1.
Hyland K, Shaw P, eds. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. Vol Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics. Routledge Handbooks Online; 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315657455
2.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
3.
Hyland, Ken. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Vol Routledge applied linguistics. New Ed. Routledge; 2006. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203006603
4.
Charles M, Pecorari D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing English for Academic Purposes. Vol Routledge Introductions to English for Specific Purposes. Routledge; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4185925
5.
Jordan, R. R. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press; 1997. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733062
6.
Bruce, Ian, 1953-. Theory and Concepts of English for Academic Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
7.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading. http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
8.
Nunan D, Carter R. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
9.
BALEAP Competency Framework for  Teachers of English for  Academic Purposes. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf
10.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes. http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
11.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading. http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
12.
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 1989;22(03). doi:10.1017/S026144480001483X
13.
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1(1):1-12. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
14.
Flowerdew J, Peacock M, eds. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge University Press; 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
15.
Pennington MC, Richards JC. Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal. 2016;47(1):5-23. doi:10.1177/0033688216631219
16.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2012;11(1):64-75. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
17.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. English for Academic Purposes: Contributions from systemic functional linguistics and Academic Literacies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2012;11(1):1-3. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com./science/article/pii/S147515851100083X
18.
Lea MR, Street BV. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 1998;23(2):157-172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364
19.
Ding A, Bruce I, Dawson Books. The English for Academic Purposes Practitioner: Operating on the Edge of Academia. Palgrave Macmillan; 2017. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9783319597379
20.
Hyland K. Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2016;31:58-69. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
21.
Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan | TeachingEnglish | British Council | BBC. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/internationalisation-higher-education-growing-demand-english-investigation-english-medium?_ga=2.227124890.646124926.1546860984-134281338.1540228783
22.
Macaro E, Curle S, Pun J, An J, Dearden J. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching. 2018;51(01):36-76. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000350
23.
West R. Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching. 1994;27(01). doi:10.1017/S0261444800007527
24.
Hyland K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Vol Routledge Applied Linguistics. Taylor & Francis; 2006. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203006603
25.
Duff PA. Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2010;30:169-192. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000048
26.
Wingate U. Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education. 2006;11(4):457-469. doi:10.1080/13562510600874268
27.
Basturkmen H. Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
28.
Humphreys G, Wyatt M. Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal. 2014;68(1):52-63. doi:10.1093/elt/cct056
29.
Peacock, Matthew, Flowerdew, John. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
30.
Benson P. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2007;40(01). doi:10.1017/S0261444806003958
31.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
32.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes. http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
33.
Dexter, Phil, Sheerin, Susan, International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Learner Independence Worksheets 2. IATEFL; 1999.
34.
Ellis, Gail, Sinclair, Barbara. Learning to Learn English: A Course in Learner Training : Learner’s Book. Cambridge University Press; 1989.
35.
Brown JD, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing Needs Analysis and English for Specific Purposes. Vol Routledge introductions to English for specific purposes. Routledge; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4332718
36.
Wingate U. Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: The Case for Inclusive Practice. Vol 42. Multilingual Matters; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=2000150
37.
Kettle M. International Student Engagement in Higher Education: Transforming Practices, Pedagogies and Participation. Multilingual Matters; 2017.
38.
J Dearden. English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emi_-_cover_option_3_final_web.pdf
39.
Gardner S, Nesi H. A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. Applied Linguistics. 2013;34(1):25-52. doi:10.1093/applin/ams024
40.
Neumann R, Parry S, Becher T. Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education. 2002;27(4):405-417. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=7362300&site=ehost-live
41.
Samuels P. Promoting Learning Development as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. 2013;(5). doi:10.47408/jldhe.v0i5.146
42.
Nesi H, Gardner S. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
43.
LearnEnglish | British Council | Genre Families. https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/
44.
A.W. B. Teaching in a Digital Age. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
45.
Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 1981;6(2):109-122. doi:10.1080/03075078112331379362
46.
Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 1994;19(2):151-161. doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007
47.
Flowerdew J, Costley T, eds. Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into Practice. Routledge; 2017.
48.
Durrant P. Discipline and Level Specificity in University Students’ Written Vocabulary. Applied Linguistics. 2014;35(3):328-356. doi:10.1093/applin/amt016
49.
