1.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
2.
Re D (A Minor) [1976] 2 W.L.R. 279. *185 In Re D. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)(17AD).
3.
Re B (a Minor) [1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213. *199 In Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)
4.
Margaret Patricia Briody v St Helen’s & Knowsley Area Health Authority 2001 WL 676777.(29AD).
5.
Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others(25AD).
6.
EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006).
7.
R (on the Application of IM, MM) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2015] EWHC 1706 (Admin). The Queen (on the application of IM, MM) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority(15AD).
8.
H v Austria (57813/00). H v Austria (57813/00)(3AD).
9.
Council of Europe: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
10.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
11.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
12.
Eijkholt M. The Right To Found A Family As A Stillborn Right To Procreate? Medical Law Review. 2010;18(2):127-151. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwq013
13.
Hugh Lafollette. Licensing Parents. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1980;9(2):182-197. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265111
14.
Mulligan A. Reproductive rights under article 8: the right to respect for the decision to become or not to become a parent E.H.R.L.R. European Human Rights Law Review. 2014;4:378-387. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIE00210F021B011E4A575BB3329EF9E75%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
15.
LaFOLLETTE H. Licensing Parents Revisited. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2010;27(4):327-343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00497.x
16.
Priaulx N. Rethinking Progenitive Conflict: Why Reproductive Autonomy Matters. Medical Law Review. 2008;16(2):169-200. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn009
17.
Parker M. The best possible child. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2007;33(5):279-283. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018176
18.
Robertson JA. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton University Press; 1994.
19.
Birk D. Human Fertilisation and Embryology: The New Law. Vol New law series. Family Law; 2009.
20.
Burns S. The Law of Assisted Reproduction. Bloomsbury Professional; 2012.
21.
Scherpe JM. MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION: THIS MARGIN NEEDS TO BE APPRECIATED. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012;71(02):276-279. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000463
22.
Storrow R. SH v Austria denies infertile Europeans human rights - BioNews. Published online 2012. http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_117832.asp
23.
Warnock M. Making Babies: Is There a Right to Have Children? Oxford University Press; 2002.
24.
Quigley M. A Right to Reproduce? Bioethics. 2010;24(8):403-411. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00722.x
25.
Harris J, Holm S, MyiLibrary. The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice and Regulation. Vol Issues in biomedical ethics. Clarendon Press; 1998. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=80723&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
26.
McGuinness S. Health, Human Rights and the Regulation of Reproductive Technologies in S.H. And Others V Austria (Application No. 57813/00). Medical Law Review. 2013;21(1):146-160. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwt003
27.
Farrell AM, Dove ES, Laurie GT, Mason JK. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. Twelfth edition. Oxford University Press; 2023. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192866226.001.0001
28.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
29.
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Ex Parte Blood [1999] Fam. 151. *151 Regina v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority,(6AD).
30.
5/FD02P00895High Court of Justice Queens Bench Division26 February 2003Before: The President Wednesday 26th February, 2003, Hearing dates : 20th, 21st and 22nd January 2003Crown copyright. The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v A & Others Case [2003] EWHC 259(QB). The L Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr A, Mrs A, YA, ZA (By their Litigation Friend, The Official Solicitor), The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Mr B, Mrs B(26AD).
31.
Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others(25AD).
32.
Case of Evans v The United Kingdom - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006).(7AD).
33.
Dickson v The United Kingdom - 44362/04 [2006] ECHR 430 (18 April 2006).
34.
Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2009] 3 WLR 118 (CA).
35.
A (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Re [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam); A (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Re(11AD).
36.
R (on the Application of M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 611. R. (on the application of M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority(30AD).
37.
R (Ex p. Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept, April 2001 (CA). R. (on the application of Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
38.
R v Ethical Committee of St. Mary’s Hospital (Manchester), Ex p. Harriot [1988] FLR 512.
39.
R v Sheffield Health Authority, Ex Parte Seale (1994) 25 BMLR 1. 25
40.
Thompson v Sheffield Fertility Clinic (QBD) 2000 WL 33148917. *1 Patricia Thompson v Sheffield Fertility Clinic(24AD).
41.
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR, Thorpe and Buxton LJJ 2002 Jan 16; 18(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. R (Ex p. Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCA Civ 29. *628 Regina (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health
42.
R v HFEA, (Ex p. Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre and H) [2002] EWCA Civ 20. The Queen on the Application of Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre, "H” v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority(31AD).
