[1]
Adam Elga 2001. Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence. Philosophy of Science. 68, 3 (2001).
[2]
Braddon-Mitchell, D. and Nola, R. 2009. Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism. MIT Press.
[3]
BUSSE, R. 2009. Humean Supervenience, Vectorial Fields, and the Spinning Sphere. Dialectica. 63, 4 (Dec. 2009), 449–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01218.x.
[4]
Butterfield, J. 2004. On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. (2004).
[5]
Craig Callender 2001. Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter. Mind. 110, 437 (2001), 25–44.
[6]
David K. Lewis 1968. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy. 65, 5 (1968), 113–126.
[7]
David Lewis A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Samuel Guttenplan, ed. 412–431.
[8]
David Lewis 1979. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs. 13, 4 (1979), 455–476.
[9]
David Lewis 1971. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy. 68, 7 (1971), 203–211.
[10]
David Lewis 1970. How to Define Theoretical Terms. The Journal of Philosophy. 67, 13 (1970), 427–446.
[11]
David Lewis 1994. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind. 103, 412 (1994), 473–490.
[12]
Gideon Rosen 1990. Modal Fictionalism. Mind. 99, 395 (1990), 327–354.
[13]
Grice, H.P. 1957. Meaning. The Philosophical Review. 66, 3 (1957), 377–388.
[14]
Guttenplan, S.D. and NetLibrary, Inc 1995. A companion to the philosophy of mind. Blackwell Publishing.
[15]
Haslanger, S. 1994. Humean supervenience and enduring things. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 72, 3 (Sep. 1994), 339–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412346141.
[16]
Hawley, K. 1999. Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations. Mind. 108, 429 (1999), 53–67.
[17]
Hawthorne, J. 1990. A note on ‘languages and language’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 68, 1 (Mar. 1990), 116–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409012340233.
[18]
Jackson, F. and Priest, G. 2004. Lewisian themes: the philosophy of David K. Lewis. Clarendon Press.
[19]
Leuenberger, S. 2010. Humility and constraints on O-language. Philosophical Studies. 149, 3 (Jul. 2010), 327–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9352-3.
[20]
Lewis, D. 1979. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. The Philosophical Review. 88, 4 (1979), 513–543.
[21]
Lewis, D. 1992. Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 70, 1 (Mar. 1992), 106–110. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408112340093.
[22]
Lewis, D. 1983. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 61, 4 (Dec. 1983), 343–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131.
[23]
Lewis, D. 1983. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 61, 4 (Dec. 1983), 343–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408312341131.
[24]
Lewis, D. 1990. Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell.
[25]
Lewis, D. 1984. Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 62, 3 (Sep. 1984), 221–236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408412340013.
[26]
Lewis, D. 1974. Radical interpretation. Synthese. 27, 3–4 (1974), 331–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484599.
[27]
Lewis, D. 1983. Survival and Identity. Philosophical papers: Volume 1. Oxford University Press. 55–72.
[28]
Lewis, D. 1999. Zimmerman and the spinning sphere. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 77, 2 (Jun. 1999), 209–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409912348951.
[29]
Lewis, D.K. 1969. Convention: a philosophical study. Harvard University Press.
[30]
Lewis, D.K. 1969. Convention: a philosophical study. Harvard University Press.
[31]
Lewis, D.K. 1973. Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell.
[32]
Lewis, D.K. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell.
[33]
Lewis, D.K. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Basil Blackwell.
[34]
Lewis, D.K. 2000. Papers in ethics and social philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
[35]
Lewis, D.K. 1999. Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
[36]
Lewis, D.K. 1998. Papers in philosophical logic. Cambridge University Press.
[37]
Lewis, D.K. 1983. Philosophical papers. Oxford University Press.
[38]
Lewis, D.K. and Oxford University Press 1987. Philosophical papers: Volume 2. Oxford University Press.
[39]
Loewer, Barry Humean Supervenience. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics. 24, 1.
[40]
Meixner, U. 2006. David Lewis. Mentis.
[41]
Nolan, D.P. 2005. David Lewis. Acumen.
[42]
O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. 1993. Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 71, 2 (Jun. 1993), 206–211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345212.
[43]
Preyer, G. and Siebelt, F. 2001. Reality and Humean supervenience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[44]
Robinson, D. 1989. Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 67, 4 (Dec. 1989), 394–409. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408912343921.
[45]
Schaffer, J. 2004. Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis. 64, 4 (Oct. 2004), 299–309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.4.299.
[46]
Schwarz, W. 2009. David Lewis: Metaphysik und Analyse. Mentis.
[47]
Stephan Leuenberger 2006. A New Problem of Descriptive Power. The Journal of Philosophy. 103, 3 (2006), 145–162.
[48]
Theodore Sider 2002. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy. 99, 6 (2002), 279–315.
[49]
Tooley, M. In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics. 16, 1.
[50]
Willard V. Quine 1948. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics. 2, 5 (1948), 21–38.
[51]
Zimmerman, D.W. 1999. One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 77, 2 (Jun. 1999), 213–215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409912348961.
[52]
Zimmerman, D.W. 1998. Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 76, 2 (Jun. 1998), 265–288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409812348401.
[53]
HumeanSupervenience.pdf.
[54]
Languages and Language - Oxford Scholarship.
