1.
Lewis DK, Oxford University Press. Philosophical Papers: Volume 2. Oxford University Press; 1987. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
2.
David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind. 1994;103(412):473-490. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
3.
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1983;61(4):343-377. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
4.
David Lewis. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs. 1979;13(4):455-476. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215339
5.
Lewis D. Survival and Identity. In: Philosophical Papers: Volume 1. Oxford University Press; 1983:55-72. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0005
6.
HumeanSupervenience.pdf. http://brian.weatherson.org/HumeanSupervenience.pdf
7.
Loewer, Barry. Humean Supervenience. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics. 24(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1294810875/C2A7DAAE6A7E4EB6PQ/5?accountid=14540
8.
Schaffer J. Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis. 2004;64(4):299-309. doi:10.1093/analys/64.4.299
9.
Adam Elga. Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence. Philosophy of Science. 2001;68(3). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080955
10.
Lewis DK. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press; 1969. http://gla.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=876856
11.
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1983;61(4):343-377. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
12.
Lewis D. Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1984;62(3):221-236. doi:10.1080/00048408412340013
13.
David Lewis. How to Define Theoretical Terms. The Journal of Philosophy. 1970;67(13):427-446. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2023861
14.
Lewis D. Radical interpretation. Synthese. 1974;27(3-4):331-344. doi:10.1007/BF00484599
15.
Languages and Language - Oxford Scholarship. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.1093/0195032047.001.0001/acprof-9780195032048-chapter-11
16.
Lewis D. Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1992;70(1):106-110. doi:10.1080/00048408112340093
17.
Guttenplan SD, NetLibrary, Inc. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Vol Blackwell companions to philosophy. Blackwell Publishing; 1995. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=44696
18.
Hawthorne J. A note on ‘languages and language’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1990;68(1):116-118. doi:10.1080/00048409012340233
19.
O’Leary-Hawthorne J. Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1993;71(2):206-211. doi:10.1080/00048409312345212
20.
Ramseyan Humility. http://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.001.0001/upso-9780262012560-chapter-9
21.
Leuenberger S. Humility and constraints on O-language. Philosophical Studies. 2010;149(3):327-354. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9352-3
22.
David Lewis. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. In: Samuel Guttenplan, ed. ; :412-431. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=44696&site=ehost-live
23.
Grice HP. Meaning. The Philosophical Review. 1957;66(3):377-388. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2182440
24.
Lewis D. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. The Philosophical Review. 1979;88(4):513-543. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184843
25.
Lewis DK. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell; 1986.
26.
David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy. 1968;65(5):113-126. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555
27.
David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy. 1971;68(7):203-211. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902
28.
Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind. 1990;99(395):327-354. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102
29.
Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy. 2002;99(6):279-315. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585
30.
Stephan Leuenberger. A New Problem of Descriptive Power. The Journal of Philosophy. 2006;103(3):145-162. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655756
31.
Willard V. Quine. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics. 1948;2(5):21-38. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
32.
Lewis D. Zimmerman and the spinning sphere. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1999;77(2):209-212. doi:10.1080/00048409912348951
33.
Zimmerman DW. One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1999;77(2):213-215. doi:10.1080/00048409912348961
34.
Robinson D. Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1989;67(4):394-409. doi:10.1080/00048408912343921
35.
Haslanger S. Humean supervenience and enduring things. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1994;72(3):339-359. doi:10.1080/00048409412346141
36.
Zimmerman DW. Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1998;76(2):265-288. doi:10.1080/00048409812348401
37.
Butterfield J. On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. Published online 2004. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2381/1/DiscsJul051.pdf
38.
Tooley M. In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics. 16(1). http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1294987228/3CE840A7A4934503PQ/10?accountid=14540
39.
BUSSE R. Humean Supervenience, Vectorial Fields, and the Spinning Sphere. Dialectica. 2009;63(4):449-489. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01218.x
40.
Craig Callender. Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter. Mind. 2001;110(437):25-44. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659829
41.
Hawley K. Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations. Mind. 1999;108(429):53-67. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659902
42.
Lewis DK. Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press; 1983.
43.
Lewis DK. Papers in Philosophical Logic. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
44.
Lewis DK. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
45.
Lewis DK. Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Vol Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
46.
Lewis DK. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press; 1969.
47.
Lewis DK. Counterfactuals. Vol Library of philosophy and logic. Basil Blackwell; 1973.
48.
Lewis DK. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell; 1986.
49.
Lewis D. Parts of Classes. Basil Blackwell; 1990.
50.
Preyer G, Siebelt F. Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis. Vol Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2001.
51.
Jackson F, Priest G. Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Clarendon Press; 2004.
52.
Schwarz W. David Lewis: Metaphysik Und Analyse. Mentis; 2009.
53.
Nolan DP. David Lewis. Vol Philosophy now. Acumen; 2005.
54.
Meixner U. David Lewis. Vol NachGedacht-Moderne Klassiker. Mentis; 2006.
55.
Braddon-Mitchell D, Nola R. Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press; 2009.