43.
Mrs U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] EWCA Civ 565. Mrs U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine(24AD).
44.
Attorney General’s Reference 2 of 2003 [2004] 1 WLR 2062.(1AD).
45.
Rose and Another v Secretary of State for Health, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2002]EWHC 1593 (ADMIN). Rose and another v Secretary of State for Health, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority(26AD).
46.
L v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Secretary of State for Health - [2008] EWHC 2149 (Fam).
47.
G (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 729 (Fam), [2016] 4 WLR 65.
48.
Re E (Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Also Known as: AB v CD, [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam) Official Transcript on Westlaw.
49.
Holdich v Lothian Health Board [2013] CSOH 197; 2014 S.L.T. 495; Court of Session (Outer House).
50.
R (on the Application of AB) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2014] EWHC 1528 (Admin).
51.
Warren v Care Fertility (Northampton) Ltd [2014] EWHC 602 (Fam.
52.
In the Matter of HFEA 2008 (Cases A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H Declaration of Parentage) [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam). Family Law Week
53.
X v St Bartholomew’s Hospital Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2015] EWFC 13; [2015].
54.
Parrillo v Italy (Application No.46470/11), Grand Chamber Judgment [2015] ECHR 755, (2016) 62 EHRR 8, 27 August 2015.
55.
M (Human Fertilisation Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 1572 (Fam).
56.
Jefferies v BMI Healthcare Ltd - Case Analysis - EWHC 2493 (Fam); [2016] Med. L.R. 656 (Fam Div).
57.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
58.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
59.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/
60.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015/572.
61.
Alghrani A, Harris J. Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated? Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2006;18(2):157-306. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq18&size=2&collection=journals&id=195
62.
Walker SEP. Potential persons and the welfare of the (potential) child test. Medical Law International. 2014;14(3):157-171. doi:10.1177/0968533214550117
63.
Sheldon S, Lee E, Macvarish J. ‘Supportive Parenting’, Responsibility and Regulation: The Welfare Assessment under the Reformed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990). The Modern Law Review. 2015;78(3):461-492. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12124
64.
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (March 2005) ‘Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law’, 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf
65.
Laing JA. Artificial Reproduction, the ‘Welfare Principle’, and the Common Good. Medical Law Review. 2005;13(3):328-356. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi022
66.
Clarke V. Men Not Included? Journal of GLBT Family Studies. 2007;3(4):309-349. doi:10.1300/J461v03n04_01
67.
Fenton RA. Time for change (1). The New Law Journal. 15AD;157(7277). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P01-5BK0-TWWR-G0BY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
68.
Fenton RA. Time for change (2). The New Law Journal. 6AD;157(7280). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P4F-J1B0-TWWR-G0V2-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
69.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/
70.
Parental status ‘lost to incompetence in IVF sector’ - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34222268
71.
NHS IVF services to be fairer and faster | Scottish Government | Official Press Release. http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-1.nsf/0/254AEB4F6E6547BB80257B6D0021AA82?OpenDocument
72.
Can I get IVF treatment on the NHS? - Health questions - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/889.aspx
73.
65-year-old woman’s IVF pregnancy branded irresponsible and inadvisable | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/15/german-politicians-criticise-65-annegret-raunigk-pregnant-quadruplets
74.
German woman Annegret Raunigk, 65, has quadruplets - media - BBC News. Published 23 May 2015. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32857398
75.
Is this Wales’ oldest IVF dad? Malcolm, 67, fathers daughter with wife, 31 - Wales Online. Published 26 March 2013. http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/wales-oldest-ivf-dad-malcolm-2031950
76.
Callus T. Ensuring Operational Compliance and Ethical Responsibility in the Regulation of ART: The HFEA, Past, Present, and Future. Law, Innovation and Technology. 2011;3(1):85-111. doi:10.5235/175799611796399858
77.
Black G. When is a Parent not a Parent? CS v KS and JS and the Question of Genetic Parentage or Social Parenting. Edinburgh Law Review. 2015;19(2):263-268. doi:10.3366/elr.2015.0279
78.
Embryo donation: in vitro fertilisation - scientific research. European Human Rights Law Review. 2015;(6):656-661. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI534B357099E011E5AEE9D7053076D9EE%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
79.
