1
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
2
Re D (A Minor) [1976] 2 W.L.R. 279. 17AD.
3
Re B (a minor) [1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213.
4
Margaret Patricia Briody v St Helen’s & Knowsley Area Health Authority 2001 WL 676777. 29AD.
5
Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. 25AD.
6
EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006).
7
R (on the application of IM, MM) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2015] EWHC 1706 (Admin). 15AD.
8
H v Austria (57813/00). 3AD.
9
Council of Europe: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
10
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
11
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
12
Eijkholt M. The Right To Found A Family As A Stillborn Right To Procreate? Medical Law Review 2010;18:127–51. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwq013
13
Hugh Lafollette. Licensing Parents. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1980;9:182–97.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265111
14
Mulligan A. Reproductive rights under article 8: the right to respect for the decision to become or not to become a parent E.H.R.L.R. European Human Rights Law Review 2014;4:378–87.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIE00210F021B011E4A575BB3329EF9E75%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
15
LaFOLLETTE H. Licensing Parents Revisited. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2010;27:327–43. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00497.x
16
Priaulx N. Rethinking Progenitive Conflict: Why Reproductive Autonomy Matters. Medical Law Review 2008;16:169–200. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwn009
17
Parker M. The best possible child. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:279–83. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018176
18
Robertson JA. Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
19
Birk D. Human fertilisation and embryology: the new law. Bristol: : Family Law 2009.
20
Burns S. The law of assisted reproduction. Haywards Heath: : Bloomsbury Professional 2012.
21
Scherpe JM. MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION: THIS MARGIN NEEDS TO BE APPRECIATED. The Cambridge Law Journal 2012;71:276–9. doi:10.1017/S0008197312000463
22
Storrow R. SH v Austria denies infertile Europeans human rights - BioNews. 2012.http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_117832.asp
23
Warnock M. Making babies: is there a right to have children? Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
24
Quigley M. A Right to Reproduce? Bioethics 2010;24:403–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00722.x
25
Harris J, Holm S, MyiLibrary. The future of human reproduction: ethics, choice and regulation. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=80723&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth
26
McGuinness S. Health, Human Rights and the Regulation of Reproductive Technologies in S.H. And Others V Austria (Application No. 57813/00). Medical Law Review 2013;21:146–60. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwt003
27
Farrell A-M, Dove ES, Laurie GT, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. Twelfth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2023. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192866226.001.0001
28
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. 5th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
29
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood [1999] Fam. 151. 6AD.
30
5/FD02P00895High Court of Justice Queens Bench Division26 February 2003Before: The President Wednesday 26th February, 2003, Hearing dates : 20th, 21st and 22nd January 2003Crown copyright. The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v A & Others case [2003] EWHC 259(QB). 26AD.
31
Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. 25AD.
32
Case of Evans v The United Kingdom - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006). 7AD.
33
Dickson v The United Kingdom - 44362/04 [2006] ECHR 430 (18 April 2006).
34
Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2009] 3 WLR 118 (CA).
35
A (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Re [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam); 11AD.
36
R (on the application of M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 611. 30AD.
37
R (ex p. Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept, April 2001 (CA).
38
R v Ethical Committee of St. Mary’s Hospital (Manchester), ex p. Harriot [1988] FLR 512.
39
R v Sheffield Health Authority, ex parte Seale (1994) 25 BMLR 1.
40
Thompson v Sheffield Fertility Clinic (QBD) 2000 WL 33148917. 24AD.
41
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR, Thorpe and Buxton LJJ 2002 Jan 16; 18(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. R (ex p. Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2002] EWCA Civ 29.
42
R v HFEA, (ex p. Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre and H) [2002] EWCA Civ 20. 31AD.
43
Mrs U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] EWCA Civ 565. 24AD.
44
Attorney General’s Reference 2 of 2003 [2004] 1 WLR 2062. 1AD.
45
Rose and another v Secretary of State for Health, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2002]EWHC 1593 (ADMIN). 26AD.
46
L v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Secretary of State for Health - [2008] EWHC 2149 (Fam).
47
G (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 729 (Fam), [2016] 4 WLR 65.
