Bibliography for Human Reproduction and the Law BETA

‘0-18 Years: Guidance for All Doctors’. n.d. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/0-18-years.

5/FD02P00895High Court of Justice Queens Bench Division26  February  2003Before: The  President Wednesday 26th February, 2003, Hearing dates : 20th, 21st and 22nd January 2003Crown copyright. 26AD. The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust v A & Others case  [2003] EWHC 259(QB) The L Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr A, Mrs A, YA, ZA (By their Litigation Friend, The Official Solicitor), The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Mr B, Mrs B.

‘65-Year-Old Woman’s IVF Pregnancy Branded Irresponsible and Inadvisable | World News | The Guardian’. n.d. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/15/german-politicians-criticise-65-annegret-raunigk-pregnant-quadruplets.

A & Anor v P & Ors [2011] EWHC 1738 (Fam). n.d.

A & B v X & Y & Ors [2015] EWHC 2080 (Fam) - Field Court Chambers. n.d.

A and B (minors) (by C their mother and next friend) v A Health and Social Services Trust (2010). n.d.

A and Others v Ireland  (25579/05)  (2011) 53 EHRR. 13. n.d.

A (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Re [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam); 11AD A (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Assisted Reproduction: Parent), Re.

A Local Authority v Mrs A & Mr B [2010] EWHC 1549. n.d.

A. Morris, and Severine Saintier. 2003. ‘To Be or Not to Be: Is That The Question? Wrongful Life and Misconceptions’. Medical Law Review 11 (2): 167–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/11.2.167.

‘*ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust and Others’. n.d. All England Reporter. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5NK6-XP41-DYBP-N15G&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Abortion Act 1967 c. 87. n.d.

‘Abortion (Foetus Protection) Bill [HL] 2017-19 — UK Parliament’. n.d. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/abortionfoetusprotection.html.

‘Abortion Law to Be Devolved to Scottish Parliament’. 2015. Scotland Office. 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/abortion-law-to-be-devolved-to-scottish-parliament.

‘Abortion Laws “punish Sex-Crime Victims” - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41756688?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story.

‘Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014-15 (Private Member’s Bill) UK Parliament’. n.d. http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/abortionsexselection.html.

‘Abortion Should Not Be a Crime, Say Britain’s Childbirth Doctors | World News | The Guardian’. n.d. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/22/abortion-decriminalise-crime-britain-childbirth-doctors.

AD v East Kent Community NHS Trust. 2003, 3 All England Law Reports.

Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 Asp 4 (Scottish Act). n.d.

———. n.d.

‘Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, Code of Practice, 1st July 2002’. n.d. https://www.mwcscot.org.uk/law-and-rights/adults-incapacity-act.

‘Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2002/302 (Scottish SI)’. n.d. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI6B936120E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Adults with Incapacity (Specified Medical Treatments) (Scotland) Regulations 2002/275 (Scottish SI). n.d.

Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 c. 50. n.d.

Alghrani, Amel, and John Harris. 2006. ‘Reproductive Liberty: Should the Foundation of Families Be Regulated?’ Child and Family Law Quarterly 18 (2): 157–306. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq18&size=2&collection=journals&id=195.

‘An Overview of Abortion Laws | Guttmacher Institute’. n.d. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws.

Anderson, Elizabeth S. 2000. ‘Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales’. Health Care Analysis 8 (1): 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477906883.

‘Anderson v Forth Valley Health Board’. n.d. 44. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4FNG-MXN0-TWW8-X0WT-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

‘Another Thought - Womb Transplants as a Future’. n.d.

Attorney General’s Reference 2 of 2003 [2004] 1 WLR 2062. 1AD.

Barton-Hanson, R. 2015. ‘Sterilization of Men with Intellectual Disabilities: Whose Best Interest Is It Anyway?’ Medical Law International 15 (1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533215592444.

‘BBC Four - House of Surrogates’. n.d. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c591s.

‘BBC Radio 4 - Moral Maze, 50 Years of the Abortion Act’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b097c1g3.

Beaumont, Paul, and Katarina Trimmings. 2012. ‘Regulating International Surrogacy Arrangements’. International Family Law Journal, no. 1: 1–134. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9673682e-e18d-4bfc-a7f8-08aa5691c866/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Birk, Dewinder. 2009. Human Fertilisation and Embryology: The New Law. Vol. New law series. Bristol: Family Law.

Black, Gillian. 2015. ‘When Is a Parent Not a Parent?  CS v KS and JS and the Question of Genetic Parentage or Social Parenting’. Edinburgh Law Review 19 (2): 263–68. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2015.0279.

Blyth, Eric. 2010. ‘Parental Orders and Identity Registration: One Country Three Systems’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 32 (4): 345–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.539353.

‘BMA - Mental Capacity for Adults in Scotland and Northern Ireland’. n.d. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni.

‘BMA Guidance for Scotland - Adults with Incapacity Scotland April 2009’. n.d. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/mental-capacity/mental-capacity-scotland-and-ni.