ESHRE First live birth after transplantation of ovarian tissue removed and frozen during childhood 10 June 2015. Published 10AD. https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Press-releases-2015/Live-birth-after-ovarian-freezing
80.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. Medical Frontiers: Debating mitochondria replacement. Published 2013. https://sciencewise.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Mito-Annex_V-open_consultation_meetings.pdf
81.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. What you can find out about your child’s donor - HFEA. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/118.html
82.
Two health regulators spared axe but face efficiency review | Society | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/25/two-health-regulators-spared-axe
83.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
84.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
85.
Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 c. 49.
86.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
87.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
88.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010/985.
89.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2062/2017-10-02-code-of-practice-8th-edition-full-version-11th-revision-final-clean.pdf
90.
Warnock M, Department of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee. Report of the Committee of inquiry into human fertilisation & embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock.Dept of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee: Report of the Committee of inquiry into human fertilisation & embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/docview/t70.d75.1983-077555?accountid=14540
91.
Brazier M, Campbell A, Golombok S. Surrogacy: Review for Health Ministers of Current Arrangements for Payments and Regulation : Report of the Review Team. Vol Cm. Stationery Office; 1998.
92.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
93.
Re C [1985] FLR 846.(1985).
94.
Re an Adoption Application (Surrogacy). All England Law Reports 2(1987).
95.
Re an Adoption Application (Surrogacy) [1987] 2 All ER 826. *81 In Re Adoption Application (Payment for Adoption)
96.
Re C (A Child) [2002] EWHC 157 (Fam Div).
97.
Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). 1(2008).
98.
*Re X and another (Foreign Surrogacy) , [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). All England Reporter. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/7VK4-48H0-Y96Y-H32V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
99.
Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam). 1(2009).
100.
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam). 1(2007).
101.
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam).
102.
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam). 1(2007).
103.
Re L (a Minor) [2010] EWHC 3146 (Fam).
104.
Re IJ (a Child) [2011] EWHC 921 (Fam).
105.
A & Anor v P & Ors [2011] EWHC 1738 (Fam).
106.
Re T (a Child)( Surrogacy: Residence Order) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam).
107.
Briody v St Helen’s and Knowsley Area Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010.
108.
K (Minors: Foreign Surrogacy) [2010] EWHC 1180 (Fam)-.
109.
G v G [2012] EWHC 1979 (Fam).
110.
CC v DD [2014] EWHC 1307 (Fam).
111.
A & B v X & Y & Ors [2015] EWHC 2080 (Fam) - Field Court Chambers.
112.
H v S (Surrogacy Agreement) [2015] EWFC 36.
113.
Horsey K, Sheldon S. Still hazy after all these years: the law regulating surrogacy. Medical Law Review. 2012;20(1):67-89. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwr039
114.
The Hague, ‘A preliminary report on the issues arising from international surrogacy arrangements’ April 2012. https://assets.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2012pd10en.pdf
115.
Beaumont P, Trimmings K. Regulating international surrogacy arrangements. International Family Law Journal. 2012;(1):1-134. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9673682e-e18d-4bfc-a7f8-08aa5691c866/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
116.
Hutchinson AM, Khan H. International Surrogacy Arrangements: Time for a Multi-lateral Convention? International Family Law Journal. 2011;(4):263-360. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cdd3bb72-6e96-48e1-9b66-c4f2bbccf156/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
117.
Horsey K. Challenging presumptions: legal parenthood and surrogacy arrangements. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2010;22(4):377-520. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/uk?identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
118.
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Revolution or Evolution? Family law. 2009;39(8):649-776. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/b3a5b9eb-63a5-4493-9fc7-f442e4aeb64c/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
119.
Ramsey J. Fit for the 21st Century? A Review of Surrogacy Provisions within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Medical Law International. 2006;7(4):281-307. doi:10.1177/096853320600700401
120.
Ramsey J. Paying for Reproduction – The Case Against Paid Surrogacy. The Juridical review. 2006;(4):325-349.
121.
McLachlan HV, Swales JK. Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood. Health Care Analysis. 2000;8(1):1-18. doi:10.1023/A:1009494710517
122.
Anderson ES. Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales. Health Care Analysis. 2000;8(1):19-26. doi:10.1023/A:1009477906883
123.
Freeman M. Does surrogacy have a future after Brazier? Medical Law Review. 1999;7(1):1-20. doi:10.1093/medlaw/7.1.1
124.
McLean S. Legal Issues in Human Reproduction. Vol Medico-legal series. Dartmouth/Gower; 1989.