Bruce I. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(1):38-54. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001
50.
Neumann R. Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 2001;26(2):135-146. doi:10.1080/03075070120052071
51.
Uhrig K. Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 2012;31(2):127-136. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001
52.
Neumann R, Parry S, Becher T. Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education. 2002;27(4):405-417. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011525
53.
Bruce I. Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 2009;28(2):105-124. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
54.
Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press; 1989. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335230648
55.
What’s disciplinary epistemology got to do with EAP? | Teaching EAP. https://teachingeap.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/whats-disciplinary-epistemology-got-to-do-with-eap/
56.
Wingate U. Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching. Published online 19 October 2016:1-16. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000264
57.
Sun YC. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013;12(4):264-272. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002
58.
Hyland K, Bondi M, eds. Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Vol Linguistic Insights : Studies in Language and Communication. Peter Lang AG; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1053948
59.
Hyland K. Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
60.
Groom N. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005;4(3):257-277. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002
61.
Dr Armin Krishnan. What are Academic Disciplines?    Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs.  Interdisciplinarity debate. http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/what_are_academic_disciplines2009.pdf
62.
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(4):234-249. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004
63.
Yakhontova T. Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006;5(2):153-167. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002
64.
Samraj B. Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004;3(1):5-22. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00053-5
65.
Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1973;57(3):195-203. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=12361480&site=ehost-live
66.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000;34(2). doi:10.2307/3587953
67.
S P Corder. PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN LINGUISTICS: IS THE DIFFERENCE MERELY ONE OF MOTIVATION? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1979;1(2). doi:10.1017/S0272263100000838
68.
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd; 2008.
69.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(2 (Listening in EAP)). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/10/2
70.
Flowerdew J, Peacock M, eds. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge University Press; 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
71.
Flowerdew, John. Academic Listening: Research Perspectives. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
72.
Chen J, Intaraprasert C. Reading Strategies Employed by University Business English Majors with Different Levels of Reading Proficiency. English Language Teaching. 2014;7(4). doi:10.5539/elt.v7n4p25
73.
Shanahan C, Shanahan T, Misischia C. Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines. Journal of Literacy Research. 2011;43(4):393-429. doi:10.1177/1086296X11424071
74.
Lai SF, Li CH, Amster R. Strategically Smart Or Proficiency-Driven? An Investigation Of Reading Strategy Use Of EFL College Students In Relation To Language Proficiency. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER). 2013;6(1). doi:10.19030/cier.v6i1.7606
75.
Malcolm D. Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System. 2009;37(4):640-651. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.008
76.
Mathew Nalliveettil G. Assessing Reading Strategies of Engineering Students: Think Aloud Approach. English Language Teaching. 2014;7(5). doi:10.5539/elt.v7n5p38
77.
Hyland K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge; 2006.
78.
Swales JM, Feak CB. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Vol Michigan series in English for academic&professional purposes. 3rd ed. University of Michigan Press; 2012.
79.
Biber D, Conrad S, Reppen R, Byrd P, Helt M. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly. 2002;36(1). doi:10.2307/3588359
80.
Biber D, Conrad S, Askews & Holts Library Services. Register, Genre, and Style. Vol Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107210073
81.
Biber, Douglas. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Vol Studies in corpus linguistics. J. Benjamins; 2006.
82.
Academic Word List - School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies - Victoria University of Wellington. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/
83.
Hunston S. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773
84.
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Vol Learning in doing. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
85.
Aguilar M. The peer seminar, a spoken research process genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004;3(1):55-72. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00043-2
86.
Helen Basturkmen, Author Vitae. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. 2002;21(3):233-242. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490601000242
87.
Basturkmen H. Dialogic interaction. In: Hyland K, Shaw P, eds. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. ; 2016:152-164. doi:10.4324/9781315657455.ch12
88.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English)(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/2/1
89.
Ferris D. Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 1998;32(2). doi:10.2307/3587585
90.
Walsh S. Analyzing university spoken interaction: a CL/CA approach. Applying Corpus Linguistics. Applying Corpus Linguistics. 2011;16(3). https://dspace.mic.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10395/1795/Morton,%20T.%20Walsh,%20S.%20and%20O’Keeffe,%20A.%20(2011).%20Analyzing%20university%20spoken%20interaction%20a%20corpus%20linguisticsconversation%20analysis%20approach(Journal%20Article)(Pre-Published%20Version).pdf;jsessionid=B0A4740596B3C8B0377875ADC0C2EC6A?sequence=2
91.
