1
Hyland K, Shaw P, editors. The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. London: : Routledge Handbooks Online 2016. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315657455
2
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet 2008.
3
Hyland, Ken. English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. New Ed. Abingdon, UK ; New York, NY: : Routledge 2006. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203006603
4
Charles M, Pecorari D, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing English for academic purposes. London: : Routledge 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4185925
5
Jordan, R. R. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733062
6
Bruce, Ian, 1953-. Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. Basingstoke, UK: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
7
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading. http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
8
Nunan D, Carter R. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
9
BALEAP Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf
10
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes. http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
11
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading. http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
12
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching 1989;22. doi:10.1017/S026144480001483X
13
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2002;1:1–12. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
14
Flowerdew J, Peacock M, editors. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
15
Pennington MC, Richards JC. Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal 2016;47:5–23. doi:10.1177/0033688216631219
16
Coffin C, Donohue JP. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012;11:64–75. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
17
Coffin C, Donohue JP. English for Academic Purposes: Contributions from systemic functional linguistics and Academic Literacies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012;11:1–3.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com./science/article/pii/S147515851100083X
18
Lea MR, Street BV. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 1998;23:157–72. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364
19
Ding A, Bruce I, Dawson Books. The English for academic purposes practitioner: operating on the edge of academia. Cham: : Palgrave Macmillan 2017. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9783319597379
20
Hyland K. Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing 2016;31:58–69. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
21
Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan | TeachingEnglish | British Council | BBC. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/internationalisation-higher-education-growing-demand-english-investigation-english-medium?_ga=2.227124890.646124926.1546860984-134281338.1540228783
22
Macaro E, Curle S, Pun J, et al. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching 2018;51:36–76. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000350
23
West R. Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching 1994;27. doi:10.1017/S0261444800007527
24
Hyland K. English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Hoboken, New Jersey: : Taylor & Francis 2006. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780203006603
25
Duff PA. Language Socialization into Academic Discourse Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2010;30:169–92. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000048
26
Wingate U. Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education 2006;11:457–69. doi:10.1080/13562510600874268
27
Basturkmen H. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
28
Humphreys G, Wyatt M. Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal 2014;68:52–63. doi:10.1093/elt/cct056
29
Peacock, Matthew, Flowerdew, John. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
30
Benson P. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching 2007;40. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003958
31
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet 2008.
32
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes. http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
33
Dexter, Phil, Sheerin, Susan, International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Learner independence worksheets 2. Whitstable: : IATEFL 1999.
34
Ellis, Gail, Sinclair, Barbara. Learning to learn English: a course in learner training : learner’s book. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
35
Brown JD, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. London: : Routledge 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4332718
36
Wingate U. Academic literacy and student diversity: the case for inclusive practice. Bristol: : Multilingual Matters 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=2000150
37
Kettle M. International student engagement in higher education: transforming practices, pedagogies and participation. Bristol: : Multilingual Matters 2017.
38
J Dearden. English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emi_-_cover_option_3_final_web.pdf
39
Gardner S, Nesi H. A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. Applied Linguistics 2013;34:25–52. doi:10.1093/applin/ams024
40
Neumann R, Parry S, Becher T. Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education 2002;27:405–17.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=7362300&site=ehost-live
41
Samuels P. Promoting Learning Development as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education Published Online First: 2013. doi:10.47408/jldhe.v0i5.146
42
Nesi H, Gardner S. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
43
LearnEnglish | British Council | Genre Families. https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/
44
A.W. B. Teaching in a Digital Age. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
45
Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education 1981;6:109–22. doi:10.1080/03075078112331379362
46
Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 1994;19:151–61. doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007
47
Flowerdew J, Costley T, editors. Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. London: : Routledge 2017.
48
Durrant P. Discipline and Level Specificity in University Students’ Written Vocabulary. Applied Linguistics 2014;35:328–56. doi:10.1093/applin/amt016
49
Bruce I. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2008;7:38–54. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001
50
Neumann R. Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education 2001;26:135–46. doi:10.1080/03075070120052071
51
Uhrig K. Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes 2012;31:127–36. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001
52
Neumann R, Parry S, Becher T. Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: a conceptual analysis... Studies in Higher Education 2002;27:405–17. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011525
53
Bruce I. Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes 2009;28:105–24. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
54
Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: : Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press 1989. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335230648
55
What’s disciplinary epistemology got to do with EAP? | Teaching EAP. https://teachingeap.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/whats-disciplinary-epistemology-got-to-do-with-eap/
56
Wingate U. Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching 2016;:1–16. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000264
57
Sun Y-C. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2013;12:264–72. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002
58
Hyland K, Bondi M, editors. Academic discourse across disciplines. Bern, Switzerland: : Peter Lang AG 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1053948
59
Hyland K. Disciplinary identities: individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
60
Groom N. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2005;4:257–77. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002
61
Dr Armin Krishnan. What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate. http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/what_are_academic_disciplines2009.pdf
62
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2008;7:234–49. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004
63
Yakhontova T. Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2006;5:153–67. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002
64
Samraj B. Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2004;3:5–22. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00053-5
65
Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 1973;57:195–203.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=12361480&site=ehost-live
66
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly 2000;34. doi:10.2307/3587953
67
S P Corder. PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN LINGUISTICS: IS THE DIFFERENCE MERELY ONE OF MOTIVATION? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1979;1. doi:10.1017/S0272263100000838
68
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet Publishing Ltd 2008.