48
Re E (Assisted Reproduction: Parent), also known as: AB v CD, [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam) official transcript on Westlaw.
49
Holdich v Lothian Health Board [2013] CSOH 197; 2014 S.L.T. 495; Court of Session (Outer House).
50
R (on the application of AB) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2014] EWHC 1528 (Admin).
51
Warren v Care Fertility (Northampton) Ltd [2014] EWHC 602 (Fam.
52
In the matter of HFEA 2008 (Cases A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H Declaration of Parentage) [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam).
53
X v St Bartholomew’s Hospital Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2015] EWFC 13; [2015].
54
Parrillo v Italy (Application No.46470/11), Grand Chamber Judgment [2015] ECHR 755, (2016) 62 EHRR 8, 27 August 2015.
55
M (Human Fertilisation Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 1572 (Fam).
56
Jefferies v BMI Healthcare Ltd - Case Analysis - EWHC 2493 (Fam); [2016] Med. L.R. 656 (Fam Div).
57
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
58
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
59
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/
60
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015/572.
61
Alghrani A, Harris J. Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated? Child and Family Law Quarterly 2006;18:157–306.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq18&size=2&collection=journals&id=195
62
Walker SEP. Potential persons and the welfare of the (potential) child test. Medical Law International 2014;14:157–71. doi:10.1177/0968533214550117
63
Sheldon S, Lee E, Macvarish J. ‘Supportive Parenting’, Responsibility and Regulation: The Welfare Assessment under the Reformed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990). The Modern Law Review 2015;78:461–92. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12124
64
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (March 2005) ‘Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law’, 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf
65
Laing JA. Artificial Reproduction, the ‘Welfare Principle’, and the Common Good. Medical Law Review 2005;13:328–56. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwi022
66
Clarke V. Men Not Included? Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2007;3:309–49. doi:10.1300/J461v03n04_01
67
Fenton RA. Time for change (1). The New Law Journal 15AD;157.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P01-5BK0-TWWR-G0BY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
68
Fenton RA. Time for change (2). The New Law Journal 6AD;157.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P4F-J1B0-TWWR-G0V2-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
69
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/
70
Parental status ‘lost to incompetence in IVF sector’ - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34222268
71
NHS IVF services to be fairer and faster | Scottish Government | Official Press Release. http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-1.nsf/0/254AEB4F6E6547BB80257B6D0021AA82?OpenDocument
72
Can I get IVF treatment on the NHS? - Health questions - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/889.aspx
73
65-year-old woman’s IVF pregnancy branded irresponsible and inadvisable | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/15/german-politicians-criticise-65-annegret-raunigk-pregnant-quadruplets
74
German woman Annegret Raunigk, 65, has quadruplets - media - BBC News. 2015.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32857398
75
Is this Wales’ oldest IVF dad? Malcolm, 67, fathers daughter with wife, 31 - Wales Online. 2013.http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/wales-oldest-ivf-dad-malcolm-2031950
76
Callus T. Ensuring Operational Compliance and Ethical Responsibility in the Regulation of ART: The HFEA, Past, Present, and Future. Law, Innovation and Technology 2011;3:85–111. doi:10.5235/175799611796399858
77
Black G. When is a Parent not a Parent? CS v KS and JS and the Question of Genetic Parentage or Social Parenting. Edinburgh Law Review 2015;19:263–8. doi:10.3366/elr.2015.0279
78
Embryo donation: in vitro fertilisation - scientific research. European Human Rights Law Review 2015;:656–61.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI534B357099E011E5AEE9D7053076D9EE%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
79
ESHRE First live birth after transplantation of ovarian tissue removed and frozen during childhood 10 June 2015. 10AD.https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Press-releases-2015/Live-birth-after-ovarian-freezing
80
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. Medical Frontiers: Debating mitochondria replacement. 2013.https://sciencewise.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Mito-Annex_V-open_consultation_meetings.pdf
81
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. What you can find out about your child’s donor - HFEA. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/118.html
82
Two health regulators spared axe but face efficiency review | Society | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/25/two-health-regulators-spared-axe
83
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
84
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
85
Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 c. 49.
