1.
Hyland, Ken: English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. Routledge, Abingdon, UK ; New York, NY (2006).
2.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet, Reading (2008).
3.
Bruce, Ian, 1953-: Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK (2011).
4.
Jordan, R. R.: English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
5.
Hyland, Ken: Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Longman, Harlow (2000).
6.
UEfAP: EAP Background Reading, http://www.uefap.com/bgnd/biblfram.htm.
7.
Jordan, R.R.: English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Language Teaching. 22, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001483X.
8.
Hyland, K., Hamp-Lyons, L.: EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 1, 1–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4.
9.
Hyland, K., Hamp-Lyons, L.: EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 1, 1–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4.
10.
Coffin, C., Donohue, J.P.: Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11, 64–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004.
11.
Coffin, C., Donohue, J.P.: English for Academic Purposes: Contributions from systemic functional linguistics and Academic Literacies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11, 1–3 (2012).
12.
Lea, M.R., Street, B.V.: Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. 23, 157–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
13.
BALEAP Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes, https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf.
14.
Tudor, I.: Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT Journal. 47, 22–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.22.
15.
Benson, P.: Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 40, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958.
16.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet, Reading (2008).
17.
Peacock, Matthew, Flowerdew, John: Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
18.
University of Glasgow :Graduate Attributes, http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.
19.
Dexter, Phil, Sheerin, Susan, International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language: Learner independence worksheets 2. IATEFL, Whitstable (1999).
20.
Ellis, Gail, Sinclair, Barbara: Learning to learn English: a course in learner training : learner’s book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989).
21.
Flowerdew, J. ed: Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
22.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10,.
23.
Biber, Douglas: University language: a corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2006).
24.
Academic Word List - School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies - Victoria University of Wellington, http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/resources/academicwordlist/.
25.
Hunston, S.: Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
26.
Nesi, Hilary: Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
27.
Badger, R., White, G.: A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 54, 153–160 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
28.
Ferris, D.: Students’ Views of Academic Aural/Oral Skills: A Comparative Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. 32, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587585.
29.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 (Spoken Academic English),.
30.
Morita, N.: Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 34, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587953.
31.
Horowitz, D.M.: What Professors Actually Require: Academic Tasks for the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 20, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294.
32.
Banerjee, J., Wall, D.: Assessing and reporting performances on pre-sessional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5, 50–69 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003.
33.
Cooper, A., Bikowski, D.: Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 6, 206–221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.008.
34.
Green, B.A., Andrade, M.S.: Guiding principles for language assessment reform: A model for collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9, 322–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.06.003.
35.
BALEAP Can Do Framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment, https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf.
36.
Atkinson, D.: A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly. 31, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975.
37.
Davidson, B.W.: Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL’: A Case for Critical Thinking in the English Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 32, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587906.
38.
Thompson, C.: Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia. TESOL Journal. 11, 15–20 (2011).
39.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 8,.
40.
Sun, Y.-C.: Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12, 264–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.07.002.
41.
Hyland, K., Bondi, M. eds: Academic discourse across disciplines. Peter Lang AG, Bern, Switzerland (2006).
42.
Hyland, K.: Disciplinary identities: individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
43.
Groom, N.: Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 257–277 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002.
44.
Nesi, H., Gardner, S.: Genres across the disciplines: student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
45.
Dr Armin Krishnan: What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate, http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/what_are_academic_disciplines2009.pdf.
46.
Woodward-Kron, R.: More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7, 234–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004.
47.
Tony Becher and Paul R. Trowler: Academic Tribes and Territories, https://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206271.pdf.
48.
Becher, T.: Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham (1989).
49.
Neumann, R.: Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 26, 135–146 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071.
50.
Becher, T.: The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education. 19, 151–161 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007.
51.
Becher, T.: Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education. 6, 109–122 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078112331379362.
52.
Woodward-Kron, R.: More than just jargon – the nature and role of specialist language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7, 234–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.004.
53.
Yakhontova, T.: Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 5, 153–167 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.03.002.
54.
Samraj, B.: Discourse features of the student-produced academic research paper: variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 3, 5–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00053-5.
55.
Biglan, A.: The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology. 57, 195–203 (1973).
56.
Morita, N.: Discourse Socialization through Oral Classroom Activities in a TESL Graduate Program. TESOL Quarterly. 34, (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587953.
57.
Uhrig, K.: Business and legal case genre networks: Two case studies. English for Specific Purposes. 31, 127–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.09.001.
58.
Bruce, I.: Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 7, 38–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.12.001.
59.
Bruce, I.: Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes. 28, 105–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005.
60.
Basturkmen, Helen: Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ (2006).
61.
Gillett, A.J.: Designing an EAP Syllabus: English Language Support for Further and Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 13, 92–104 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877890130210.
62.
Basturkmen, H.: Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2010).
63.
Benesch, S.: Needs Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly. 30, (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931.
64.
Flowerdew, L.: Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 135–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001.
65.
Breen, M.P.: Contemporary Paradigms in Syllabus Design. Part I. Language Teaching. 20, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800004365.