Weissberg B. The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 1993;12(1):23-35. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J
92.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000;34(2). doi:10.2307/3587953
93.
Nesi, Hilary. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Vol (The Cambridge applied linguistics serie. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
94.
Swales JM. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
95.
Coffin C. Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education. Routledge; 2003.
96.
Pecorari D. Teaching to Avoid Plagiarism: How to Promote Good Source Use. Open University Press; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1336595
97.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000;54(2):153-160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
98.
Charles M, Pecorari D, Hunston S, eds. Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. Continuum; 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781441135803
99.
Hyland K. Teaching and Researching Writing. Vol Applied Linguistics in Action. Third edition. Routledge; 2016.
100.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Vol Applied linguistics and language study. Longman; 2000.
101.
Xing JZ. Teaching and Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Pedagogical Grammar. Hong Kong University Press; 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622097629.001.0001
102.
Davies M, Barnett R. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137378057
103.
Paul, R. Critical Thinking Movement: 3 Waves. Published 2011. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-movement-3-waves/856
104.
Moore TJ. Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development. 2011;30(3):261-274. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.501328
105.
Hyland K, Sancho Guinda C, eds. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137030825
106.
Atkinson D. A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 1997;31(1). doi:10.2307/3587975
107.
Davidson BW. Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1998;32(1). doi:10.2307/3587906
108.
Thompson C. Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal. 2011;11(4):15-20. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x/pdf
109.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8(2). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/8/2
110.
Basturkmen H. Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
111.
Brown JD, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing Needs Analysis and English for Specific Purposes. Vol Routledge introductions to English for specific purposes. Routledge; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4332718
112.
Woodrow L. Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes. Routledge; 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781351389174
113.
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Vol ESL and applied linguistics professional series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2006.
114.
Gillett AJ. Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 1989;13(2):92-104. doi:10.1080/0309877890130210
115.
Benesch S. Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 1996;30(4). doi:10.2307/3587931
116.
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005;4(2):135-147. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001
117.
Breen MP. Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design. Part I. Language Teaching. 1987;20(02). doi:10.1017/S0261444800004365
118.
Breen MP, Littlejohn A. Classroom Decision-Making: Negotiation and Process Syllabuses in Practice. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
119.
Tomlinson B. Developing Materials for Language Teaching. 2nd ed. Bloomsbury Academic; 2013.
120.
Nunan D. Syllabus Design. Vol Language teaching: a scheme for teacher education. Oxford University Press; 1988.
121.
Biggs JB, Tang CS kum, Society for Research into Higher Education, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Fourth edition. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press; 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=798265
122.
Woodrow L. Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes. Routledge; 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781351389174
123.
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf
124.
Manning A. Assessing EAP: Theory and Practice in Assessment Literacy. Garnet Education; 2016.
125.
BALEAP Guidelines on English Language Tests for University Entry. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/BALEAP_Guidelines_on_English_Language_Tests_for_University_AGM_v19_May_2012.pdf
126.
Horowitz DM. What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1986;20(3). doi:10.2307/3586294
127.
Weir CJ. Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Vol Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230514577
128.
Banerjee J, Wall D. Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006;5(1):50-69. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003
129.
Cooper A, Bikowski D. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2007;6(3):206-221. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008
130.
Green BA, Andrade MS. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2010;9(4):322-334. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003
131.
Hamp-Lyons L, Condon W. Assessing the Portfolio: Principles for Practice, Theory, and Research. Vol Written language series. Hampton Press, Inc; 2000.
132.
Bell, Roger T. An Introduction to Applied Linguistics: Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Batsford; 1981.
133.
Biber, Douglas, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman; 2002.
134.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic Writing: Process and Product. Vol ELT documents. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
135.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, Saint Martin, Monique de, Baudelot, Christian, Vincent, Guy. Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professional Power. Polity; 1994.
136.
Byram, Michael, Morgan, Carol. Teaching-and-Learning Language-and-Culture. Vol Multilingual matters (Series). Multilingual Matters; 1994.
137.