86
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
87
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
88
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010/985.
89
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. HFEA - Code of Practice 8. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2062/2017-10-02-code-of-practice-8th-edition-full-version-11th-revision-final-clean.pdf
90
Warnock M, Department of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee. Report of the Committee of inquiry into human fertilisation & embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock.Dept of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee: Report of the Committee of inquiry into human fertilisation & embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/docview/t70.d75.1983-077555?accountid=14540
91
Brazier M, Campbell A, Golombok S. Surrogacy: review for health ministers of current arrangements for payments and regulation : report of the review team. London: : Stationery Office 1998.
92
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
93
Re C [1985] FLR 846. 1985.
94
Re an adoption application (surrogacy). 1987.
95
Re an adoption application (surrogacy) [1987] 2 All ER 826.
96
Re C (A Child) [2002] EWHC 157 (Fam Div).
97
Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). 2008.
98
*Re X and another (Foreign Surrogacy) , [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). All England Reporterhttps://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/7VK4-48H0-Y96Y-H32V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
99
Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam). 2009.
100
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam). 2007.
101
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam).
102
Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam). 2007.
103
Re L (a minor) [2010] EWHC 3146 (Fam).
104
Re IJ (a child) [2011] EWHC 921 (Fam).
105
A & Anor v P & Ors [2011] EWHC 1738 (Fam).
106
Re T (a child)( Surrogacy: residence order) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam).
107
Briody v St Helen’s and Knowsley Area Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010.
108
K (Minors: Foreign Surrogacy) [2010] EWHC 1180 (Fam)-.
109
G v G [2012] EWHC 1979 (Fam).
110
CC v DD [2014] EWHC 1307 (Fam).
111
A & B v X & Y & Ors [2015] EWHC 2080 (Fam) - Field Court Chambers.
112
H v S (Surrogacy Agreement) [2015] EWFC 36.
113
Horsey K, Sheldon S. Still hazy after all these years: the law regulating surrogacy. Medical Law Review 2012;20:67–89. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwr039
114
The Hague, ‘A preliminary report on the issues arising from international surrogacy arrangements’ April 2012. https://assets.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2012pd10en.pdf
115
Beaumont P, Trimmings K. Regulating international surrogacy arrangements. International Family Law Journal 2012;:1–134.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9673682e-e18d-4bfc-a7f8-08aa5691c866/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
116
Hutchinson A-M, Khan H. International Surrogacy Arrangements: Time for a Multi-lateral Convention? International Family Law Journal 2011;:263–360.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cdd3bb72-6e96-48e1-9b66-c4f2bbccf156/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
117
Horsey K. Challenging presumptions: legal parenthood and surrogacy arrangements. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2010;22:377–520.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/uk?identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
118
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Revolution or Evolution? Family law 2009;39:649–776.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/b3a5b9eb-63a5-4493-9fc7-f442e4aeb64c/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
119
Ramsey J. Fit for the 21st Century? A Review of Surrogacy Provisions within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Medical Law International 2006;7:281–307. doi:10.1177/096853320600700401
120
Ramsey J. Paying for Reproduction – The Case Against Paid Surrogacy. The Juridical review 2006;:325–49.
121
McLachlan HV, Swales JK. Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:1–18. doi:10.1023/A:1009494710517
122
Anderson ES. Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:19–26. doi:10.1023/A:1009477906883
123
Freeman M. Does surrogacy have a future after Brazier? Medical Law Review 1999;7:1–20. doi:10.1093/medlaw/7.1.1
124
McLean S. Legal issues in human reproduction. Aldershot: : Dartmouth/Gower 1989.
