[1]
D. K. Lewis and Oxford University Press, Philosophical papers: Volume 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
[2]
David Lewis, ‘Humean Supervenience Debugged’, Mind, vol. 103, no. 412, pp. 473–490, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254396
[3]
D. Lewis, ‘New work for a theory of universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 343–377, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1080/00048408312341131.
[4]
David Lewis, ‘Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow’, Noûs, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 455–476, 1979 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215339
[5]
D. Lewis, ‘Survival and Identity’, in Philosophical papers: Volume 1, New York: Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 55–72 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.003.0005
[6]
‘HumeanSupervenience.pdf’. [Online]. Available: http://brian.weatherson.org/HumeanSupervenience.pdf
[7]
Loewer, Barry, ‘Humean Supervenience’, Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics, vol. 24, no. 1 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1294810875/C2A7DAAE6A7E4EB6PQ/5?accountid=14540
[8]
J. Schaffer, ‘Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity’, Analysis, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 299–309, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1093/analys/64.4.299.
[9]
Adam Elga, ‘Statistical Mechanics and the Asymmetry of Counterfactual Dependence’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 68, no. 3, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080955
[10]
D. K. Lewis, Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1969 [Online]. Available: http://gla.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=876856
[11]
D. Lewis, ‘New work for a theory of universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 343–377, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1080/00048408312341131.
[12]
D. Lewis, ‘Putnam’s paradox’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 221–236, Sep. 1984, doi: 10.1080/00048408412340013.
[13]
David Lewis, ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 427–446, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2023861
[14]
D. Lewis, ‘Radical interpretation’, Synthese, vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 331–344, 1974, doi: 10.1007/BF00484599.
[15]
‘Languages and Language - Oxford Scholarship’, [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.1093/0195032047.001.0001/acprof-9780195032048-chapter-11
[16]
D. Lewis, ‘Meaning without use: Reply to Hawthorne’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 106–110, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1080/00048408112340093.
[17]
S. D. Guttenplan and NetLibrary, Inc, A companion to the philosophy of mind, vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.netLibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=44696
[18]
J. Hawthorne, ‘A note on “languages and language”’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 116–118, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.1080/00048409012340233.
[19]
J. O’Leary-Hawthorne, ‘Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 206–211, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1080/00048409312345212.
[20]
‘Ramseyan Humility’, [Online]. Available: http://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012560.001.0001/upso-9780262012560-chapter-9
[21]
S. Leuenberger, ‘Humility and constraints on O-language’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 327–354, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11098-009-9352-3.
[22]
David Lewis, ‘A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind’, Samuel Guttenplan, Ed. pp. 412–431 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=44696&site=ehost-live
[23]
H. P. Grice, ‘Meaning’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 377–388, 1957 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2182440
[24]
D. Lewis, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 513–543, 1979 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184843
[25]
D. K. Lewis, On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
[26]
David K. Lewis, ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 113–126, 1968 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024555
[27]
David Lewis, ‘Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 203–211, 1971 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2024902
[28]
Gideon Rosen, ‘Modal Fictionalism’, Mind, vol. 99, no. 395, pp. 327–354, 1990 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2255102
[29]
Theodore Sider, ‘The Ersatz Pluriverse’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 279–315, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655585
[30]
Stephan Leuenberger, ‘A New Problem of Descriptive Power’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 145–162, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655756
[31]
Willard V. Quine, ‘On What There Is’, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 21–38, 1948 [Online]. Available: https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123117
[32]
D. Lewis, ‘Zimmerman and the spinning sphere’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 209–212, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1080/00048409912348951.
[33]
D. W. Zimmerman, ‘One really big liquid sphere: Reply to Lewis’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 213–215, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1080/00048409912348961.
[34]
D. Robinson, ‘Matter, motion, and Humean supervenience’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 394–409, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.1080/00048408912343921.
[35]
S. Haslanger, ‘Humean supervenience and enduring things’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 339–359, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.1080/00048409412346141.
[36]
D. W. Zimmerman, ‘Temporal parts and supervenient causation: The incompatibility of two Humean doctrines’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 265–288, Jun. 1998, doi: 10.1080/00048409812348401.
[37]
J. Butterfield, ‘On the Persistence of Homogeneous Matter’, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/2381/1/DiscsJul051.pdf
[38]
M. Tooley, ‘In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion’, Philosophical TopicsSouthwestern Journal of Philosophy (1970-1980);Philosophical Topics, vol. 16, no. 1 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1294987228/3CE840A7A4934503PQ/10?accountid=14540
[39]
R. BUSSE, ‘Humean Supervenience, Vectorial Fields, and the Spinning Sphere’, Dialectica, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 449–489, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01218.x.
[40]
Craig Callender, ‘Humean Supervenience and Rotating Homogeneous Matter’, Mind, vol. 110, no. 437, pp. 25–44, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659829
[41]
K. Hawley, ‘Persistence and Non-Supervenient Relations’, Mind, vol. 108, no. 429, pp. 53–67, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659902
[42]
D. K. Lewis, Philosophical papers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
[43]
D. K. Lewis, Papers in philosophical logic, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[44]
D. K. Lewis, Papers in metaphysics and epistemology, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[45]
D. K. Lewis, Papers in ethics and social philosophy, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[46]
D. K. Lewis, Convention: a philosophical study. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1969.
[47]
D. K. Lewis, Counterfactuals, vol. Library of philosophy and logic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973.
[48]
D. K. Lewis, On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
[49]
D. Lewis, Parts of classes. Basil Blackwell, 1990.
[50]
G. Preyer and F. Siebelt, Reality and Humean supervenience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis, vol. Studies in epistemology and cognitive theory. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2001.
[51]
F. Jackson and G. Priest, Lewisian themes: the philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.
[52]
W. Schwarz, David Lewis: Metaphysik und Analyse. Paderborn: Mentis, 2009.
[53]
D. P. Nolan, David Lewis, vol. Philosophy now. Chesham: Acumen, 2005.
[54]
U. Meixner, David Lewis, vol. NachGedacht-Moderne Klassiker. Paderborn: Mentis, 2006.
[55]
D. Braddon-Mitchell and R. Nola, Conceptual analysis and philosophical naturalism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009.