Brazier, Margaret, Alistair Campbell, and Susan Golombok. 1998. Surrogacy: Review for Health Ministers of Current Arrangements for Payments and Regulation : Report of the Review Team. Vol. Cm. London: Stationery Office.

Bridgeman, J. 2006. ‘Young People and Sexual Health: Whose Rights? Whose Responsibilities?’ Medical Law Review 14 (3): 418–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwl014.

Briody v St Helen’s and Knowsley Area Health Authority [2001] EWCA Civ 1010. n.d.

British Medical Association. 1996. Changing Conceptions of Motherhood: The Practice of Surrogacy in Britain. London: BMA.

Brown, Jonathan. 2015. ‘Scotland and the Abortion Act 1967: Historic Flaws, Contemporary Problems’. Juridical Review 2015 (2): 135–55. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI935360A00B1211E5A7DEE1FD78849580%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Burin, Achas K. 2014. ‘Beyond Pragmatism: Defending the “Bright Line” of Birth’. Medical Law Review 22. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/5DW2-S201-DYJF-0476-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Burns, Seamus. 2012. The Law of Assisted Reproduction. Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional.

Burton v Islington Health Authority de Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority (1992). 1992, 3 All England Law Reports.

C v S [1987] 1 All ER 1230. n.d.

C v S [1988] QB 135. n.d.

Callus, Thérèse. 2011. ‘Ensuring Operational Compliance and Ethical Responsibility in the Regulation of ART: The HFEA, Past, Present, and Future’. Law, Innovation and Technology 3 (1): 85–111. https://doi.org/10.5235/175799611796399858.

Campbell, T. D., and A. J. M. McKay. 1978. ‘Antenatal Injury and the Rights of the Foetus’. The Philosophical Quarterly 28 (110). https://doi.org/10.2307/2219040.

‘Can I Get IVF Treatment on the NHS? - Health Questions - NHS Choices’. n.d. https://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/889.aspx.

Case of Evans v The United Kingdom - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006). 7AD.

‘Cattanach v Melchior [2003] HCA 38.’ n.d. http://www.vrlaw.com.au/cases/pdfs/200402261614260.Cattanach.PDF.

CC v DD [2014] EWHC 1307 (Fam). n.d.

Chalmers, James. 2011. ‘Regulating Adolescent Sexuality: English and Scottish Approaches Compared’. Child and Family Law Quarterly 23 (4): 429–546. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/c2cc6afe-3cba-4a5e-be83-4c4aa1cbbf87/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

‘Charity Offers UK Drug Addicts £200 to Be Sterilised - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11545519.

Chico, Victoria. 2007. ‘Wrongful Conception: Policy, Inconsistency and the Conventional Award’. Medical Law International 8 (2): 139–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/096853320700800202.

‘Childlessness Overcome Through Surrogacy (COTS)’. n.d. http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/.

Clarke, Victoria. 2007. ‘Men Not Included?’ Journal of GLBT Family Studies 3 (4): 309–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J461v03n04_01.

‘Code of Practice for the Mental Capacity Act 2005, April 2007.’ n.d. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/legal-policy/mental-capacity/mca-cp.pdf.

Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976. n.d.

‘Consultation Report on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010, Department of Health, January 2010’. n.d. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_111659.

Coombes, R. 2007. ‘Ashley X: A Difficult Moral Choice’. BMJ 334 (7584): 72–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39091.555856.B7.

‘Council of Europe: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. n.d. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.

‘CPS Decision to Stop Private Prosecutions of Doctors Charged with Abortion Offences - CPS News Brief’. n.d. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2015/03/cps-decision-to-stop-private-prosecutions-of-doctors-charged-with-abortion-offences.html.

Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories (1980) :: :: California Court of Appeal Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia. n.d.

Cutas, Daniela, and Sarah Chan, eds. 2014. Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Paperback edition. Vol. Science, Ethics and Society. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

‘Decision Not to Charge over Gender-Based Abortions Was Right, DPP Says - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24430356.

‘Department of Health, “Best Practice Guidance for Doctors and Other Health Professionals on the Provision of Advice and Treatment to Young People under 16 on Contraception, Sexual and Reproductive Health” (July 2004)’. n.d. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4086960.

‘Department of Health (December 2006) Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act – Proposals for Revised Legislation’. n.d. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_073065.pdf.

Dickson v The United Kingdom - 44362/04 [2006] ECHR 430 (18 April 2006). n.d.

‘Director of Public Prosecutions Publishes Fuller Reasons for Decision Not to Prosecute Doctors over Abortion Case’. n.d. http://cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/dpp_abortion_case_fuller_reasons/index.html.

‘DIY Contraceptive Jab to Be Offered by the NHS for the First Time - BBC Newsbeat’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/34346610/diy-contraceptive-jab-to-be-offered-by-the-nhs-for-the-first-time.

‘Doctor to Appear in Court in UK’s First Gender Abortion Prosecution - Telegraph’. 2014. 9 November 2014. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11217504/Doctor-to-appear-in-court-in-UKs-first-gender-abortion-prosecution.html.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. London: HarperCollins.