125
Gamble N. Surrogacy: creating a sensible national and international legal framework. International Family Law 2012;:257–366.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cb91e83a-0c94-4804-a39f-d87f3345c7f1/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
126
Gamble N. International surrogacy law conference in Las Vegas, October 2011. Family Law 2012;42:115–248.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/f2e81c12-8d6a-48b6-bae0-ba48e01466c3/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
127
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. International Surrogacy: Payments, Public Policy and Media Hype. Family law 2011;41:445–558.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/22882172-90ad-4b99-ad15-1ea0404ce6c7/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
128
Gamble N, Ghevaert L. Lesbian Mothers in Dispute: T v B. Family law 2010;40:1153–248.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9a0344b1-8efc-43a8-b4f4-b97746015621/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
129
Finnerty S. Who profits from international surrogacy? The legal and bioethical ramifications of international surrogacy. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland 2015;21:83–7.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIEB093FD0A98311E5A3FC839483A8C718%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
130
Blyth E. Parental Orders and identity registration: one country three systems. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2010;32:345–52. doi:10.1080/09649069.2010.539353
131
Wilkinson S. The exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy. Bioethics 2003;17:169–87. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00331
132
Jackson E. Regulating reproduction: law, technology, and autonomy. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html
133
British Medical Association. Changing conceptions of motherhood: the practice of surrogacy in Britain. London: : BMA 1996.
134
Cutas D, Chan S, editors. Families: beyond the nuclear ideal. Paperback edition. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2014.
135
Ramskold LAH, Posner MP. Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates. Journal of Medical Ethics 2013;39:397–402. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100527
136
Leading cases - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases
137
Childlessness Overcome Through Surrogacy (COTS). http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
138
Gamble and Ghevaert LLP – Fertility and Parenting Law Specialists. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre
139
Leading cases - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases
140
Register a birth - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/register-birth/overview
141
Home Office UK Border Agency Website, ‘Inter-Country Surrogacy and the Immigration Rules’ Inter- Country Surrogacy Leaflet (October 2009). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261435/Intercountry-surrogacy-leaflet.pdf
142
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Surrogacy Overseas. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/477720/new_1.pdf
143
In the matter of Z (A Child) - Parental Order and Single. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/re-z-20160520.pdf
144
Knowledge centre - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre?root_level_topic=surrogacy
145
J v G (Parental Orders) [2013] EWHC 1432 (Fam). Family law reports 2013;1.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/8405b1cf-33a4-4e80-9d6a-9920d2a35b1b/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
146
Home - Brilliant Beginnings. http://www.brilliantbeginnings.co.uk/
147
Another thought - womb transplants as a future.
148
BBC Four - House of Surrogates. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c591s
149
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (2005) Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1, 14th March 2005. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf
150
Great Britain. Department of Health. Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: a public consultation. 2005.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_4123863
151
Department of Health (December 2006) Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act – Proposals for revised legislation. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_073065.pdf
152
Consultation report on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010, Department of Health, January 2010. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_111659
153
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010/985.
154
Maternity leave rights to be introduced for parents through surrogacy’ NatalieGamble Associates (2012) - Blog - Natalie Gamble Associates. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/blog/2012/11/15/maternity-leave-rights-to-be-introduced-for-parents-through-surrogacy/
155
Modern workplaces consultation - government response. 2012.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-workplaces-consultation-government-response--2
156
R (ex p. John Smeaton on Behalf of Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) v The Secretary of State for Health, Schering Health Care Limited, Family Planning Association 18 April 2002 QBD (Admin Ct) [2002] EWHC 610.
157
R v Sec of State for Health and FPA, ex p Axon [2006] EWCA 37.
158
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] 3 WLR 830 (HL).
159
A Local Authority v Mrs A & Mr B [2010] EWHC 1549.
160
Sheldon S. The regulatory cliff edge between contraception and abortion: the legal and moral significance of implantation. Journal of Medical Ethics 2015;41:762–5. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102712
161
Bridgeman J. Young people and sexual health: whose rights? Whose responsibilities? Medical Law Review 2006;14:418–24. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwl014
162
Scheiwe K. Between autonomy and dependency: minors’ rights to decide on matters of sexuality, reproduction, marriage, and parenthood. Problems and the state of debate - an introduction. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2004;18:262–82.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI29059EC0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
163
Chalmers J. Regulating adolescent sexuality: English and Scottish approaches compared. Child and family law quarterly 2011;23:429–546.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/c2cc6afe-3cba-4a5e-be83-4c4aa1cbbf87/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
164
Mason JK. Medico-legal aspects of reproduction and parenthood. 2nd ed. Aldershot: : Dartmouth 1998.