125.
Gamble N. Surrogacy: creating a sensible national and international legal framework. International Family Law. 2012;(3):257-366. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cb91e83a-0c94-4804-a39f-d87f3345c7f1/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
126.
Gamble N. International surrogacy law conference in Las Vegas, October 2011. Family Law. 2012;42(2):115-248. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/f2e81c12-8d6a-48b6-bae0-ba48e01466c3/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
127.
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. International Surrogacy: Payments, Public Policy and Media Hype. Family law. 2011;41(5):445-558. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/22882172-90ad-4b99-ad15-1ea0404ce6c7/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
128.
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. Lesbian Mothers in Dispute: T v B. Family law. 2010;40(11):1153-1248. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9a0344b1-8efc-43a8-b4f4-b97746015621/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
129.
Finnerty S. Who profits from international surrogacy? The legal and bioethical ramifications of international surrogacy. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland. 2015;21(2):83-87. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIEB093FD0A98311E5A3FC839483A8C718%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
130.
Blyth E. Parental Orders and identity registration: one country three systems. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2010;32(4):345-352. doi:10.1080/09649069.2010.539353
131.
Wilkinson S. The exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy. Bioethics. 2003;17(2):169-187. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00331
132.
Jackson E. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology, and Autonomy. Hart Pub; 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html
133.
British Medical Association. Changing Conceptions of Motherhood: The Practice of Surrogacy in Britain. BMA; 1996.
134.
Cutas D, Chan S, eds. Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Vol Science, Ethics and Society. Paperback edition. Bloomsbury Academic; 2014.
135.
Ramskold LAH, Posner MP. Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(6):397-402. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100527
136.
Leading cases - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases
137.
Childlessness Overcome Through Surrogacy (COTS). http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
138.
Gamble and Ghevaert LLP – Fertility and Parenting Law Specialists. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre
139.
Leading cases - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases
140.
Register a birth - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/register-birth/overview
141.
Home Office UK Border Agency Website, ‘Inter-Country Surrogacy and the Immigration Rules’ Inter- Country Surrogacy Leaflet (October 2009). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261435/Intercountry-surrogacy-leaflet.pdf
142.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Surrogacy Overseas. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/477720/new_1.pdf
143.
In the matter of Z (A Child) - Parental Order and Single. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/re-z-20160520.pdf
144.
Knowledge centre - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre?root_level_topic=surrogacy
145.
J v G (Parental Orders) [2013] EWHC 1432 (Fam). Family law reports. 2013;1. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/8405b1cf-33a4-4e80-9d6a-9920d2a35b1b/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
146.
Home - Brilliant Beginnings. http://www.brilliantbeginnings.co.uk/
147.
Another thought - womb transplants as a future.
148.
BBC Four - House of Surrogates. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c591s
149.
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (2005) Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1, 14th March 2005. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf
150.
Great Britain. Department of Health. Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: a public consultation. Published online 2005. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_4123863
151.
Department of Health (December 2006) Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act – Proposals for revised legislation. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_073065.pdf
152.
Consultation report on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010, Department of Health, January 2010. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_111659
153.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010/985.
154.
Maternity leave rights to be introduced for parents through surrogacy’ NatalieGamble Associates (2012) - Blog - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/blog/2012/11/15/maternity-leave-rights-to-be-introduced-for-parents-through-surrogacy/
155.
Modern workplaces consultation - government response. Published 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-workplaces-consultation-government-response--2
156.
R (Ex p. John Smeaton on Behalf of Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) v The Secretary of State for Health, Schering Health Care Limited, Family Planning Association 18 April 2002 QBD (Admin Ct) [2002] EWHC 610.
157.
R v Sec of State for Health and FPA, Ex p Axon [2006] EWCA 37.
158.
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] 3 WLR 830 (HL).
159.
A Local Authority v Mrs A & Mr B [2010] EWHC 1549.
160.
Sheldon S. The regulatory cliff edge between contraception and abortion: the legal and moral significance of implantation. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015;41(9):762-765. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102712
161.
Bridgeman J. Young people and sexual health: whose rights? Whose responsibilities? Medical Law Review. 2006;14(3):418-424. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl014
162.
Scheiwe K. Between autonomy and dependency: minors’ rights to decide on matters of sexuality, reproduction, marriage, and parenthood. Problems and the state of debate - an introduction. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2004;18(3):262-282. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI29059EC0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
163.