E v Eve (1986) 31 DLR (4th) 1, (Supreme Court of Canada). n.d.

Eijkholt, M. 2010. ‘The Right To Found A Family As A Stillborn Right To Procreate?’ Medical Law Review 18 (2): 127–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwq013.

‘Embryo Donation: In Vitro Fertilisation - Scientific Research’. 2015. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6: 656–61. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI534B357099E011E5AEE9D7053076D9EE%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority’. 1984. All England Law Reports 3. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-61P0-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

‘ESHRE First Live Birth after Transplantation of Ovarian Tissue Removed and Frozen during Childhood  10 June 2015’. 10AD. 10AD. https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Press-releases-2015/Live-birth-after-ovarian-freezing.

‘Essex Mother Fights to Sterilise Her Disabled Daughter - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-23883063.

EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 6339/05 [2006] ECHR 200 (7 March 2006). n.d.

F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 All ER 545 (HL). n.d.

F v West Berkshire Area Health Authority [1989] 2 W.L.R. 1025 [1990] 2 A.C. 1. n.d.

Farrell, Anne-Maree, E. S. Dove, G. T. Laurie, and J. K. Mason. 2023. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. Twelfth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192866226.001.0001.

Feinberg, Joel. 1992. Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Fenton, Rachel Anne. 6AD. ‘Time for Change (2)’. The New Law Journal 157 (7280). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P4F-J1B0-TWWR-G0V2-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

———. 15AD. ‘Time for Change (1)’. The New Law Journal 157 (7277). https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4P01-5BK0-TWWR-G0BY-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Finnerty, Susan. 2015. ‘Who Profits from International Surrogacy? The Legal and Bioethical Ramifications of International Surrogacy’. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland 21 (2): 83–87. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIEB093FD0A98311E5A3FC839483A8C718%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Surrogacy Overseas’. n.d. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/477720/new_1.pdf.

Fortin, Jane. 1987. ‘Is the “Wrongful Life” Action Really Dead?’ Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 9 (5): 306–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649068708413556.

Freeman, M. 1999. ‘Does Surrogacy Have a Future after Brazier?’ Medical Law Review 7 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/7.1.1.

Freeman, Michael D. A. 1988. Medicine, Ethics and the Law. Vol. Current legal problems. London: Stevens.

G (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 729 (Fam), [2016] 4 WLR 65. n.d.

G v G [2012] EWHC 1979 (Fam). n.d.

‘Gamble and Ghevaert LLP – Fertility and Parenting Law Specialists’. n.d. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre.

Gamble, Natalie. 2012a. ‘International Surrogacy Law Conference in Las Vegas, October 2011’. Family Law 42 (2): 115–248. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/f2e81c12-8d6a-48b6-bae0-ba48e01466c3/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

———. 2012b. ‘Surrogacy: Creating a Sensible National and International Legal Framework’. International Family Law, no. 3: 257–366. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cb91e83a-0c94-4804-a39f-d87f3345c7f1/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Gamble, Natalie, and Louisa Ghevaert. 2009. ‘The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Revolution or Evolution?’ Family Law 39 (8): 649–776. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/b3a5b9eb-63a5-4493-9fc7-f442e4aeb64c/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

———. 2010. ‘Lesbian Mothers in Dispute: T v B’. Family Law 40 (11): 1153–1248. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/9a0344b1-8efc-43a8-b4f4-b97746015621/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

———. 2011. ‘International Surrogacy: Payments, Public Policy and Media Hype’. Family Law 41 (5): 445–558. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/22882172-90ad-4b99-ad15-1ea0404ce6c7/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

‘German Woman Annegret Raunigk, 65, Has Quadruplets - Media - BBC News’. 2015. 23 May 2015. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32857398.

Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] 3 WLR 830 (HL). n.d.

Glover, Jonathan. 1990. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Vol. Penguin philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

‘Goodwill v British Pregnancy Advisory Service’. 1996. All England Law Reports 2. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-612J-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Great Britain. Department of Health. 2005. ‘Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: A Public Consultation’. Electronic resource. London: Department of Health. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_4123863.

Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68. n.d.

‘Greenfield v Flather and Others’. n.d. All England Reporter. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/4SPK-6KP0-TWP1-70CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Grubb, Andrew, and Judith M. Laing. 2003. Principles of Medical Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

H v Austria (57813/00). 3AD H v Austria (57813/00).

H v S (Surrogacy Agreement) [2015] EWFC 36. n.d.

HAMILTON v. FIFE HEALTH BOARD. n.d.

Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc. :: 1983 :: Washington Supreme Court Decisions :: Washington Case Law :: Washington Law :: US Law :: Justia. n.d.

Harris, John. 1990. ‘The Wrong of Wrongful Life’. Journal of Law and Society 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1409957.

Harris, John and Dawson Books. 1985. The Value of Life. Electronic resource. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. http://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=University%20of%20Glasgow&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203005606.