165
Kennedy I. Treat me right: essays in medical law and ethics. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1988.
166
Keown J. ‘Morning after’ pills, ‘miscarriage’ and muddle. Legal Studies 2005;25:296–319. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00616.x
167
Smith JC, Tausz D. Morning-after pill: whether prescription, supply, administration or use of contraceptive pills involving commission of any offences. Criminal Law Review 2002;:664–6.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI78EF5EB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
168
Robertson JA. Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
169
Dworkin R. Life’s dominion: an argument about abortion and euthanasia. London: : HarperCollins 1993.
170
Glover J. Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1990.
171
Harris J, Dawson Books. The value of life. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1985. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203005606
172
Lockwood M. Moral dilemmas in modern medicine. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1985.
173
Department of Health, ‘Best practice guidance for doctors and other health professionals on the provision of advice and treatment to young people under 16 on contraception, sexual and reproductive health’ (July 2004). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4086960
174
0-18 years: guidance for all doctors. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/0-18-years
175
Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 c. 50.
176
Section 8 Family Law Reform Act 1969.
177
Mental Capacity Act 2005.
178
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 asp 4 (Scottish Act).
179
What is contraception? - Contraception guide - NHS Choices. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception-guide/pages/what-is-contraception.aspx
180
DIY contraceptive jab to be offered by the NHS for the first time - BBC Newsbeat. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34346610/diy-contraceptive-jab-to-be-offered-by-the-nhs-for-the-first-time
181
Mental Health Trust v DD [2015] EWCOP 4.
182
Re D (a minor) [1976] 1 All ER 326. 1976.
183
Re D (a minor) [1976] 2 WLR 279.
184
Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation) [1987] 2 All ER 206 (HL). 1987.
185
Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation)[1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213.
186
Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199.
187
F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 All ER 545 (HL).
188
F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 W.L.R. 1025 [1990] 2 A.C. 1.
189
Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation: Patient’s Best Interests) [2001] Fam 15.
190
Re SL (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment) [2000] 3 WLR 1288.
191
Re SL v SL [2000] 2 FLR 389.
192
Re SL [2000] 55 BMLR 105(CA).
193
Re A (male sterilisation) (Mental Patient: Sterilisation), Also known as: Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) and as Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor and as Re RB (Male Patient: Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FLR 549.
194
Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation [2000] 1 FCR 193.
195
Re A (medical treatment: male sterilisation) [2000] 53 BMLR 66 (CA).
196
Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor 1999 WL 1425731.
197
Trust A and Another v H (An Adult Patient) [2006] EWHC 1230 (Fam) - Family Law Week.
198
E v Eve (1986) 31 DLR (4th) 1, (Supreme Court of Canada).
199
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
200
Barton-Hanson R. Sterilization of men with intellectual disabilities: Whose best interest is it anyway? Medical Law International 2015;15:49–73. doi:10.1177/0968533215592444
201
Shaw J. Sterilisation of Mentally Handicapped People: Judges Rule OK? The Modern Law Review 1990;53:91–106.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096044
202
Freeman MDA. Medicine, ethics and the law. London: : Stevens 1988.
203
McNorrie KMcK. Family planning practice and the law. Aldershot: : Dartmouth 1991.
204
Wheat K. Best Interests and the Bolam Test. Nottingham Law Journal 2001;10:68–74.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/notnghmlj10&collection=journals&id=76
205
Samiloff J. Whose choice? The New Law Journal;157.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4R3C-4B00-TWWR-G1CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
206
BMA - Mental capacity for adults in Scotland and Northern Ireland. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni
207
Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001. Family Law Reports 2001;2.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/5JVX-KPY1-DY9F-G10K-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
208
Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001 - [2001] 2 FLR 158, [2001] 2 FCR 569.
209
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 asp 4 (Scottish Act).
210
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Regulations 2002/275 (Scottish SI).
211
Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2002/302 (Scottish SI). https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6B936120E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
212
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, Code of Practice, 1st July 2002. https://www.mwcscot.org.uk/law-and-rights/adults-incapacity-act
213
Mental Capacity Act 2005 c. 9.
