1.
Hyland, Ken. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Vol Routledge applied linguistics. New Ed. Routledge; 2006.
2.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
3.
Bruce, Ian, 1953-. Theory and Concepts of English for Academic Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
4.
Jordan, R. R. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
5.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Vol Applied linguistics and language study. Longman; 2000.
6.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading. http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm
7.
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 1989;22(03). doi:10.1017/S026144480001483X
8.
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1(1):1-12. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
9.
Hyland K, Hamp-Lyons L. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1(1):1-12. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
10.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2012;11(1):64-75. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
11.
Coffin C, Donohue JP. English for Academic Purposes: Contributions from systemic functional linguistics and Academic Literacies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2012;11(1):1-3. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com./science/article/pii/S147515851100083X
12.
Lea MR, Street BV. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 1998;23(2):157-172. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364
13.
BALEAP Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf
14.
Tudor I. Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal. 1993;47(1):22-31. doi:10.1093/elt/47.1.22
15.
Benson P. Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2007;40(01). doi:10.1017/S0261444806003958
16.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
17.
Peacock, Matthew, Flowerdew, John. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
18.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes. http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/
19.
Dexter, Phil, Sheerin, Susan, International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Learner Independence Worksheets 2. IATEFL; 1999.
20.
Ellis, Gail, Sinclair, Barbara. Learning to Learn English: A Course in Learner Training : Learner’s Book. Cambridge University Press; 1989.
21.
Flowerdew J, ed. Academic Listening: Research Perspectives. Cambridge University Press; 1994. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524612
22.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(2 (Listening in EAP)). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/10/2
23.
Biber, Douglas. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Vol Studies in corpus linguistics. J. Benjamins; 2006.
24.
Academic Word List - School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies - Victoria University of Wellington. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/
25.
Hunston S. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2002. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773
26.
Nesi, Hilary. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Vol (The Cambridge applied linguistics serie. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
27.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000;54(2):153-160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
28.
Ferris D. Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 1998;32(2). doi:10.2307/3587585
29.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English)(1). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/2/1
30.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000;34(2). doi:10.2307/3587953
31.
Horowitz DM. What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1986;20(3). doi:10.2307/3586294
32.
Banerjee J, Wall D. Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006;5(1):50-69. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003
33.
Cooper A, Bikowski D. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2007;6(3):206-221. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008
34.
Green BA, Andrade MS. Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2010;9(4):322-334. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003
35.
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment. https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf
36.
Atkinson D. A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 1997;31(1). doi:10.2307/3587975
37.
Davidson BW. Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 1998;32(1). doi:10.2307/3587906
38.
Thompson C. Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal. 2011;11(4):15-20. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x/pdf
39.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8(2). https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14751585/8/2
40.
Sun YC. Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013;12(4):264-272. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002
41.
Hyland K, Bondi M, eds. Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Vol Linguistic Insights : Studies in Language and Communication. Peter Lang AG; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1053948
42.
Hyland K. Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
43.
Groom N. Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005;4(3):257-277. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002
44.
Nesi H, Gardner S. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
45.
Dr Armin Krishnan. What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate. http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/what_are_academic_disciplines2009.pdf
46.
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(4):234-249. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004
47.
Tony Becher and Paul R. Trowler. Academic Tribes and Territories. https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206271.pdf
48.
Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press; 1989. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780335230648
49.
Neumann R. Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 2001;26(2):135-146. doi:10.1080/03075070120052071
50.
Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 1994;19(2):151-161. doi:10.1080/03075079412331382007
51.
Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 1981;6(2):109-122. doi:10.1080/03075078112331379362
52.
Woodward-Kron R. More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(4):234-249. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004
53.
Yakhontova T. Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2006;5(2):153-167. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002
54.
Samraj B. Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004;3(1):5-22. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00053-5
55.
Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1973;57(3):195-203. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1974-01819-001&site=ehost-live
56.
Morita N. Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 2000;34(2). doi:10.2307/3587953
57.
Uhrig K. Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 2012;31(2):127-136. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001
58.
Bruce I. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(1):38-54. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001
59.
Bruce I. Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 2009;28(2):105-124. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
60.
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Vol ESL and applied linguistics professional series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2006.
61.
Gillett AJ. Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 1989;13(2):92-104. doi:10.1080/0309877890130210
62.
Basturkmen H. Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=GlasgowUni&isbn=9780230290518
63.
Benesch S. Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 1996;30(4). doi:10.2307/3587931
64.
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005;4(2):135-147. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001
65.
Breen MP. Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design. Part I. Language Teaching. 1987;20(02). doi:10.1017/S0261444800004365
66.
Flowerdew L. Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2005;4(2):135-147. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001
67.
Bell, Roger T. An Introduction to Applied Linguistics: Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Batsford; 1981.
68.
Biber, Douglas, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman; 2002.
69.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic Writing: Process and Product. Vol ELT documents. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
70.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, Saint Martin, Monique de, Baudelot, Christian, Vincent, Guy. Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professional Power. Polity; 1994.
