1
Hughes A, Hughes J. Testing for language teachers. Third edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2020. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024723
2
Fulcher G. Practical language testing. London: : Hodder Education 2010.
3
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
4
Bachman LF. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1990.
5
Bachman LF, Palmer AS. Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
6
Brown HD. Principles of language learning and teaching: a course in second language acquisition. Sixth edition. White Plains, NY: : Pearson Education 2014.
7
Brown K. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: : Elsevier 2006.
8
Buck G. Assessing listening. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
9
Council of Europe. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
10
Cushing Weigle S. Assessing Writing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
11
Davies A. Principles of language testing. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990.
12
Douglas D. Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
13
Ellis R. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1994.
14
Hughes A, Hughes J. Testing for language teachers. Third edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2020. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024723
15
Hymes D. Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, Pa: 1974.
16
Larsen-Freeman D, Long MH. An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: : Longman 1991.
17
Larsen-Freeman D. Techniques and principles in language teaching. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
18
Lightbown PM, Spada N. How languages are learned. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1999.
19
Luoma S. Assessing speaking. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017
20
McNamara TF. Language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
21
Nunan D. Language teaching methodology: a textbook for teachers. Hemel Hempstead, Herts: : Phoenix ELT 1995.
22
Nuttall CE. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: : Macmillan Education 2005.
23
Peregoy, Suzanne. Reading: A Resource Book for Teaching K-12 English Learners. 6th Intl. Pearson/Education 2013.
24
Read J. Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
25
Richards JC. The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
26
Richards JC, Lockhart C. Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
27
Richards JC, Rodgers TS. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
28
Weir CJ. Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230514577
29
British Council. http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/
30
Qualifications Curriculum Authority. https://www.qca.org.uk/
31
SQA. http://www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/5398.html
32
Studies in Language Testing (SiLT). http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/research-and-validation/published-research/silt/
33
Research Notes. http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/rs_notes/
34
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
35
ALTE Framework of Language Examinations. https://www.alte.org/
36
Bachman LF. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1990.
37
Carroll BJ, Hall PJ. Make your own language tests: a practical guide to writing language performance tests. Oxford: : Pergamon Press 1985.
38
Council of Europe. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
39
Davies A. Principles of language testing. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990.
40
Harley B. The Development of second language proficiency. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
41
Hughes A. Testing for language teachers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
42
McNamara TF. Measuring second language performance. London: : Longman 1996.
43
McNamara TF. Language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
44
Morrow K. Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004.
45
Brown K. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: : Elsevier 2006.
46
Weir CJ. Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230514577
47
Alderson JC, Banerjee J. Language testing and assessment (Part I). Language Teaching 2001;34. doi:10.1017/S0261444800014464
48
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
49
Nunan D, Carter R. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
50
Carroll BJ, Hall PJ. Make your own language tests: a practical guide to writing language performance tests. Oxford: : Pergamon Press 1985.
51
Council of Europe. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
52
Davies A. Principles of language testing. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990.
53
Current Issues in English Language Teacher-Based Assessment. TESOL Quarterly 2012;43:393–415.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27785027
54
Hughes A. Testing for language teachers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
55
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
56
Graves K. Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
57
Heaton, J. B. Writing English language tests. New ed. London: : Longman 1988.
58
Kitao SK, Kitao K. Essentials of English language testing. Tokyo: : Eichosha Co 1999.
59
Mager, Robert Frank. Preparing instructional objectives: a critical tool in the development of effective instruction. 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: : Center for Effective Performance 1997.
60
McGinley K. The ’Test of Interactive English’--from conception to implementation. ELT Journal 2006;60:374–81. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl028
61
McNamara TF. Language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
62
Nunan D. The learner-centred curriculum: a study in second language teaching. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1988.
63
Perry FL. Research in applied linguistics: becoming a discerning consumer. Mahwah, NJ: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2005.
64
Schellekens, Philida. Oxford ESOL handbook. Oxford, UK: : Oxford University Press 2007.
65
Stoynoff S. Looking backward and forward at classroom-based language assessment. ELT Journal 2012;66:523–32. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs041
66
Weir CJ. Language testing and validation: an evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2005. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230514577
67
Greenall, Simon. Reward: Teacher’s book: pre-intermediate. Teacher’s book. Oxford: : Macmillan Heinemann 1994.
68
Soars, John. New Headway English Course: Teacher’s book: Mike Sayer.Pre-Intermediate. Teacher’s book. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
69
Barker, Helen. New cutting edge. Tearcher’s. Harlow: : Pearson Longman 2006.
70
Alderson JC. Assessing reading. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935
71
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
72
Bachman LF, Palmer AS. Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
73
Buck G. Assessing listening. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
74
Chang AC-S, Read J. The Effects of Listening Support on the Listening Performance of EFL Learners. TESOL Quarterly 2006;40. doi:10.2307/40264527
75
Flowerdew J, Miller L. Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667244
76
Robinson, Helen M., Conference on Reading. Sequential development of reading abilities. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1977.
77
Koda K. Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841
78
Lunzer EA, Gardner K, Schools Council (Great Britain). The effective use of reading. London: : Heinemann Educational Books for the Schools Council 1979.
79
Lynch T. Teaching second language listening. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
80
Munby J. Communicative syllabus design: a sociolinguistic model for defining the content of purpose-specific language programmes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1978.
81
Nuttall CE. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. [2nd ed.]. Oxford: : Macmillan Education 2005.
82
Sakai H. Effect of Repetition of Exposure and Proficiency Level in L2 Listening Tests. TESOL Quarterly 2011;43:360–72.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27785016
83
Bachman LF, Palmer AS. Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
84
Bereiter Carl. The psychology of written composition C.: Bereiter: M. Scardamalia. NJ: : Lon 1987.
