1
Lewis DK, Oxford University Press. Philosophical papers: Volume 2. New York: : Oxford University Press 1987. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
2
David Lewis. Humean Supervenience Debugged. Mind 1994;103:473–90.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
3
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983;61:343–77. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
4
David Lewis. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. Noûs 1979;13:455–76.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215339
5
Lewis D. Survival and Identity. In: Philosophical papers: Volume 1. New York: : Oxford University Press 1983. 55–72.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0005
6
HumeanSupervenience.pdf. http://brian.weatherson.org/HumeanSupervenience.pdf
7
Loewer, Barry. Humean Supervenience. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics;24.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1294810875/C2A7DAAE6A7E4EB6PQ/5?accountid=14540
8
Schaffer J. Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis 2004;64:299–309. doi:10.1093/analys/64.4.299
9
Adam Elga. Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence. Philosophy of Science 2001;68.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080955
10
Lewis DK. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1969. http://gla.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=876856
11
Lewis D. New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983;61:343–77. doi:10.1080/00048408312341131
12
Lewis D. Putnam’s paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1984;62:221–36. doi:10.1080/00048408412340013
13
David Lewis. How to Define Theoretical Terms. The Journal of Philosophy 1970;67:427–46.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2023861
14
Lewis D. Radical interpretation. Synthese 1974;27:331–44. doi:10.1007/BF00484599
15
Languages and Language - Oxford Scholarship. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.1093/0195032047.001.0001/acprof-9780195032048-chapter-11
16
Lewis D. Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1992;70:106–10. doi:10.1080/00048408112340093
17
Guttenplan SD, NetLibrary, Inc. A companion to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 1995. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=44696
18
Hawthorne J. A note on ‘languages and language’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1990;68:116–8. doi:10.1080/00048409012340233
19
O’Leary-Hawthorne J. Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1993;71:206–11. doi:10.1080/00048409312345212
20
Ramseyan Humility. http://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.001.0001/upso-9780262012560-chapter-9
21
Leuenberger S. Humility and constraints on O-language. Philosophical Studies 2010;149:327–54. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9352-3
22
David Lewis. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. In: Samuel Guttenplan, ed. .412–31.http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=44696&site=ehost-live
23
Grice HP. Meaning. The Philosophical Review 1957;66:377–88.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2182440
24
Lewis D. Attitudes De Dicto and De Se. The Philosophical Review 1979;88:513–43.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184843
25
Lewis DK. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
26
David K. Lewis. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. The Journal of Philosophy 1968;65:113–26.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555
27
David Lewis. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy 1971;68:203–11.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902
28
Gideon Rosen. Modal Fictionalism. Mind 1990;99:327–54.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102
29
Theodore Sider. The Ersatz Pluriverse. The Journal of Philosophy 2002;99:279–315.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585
30
Stephan Leuenberger. A New Problem of Descriptive Power. The Journal of Philosophy 2006;103:145–62.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655756
31
Willard V. Quine. On What There Is. The Review of Metaphysics 1948;2:21–38.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
32
Lewis D. Zimmerman and the spinning sphere. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1999;77:209–12. doi:10.1080/00048409912348951
33
Zimmerman DW. One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1999;77:213–5. doi:10.1080/00048409912348961
34
Robinson D. Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1989;67:394–409. doi:10.1080/00048408912343921
35
Haslanger S. Humean supervenience and enduring things. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1994;72:339–59. doi:10.1080/00048409412346141
36
Zimmerman DW. Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1998;76:265–88. doi:10.1080/00048409812348401
37
Butterfield J. On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter. Published Online First: 2004.http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2381/1/DiscsJul051.pdf
38
Tooley M. In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion. Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics;16.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1294987228/3CE840A7A4934503PQ/10?accountid=14540
39
BUSSE R. Humean Supervenience, Vectorial Fields, and the Spinning Sphere. Dialectica 2009;63:449–89. doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01218.x
40
Craig Callender. Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter. Mind 2001;110:25–44.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659829
41
Hawley K. Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations. Mind 1999;108:53–67.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659902
42
Lewis DK. Philosophical papers. New York: : Oxford University Press 1983.
43
Lewis DK. Papers in philosophical logic. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
44
Lewis DK. Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
45
Lewis DK. Papers in ethics and social philosophy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
46
Lewis DK. Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1969.
47
Lewis DK. Counterfactuals. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1973.
48
Lewis DK. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1986.
49
Lewis D. Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell 1990.
50
Preyer G, Siebelt F. Reality and Humean supervenience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis. Lanham, Md: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2001.
51
Jackson F, Priest G. Lewisian themes: the philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 2004.
52
Schwarz W. David Lewis: Metaphysik und Analyse. Paderborn: : Mentis 2009.
53
Nolan DP. David Lewis. Chesham: : Acumen 2005.
54
Meixner U. David Lewis. Paderborn: : Mentis 2006.
55
Braddon-Mitchell D, Nola R. Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2009.