71.
Byram, Michael, Morgan, Carol. Teaching-and-Learning Language-and-Culture. Vol Multilingual matters (Series). Multilingual Matters; 1994.
72.
Gillett A, Weetman C. Investigation of the perceived usefulness of a StudyNet group discussion facility by students in higher education. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching. 2005;2(1):36-43. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/2597/902908.pdf?sequence=1
73.
Gillett A, Wray L, British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes. Assessing the Effectiveness of EAP Programmes. BALEAP; 2006.
74.
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
75.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Vol Applied linguistics and language study. Longman; 2000.
76.
Principles and practices in second language aquisition. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
77.
Lynch, Brian K. Language Program Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 1996.
78.
Musumeci, Diane. Breaking Tradition: An Exploration of the Historical Relationship between Theory and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Vol The McGraw-Hill second language professional series. McGraw-Hill; 1997.
79.
Nation P. The Four Strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2007;1(1):2-13. doi:10.2167/illt039.0
80.
Subject benchmark statements: Languages and related studies. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-languages-cultures-and-societies
81.
Robinson, Pauline C. ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. Vol Language teaching methodology series. Prentice Hall; 1991.
82.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council. Academic Writing: Process and Product. Vol ELT documents. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council; 1988.
83.
SCHMIDT RW. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics. 1990;11(2):129-158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
84.
Gass SM, Madden CG, Conference on Applied Linguistics. Input in Second Language Acquisition. Vol Series on Issues in Second Language Research. Newbury House; 1985.
85.
Swales, John M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Vol The Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
86.
Watson Todd R. EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2003;2(2):147-156. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6
87.
Weissberg B. The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 1993;12(1):23-35. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J
88.
Bloomsbury - Academic Writing. http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/academic-writing-9781441112361/
89.
Pecorari D. Teaching to Avoid Plagiarism: How to Promote Good Source Use. Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=1336595
90.
Allwright D. Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 2003;7(2):113-141. doi:10.1191/1362168803lr118oa
91.
Dick Allwright. Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal. 89(3):353-366. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588663
92.
Allwright, Dick. The Developing Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice. Vol Research and practice in applied linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
93.
Gieve, Simon, Miller, Inés K. Understanding the Language Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
94.
Zhang R. Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research. 2004;8(3):331-345. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr142xx
95.
de Almeida Soares D. Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research. 2008;12(4):517-533. doi:10.1177/1362168808097165
96.
Wright T. Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching. 2010;43(03):259-296. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000030
97.
Teachers’ beliefs. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/55/2/186/3114052
98.
Borg S. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 2003;36(2):81-109. doi:10.1017/S0261444803001903
99.
Towards reflective teaching. http://www.tttjournal.co.uk/uploads/File/back_articles/Towards_Reflective_Teaching.pdf
100.
Wajnryb, Ruth. Classroom Observation Tasks: A Resource Book for Language Teachers and Trainers. Vol Cambridge teacher training and development. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
101.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
102.
Cottrell, Stella. Teaching Study Skills and Supporting Learning. Vol Palgrave study guides. Palgrave; 2001.
103.
Cottrell S. Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument. Third edition. Palgrave; 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6234915
104.
Cottrell S. The Study Skills Handbook. Fifth edition. Red Globe Press; 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gla/detail.action?docID=6234945
105.
Woodward-Kron R. Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2002;1(2):121-143. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00013-9
106.
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-where-to-begin/796
107.
The University’s student guide to assessment. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_106264_en.pdf
108.
UWF - Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment - Assessment of Student Learning: Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm
109.
Bloom’s taxonomy. http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
110.
Hyland, Ken, Hyland, Fiona. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Vol Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2006. https://ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
111.
Tribble, Chris. Writing. Vol Language teaching : a scheme for teacher education. Oxford University Press; 1996.
112.
Weigle, Sara Cushing. Assessing Writing. Vol Cambridge language assessment series. Cambridge University Press; 2002.
113.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet; 2008.
114.
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 2000;54(2):153-160. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
115.
Bitchener J, Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics. 2010;31(2):193-214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016
116.
Hyland K, Hyland F. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching. 2006;39(02). doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399
117.
Muncie J. Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal. 2000;54(1):47-53. doi:10.1093/elt/54.1.47
118.
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 2004;37(1):1-28. doi:10.1017/S0261444804002113
119.
Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal. 2005;59(1):23-30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003
120.
Wilson JJ. How to Teach Listening. Vol How to--. Pearson Longman; 2008.
121.
Nuttall CE. Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Vol Macmillan books for teachers. [2nd ed.]. Macmillan Education; 2005.
122.
Alexander O, Argent S, Spencer J. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s Guide to Principles and Practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd; 2008.
123.
Jordan RR. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Vol Cambridge language teaching library. Cambridge University Press; 1997.
124.
Peacock M, Flowerdew J. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Vol Cambridge applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