66.
Flowerdew, L.: Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 135–147 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001.
67.
Bell, Roger T.: An introduction to applied linguistics: approaches and methods in language teaching. Batsford, London (1981).
68.
Biber, Douglas, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan: Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Longman, Harlow (2002).
69.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council: Academic writing: process and product. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council, Basingstoke (1988).
70.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Passeron, Jean-Claude, Saint Martin, Monique de, Baudelot, Christian, Vincent, Guy: Academic discourse: linguistic misunderstanding and professional power. Polity, Cambridge (1994).
71.
Byram, Michael, Morgan, Carol: Teaching-and-learning language-and-culture. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon (1994).
72.
Gillett, A., Weetman, C.: Investigation of the perceived usefulness of a StudyNet group discussion facility by students in higher education. Journal for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching. 2, 36–43 (2005).
73.
Gillett, A., Wray, L., British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes: Assessing the effectiveness of EAP programmes. BALEAP, London (2006).
74.
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald: The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
75.
Hyland, Ken: Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Longman, Harlow (2000).
76.
Principles and practices in second language aquisition, http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf.
77.
Lynch, Brian K.: Language program evaluation: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England] (1996).
78.
Musumeci, Diane: Breaking tradition: an exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997).
79.
Nation, P.: The Four Strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 1, 2–13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0.
80.
Subject benchmark statements: Languages and related studies, https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-languages-cultures-and-societies.
81.
Robinson, Pauline C.: ESP today: a practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall, London (1991).
82.
Robinson, Pauline C., British Council: Academic writing: process and product. Modern English Publications in association with the British Council, Basingstoke (1988).
83.
SCHMIDT, R.W.: The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics. 11, 129–158 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129.
84.
Gass, S.M., Madden, C.G., Conference on Applied Linguistics: Input in second language acquisition. Newbury House, Cambridge, MA (1985).
85.
Swales, John M.: Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
86.
Watson Todd, R.: EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2, 147–156 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00014-6.
87.
Weissberg, B.: The graduate seminar: Another research-process genre. English for Specific Purposes. 12, 23–35 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90025-J.
88.
Bloomsbury - Academic Writing, http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/academic-writing-9781441112361/.
89.
Pecorari, D.: Teaching to avoid plagiarism: how to promote good source use. Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, Berkshire (2013).
90.
Allwright, D.: Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 7, 113–141 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803lr118oa.
91.
Dick Allwright: Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice. The Modern Language Journal. 89, 353–366.
92.
Allwright, Dick: The developing language learner: an introduction to exploratory practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingst (2009).
93.
Gieve, Simon, Miller, Inés K.: Understanding the language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006).
94.
Zhang, R.: Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China. Language Teaching Research. 8, 331–345 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr142xx.
95.
de Almeida Soares, D.: Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research. 12, 517–533 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808097165.
96.
Wright, T.: Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching. 43, 259–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000030.
98.
Borg, S.: Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 36, 81–109 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903.
99.
Towards reflective teaching, http://www.tttjournal.co.uk/uploads/File/back_articles/Towards_Reflective_Teaching.pdf.
100.
Wajnryb, Ruth: Classroom observation tasks: a resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
101.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet, Reading (2008).
102.
Cottrell, Stella: Teaching study skills and supporting learning. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2001).
103.
Cottrell, S.: Critical thinking skills: developing effective analysis and argument. Palgrave, London (2017).
104.
Cottrell, S.: The study skills handbook. Red Globe Press, London (2019).
105.
Woodward-Kron, R.: Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 1, 121–143 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00013-9.
106.
Critical Thinking: Where to Begin, http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/critical-thinking-where-to-begin/796.
107.
The University’s student guide to assessment, http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_106264_en.pdf.
108.
UWF - Center for University Teaching, Learning, and Assessment - Assessment of Student Learning: Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy, http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm.
109.
Bloom’s taxonomy, http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm.
110.
Hyland, Ken, Hyland, Fiona: Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
111.
Tribble, Chris: Writing. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996).
112.
Weigle, Sara Cushing: Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
113.
Alexander, Olwyn, Argent, Sue, Spencer, Jenifer: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet, Reading (2008).
114.
Badger, R., White, G.: A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 54, 153–160 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
115.
Bitchener, J., Knoch, U.: The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics. 31, 193–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016.
116.
Hyland, K., Hyland, F.: Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching. 39, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.
117.
Muncie, J.: Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal. 54, 47–53 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.1.47.
118.
O’Brien, T.: Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 37, 1–28 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002113.
119.
Rollinson, P.: Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal. 59, 23–30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003.
120.
Wilson, J.J.: How to teach listening. Pearson Longman, Harlow (2008).
121.
Nuttall, C.E.: Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Macmillan Education, Oxford (2005).
122.
Alexander, O., Argent, S., Spencer, J.: EAP essentials: a teacher’s guide to principles and practice. Garnet Publishing Ltd, Reading (2008).
123.
Jordan, R.R.: English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
124.
Peacock, M., Flowerdew, J.: Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