69
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ;10.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/10/2
70
Flowerdew J, Peacock M, editors. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766
71
Flowerdew, John. Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994.
72
Chen J, Intaraprasert C. Reading Strategies Employed by University Business English Majors with Different Levels of Reading Proficiency. English Language Teaching 2014;7. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n4p25
73
Shanahan C, Shanahan T, Misischia C. Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines. Journal of Literacy Research 2011;43:393–429. doi:10.1177/1086296X11424071
74
Lai S-F, Li C-H, Amster R. Strategically Smart Or Proficiency-Driven? An Investigation Of Reading Strategy Use Of EFL College Students In Relation To Language Proficiency. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER) 2013;6. doi:10.19030/cier.v6i1.7606
75
Malcolm D. Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System 2009;37:640–51. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.008
76
Mathew Nalliveettil G. Assessing Reading Strategies of Engineering Students: Think Aloud Approach. English Language Teaching 2014;7. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n5p38
77
Hyland K. English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. London: : Routledge 2006.
78
Swales JM, Feak CB. Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, Mich: : University of Michigan Press 2012.
79
Biber D, Conrad S, Reppen R, et al. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly 2002;36. doi:10.2307/3588359
80
Biber D, Conrad S, Askews & Holts Library Services. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781107210073
81
Biber, Douglas. University language: a corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: : J. Benjamins 2006.
82
Academic Word List - School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies - Victoria University of Wellington. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/
83
Hunston S. Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773
84
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.
85
Aguilar M. The peer seminar, a spoken research process genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2004;3:55–72. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00043-2
86
Helen Basturkmen, Author Vitae. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP 2002;21:233–42.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490601000242
87
Basturkmen H. Dialogic interaction. In: Hyland K, Shaw P, eds. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. 2016. 152–64. doi:10.4324/9781315657455.ch12
88
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ;2 (Spoken Academic English).https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/2/1
89
Ferris D. Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly 1998;32. doi:10.2307/3587585
90
Walsh S. Analyzing university spoken interaction: a CL/CA approach. Applying Corpus Linguistics. Applying Corpus Linguistics 2011;16.https://dspace.mic.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10395/1795/Morton,%20T.%20Walsh,%20S.%20and%20O’Keeffe,%20A.%20(2011).%20Analyzing%20university%20spoken%20interaction%20a%20corpus%20linguisticsconversation%20analysis%20approach(Journal%20Article)(Pre-Published%20Version).pdf;jsessionid=B0A4740596B3C8B0377875ADC0C2EC6A?sequence=2
91
Weissberg B. The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes 1993;12:23–35. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J
92
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly 2000;34. doi:10.2307/3587953
93
Nesi, Hilary. Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
94
Swales JM. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
95
Coffin C. Teaching academic writing: a toolkit for higher education. London: : Routledge 2003.
96
Pecorari D. Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Maidenhead, Berks: : Open University Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1336595
97
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 2000;54:153–60. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
98
Charles M, Pecorari D, Hunston S, editors. Academic writing: at the interface of corpus and discourse. London: : Continuum 2009. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781441135803
99
Hyland K. Teaching and researching writing. Third edition. New York: : Routledge 2016.
100
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: : Longman 2000.
101
Xing JZ. Teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language: a pedagogical grammar. Hong Kong: : Hong Kong University Press 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622097629.001.0001
102
Davies M, Barnett R. The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2015. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137378057
103
Paul, R. Critical Thinking Movement: 3 Waves. 2011.http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-movement-3-waves/856
104
Moore TJ. Critical thinking and disciplinary thinking: a continuing debate. Higher Education Research & Development 2011;30:261–74. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.501328
105
Hyland K, Sancho Guinda C, editors. Stance and voice in written academic genres. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781137030825
106
Atkinson D. A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 1997;31. doi:10.2307/3587975
107
Davidson BW. Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly 1998;32. doi:10.2307/3587906
108
Thompson C. Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal 2011;11:15–20.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x/pdf
109
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. ;8.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/8/2
110
Basturkmen H. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
111
Brown JD, Ebooks Corporation Limited. Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. London: : Routledge 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=4332718
112
Woodrow L. Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. London: : Routledge 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781351389174
113
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, NJ: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2006.
114
Gillett AJ. Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education 1989;13:92–104. doi:10.1080/0309877890130210
115
Benesch S. Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly 1996;30. doi:10.2307/3587931
116
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2005;4:135–47. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001
117
Breen MP. Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design. Part I. Language Teaching 1987;20. doi:10.1017/S0261444800004365
118
Breen MP, Littlejohn A. Classroom decision-making: negotiation and process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
119
Tomlinson B. Developing materials for language teaching. 2nd ed. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2013.
120
Nunan D. Syllabus design. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1988.