Gillett A, Weetman C. Investigation of the perceived usefulness of a StudyNet group discussion facility by students in higher education. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching. 2005;2(1):36-43. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/2597/902908.pdf?sequence=1
138.
Gillett A, Wray L, British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes. Assessing the Effectiveness of EAP Programmes. BALEAP; 2006.
139.
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
140.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Vol Applied linguistics and language study. Longman; 2000.
141.
Principles and practices in second language aquisition. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
142.
Lynch, Brian K. Language Program Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
143.
Musumeci, Diane. Breaking Tradition: An Exploration of the Historical Relationship between Theory and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Vol The McGraw-Hill second language professional series. McGraw-Hill; 1997.
144.
Nation P. The Four Strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2007;1(1):2-13. doi:10.2167/illt039.0
145.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic Writing: Process and Product. Vol ELT documents. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
146.
Subject benchmark statements: Languages and related studies. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Subject-benchmark-statement-Languages-and-related-studies.aspx
147.
Robinson, Pauline C. ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. Vol Language teaching methodology series. Prentice Hall; 1991.
148.
SCHMIDT RW. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics. 1990;11(2):129-158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
149.
Gass SM, Madden CG, Conference on Applied Linguistics. Input in Second Language Acquisition. Vol Series on Issues in Second Language Research. Newbury House; 1985.
150.
Watson Todd R. EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2003;2(2):147-156. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6
151.
Bloomsbury - Academic Writing. http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/academic-writing-9781441112361/
152.
Pecorari, Diane. Teaching to Avoid Plagiarism: How to Promote Good Source Use. Open University Press; 2013.
153.
Allwright D. Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 2003;7(2):113-141. doi:10.1191/1362168803lr118oa
154.
Dick Allwright. Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal. 89(3):353-366. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588663
155.
Allwright, Dick. The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice. Vol Research and practice in applied linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
156.
Gieve, Simon, Miller, Inés K. Understanding the Language Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
157.
Zhang R. Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research. 2004;8(3):331-345. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr142xx
158.
Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. http://ltr.sagepub.com/content/12/4/517
159.
Wright T. Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching. 2010;43(03):259-296. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000030
160.
Teachers’ beliefs. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/55/2/186/3114052
161.
Borg S. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 2003;36(2):81-109. doi:10.1017/S0261444803001903
162.
Towards reflective teaching. http://www.tttjournal.co.uk/uploads/File/back_articles/Towards_Reflective_Teaching.pdf
163.
Wajnryb, Ruth. Classroom Observation Tasks: A Resource Book for Language Teachers and Trainers. Vol Cambridge teacher training and development. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
164.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
165.
Cottrell, Stella. Teaching Study Skills and Supporting Learning. Vol Palgrave study guides. Palgrave; 2001.
166.
Cottrell, Stella. Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. Vol Palgrave study skills. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
167.
Cottrell, Stella. The Study Skills Handbook. Vol Palgrave study skills. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
168.
Woodward-Kron R. Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1(2):121-143. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00013-9
169.
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-where-to-begin/796
170.
The University’s student guide to assessment. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_106264_en.pdf
171.
UWF - Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment - Assessment of Student Learning: Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm
172.
Bloom’s taxonomy. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
173.
Hyland, Ken, Hyland, Fiona. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Vol Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
174.
Tribble, Chris. Writing. Vol Language teaching : a scheme for teacher education. Oxford University Press; 1996.
175.
Weigle, Sara Cushing. Assessing Writing. Vol Cambridge language assessment series. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
176.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
177.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000;54(2):153-160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
178.
Bitchener J, Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics. 2010;31(2):193-214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016
179.
Hyland K, Hyland F. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching. 2006;39(02). doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
180.
Muncie J. Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal. 2000;54(1):47-53. doi:10.1093/elt/54.1.47
181.
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2004;37(1):1-28. doi:10.1017/S0261444804002113
182.
Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal. 2005;59(1):23-30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003
183.
Wilson JJ. How to Teach Listening. Vol How to--. Pearson Longman; 2008. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c44770ad-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099
184.
Nuttall CE. Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Vol Macmillan books for teachers. [2nd ed.]. Macmillan Education; 2005. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c34770ad-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099
185.
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd; 2008.
186.
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press; 1997. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733062
187.
Peacock M, Flowerdew J. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=750c9aa3-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099