85
Bygate M. Speaking. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1987.
86
Douglas D. Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
87
Grabe W, Kaplan RB. Theory and practice of writing: an applied linguistic perspective. Harlow: : Longman 1996.
88
Gregg LW, Steinberg ER. Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J: : L. Erlbaum Associates 1980.
89
Heaton, J. B. Writing English language tests. New ed. London: : Longman 1988.
90
Hughes A. Testing for language teachers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
91
Luoma S. Assessing speaking. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733017
92
McNamara TF. Language testing. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
93
Markham LR. Influences of Handwriting Quality on Teacher Evaluation of Written Work. American Educational Research Journal;13:277–83.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1162390
94
Morrow K. Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004.
95
Powers DE, Fowles ME. Effects of Applying Different Time Limits to a Proposed GRE Writing Test. Journal of Educational Measurement;33:433–52.https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1435333
96
Murphy S, Ruth L. Designing Topics for Writing Assessment: Problems of Meaning. College Composition and Communication;35:410–22.http://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/357793
97
Sloan CA, McGinnis I. The Effect of Handwriting on Teachers’ Grading of High School Essays. Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception 1978;17:15–21.http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED220836
98
Cushing Weigle S. Assessing Writing. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997
99
Weir, Cyril J. Understanding and developing language tests. Hemel Hempstead: : Phoenix 1995.
100
Isaacs T, Trofimovich P, editors. Second Language Pronunciation Assessment Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Channel View Publications and Multilingual Matters 2016. https://channelviewpublications.wordpress.com/2016/12/08/publication-of-multilingual-matters-first-open-access-book-a-milestone-for-pronunciation-assessment/
101
Brophy J. Teacher Praise: A Functional Analysis. Review of Educational Research 1981;51:5–32. doi:10.3102/00346543051001005
102
Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003;12:267–96. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
103
Conrad SM, Goldstein LM. ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999;8:147–79. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X
104
Cullen R. Supportive teacher talk: the importance of the F-move. ELT Journal 2002;56:117–27. doi:10.1093/elt/56.2.117
105
Focus on form in classroom. New York: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
106
Focus on form in classroom. New York: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
107
Ferris DR. The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision. TESOL Quarterly 1997;31. doi:10.2307/3588049
108
Ferris D. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 1999;8:1–11. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6
109
Ferris DR. The "Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing 2004;13:49–62. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
110
Good, Thomas L., 1943-. Looking in classrooms: Good: Jere E. Brophy. 10th ed. Boston, MA: : Pearson Allyn and Bacon 2008.
111
Hyland F. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998;7:255–86. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
112
Laosa L. Inequality in the classroom: observational research on teacher-student interaction. Aztlan 1979;8:409–20.
113
Leki I. The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annals 1991;24:203–18. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
114
Lyster R, Ranta L. Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1997;19. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034
115
Nunan D. Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal 1987;41:136–45. doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.136
116
Nunan D. Language teaching methodology: a textbook for teachers. Hemel Hempstead, Herts: : Phoenix ELT 1995.
117
Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 2005;59:23–30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003
118
Seedhouse P. Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal 1996;50:16–24. doi:10.1093/elt/50.1.16
119
Sinclair JM, Coulthard M. Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. London: : Oxford University Press 1975.
120
Focus on form in classroom. New York: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
121
Truscott J. The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning 1996;46:327–69. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
122
Zamel V. Responding to Student Writing. TESOL Quarterly 1985;19. doi:10.2307/3586773
123
Nunan D, Carter R. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
124
The BALEAP Accreditation Scheme Handbook (Revised Edition 2011). http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/pdfs/baleap-accreditation-scheme-handbook.pdf
125
British Council - Accreditation Handbook 2012 / 2013. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/accreditation_uk_handbook_2016-17.pdf
126
Dupuis V, European Centre for Modern Languages. Facing the future: language educators across Europe. Strasbourg: : Council of Europe Publishing 2003.
127
Bachman LF. Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
128
Brown JD. The elements of language curriculum: a systematic approach to program development. Boston: : Heinle & Heinle 1995.
129
Lynch BK. Language program evaluation: theory and practice. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
130
Alderson CJ, Clapham C, Wall D. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
131
Nunan D. The learner-centred curriculum: a study in second language teaching. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1988.
132
Rea-Dickins, Pauline, Germaine, Kevin P. Evaluation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1992.
133
White RV. The ELT curriculum: design, innovation, and management. Oxford, UK: : Blackwell 1988.
134
Cheng L, Rogers WT, Wang X. Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2008;33:9–32. doi:10.1080/02602930601122555
135
Rea-Dickins P. Understanding teachers as agents of assessment. Language Testing 2004;21:249–58. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt283ed
136
Bailey KM. Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing 1996;13:257–79. doi:10.1177/026553229601300303
137
Hughes, Arthur, Sheldon, Leslie E., British Council. Testing English for university study. [Basingstoke?]: : Modern English Publications in association with the British Council 1988.
138
Alderson JC, Hamp-Lyons L. TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback. Language Testing 1996;13:280–97. doi:10.1177/026553229601300304
139
Gorsuch GJ. EFL Educational Policies and Educational Cultures: Influences on Teachers’ Approval of Communicative Activities. TESOL Quarterly 2000;34. doi:10.2307/3587781
140
Alderson JC, Wall D. Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics 1993;14:115–29. doi:10.1093/applin/14.2.115
141
Watanabe Y. Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing 1996;13:318–33. doi:10.1177/026553229601300306
142
Liying, Cheng. Washback in language testing: research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: : Lawrence Erlbaum 2004.
143
Bitchener J, Young S, Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2005;14:191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