Harris, John, Søren Holm, and MyiLibrary. 1998. The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice and Regulation. Electronic resource. Vol. Issues in biomedical ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=80723&entityid=https://idp.gla.ac.uk/shibboleth.

Harriton v Stephens [2006] HCA 15; (2006) 226 CLR 52; (2006) 226 ALR 391; (2006) 80 ALJR 791 (9 May 2006). n.d.

Harvey Teff. 1985. ‘The Action for “Wrongful Life” in England and the United States’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 34 (3): 423–41. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/759304.

Holdich v Lothian Health Board [2013] CSOH 197; 2014 S.L.T. 495; Court of Session (Outer House). n.d.

‘Home - Brilliant Beginnings’. n.d. http://www.brilliantbeginnings.co.uk/.

‘Home Office UK Border Agency Website, “Inter-Country Surrogacy and the Immigration Rules” Inter- Country Surrogacy Leaflet (October 2009)’. n.d. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/261435/Intercountry-surrogacy-leaflet.pdf.

Horsey, K., and S. Sheldon. 2012. ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Law Regulating Surrogacy’. Medical Law Review 20 (1): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwr039.

Horsey, Kirsty. 2010. ‘Challenging Presumptions: Legal Parenthood and Surrogacy Arrangements’. Child and Family Law Quarterly 22 (4): 377–520. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/uk?identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

‘House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (2005) Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1, 14th March 2005’. n.d. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf.

‘House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee (March 2005) “Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law”, 5th Report of Session 2004-05, HC 7-1’. n.d. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/7/7i.pdf.

Hugh Lafollette. 1980. ‘Licensing Parents’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 9 (2): 182–97. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265111.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 c. 37. n.d.

———. n.d.

———. n.d.

———. n.d.

———. n.d.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. n.d.

———. n.d.

———. n.d.

———. n.d.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. 2013. ‘Medical Frontiers: Debating Mitochondria Replacement’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. 2013. https://sciencewise.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Mito-Annex_V-open_consultation_meetings.pdf.

———. n.d. ‘HFEA - Code of Practice 8’. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/.

———. n.d. ‘HFEA - Code of Practice 8’. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/code-of-practice/.

———. n.d. ‘HFEA - Code of Practice 8’. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2062/2017-10-02-code-of-practice-8th-edition-full-version-11th-revision-final-clean.pdf.

———. n.d. ‘What You Can Find out about Your Child’s Donor - HFEA’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/118.html.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015/572. n.d.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Parental Orders) Regulations 2010/985. n.d.

———. n.d.

Hutchinson, Anne-Marie, and Hassan Khan. 2011. ‘International Surrogacy Arrangements: Time for a Multi-Lateral Convention?’ International Family Law Journal, no. 4: 263–360. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/cdd3bb72-6e96-48e1-9b66-c4f2bbccf156/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

In the matter of HFEA 2008 (Cases A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H Declaration of Parentage) [2015] EWHC 2602 (Fam). n.d. Family Law Week.

‘In the Matter of Z (A Child) - Parental Order and Single’. n.d. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/re-z-20160520.pdf.

Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 c. 34. n.d.

‘Is This Wales’ Oldest IVF Dad? Malcolm, 67, Fathers Daughter with Wife, 31 - Wales Online’. 2013. 26 March 2013. http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/wales-oldest-ivf-dad-malcolm-2031950.

‘J v G (Parental Orders) [2013] EWHC 1432 (Fam)’. 2013. Family Law Reports 1. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/8405b1cf-33a4-4e80-9d6a-9920d2a35b1b/?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Jackson, Emily. 2001. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology, and Autonomy. Electronic resource. Oxford: Hart Pub. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://portal.igpublish.com/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html.

———. 2016a. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2016b. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2019a. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001.

———. 2019b. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825845.001.0001.

Jefferies v BMI Healthcare Ltd - Case Analysis - EWHC 2493 (Fam); [2016] Med. L.R. 656 (Fam Div). n.d.

Jepson v Chief Constable of West Mercia Police Constabulary [2003] EWHC 3318. n.d.

‘Judge Approves Man’s Sterilisation in Legal First - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23721893.

K (Minors: Foreign Surrogacy) [2010] EWHC 1180 (Fam)-. n.d.

Kelly v Kelly [1997] 2 FLR 828. n.d.

Kelly v Kelly [1997] SLT 896 CS (IH). n.d.

Kennedy, Ian. 1988. Treat Me Right: Essays in Medical Law and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Keown, John. 2005. ‘“Morning after” Pills, “Miscarriage” and Muddle’. Legal Studies 25 (2): 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00616.x.

‘Knowledge Centre - Natalie Gamble Associates’. n.d. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/knowledge-centre?root_level_topic=surrogacy.

L v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Secretary of State for Health - [2008] EWHC 2149 (Fam). n.d.

LaFOLLETTE, HUGH. 2010. ‘Licensing Parents Revisited’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4): 327–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00497.x.

Laing, J. A. 2005. ‘Artificial Reproduction, the “Welfare Principle”, and the Common Good’. Medical Law Review 13 (3): 328–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwi022.