Chalmers J. Regulating adolescent sexuality: English and Scottish approaches compared. Child and family law quarterly. 2011;23(4):429-546. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/c2cc6afe-3cba-4a5e-be83-4c4aa1cbbf87/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
164.
Mason JK. Medico-Legal Aspects of Reproduction and Parenthood. Vol Medico-legal series. 2nd ed. Dartmouth; 1998.
165.
Kennedy I. Treat Me Right: Essays in Medical Law and Ethics. Clarendon Press; 1988.
166.
Keown J. ‘Morning after’ pills, ‘miscarriage’ and muddle. Legal Studies. 2005;25(2):296-319. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00616.x
167.
Smith JC, Tausz D. Morning-after pill: whether prescription, supply, administration or use of contraceptive pills involving commission of any offences. Criminal Law Review. Published online 2002:664-666. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI78EF5EB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
168.
Robertson JA. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton University Press; 1994.
169.
Dworkin R. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. HarperCollins; 1993.
170.
Glover J. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Vol Penguin philosophy. Penguin; 1990.
171.
Harris J, Dawson Books. The Value of Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1985. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203005606
172.
Lockwood M. Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine. Vol Studies in bioethics. Oxford University Press; 1985.
173.
Department of Health, ‘Best practice guidance for doctors and other health professionals on the provision of advice and treatment to young people under 16 on contraception, sexual and reproductive health’ (July 2004). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4086960
174.
0-18 years: guidance for all doctors. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/0-18-years
175.
Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 c. 50.
176.
Section 8 Family Law Reform Act 1969.
177.
Mental Capacity Act 2005.
178.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 Asp 4 (Scottish Act).
179.
What is contraception? - Contraception guide - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception-guide/pages/what-is-contraception.aspx
180.
DIY contraceptive jab to be offered by the NHS for the first time - BBC Newsbeat. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34346610/diy-contraceptive-jab-to-be-offered-by-the-nhs-for-the-first-time
181.
Mental Health Trust v DD [2015] EWCOP 4.
182.
Re D (a Minor) [1976] 1 All ER 326. 1(1976).
183.
Re D (a Minor) [1976] 2 WLR 279.
184.
Re B (a Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1987] 2 All ER 206 (HL). 2(1987).
185.
Re B (a Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation)[1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213.
186.
Re B (a Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199.
187.
F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 All ER 545 (HL).
188.
F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 W.L.R. 1025 [1990] 2 A.C. 1.
189.
Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation: Patient’s Best Interests) [2001] Fam 15.
190.
Re SL (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment) [2000] 3 WLR 1288.
191.
Re SL v SL [2000] 2 FLR 389.
192.
Re SL [2000] 55 BMLR 105(CA).
193.
Re A (Male Sterilisation) (Mental Patient: Sterilisation), Also Known as: Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) and as Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor and as Re RB (Male Patient: Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FLR 549.
194.
Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation [2000] 1 FCR 193.
195.
Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) [2000] 53 BMLR 66 (CA).
196.
Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor 1999 WL 1425731.
197.
Trust A and Another v H (An Adult Patient) [2006] EWHC 1230 (Fam) - Family Law Week.
198.
E v Eve (1986) 31 DLR (4th) 1, (Supreme Court of Canada).
199.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
200.
Barton-Hanson R. Sterilization of men with intellectual disabilities: Whose best interest is it anyway? Medical Law International. 2015;15(1):49-73. doi:10.1177/0968533215592444
201.
Shaw J. Sterilisation of Mentally Handicapped People: Judges Rule OK? The Modern Law Review. 1990;53(1):91-106. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096044
202.
Freeman MDA. Medicine, Ethics and the Law. Vol Current legal problems. Stevens; 1988.
203.
McNorrie KMcK. Family Planning Practice and the Law. Vol Medico-legal series. Dartmouth; 1991.
204.
Wheat K. Best Interests and the Bolam Test. Nottingham Law Journal. 2001;10(1):68-74. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/notnghmlj10&collection=journals&id=76
205.
Samiloff J. Whose choice? The New Law Journal. 157(7296). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4R3C-4B00-TWWR-G1CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
206.
BMA - Mental capacity for adults in Scotland and Northern Ireland. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni
207.
Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001. Family Law Reports. 2001;2. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/5JVX-KPY1-DY9F-G10K-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
208.
Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001 - [2001] 2 FLR 158, [2001] 2 FCR 569. Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity)
209.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 Asp 4 (Scottish Act).
210.
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Regulations 2002/275 (Scottish SI).
211.
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2002/302 (Scottish SI). https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6B936120E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
212.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, Code of Practice, 1st July 2002. https://www.mwcscot.org.uk/law-and-rights/adults-incapacity-act
213.
Mental Capacity Act 2005 c. 9.
214.
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Independent Mental Capacity Advocates) (General) Regulations 2006/1832.
215.
Code of Practice for the Mental Capacity Act 2005, April 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/legal-policy/mental-capacity/mca-cp.pdf
216.
Scottish Law Commission. Scottish Law Commission, Report on Incapable Adults, (Scot Law Com No. 151). Published online 1995. http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/5013/2758/0994/rep151_1.pdf
217.
BMA Guidance for Scotland - Adults with incapacity Scotland April 2009. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni
218.
Judge approves man’s sterilisation in legal first - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23721893
219.
Essex mother fights to sterilise her disabled daughter - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-23883063
220.
Sterilisation legal bid withdrawn - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13147612
221.
Coombes R. Ashley X: a difficult moral choice. BMJ. 2007;334(7584):72-73. doi:10.1136/bmj.39091.555856.B7
222.
UK aid helps to fund forced sterilisation of India’s poor | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/15/uk-aid-forced-sterilisation-india
223.
Project Prevention - Children Requiring a Caring Community. http://www.projectprevention.org/
224.
Charity offers UK drug addicts £200 to be sterilised - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519
225.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
226.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
227.
Brown J. Scotland and the Abortion Act 1967: historic flaws, contemporary problems. Juridical Review. 2015;2015(2):135-155. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI935360A00B1211E5A7DEE1FD78849580%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
228.
Neal M. When conscience isn’t clear: Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68. Medical Law Review. 2015;23(4):668-682. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv027
229.
Sheldon S. The Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Argument for Modernisation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2016;36(2):334-365. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqv026
230.
McGuinness S, Thomson M. Medicine and Abortion Law Complicating the Reforming Profession. Medical Law Review. 2015;23(2):177-199. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv012
231.
Palmer S. Abortion and human rights. European Human Rights Law Review. 2014;2014(6):596-605. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8F3126807C6D11E4B490925E6739F560%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
232.
McGuinness S. Law, Reproduction, and Disability: Fatally ‘Handicapped’? Medical Law Review. 2013;21(2):213-242. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fws041
233.
Scott R. Interpreting the disability ground of the Abortion Act. Cambridge Law Journal. 2005;64(2):388-412. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIFB3AF520E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
234.
Swift K, Robson M. Why Doctors Need Not Fear Prosecution for Gender-Related Abortions. Journal of Criminal Law. 2012;76(4):348-358. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jcriml76&id=376
235.
Scott R. Risks, Reasons and Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and English Abortion Law. Medical Law Review. Published online 6 November 2015:1-33. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv020
236.
Burin AK. Beyond Pragmatism: Defending the ‘Bright Line’ of Birth. Medical Law Review. 2014;22. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/5DW2-S201-DYJF-0476-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
237.
Neal M. Devolving abortion law. Edinburgh Law Review. 2016;20(3):399-404. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB490F6B0769611E6890FF24C4AB7456E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
238.
Rosamund Scott. Risks, reasons and rights: the European Convention on Human Rights and English abortion law. Medical law review. 2016;24(1):1-33. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI42050760D6A211E5A668A3518D52AAFC%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
239.
Abortion Act 1967 c. 87.
240.
Offences Against the Person Act 1861 c. 100.
241.
Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 c. 34.
242.
Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014-15 (Private Member’s Bill) UK Parliament. http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/abortionsexselection.html
243.
Reproductive Health (Access to Terminations) Bill 2016-17 — UK Parliament. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/reproductivehealthaccesstoterminations.html
244.
Abortion (Foetus Protection) Bill [HL] 2017-19 — UK Parliament. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/abortionfoetusprotection.html
245.
R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687.
246.
Paton v BPAS [1979] 1 QB 276.
247.
Paton v United Kingdom (1981) 3 EHRR 408 (ECHR).
248.
C v S [1988] QB 135.
249.
C v S [1987] 1 All ER 1230.
250.
Kelly v Kelly [1997] 2 FLR 828.
251.
Kelly v Kelly [1997] SLT 896 CS (IH).
