Strategic bargaining and pipeline politics: Confronting the credible commitment problem in Eurasian energy transit. Review of International Political Economy. 19, 808–836 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.603662.
94.
Stulberg, A.N.: Natural gas and the Russia-Ukraine crisis: Strategic restraint and the emerging Europe-Eurasia gas network. Energy Research & Social Science. 24, 71–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.017.
95.
Kuzemko, C., Keating, M.F., Goldthau, A.: The global energy challenge: environment, development and security. Palgrave Macmillan Education, London (2016).
96.
Duffield, J.S.: The Return of Energy Insecurity in the Developed Democracies. Contemporary Security Policy. 33, 1–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.659571.
97.
Judge, A., Maltby, T.: European Energy Union? Caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’. European Journal of International Security. 2, 179–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.3.
98.
Brown, M.A., Wang, Y., Sovacool, B.K., D’Agostino, A.L.: Forty years of energy security trends: A comparative assessment of 22 industrialized countries. Energy Research & Social Science. 4, 64–77 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.008.
99.
Cherp, A., Jewell, J.: The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy. 75, 415–421 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005.
100.
Ciută, F.: Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security? Security Dialogue. 41, 123–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610361596.
101.
Heinrich, A.: Securitisation in the Gas Sector: Energy Security Debates Concerning the Example of the Nord Stream Pipeline. In: Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe. pp. 61–91. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_3.
102.
Heinrich, A., Szulecki, K.: Energy Securitisation: Applying the Copenhagen School’s Framework to Energy. In: Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe. pp. 33–59. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_2.
103.
Hofmann, S.C., Staeger, U.: Frame contestation and collective securitisation: the case of EU energy policy. West European Politics. 42, 323–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510197.
104.
Judge, A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K.: Energy Securitisation: Avenues for Future Research. In: Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe. pp. 149–173. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_6.
105.
Kester, J., Sovacool, B.K.: Torn between war and peace: Critiquing the use of war to mobilize peaceful climate action. Energy Policy. 104, 50–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.026.
106.
Kuzemko, C.: Politicising UK energy: what ‘speaking energy security’ can do. Policy & Politics. 42, 259–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655990.
107.
Lis, A.: Politics and Knowledge Production: Between Securitisation and Riskification of the Shale Gas Issue in Poland and Germany. In: Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe. pp. 93–115. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_4.
108.
Meierding, E.: Oil War Narratives: Mad Max and El Dorado. (2019).
109.
Nyman, J.: ‘Red Storm Ahead’: Securitisation of Energy in US–China Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 43–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814525495.
110.
Stoddard, E.: Reconsidering the ontological foundations of international energy affairs: realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security. 22, 437–463 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.775122.
111.
Szulecki, K., Kusznir, J.: Energy Security and Energy Transition: Securitisation in the Electricity Sector. In: Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe. pp. 117–148. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_5.
112.
Wilson, J.D.: A securitisation approach to international energy politics. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, 114–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.024.
113.
A New World: The Geopolitics of Energy Transition, http://geopoliticsofrenewables.org/Report, (2019).
114.
Fischhendler, I., Nathan, D., Boymel, D.: Marketing Renewable Energy through Geopolitics: Solar Farms in Israel. Global Environmental Politics. 15, 98–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00300.
115.
Overland, I.: The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths. Energy Research & Social Science. 49, 36–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018.
116.
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Eyre, N.: Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy. 53, 331–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.
117.
Criekemans, D.: Geopolitics of the Renewable Energy Game and Its Potential Impact upon Global Power Relations. In: Scholten, D. (ed.) The Geopolitics of Renewables. pp. 37–73. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_2.
118.
Fischhendler, I.: The Use of Intangible Benefits for Promoting Contested Policies: The Case of Geopolitical Benefits and the Israeli Gas Policy. Geopolitics. 23, 929–953 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1350842.
119.
Froggatt, A., Levi, M.A.: Climate and Energy Security Policies and Measures: Synergies and Conflicts. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 85, (2009).
120.
Huber, M.: Theorizing Energy Geographies. Geography Compass. 9, 327–338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12214.
121.
Johansson, B.: Security aspects of future renewable energy systems–A short overview. Energy. 61, 598–605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.023.
122.
O’Sullivan, M., Overland, I., Sandalow, D.: 'The Geopolitics of Renewable Energy’, Working paper for the Centre for Energy Policy, at the University of Columbia. (2017).
123.
Paltsev, S.: The complicated geopolitics of renewable energy. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 72, 390–395 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1240476.
124.
Scholten, D., Bosman, R.: The geopolitics of renewables; exploring the political implications of renewable energy systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 103, 273–283 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.014.
125.
Scholten, D., Bosman, R.: The Strategic Realities of the Emerging Energy Game—Conclusion and Reflection. In: Scholten, D. (ed.) The Geopolitics of Renewables. pp. 307–328. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_12.
126.
Smith Stegen, K.: Redrawing the Geopolitical Map: International Relations and Renewable Energies. In: Scholten, D. (ed.) The Geopolitics of Renewables. pp. 75–95. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_3.
127.
Van de Graaf, T.: Battling for a Shrinking Market: Oil Producers, the Renewables Revolution, and the Risk of Stranded Assets. In: Scholten, D. (ed.) The Geopolitics of Renewables. pp. 97–121. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67855-9_4.
128.
Kern, F., Markard, J.: Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B.K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., and Klare, M.T. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. pp. 291–318. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_12.
129.
Tarasova, E.: (Non-) Alternative energy transitions: Examining neoliberal rationality in official nuclear energy discourses of Russia and Poland. Energy Research & Social Science. 41, 128–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.008.
130.
Thombs, R.P.: When democracy meets energy transitions: A typology of social power and energy system scale. Energy Research & Social Science. 52, 159–168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.020.
131.
Araújo, K.: The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, 112–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.002.
132.
Blanchet, T.: Struggle over energy transition in Berlin: How do grassroots initiatives affect local energy policy-making? Energy Policy. 78, 246–254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.001.
133.
Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C.: Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 33, 35–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024.
134.
Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C.: Corrigendum to "Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions” [Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017) 35–48]. Energy Research & Social Science. 42, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.030.
135.
Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C.: Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. 35, 78–93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
136.
Delina, L.L.: Energy democracy in a continuum: Remaking public engagement on energy transitions in Thailand. Energy Research & Social Science. 42, 53–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.008.
137.
Haas, R., Panzer, C., Resch, G., Ragwitz, M., Reece, G., Held, A.: A historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable energy sources in EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15, 1003–1034 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015.
138.
Hess, D.J.: Energy democracy and social movements: A multi-coalition perspective on the politics of sustainability transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 40, 177–189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.003.
139.
Scrase, I., MacKerron, G. eds: Energy for the future: a new agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2009).
140.
Miller, C.A., Richter, J., O’Leary, J.: Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 6, 29–40 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.004.
141.
Miller, C.A., O’Leary, J., Graffy, E., Stechel, E.B., Dirks, G.: Narrative futures and the governance of energy transitions. Futures. 70, 65–74 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.12.001.
142.
Moss, T., Becker, S., Naumann, M.: Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment. 20, 1547–1563 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.
143.
Ratinen, M., Lund, P.D.: Democracy and Transitions: European Experiences of Policy Inclusiveness and Changes in the Electricity Industry. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B.K., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., and Klare, M.T. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. pp. 341–362. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_14.
144.
Stirling, A.: Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Research & Social Science. 1, 83–95 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001.