Laura C. H. Hoyano. 2002. ‘Misconceptions about Wrongful Conception’. The Modern Law Review 65 (6): 883–906. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097534?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Laurie, G. T., Shawn Harmon, E. S. Dove, J. K. Mason, and Alexander McCall Smith. 2019a. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001.

———. 2019b. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001.

———. 2019c. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001.

———. 2019d. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001.

———. 2019e. Mason & McCall Smith’s Law & Medical Ethics. 11th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198826217.001.0001.

Law Commission. 1974. ‘Report on Injuries to Unborn Children (Cmnd 5709)’. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2016/08/LC.-060-REPORT-ON-INJURIES-TO-UNBORN-CHILDREN-ADVICE-TO-THE-LORD-CHANCELLOR-UNDER-SECTION-31E-OF-THE-LAW-COMMISSIONS-ACT-1965.pdf.

Law Society of Scotland. 1995. ‘The Journal of the Law Society of Scotland’.

‘Leading Cases - Natalie Gamble Associates’. n.d. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/about-us/leading-cases.

‘Lloyd’s Law Reports: Medical’. 1998.

Lockwood, Michael. 1985. Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine. Vol. Studies in bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers  MR,  Thorpe and  Buxton  LJJ 2002 Jan 16; 18(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. n.d. R (ex p. Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health  [2002] EWCA Civ 29 *628 Regina (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health.

Lord Slynn of Hadley ,  Lord Steyn ,  Lord Hope of Craighead ,  Lord Clyde and  Lord Millett 1999 July 5, 6, 7; Nov. 25(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales. n.d. McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [1999] 3 WLR 1301 *59 McFarlane and Another Respondents v Tayside Health Board Appellants.

M (Human Fertilisation Embryology Act 2008), Re [2016] EWHC 1572 (Fam). n.d.

‘Maclean A, An Alexandrian Approach to the Knotty Problem of Wrongful Pregnancy: Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust in the House of Lords’. n.d. http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/2004/issue3/maclean3.html.

Margaret Patricia Briody v St Helen’s & Knowsley Area Health Authority  2001 WL 676777. 29AD.

Mason, J. J. 2000. ‘Unwanted Pregnancy: A Case of Retroversion’. Edinburgh Law Review. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr4&id=197.

———. 2002. ‘Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Terminology’. Edinburgh Law Review. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/edinlr6&id=52.

Mason, J. K. 1998. Medico-Legal Aspects of Reproduction and Parenthood. 2nd ed. Vol. Medico-legal series. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Mason, J K. 2004. ‘Wrongful Life: The Problem of Causation’. Medical Law International 6 (2): 149–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/096853320400600205.

‘Maternity Leave Rights to Be Introduced for Parents through Surrogacy’ NatalieGamble Associates (2012) - Blog - Natalie Gamble Associates’. n.d. http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/blog/2012/11/15/maternity-leave-rights-to-be-introduced-for-parents-through-surrogacy/.

McCluskey v HM Advocate (1989) SLT 175. n.d. Times Law Reports.

McGuinness, S. 2013a. ‘Health, Human Rights and the Regulation of Reproductive Technologies in S.H. And Others V Austria (Application No. 57813/00)’. Medical Law Review 21 (1): 146–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwt003.

———. 2013b. ‘Law, Reproduction, and Disability: Fatally “Handicapped”?’ Medical Law Review 21 (2): 213–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fws041.

McGuinness, S., and M. Thomson. 2015. ‘Medicine and Abortion Law Complicating the Reforming Profession’. Medical Law Review 23 (2): 177–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv012.

McKAY AND ANOTHER v. ESSEX AREA HEALTH AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER  [1978 M. No. 2947]. n.d. ICLR: King’s/Queen’s Bench Division.

McLachlan, Hugh V., and J.K. Swales. 2000. ‘Babies, Child Bearers and Commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogate Motherhood’. Health Care Analysis 8 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009494710517.

McLean, Sheila. 1989. Legal Issues in Human Reproduction. Vol. Medico-legal series. Aldershot: Dartmouth/Gower.

McLelland v Greater Glasgow HB [2001] SLT 446, Ex Div. n.d.

McNorrie, Kenneth McK. 1991. Family Planning Practice and the Law. Vol. Medico-legal series. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Mental Capacity Act 2005. n.d.

Mental Capacity Act 2005 c. 9. n.d.

Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Independent Mental Capacity Advocates) (General) Regulations 2006/1832. n.d.

Mental Health Trust v DD [2015] EWCOP 4. n.d.

‘Modern Workplaces Consultation - Government Response’. 2012. Government Equalities Office. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modern-workplaces-consultation-government-response--2.

Montreal Tramways v Leveille [1933] 4 DLR 337. n.d.

Mrs U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] EWCA Civ 565. 24AD Mrs U v Centre for Reproductive Medicine.