252.
Jepson v Chief Constable of West Mercia Police Constabulary [2003] EWHC 3318.
253.
VO v France Application No 53924/00 8 July 2004 (ECHR).
254.
A and Others v Ireland (25579/05) (2011) 53 EHRR. 13.
255.
Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68.
256.
Decision not to charge over gender-based abortions was right, DPP says - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24430356
257.
Director of Public Prosecutions publishes fuller reasons for decision not to prosecute doctors over abortion case. http://cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/dpp_abortion_case_fuller_reasons/index.html
258.
Doctor to appear in court in UK’s first gender abortion prosecution - Telegraph. Published 9 November 2014. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11217504/Doctor-to-appear-in-court-in-UKs-first-gender-abortion-prosecution.html
259.
CPS decision to stop private prosecutions of doctors charged with abortion offences - CPS News Brief. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2015/03/cps-decision-to-stop-private-prosecutions-of-doctors-charged-with-abortion-offences.html
260.
Abortion law to be devolved to Scottish Parliament. Published 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/abortion-law-to-be-devolved-to-scottish-parliament
261.
Scotland offers free abortions to women from Northern Ireland - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41879520?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story
262.
Abortion laws ‘punish sex-crime victims’ - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41756688?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story
263.
Abortion should not be a crime, say Britain’s childbirth doctors | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/22/abortion-decriminalise-crime-britain-childbirth-doctors
264.
Statement from Director of Public Prosecutions on abortion related cases - CPS News Brief. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2013/10/statement-from-director-of-public-prosecutions-on-abortion-related-cases.html
265.
BBC Radio 4 - Moral Maze, 50 Years of the Abortion Act. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097c1g3
266.
An Overview of Abortion Laws | Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
267.
Scott R. Maternal duties toward the unborn? Soundings from the law of tort. Medical Law Review. 8. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-9F80-TWWR-J032&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
268.
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, Mason JK, McCall Smith A. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
269.
Jackson E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn. Oxford University Press; 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
270.
McCluskey v HM Advocate (1989) SLT 175. Times Law Reports
271.
Burton v Islington Health Authority de Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority (1992). All England Law Reports 3(1992).
272.
A and B (Minors) (by C Their Mother and next Friend) v A Health and Social Services Trust (2010).
273.
HAMILTON v. FIFE HEALTH BOARD.
274.
Montreal Tramways v Leveille [1933] 4 DLR 337.
275.
Watt v Rama [1972] VicRp 40; [1972] VR 353 (14 December 1971).
276.
Campbell TD, McKay AJM. Antenatal Injury and the Rights of the Foetus. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1978;28(110). doi:10.2307/2219040
277.
Grubb A, Laing JM. Principles of Medical Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2003.
278.
Thomson EAC. Nasciturus and Delict—Born Yesterday? Scots Law Times. 2005;21:121-126. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ID46496F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
279.
Law Commission. Report on injuries to unborn children (Cmnd 5709). Published online 1974. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2016/08/LC.-060-REPORT-ON-INJURIES-TO-UNBORN-CHILDREN-ADVICE-TO-THE-LORD-CHANCELLOR-UNDER-SECTION-31E-OF-THE-LAW-COMMISSIONS-ACT-1965.pdf
280.
Scottish Law Commission. Liability for Antenatal Injury: Report on a Reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. Vol Cmnd. H.M.S.O.; 1973.
281.
Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976.
282.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
283.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
284.
McKAY AND ANOTHER v. ESSEX AREA HEALTH AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER [1978 M. No. 2947]. ICLR: King’s/Queen’s Bench Division
285.
Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories (1980) :: :: California Court of Appeal Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia.
286.
Turpin v. Sortini :: :: Supreme Court of California Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia.
287.
Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc. :: 1983 :: Washington Supreme Court Decisions :: Washington Case Law :: Washington Law :: US Law :: Justia.
288.
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo :: 1984 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia.
289.
Harriton v Stephens [2006] HCA 15; (2006) 226 CLR 52; (2006) 226 ALR 391; (2006) 80 ALJR 791 (9 May 2006).
290.
Harris J. The Wrong of Wrongful Life. Journal of Law and Society. 1990;17(1). doi:10.2307/1409957
291.
Feinberg J. Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton University Press; 1992.
292.