214
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Independent Mental Capacity Advocates) (General) Regulations 2006/1832.
215
Code of Practice for the Mental Capacity Act 2005, April 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/legal-policy/mental-capacity/mca-cp.pdf
216
Scottish Law Commission. Scottish Law Commission, Report on Incapable Adults, (Scot Law Com No. 151). 1995.http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/5013/2758/0994/rep151_1.pdf
217
BMA Guidance for Scotland - Adults with incapacity Scotland April 2009. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni
218
Judge approves man’s sterilisation in legal first - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23721893
219
Essex mother fights to sterilise her disabled daughter - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-23883063
220
Sterilisation legal bid withdrawn - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13147612
221
Coombes R. Ashley X: a difficult moral choice. BMJ 2007;334:72–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.39091.555856.B7
222
UK aid helps to fund forced sterilisation of India’s poor | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/15/uk-aid-forced-sterilisation-india
223
Project Prevention - Children Requiring a Caring Community. http://www.projectprevention.org/
224
Charity offers UK drug addicts £200 to be sterilised - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519
225
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
226
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
227
Brown J. Scotland and the Abortion Act 1967: historic flaws, contemporary problems. Juridical Review 2015;2015:135–55.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI935360A00B1211E5A7DEE1FD78849580%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
228
Neal M. When conscience isn’t clear: Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68. Medical Law Review 2015;23:668–82. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv027
229
Sheldon S. The Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Argument for Modernisation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2016;36:334–65. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqv026
230
McGuinness S, Thomson M. Medicine and Abortion Law Complicating the Reforming Profession. Medical Law Review 2015;23:177–99. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv012
231
Palmer S. Abortion and human rights. European Human Rights Law Review 2014;2014:596–605.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8F3126807C6D11E4B490925E6739F560%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
232
McGuinness S. Law, Reproduction, and Disability: Fatally ‘Handicapped’? Medical Law Review 2013;21:213–42. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fws041
233
Scott R. Interpreting the disability ground of the Abortion Act. Cambridge Law Journal 2005;64:388–412.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIFB3AF520E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
234
Swift K, Robson M. Why Doctors Need Not Fear Prosecution for Gender-Related Abortions. Journal of Criminal Law 2012;76:348–58.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jcriml76&id=376
235
Scott R. Risks, Reasons and Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and English Abortion Law. Medical Law Review 2015;:1–33. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwv020
236
Burin AK. Beyond Pragmatism: Defending the ‘Bright Line’ of Birth. Medical Law Review 2014;22.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/5DW2-S201-DYJF-0476-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
237
Neal M. Devolving abortion law. Edinburgh Law Review 2016;20:399–404.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB490F6B0769611E6890FF24C4AB7456E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
238
Rosamund Scott. Risks, reasons and rights: the European Convention on Human Rights and English abortion law. Medical law review 2016;24:1–33.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI42050760D6A211E5A668A3518D52AAFC%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
239
Abortion Act 1967 c. 87.
240
Offences Against the Person Act 1861 c. 100.
241
Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 c. 34.
242
Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014-15 (Private Member’s Bill) UK Parliament. http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/abortionsexselection.html
243
Reproductive Health (Access to Terminations) Bill 2016-17 — UK Parliament. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/reproductivehealthaccesstoterminations.html
244
Abortion (Foetus Protection) Bill [HL] 2017-19 — UK Parliament. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/abortionfoetusprotection.html
245
R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687.
246
Paton v BPAS [1979] 1 QB 276.
247
Paton v United Kingdom (1981) 3 EHRR 408 (ECHR).
249
C v S [1987] 1 All ER 1230.
250
Kelly v Kelly [1997] 2 FLR 828.
251
Kelly v Kelly [1997] SLT 896 CS (IH).
252
Jepson v Chief Constable of West Mercia Police Constabulary [2003] EWHC 3318.
253
VO v France application no 53924/00 8 July 2004 (ECHR).
254
A and Others v Ireland (25579/05) (2011) 53 EHRR. 13.
255
Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68.