Mulligan, Andrea. 2014. ‘Reproductive Rights under Article 8: The Right to Respect for the Decision to Become or Not to Become a Parent  E.H.R.L.R.’ European Human Rights Law Review 4: 378–87. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIE00210F021B011E4A575BB3329EF9E75%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others  [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. 25AD Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others.

Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others [2004] EWCA (Civ) 727. 25AD Natallie Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Others.

Neal, Mary. 2015. ‘When Conscience Isn’t Clear: Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan and Another [2014] UKSC 68’. Medical Law Review 23 (4): 668–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv027.

———. 2016. ‘Devolving Abortion Law’. Edinburgh Law Review 20 (3): 399–404. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB490F6B0769611E6890FF24C4AB7456E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘NHS IVF Services to Be Fairer and Faster | Scottish Government | Official Press Release’. n.d. http://www.wired-gov.net/wg/wg-news-1.nsf/0/254AEB4F6E6547BB80257B6D0021AA82?OpenDocument.

Norrie, K. McK. 1990. ‘Wrongful Life in Scots Law: No Right No Remedy’. The Juridical Review 205.

Offences Against the Person Act 1861 c. 100. n.d.

Palmer, Stephanie. 2014. ‘Abortion and Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review 2014 (6): 596–605. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8F3126807C6D11E4B490925E6739F560%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘Parental Status “lost to Incompetence in IVF Sector” - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34222268.

Parker, M. 2007. ‘The Best Possible Child’. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5): 279–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.018176.

‘Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust’. 2001. All England Law Reports 3. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-6121&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Parrillo v Italy (Application No.46470/11), Grand Chamber Judgment [2015] ECHR 755, (2016) 62 EHRR 8, 27 August 2015. n.d.

Paton v BPAS [1979] 1 QB 276. n.d.

Paton v United Kingdom (1981) 3 EHRR 408 (ECHR). n.d.

‘Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001’. 2001. Family Law Reports 2. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/5JVX-KPY1-DY9F-G10K-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity) 1 May 2001  - [2001] 2 FLR 158, [2001] 2 FCR 569. n.d. Practice Note (Official Solicitor: Declaratory Proceedings: Medical and Welfare Proceedings for Adults Who Lack Capacity).

Priaulx, N. 2008. ‘Rethinking Progenitive Conflict: Why Reproductive Autonomy Matters’. Medical Law Review 16 (2): 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwn009.

Priaulx, Nicolette. 2007. The Harm Paradox: Tort Law and the Unwanted Child in an Era of Choice. Vol. Biomedical law&ethics library. London: Routledge-Cavendish.

Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo :: 1984 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia. n.d.

‘Project Prevention - Children Requiring a Caring Community’. n.d. http://www.projectprevention.org/.

Quigley, Muireann. 2010. ‘A Right to Reproduce?’ Bioethics 24 (8): 403–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00722.x.

R (ex p. John Smeaton on Behalf of Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) v The Secretary of State for Health, Schering Health Care Limited, Family Planning Association 18 April 2002 QBD (Admin Ct) [2002] EWHC 610. n.d.

R (ex p. Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept, April 2001 (CA). n.d. R. (on the application of Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

R (on the application of AB) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority  [2014] EWHC 1528 (Admin). n.d.

R (on the application of IM, MM) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2015] EWHC 1706 (Admin). 15AD The Queen (on the application of IM, MM) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

R (on the application of M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority  [2016] EWCA Civ 611. 30AD R. (on the application of M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687. n.d.

R v Ethical Committee of St. Mary’s Hospital (Manchester), ex p. Harriot [1988] FLR 512. n.d.

R v HFEA, (ex p. Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre and H)  [2002] EWCA Civ 20. 31AD The Queen on the Application of Assisted Reproduction and Gynaecology Centre, "H” v The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood [1999] Fam. 151. 6AD *151 Regina v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority,.

R v Sec of State for Health and FPA, ex p Axon [2006] EWCA 37. n.d.

R v Sheffield Health Authority, ex parte Seale (1994) 25 BMLR 1. n.d., 25.

Ramsey, J. 2006a. ‘Paying for Reproduction – The Case Against Paid Surrogacy’. The Juridical Review, no. 4: 325–49.

———. 2006b. ‘Fit for the 21st Century? A Review of Surrogacy Provisions within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990’. Medical Law International 7 (4): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/096853320600700401.

Ramskold, Louise Anna Helena, and Marcus Paul Posner. 2013. ‘Commercial Surrogacy: How Provisions of Monetary Remuneration and Powers of International Law Can Prevent Exploitation of Gestational Surrogates’. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6): 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100527.

Re A (male sterilisation) (Mental Patient: Sterilisation), Also known as: Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) and as Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor and as Re RB (Male Patient: Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FLR 549. n.d.

Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation [2000] 1 FCR 193. n.d.

Re A (medical treatment: male sterilisation) [2000] 53 BMLR 66 (CA). n.d.

Re an adoption application (surrogacy). 1987, 2 All England Law Reports.

Re an adoption application (surrogacy) [1987] 2 All ER 826. n.d. *81 In Re Adoption Application (Payment for Adoption).