121
Biggs JB, Tang CS, Society for Research into Higher Education, et al. Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. Fourth edition. Maidenhead: : McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=798265
122
Woodrow L. Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. London: : Routledge 2018. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9781351389174
123
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf
124
Manning A. Assessing EAP: theory and practice in assessment literacy. Reading: : Garnet Education 2016.
125
BALEAP Guidelines on English Language Tests for University Entry. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/BALEAP_Guidelines_on_English_Language_Tests_for_University_AGM_v19_May_2012.pdf
126
Horowitz DM. What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly 1986;20. doi:10.2307/3586294
127
Weir CJ. Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230514577
128
Banerjee J, Wall D. Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2006;5:50–69. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003
129
Cooper A, Bikowski D. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2007;6:206–21. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008
130
Green BA, Andrade MS. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2010;9:322–34. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003
131
Hamp-Lyons L, Condon W. Assessing the portfolio: principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, New Jersey: : Hampton Press, Inc 2000.
132
Bell, Roger T. An introduction to applied linguistics: approaches and methods in language teaching. London: : Batsford 1981.
133
Biber, Douglas, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan. Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: : Longman 2002.
134
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic writing: process and product. Basingstoke: : Modern English Publications in association with the British Council 1988.
135
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, Saint Martin, Monique de, et al. Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professional power. Cambridge: : Polity 1994.
136
Byram, Michael, Morgan, Carol. Teaching-and-learning language-and-culture. Clevedon: : Multilingual Matters 1994.
137
Gillett A, Weetman C. Investigation of the perceived usefulness of a StudyNet group discussion facility by students in higher education. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching 2005;2:36–43.https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/2597/902908.pdf?sequence=1
138
Gillett A, Wray L, British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes. Assessing the effectiveness of EAP programmes. London: : BALEAP 2006.
139
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
140
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: : Longman 2000.
141
Principles and practices in second language aquisition. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
142
Lynch, Brian K. Language program evaluation: theory and practice. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
143
Musumeci, Diane. Breaking tradition: an exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. New York: : McGraw-Hill 1997.
144
Nation P. The Four Strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 2007;1:2–13. doi:10.2167/illt039.0
145
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic writing: process and product. Basingstoke: : Modern English Publications in association with the British Council 1988.
146
Subject benchmark statements: Languages and related studies. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Subject-benchmark-statement-Languages-and-related-studies.aspx
147
Robinson, Pauline C. ESP today: a practitioner’s guide. London: : Prentice Hall 1991.
148
SCHMIDT RW. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics 1990;11:129–58. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
149
Gass SM, Madden CG, Conference on Applied Linguistics. Input in second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: : Newbury House 1985.
150
Watson Todd R. EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003;2:147–56. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6
151
Bloomsbury - Academic Writing. http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/academic-writing-9781441112361/
152
Pecorari, Diane. Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Maidenhead, Berks: : Open University Press 2013.
153
Allwright D. Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research 2003;7:113–41. doi:10.1191/1362168803lr118oa
154
Dick Allwright. Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal;89:353–66.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588663
155
Allwright, Dick. The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Houndmills, Basingst: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
156
Gieve, Simon, Miller, Inés K. Understanding the language classroom. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2006.
157
Zhang R. Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research 2004;8:331–45. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr142xx
158
Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. http://ltr.sagepub.com/content/12/4/517
159
Wright T. Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching 2010;43:259–96. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000030
160
Teachers’ beliefs. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/55/2/186/3114052
161
Borg S. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching 2003;36:81–109. doi:10.1017/S0261444803001903
162
Towards reflective teaching. http://www.tttjournal.co.uk/uploads/File/back_articles/Towards_Reflective_Teaching.pdf
163
Wajnryb, Ruth. Classroom observation tasks: a resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
164
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet 2008.
165
Cottrell, Stella. Teaching study skills and supporting learning. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
166
Cottrell, Stella. Critical thinking skills: developing effective analysis and argument. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
167
Cottrell, Stella. The study skills handbook. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
168
Woodward-Kron R. Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2002;1:121–43. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00013-9
169
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-where-to-begin/796
170
The University’s student guide to assessment. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_106264_en.pdf
171
UWF - Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment - Assessment of Student Learning: Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm
172
Bloom’s taxonomy. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
173
Hyland, Ken, Hyland, Fiona. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
174
Tribble, Chris. Writing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
175
Weigle, Sara Cushing. Assessing writing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
176
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet 2008.
177
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 2000;54:153–60. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
178
Bitchener J, Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics 2010;31:193–214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016
179
Hyland K, Hyland F. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching 2006;39. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
180
Muncie J. Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal 2000;54:47–53. doi:10.1093/elt/54.1.47
181
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching 2004;37:1–28. doi:10.1017/S0261444804002113
182
Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 2005;59:23–30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003
183
Wilson JJ. How to teach listening. Harlow: : Pearson Longman 2008. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c44770ad-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099
184
Nuttall CE. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: : Macmillan Education 2005. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c34770ad-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099
185
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Reading: : Garnet Publishing Ltd 2008.
186
Jordan RR. English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733062
187
Peacock M, Flowerdew J. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=750c9aa3-e340-e911-80cd-005056af4099