Scott R. Reconsidering "Wrongful Life” in England after Thirty Years: Legislative Mistakes and Unjustifiable Anomalies. The Cambridge Law Journal. 72(1):115-154. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57YB-5241-DY08-C13P&csi=374818&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
293.
Sheldon S. Only Skin Deep? The Harm of Being Born a Different Colour to One’s Parents. Medical Law Review. 19. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=54G3-MJ21-DYJF-025Y&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
294.
Warner KA. Wrongful life goes down down-under. Law Quarterly Review. 123:209-212. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB7A3BD61CC4611DBB309A63ACD578CE5%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
295.
Norrie KMcK. Wrongful life in Scots law: no right no remedy. The Juridical review. 1990;205.
296.
Harvey Teff. The Action for ‘Wrongful Life’ in England and the United States. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1985;34(3):423-441. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/759304
297.
Fortin J. Is the ‘wrongful life’ action really dead? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 1987;9(5):306-313. doi:10.1080/09649068708413556
298.
A. Morris, Severine Saintier. To Be or Not to Be: Is That The Question? Wrongful Life and Misconceptions. Medical Law Review. 2003;11(2):167-193. doi:10.1093/medlaw/11.2.167
299.
Mason JK. Wrongful Life: The Problem of Causation. Medical Law International. 2004;6(2):149-161. doi:10.1177/096853320400600205
300.
Priaulx N. The Harm Paradox: Tort Law and the Unwanted Child in an Era of Choice. Vol Biomedical lawðics library. Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
301.
Sheldon T. Court awards damages to disabled child for having been born. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):784b-7784. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7393.784/b
302.
Lord Slynn of Hadley , Lord Steyn , Lord Hope of Craighead , Lord Clyde and Lord Millett 1999 July 5, 6, 7; Nov. 25(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [1999] 3 WLR 1301. *59 McFarlane and Another Respondents v Tayside Health Board Appellants
303.
Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust. All England Law Reports. 2001;3. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-6121&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
304.
Rees v. Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust [2003] UKHL 52, [2003] 3 WLR 1091, HL.
305.
AD v East Kent Community NHS Trust. All England Law Reports 3(2003).
306.
*ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and others. All England Reporter. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5NK6-XP41-DYBP-N15G&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
307.
Goodwill v British Pregnancy Advisory Service. All England Law Reports. 1996;2. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-612J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
308.
Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority. All England Law Reports. 1984;3. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-61P0-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
309.
Udale v Bloomsbury Area Health Authority. All England Law Reports. 1983;2. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60X8&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
310.
Thake and another v Maurice. All England Law Reports. 1986;1. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-617C&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
311.
The New law journal.
312.
Anderson v Forth Valley Health Board. 44. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FNG-MXN0-TWW8-X0WT-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
313.
McLelland v Greater Glasgow HB [2001] SLT 446, Ex Div.
314.
Greenfield v Flather and others. All England Reporter. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4SPK-6KP0-TWP1-70CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
315.
Lloyd’s law reports: Medical. Published online 1998.
316.
Cattanach v Melchior [2003] HCA 38. http://www.vrlaw.com.au/cases/pdfs/200402261614260.Cattanach.PDF
317.
Laura C. H. Hoyano. Misconceptions about Wrongful Conception. The Modern Law Review. 2002;65(6):883-906. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097534?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
318.
Chico V. Wrongful Conception: Policy, Inconsistency and the Conventional Award. Medical Law International. 2007;8(2):139-164. doi:10.1177/096853320700800202
319.
Maclean A, An Alexandrian approach to the knotty problem of wrongful pregnancy: Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust in the House of Lords. http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/2004/issue3/maclean3.html
320.
Scott R. Prenatal Screening, Autonomy and Reasons: The Relationship Between the Law of Abortion and Wrongful Birth. Medical Law Review. 2003;11(3):265-325. doi:10.1093/medlaw/11.3.265
321.
Law Society of Scotland. The journal of the Law Society of Scotland. Published online 1995.
322.
Mason, J. J. Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion. Edinburgh Law Review. Published online 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr4&id=197
323.
Mason, J. J. Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Terminology. Edinburgh Law Review. Published online 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr6&id=52
324.
The Juridical review.
325.
Walker SEP. Applying the actual/potential person distinction to reproductive torts. Medical Law International. 2014;14(1-2):3-21. doi:10.1177/0968533214537288
326.
Witting, C. Physical Damage in Negligence. Cambridge Law Journal. Published online 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/camblj61&id=205