Re B (a minor)  [1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213. n.d. *199 In Re B. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation).

Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation) [1987] 2 All ER 206 (HL). 1987, 2.

Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation) [1988] A.C. 199. n.d.

Re B (a minor) (wardship: sterilisation)[1987] 2 W.L.R. 1213. n.d.

Re C [1985] FLR 846. 1985.

Re C (A Child) [2002] EWHC 157 (Fam Div). n.d.

Re D (A Minor)  [1976] 2 W.L.R. 279. 17AD *185 In Re D. (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation).

Re D (a minor) [1976] 1 All ER 326. 1976, 1.

Re D (a minor) [1976] 2 WLR 279. n.d.

Re E (Assisted Reproduction: Parent),  also known as: AB v CD,  [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam) official transcript on Westlaw. n.d.

Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam). 2007a, 1.

———. 2007b, 1.

———. n.d.

Re IJ (a child) [2011] EWHC 921 (Fam). n.d.

Re L (a minor) [2010] EWHC 3146 (Fam). n.d.

Re R-B (A Patient) v Official Solicitor 1999 WL 1425731. n.d.

Re S (Adult Patient: Sterilisation: Patient’s Best Interests) [2001] Fam 15. n.d.

Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam). 2009, 1.

Re SL [2000] 55 BMLR 105(CA). n.d.

Re SL (Adult Patient) (Medical Treatment) [2000] 3 WLR 1288. n.d.

Re SL v SL [2000] 2 FLR 389. n.d.

Re T (a child)( Surrogacy: residence order) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam). n.d.

‘*Re X and Another (Foreign Surrogacy) , [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam)’. n.d. All England Reporter. https://plus-lexis-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/api/document/collection/uk/id/7VK4-48H0-Y96Y-H32V-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). 2008, 1.

Rees v. Darlington Memorial Hospital NHS Trust [2003] UKHL 52, [2003] 3 WLR 1091, HL. n.d.

‘Register a Birth - GOV.UK’. n.d. https://www.gov.uk/register-birth/overview.

‘Reproductive Health (Access to Terminations) Bill 2016-17 — UK Parliament’. n.d. https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/reproductivehealthaccesstoterminations.html.

Robertson, John A. 1994a. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

———. 1994b. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Rosamund Scott. 2016. ‘Risks, Reasons and Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and English Abortion Law.’ Medical Law Review 24 (1): 1–33. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI42050760D6A211E5A668A3518D52AAFC%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Rose and another v Secretary of State for Health, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2002]EWHC 1593 (ADMIN). 26AD Rose and another v Secretary of State for Health, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

Samiloff, Julian. n.d. ‘Whose Choice?’ The New Law Journal 157 (7296). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4R3C-4B00-TWWR-G1CS-00000-00?context=1001073&identityprofileid=32QDCK57563.

Scheiwe, K. 2004. ‘Between Autonomy and Dependency: Minors’ Rights to Decide on Matters of Sexuality, Reproduction, Marriage, and Parenthood. Problems and the State of Debate - an Introduction’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 18 (3): 262–82. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI29059EC0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Scherpe, Jens M. 2012. ‘MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION: THIS MARGIN NEEDS TO BE APPRECIATED’. The Cambridge Law Journal 71 (02): 276–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000463.

‘Scotland Offers Free Abortions to Women from Northern Ireland - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-41879520?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/f16883ee-804f-43cd-8bc3-80d0fed59682/abortion&link_location=live-reporting-story.

Scott, R. 2003. ‘Prenatal Screening, Autonomy and Reasons: The Relationship Between the Law of Abortion and Wrongful Birth’. Medical Law Review 11 (3): 265–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/11.3.265.

Scott, Rosamund. 2005. ‘Interpreting the Disability Ground of the Abortion Act’. Cambridge Law Journal 64 (2): 388–412. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIFB3AF520E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

———. 2015. ‘Risks, Reasons and Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and English Abortion Law’. Medical Law Review, November, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv020.

———. n.d. ‘Maternal Duties toward the Unborn? Soundings from the Law of Tort’. Medical Law Review 8. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-9F80-TWWR-J032&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

———. n.d. ‘Reconsidering "Wrongful Life” in England after Thirty Years: Legislative Mistakes and Unjustifiable Anomalies’. The Cambridge Law Journal 72 (1): 115–54. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57YB-5241-DY08-C13P&csi=374818&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Scottish Law Commission. 1973. Liability for Antenatal Injury: Report on a Reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. Vol. Cmnd. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O.

———. 1995. ‘Scottish Law Commission, Report on Incapable Adults, (Scot Law Com No. 151)’. HMSO. http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/files/5013/2758/0994/rep151_1.pdf.

Section 8 Family Law Reform Act 1969. n.d.

Shaw, Josephine. 1990. ‘Sterilisation of Mentally Handicapped People: Judges Rule OK?’ The Modern Law Review 53 (1): 91–106. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096044.

Sheldon, Sally. 2015. ‘The Regulatory Cliff Edge between Contraception and Abortion: The Legal and Moral Significance of Implantation’. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9): 762–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102712.