256
Decision not to charge over gender-based abortions was right, DPP says - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24430356
257
Director of Public Prosecutions publishes fuller reasons for decision not to prosecute doctors over abortion case. http://cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/dpp_abortion_case_fuller_reasons/index.html
258
Doctor to appear in court in UK’s first gender abortion prosecution - Telegraph. 2014.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11217504/Doctor-to-appear-in-court-in-UKs-first-gender-abortion-prosecution.html
259
CPS decision to stop private prosecutions of doctors charged with abortion offences - CPS News Brief. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2015/03/cps-decision-to-stop-private-prosecutions-of-doctors-charged-with-abortion-offences.html
260
Abortion law to be devolved to Scottish Parliament. 2015.https://www.gov.uk/government/news/abortion-law-to-be-devolved-to-scottish-parliament
261
Scotland offers free abortions to women from Northern Ireland - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41879520?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story
262
Abortion laws ‘punish sex-crime victims’ - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41756688?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story
263
Abortion should not be a crime, say Britain’s childbirth doctors | World news | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/22/abortion-decriminalise-crime-britain-childbirth-doctors
264
Statement from Director of Public Prosecutions on abortion related cases - CPS News Brief. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2013/10/statement-from-director-of-public-prosecutions-on-abortion-related-cases.html
265
BBC Radio 4 - Moral Maze, 50 Years of the Abortion Act. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097c1g3
266
An Overview of Abortion Laws | Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
267
Scott R. Maternal duties toward the unborn? Soundings from the law of tort. Medical Law Review;8.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-9F80-TWWR-J032&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
268
Laurie GT, Harmon S, Dove ES, et al. Mason & McCall Smith’s law & medical ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001
269
Jackson E. Medical law: text, cases, and materials. 5th edn. [Oxford]: : Oxford University Press 2019. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001
270
McCluskey v HM Advocate (1989) SLT 175.
271
Burton v Islington Health Authority de Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority (1992). 1992.
272
A and B (minors) (by C their mother and next friend) v A Health and Social Services Trust (2010).
273
HAMILTON v. FIFE HEALTH BOARD.
274
Montreal Tramways v Leveille [1933] 4 DLR 337.
275
Watt v Rama [1972] VicRp 40; [1972] VR 353 (14 December 1971).
276
Campbell TD, McKay AJM. Antenatal Injury and the Rights of the Foetus. The Philosophical Quarterly 1978;28. doi:10.2307/2219040
277
Grubb A, Laing JM. Principles of medical law. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
278
Thomson EAC. Nasciturus and Delict—Born Yesterday? Scots Law Times 2005;21:121–6.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ID46496F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
279
Law Commission. Report on injuries to unborn children (Cmnd 5709). 1974.https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2016/08/LC.-060-REPORT-ON-INJURIES-TO-UNBORN-CHILDREN-ADVICE-TO-THE-LORD-CHANCELLOR-UNDER-SECTION-31E-OF-THE-LAW-COMMISSIONS-ACT-1965.pdf
280
Scottish Law Commission. Liability for antenatal injury: report on a reference under section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. Edinburgh: : H.M.S.O. 1973.
281
Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976.
282
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37.
283
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
284
McKAY AND ANOTHER v. ESSEX AREA HEALTH AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER [1978 M. No. 2947].
285
Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories (1980) :: :: California Court of Appeal Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia.
286
Turpin v. Sortini :: :: Supreme Court of California Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia.
287
Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc. :: 1983 :: Washington Supreme Court Decisions :: Washington Case Law :: Washington Law :: US Law :: Justia.
288
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo :: 1984 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia.
289
Harriton v Stephens [2006] HCA 15; (2006) 226 CLR 52; (2006) 226 ALR 391; (2006) 80 ALJR 791 (9 May 2006).
290
Harris J. The Wrong of Wrongful Life. Journal of Law and Society 1990;17. doi:10.2307/1409957
291
Feinberg J. Freedom and fulfillment: philosophical essays. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1992.
292
Scott R. Reconsidering "Wrongful Life” in England after Thirty Years: Legislative Mistakes and Unjustifiable Anomalies. The Cambridge Law Journal;72:115–54.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57YB-5241-DY08-C13P&csi=374818&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
293
Sheldon S. Only Skin Deep? The Harm of Being Born a Different Colour to One’s Parents. Medical Law Review;19.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=54G3-MJ21-DYJF-025Y&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
294
Warner KA. Wrongful life goes down down-under. Law Quarterly Review;123:209–12.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB7A3BD61CC4611DBB309A63ACD578CE5%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
295
Norrie KMcK. Wrongful life in Scots law: no right no remedy. The Juridical review 1990;205.
296
Harvey Teff. The Action for ‘Wrongful Life’ in England and the United States. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1985;34:423–41.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/759304
297
Fortin J. Is the ‘wrongful life’ action really dead? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 1987;9:306–13. doi:10.1080/09649068708413556
298
A. Morris, Severine Saintier. To Be or Not to Be: Is That The Question? Wrongful Life and Misconceptions. Medical Law Review 2003;11:167–93. doi:10.1093/medlaw/11.2.167
299
Mason JK. Wrongful Life: The Problem of Causation. Medical Law International 2004;6:149–61. doi:10.1177/096853320400600205
300
Priaulx N. The harm paradox: tort law and the unwanted child in an era of choice. London: : Routledge-Cavendish 2007.
301
Sheldon T. Court awards damages to disabled child for having been born. BMJ 2003;326:784b–784. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7393.784/b
302
Lord Slynn of Hadley , Lord Steyn , Lord Hope of Craighead , Lord Clyde and Lord Millett 1999 July 5, 6, 7; Nov. 25(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [1999] 3 WLR 1301.
303
Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust. All England Law Reports 2001;3.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-6121&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
304
Rees v. Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust [2003] UKHL 52, [2003] 3 WLR 1091, HL.
305
AD v East Kent Community NHS Trust. 2003.
306
*ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and others. All England Reporterhttp://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5NK6-XP41-DYBP-N15G&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
307
Goodwill v British Pregnancy Advisory Service. All England Law Reports 1996;2.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-612J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
308
Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority. All England Law Reports 1984;3.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-61P0-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
309
Udale v Bloomsbury Area Health Authority. All England Law Reports 1983;2.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60X8&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
310
Thake and another v Maurice. All England Law Reports 1986;1.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-617C&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
312
Anderson v Forth Valley Health Board. ;44.https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FNG-MXN0-TWW8-X0WT-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
313
McLelland v Greater Glasgow HB [2001] SLT 446, Ex Div.
314
Greenfield v Flather and others. All England Reporterhttps://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4SPK-6KP0-TWP1-70CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563
315
Lloyd’s law reports: Medical. 1998.
316
Cattanach v Melchior [2003] HCA 38. http://www.vrlaw.com.au/cases/pdfs/200402261614260.Cattanach.PDF
317
Laura C. H. Hoyano. Misconceptions about Wrongful Conception. The Modern Law Review 2002;65:883–906.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097534?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
318
Chico V. Wrongful Conception: Policy, Inconsistency and the Conventional Award. Medical Law International 2007;8:139–64. doi:10.1177/096853320700800202
319
Maclean A, An Alexandrian approach to the knotty problem of wrongful pregnancy: Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust in the House of Lords. http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/2004/issue3/maclean3.html
320
Scott R. Prenatal Screening, Autonomy and Reasons: The Relationship Between the Law of Abortion and Wrongful Birth. Medical Law Review 2003;11:265–325. doi:10.1093/medlaw/11.3.265
321
Law Society of Scotland. The journal of the Law Society of Scotland. 1995.
322
Mason, J. J. Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion. Edinburgh Law Review Published Online First: 2000.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr4&id=197
323
Mason, J. J. Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Terminology. Edinburgh Law Review Published Online First: 2002.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr6&id=52
324
The Juridical review.
325
Walker SEP. Applying the actual/potential person distinction to reproductive torts. Medical Law International 2014;14:3–21. doi:10.1177/0968533214537288
326
Witting, C. Physical Damage in Negligence. Cambridge Law Journal Published Online First: 2002.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/camblj61&id=205