———. 2016. ‘The Decriminalisation of Abortion: An Argument for Modernisation’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2): 334–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqv026.

———. n.d. ‘Only Skin Deep? The Harm of Being Born a Different Colour to One’s Parents’. Medical Law Review 19. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=54G3-MJ21-DYJF-025Y&csi=280341&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Sheldon, Sally, Ellie Lee, and Jan Macvarish. 2015. ‘“Supportive Parenting”, Responsibility and Regulation: The Welfare Assessment under the Reformed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990)’. The Modern Law Review 78 (3): 461–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12124.

Sheldon, T. 2003. ‘Court Awards Damages to Disabled Child for Having Been Born’. BMJ 326 (7393): 784b–7784. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7393.784/b.

Smith, J.C., and Dilys Tausz. 2002. ‘Morning-after Pill: Whether Prescription, Supply, Administration or Use of Contraceptive Pills Involving Commission of Any Offences’. Criminal Law Review, 664–66. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI78EF5EB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘Statement from Director of Public Prosecutions on Abortion Related Cases - CPS News Brief’. n.d. http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2013/10/statement-from-director-of-public-prosecutions-on-abortion-related-cases.html.

‘Sterilisation Legal Bid Withdrawn - BBC News’. n.d. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13147612.

Storrow, Richard. 2012. ‘SH v Austria Denies Infertile Europeans Human Rights - BioNews’. http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_117832.asp.

Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 c. 49. n.d.

Swift, K., and M. Robson. 2012. ‘Why Doctors Need Not Fear Prosecution for Gender-Related Abortions’. Journal of Criminal Law 76 (4): 348–58. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jcriml76&id=376.

‘Thake and Another v Maurice’. 1986. All England Law Reports 1. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-617C&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

‘The Hague, “A Preliminary Report on the Issues Arising from International Surrogacy Arrangements” April 2012.’ n.d. https://assets.hcch.net/upload/wop/gap2012pd10en.pdf.

‘The Juridical Review’. n.d.

‘The New Law Journal’. n.d.

Thompson v Sheffield Fertility Clinic (QBD)  2000 WL 33148917. 24AD *1 Patricia Thompson v Sheffield Fertility Clinic.

Thomson, E.A.C. 2005. ‘Nasciturus and Delict—Born Yesterday?’ Scots Law Times 21: 121–26. http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ID46496F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.

Trust A and Another v H (An Adult Patient) [2006] EWHC 1230 (Fam) - Family Law Week. n.d.

Turpin v. Sortini :: :: Supreme Court of California Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: US Law :: Justia. n.d.

‘Two Health Regulators Spared Axe but Face Efficiency Review | Society | The Guardian’. n.d. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jan/25/two-health-regulators-spared-axe.

‘Udale v Bloomsbury Area Health Authority’. 1983. All England Law Reports 2. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60X8&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

‘UK Aid Helps to Fund Forced Sterilisation of India’s Poor | World News | The Guardian’. n.d. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/15/uk-aid-forced-sterilisation-india.

VO v France application no 53924/00 8 July 2004 (ECHR). n.d.

Walker, S. E. P. 2014. ‘Potential Persons and the Welfare of the (Potential) Child Test’. Medical Law International 14 (3): 157–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533214550117.

Walker, Samuel E.P. 2014. ‘Applying the Actual/Potential Person Distinction to Reproductive Torts’. Medical Law International 14 (1–2): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533214537288.

Warner, Kenneth A. n.d. ‘Wrongful Life Goes down Down-Under’. Law Quarterly Review 123: 209–12. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.gla.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIB7A3BD61CC4611DBB309A63ACD578CE5%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Warnock, Mary. 2002. Making Babies: Is There a Right to Have Children? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Warnock, Mary, and Department of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee. n.d. ‘Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation & Embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock.Dept of Health and Social Security; In Vitro Fertilisation Departmental Committee: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation & Embryology. Chairman - Dame Mary Warnock.’ https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/docview/t70.d75.1983-077555?accountid=14540.

Warren v Care Fertility (Northampton) Ltd [2014] EWHC 602 (Fam. n.d.

Watt v Rama [1972] VicRp 40; [1972] VR 353 (14 December 1971). n.d.

‘What Is Contraception? - Contraception Guide - NHS Choices’. n.d. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contraception-guide/pages/what-is-contraception.aspx.

Wheat, K. 2001. ‘Best Interests and the Bolam Test’. Nottingham Law Journal 10 (1): 68–74. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/notnghmlj10&collection=journals&id=76.

Wilkinson, Stephen. 2003. ‘The Exploitation Argument against Commercial Surrogacy’. Bioethics 17 (2): 169–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00331.

Witting, C. 2002. ‘Physical Damage in Negligence’. Cambridge Law Journal. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/camblj61&id=205.

X v St Bartholomew’s Hospital Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2015] EWFC 13; [2015]. n.d.

Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2009] 3 WLR 118 (CA). n.d.